Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on October 21, 2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
12/24/3245    most recent
ddg347v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kun, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kun, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, 2003, Vol. 12, No. 24 3245-3258
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddg347
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Classifying the estrogen receptor status of breast cancers by expression profiles reveals a poor prognosis subpopulation exhibiting high expression of the ERBB2 receptor

Yu Kun1, Lee Chee How1, Tan Puay Hoon2, Vladimir B. Bajic4, Tan Sin Lam4, Amit Aggarwal1, Hong Ga Sze1, Wee Siew Bok1, Wong Chow Yin1 and Patrick Tan1,3,*

1National Cancer Centre, 2Department of Pathology and 3Defence Medical Research Institute, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169610, Republic of Singapore and 4Institute for Infocomm Research, 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613, Republic of Singapore

Received July 4, 2003; Accepted October 9, 2003

Recent work using expression profiling to computationally predict the estrogen receptor (ER) status of breast tumors has revealed that certain tumors are characterized by a high prediction uncertainty (‘low-confidence’). We analyzed these ‘low-confidence’ tumors and determined that their ‘uncertain’ prediction status arises as a result of widespread perturbations in multiple genes whose expression is important for ER subtype discrimination. Patients with ‘low-confidence’ ER+ tumors exhibited a significantly worse overall survival (P=0.03) and shorter time to distant metastasis (P=0.004) compared with their ‘high-confidence’ ER+ counterparts, indicating that the ‘high-’ and ‘low-confidence’ binary distinction is clinically meaningful. We then discovered that elevated expression of the ERBB2 receptor is significantly correlated with a breast tumor exhibiting a ‘low-confidence’ prediction, and this association was subsequently validated across multiple independently derived breast cancer expression datasets employing a variety of different array technologies and patient populations. Although ERBB2 signaling has been proposed to inhibit the transcriptional activity of ER, a large proportion of the perturbed genes in the ‘low-confidence’/ERBB2+ samples are not known to be estrogen responsive, and a recently described bioinformatic algorithm (DEREF) was used to demonstrate the absence of potential estrogen-response elements (EREs) in their promoters. We propose that a significant portion of ERBB2's effects on ER+ breast tumors may involve ER-independent mechanisms of gene activation, which may contribute to the clinically aggressive behavior of the ‘low-confidence’ breast tumor subtype.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +65 64368345; Fax: +65 62265694; Email: cmrtan{at}nccs.com.sg


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
S. Raulic, Y. Ramos-Valdes, and G. E DiMattia
Stanniocalcin 2 expression is regulated by hormone signalling and negatively affects breast cancer cell viability in vitro
J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 197(3): 517 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. K.T. Tan, L. K. Tan, K. Yu, P. H. Tan, M. Lee, L. H. Sii, C. Y. Wong, G. H. Ho, A. W.Y. Yeo, P. K.H. Chow, et al.
Clinical Validation of a Customized Multiple Signature Microarray for Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 14(2): 461 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Z. Lin, S. Reierstad, C.-C. Huang, and S. E. Bulun
Novel Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Binding Sites and Estradiol Target Genes Identified by Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Cloning in Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 67(10): 5017 - 5024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. M. E. Harvell, J. K. Richer, D. C. Allred, C. A. Sartorius, and K. B. Horwitz
Estradiol Regulates Different Genes in Human Breast Tumor Xenografts Compared with the Identical Cells in Culture
Endocrinology, February 1, 2006; 147(2): 700 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. M. Siddique, C. Balram, L. Fiszer-Maliszewska, A. Aggarwal, A. Tan, P. Tan, K. C. Soo, and K. Sabapathy
Evidence for Selective Expression of the p53 Codon 72 Polymorphs: Implications in Cancer Development
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2245 - 2252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
V. X. Jin, Y.-W. Leu, S. Liyanarachchi, H. Sun, M. Fan, K. P. Nephew, T. H.-M. Huang, and R. V. Davuluri
Identifying estrogen receptor {alpha} target genes using integrated computational genomics and chromatin immunoprecipitation microarray
Nucleic Acids Res., December 17, 2004; 32(22): 6627 - 6635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
O. Modlich, H.-B. Prisack, M. Munnes, W. Audretsch, and H. Bojar
Immediate Gene Expression Changes After the First Course of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer Disease
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2004; 10(19): 6418 - 6431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.