Human Molecular Genetics, 2003, Vol. 12, No. 7 701-709
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddg078
© 2003 Oxford University Press
Comparison of the genomes of human and mouse lays the foundation of genome zoology
MRC Functional Genetics Unit, Department of Human Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QX, UK
Received January 14, 2003; Accepted January 17, 2003
The extensive similarities between the genomes of human and model organisms are the foundation of much of modern biology, with model organism experimentation permitting valuable insights into biological function and the aetiology of human disease. In contrast, differences among genomes have received less attention. Yet these can be expected to govern the physiological and morphological distinctions apparent among species, especially if such differences are the result of evolutionary adaptation. A recent comparison of the draft sequences of mouse and human genomes has shed light on the selective forces that have predominated in their recent evolutionary histories. In particular, mouse-specific clusters of homologues associated with roles in reproduction, immunity and host defence appear to be under diversifying positive selective pressure, as indicated by high ratios of non-synonymous to synonymous substitution rates. These clusters are also frequently punctuated by homologous pseudogenes. They thus have experienced numerous gene death, as well as gene birth, events. These regions appear, therefore, to have borne the brunt of adaptive evolution that underlies physiological and behavioural innovation in mice. We predict that the availability of numerous animal genomes will give rise to a new field of genome zoology in which differences in animal physiology and ethology are illuminated by the study of genomic sequence variations.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 1865272175; Fax: +44 1865272420; Email: chris.ponting{at}anat.ox.ac.uk
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D.-Q. Nguyen, C. Webber, J. Hehir-Kwa, R. Pfundt, J. Veltman, and C. P. Ponting Reduced purifying selection prevails over positive selection in human copy number variant evolution Genome Res., November 1, 2008; 18(11): 1711 - 1723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. C. Karn, N. L. Clark, E. D. Nguyen, and W. J. Swanson Adaptive Evolution in Rodent Seminal Vesicle Secretion Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., November 1, 2008; 25(11): 2301 - 2310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. R Copley The animal in the genome: comparative genomics and evolution Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2008; 363(1496): 1453 - 1461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Ramm, P. L. Oliver, C. P. Ponting, P. Stockley, and R. D. Emes Sexual Selection and the Adaptive Evolution of Mammalian Ejaculate Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., January 1, 2008; 25(1): 207 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Heger and C. P. Ponting Evolutionary rate analyses of orthologs and paralogs from 12 Drosophila genomes Genome Res., December 1, 2007; 17(12): 1837 - 1849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Goodstadt, A. Heger, C. Webber, and C. P. Ponting An analysis of the gene complement of a marsupial, Monodelphis domestica: Evolution of lineage-specific genes and giant chromosomes Genome Res., July 1, 2007; 17(7): 969 - 981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Mookherjee, H. L. Wilson, S. Doria, Y. Popowych, R. Falsafi, J. Yu, Y. Li, S. Veatch, F. M. Roche, K. L. Brown, et al. Bovine and human cathelicidin cationic host defense peptides similarly suppress transcriptional responses to bacterial lipopolysaccharide J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2006; 80(6): 1563 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. LIPOVICH and M.-C. KING Novel Transcriptional Units and Unconventional Gene Pairs in the Human Genome: Toward a Sequence-level Basis for Primate-specific Phenotypes? Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2003; 68(0): 461 - 470. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|