Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (44)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arnaud, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kelsey, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arnaud, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kelsey, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, 2003, Vol. 12, No. 9 1005-1019
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddg110
© 2003 Oxford University Press

Conserved methylation imprints in the human and mouse GRB10 genes with divergent allelic expression suggests differential reading of the same mark

Philippe Arnaud1, David Monk2, Megan Hitchins2,{dagger}, Emma Gordon1, Wendy Dean1, Colin V. Beechey3, Jo Peters3, William Craigen4, Michael Preece2, Philip Stanier2, Gudrun E. Moore2 and Gavin Kelsey1,*

1Developmental Genetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK, 2Department of Fetal and Maternal Medicine, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK, 3MRC Mammalian Genetics Unit, Harwell, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0RD, UK and 4Departments of Molecular and Human Genetics, and Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

Received December 17, 2002; Accepted February 21, 2003

Grb10/GRB10 encodes a cytoplasmic adapter protein which modulates coupling of a number of cell surface receptor tyrosine kinases with specific signalling pathways. Mouse Grb10 is an imprinted gene with maternal-specific expression. In contrast, human GRB10 is expressed biallelically in most tissues, except for maternal-specific expression of one isoform in muscle and paternal expression in fetal brain. Owing to its location in 7p11.2–p12, GRB10 has been considered a candidate gene for the imprinted growth disorder, the Silver–Russell syndrome (SRS), but its predominantly biallelic expression argues against involvement in the syndrome. To investigate the discrepant imprinting between mouse and human, we compared the sequence organization of their upstream regions, and examined their allelic methylation patterns and the splice variant organization of the mouse locus. Contrary to expectation, we detected both maternal and paternal expression of mouse Grb10. Expression of the paternal allele arises from a different promoter region than the maternal and, as in human, is restricted to the brain. The upstream regions are well conserved, especially the presence of two CpG islands. Surprisingly, both genes have a similar imprinted methylation pattern, the second CpG island is a differentially methylated region (DMR) with maternal methylation in both species. Analysis of 24 SRS patients did not reveal methylation anomalies in the DMR. In the mouse this DMR is a gametic methylation mark. Our results suggest that the difference in imprinted expression in mouse and human is not due to acquisition of an imprint mark but in differences in the reading of this mark.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 1223496332; Fax: +44 1223496022; Email: gavin.kelsey{at}bbsrc.ac.uk

{dagger} Present address: Molecular Embryology Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
S Abu-Amero, D Monk, J Frost, M Preece, P Stanier, and G E Moore
The genetic aetiology of Silver-Russell syndrome
J. Med. Genet., April 1, 2008; 45(4): 193 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. Bruce, K. Hannula-Jouppi, C. M. Lindgren, M. Lipsanen-Nyman, and J. Kere
Restriction Site-Specific Methylation Studies of Imprinted Genes with Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2008; 54(3): 491 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
T. R. Menheniott, K. Woodfine, R. Schulz, A. J. Wood, D. Monk, A. S. Giraud, H. S. Baldwin, G. E. Moore, and R. J. Oakey
Genomic Imprinting of Dopa decarboxylase in Heart and Reciprocal Allelic Expression with Neighboring Grb10
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2008; 28(1): 386 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
F. M. Smith, L. J. Holt, A. S. Garfield, M. Charalambous, F. Koumanov, M. Perry, R. Bazzani, S. A. Sheardown, B. D. Hegarty, R. J. Lyons, et al.
Mice with a Disruption of the Imprinted Grb10 Gene Exhibit Altered Body Composition, Glucose Homeostasis, and Insulin Signaling during Postnatal Life
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2007; 27(16): 5871 - 5886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
M. F. Mehler and J. S. Mattick
Noncoding RNAs and RNA Editing in Brain Development, Functional Diversification, and Neurological Disease
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2007; 87(3): 799 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
Y. Yamasaki-Ishizaki, T. Kayashima, C. K. Mapendano, H. Soejima, T. Ohta, H. Masuzaki, A. Kinoshita, T. Urano, K.-i. Yoshiura, N. Matsumoto, et al.
Role of DNA Methylation and Histone H3 Lysine 27 Methylation in Tissue-Specific Imprinting of Mouse Grb10
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2007; 27(2): 732 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
D. Monk, R. Sanches, P. Arnaud, S. Apostolidou, F.A. Hills, S. Abu-Amero, A. Murrell, H. Friess, W. Reik, P. Stanier, et al.
Imprinting of IGF2 P0 transcript and novel alternatively spliced INS-IGF2 isoforms show differences between mouse and human
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2006; 15(8): 1259 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
H. Hiura, Y. Obata, J. Komiyama, M. Shirai, and T. Kono
Oocyte growth-dependent progression of maternal imprinting in mice
Genes Cells, April 1, 2006; 11(4): 353 - 361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
P. Arnaud, K. Hata, M. Kaneda, E. Li, H. Sasaki, R. Feil, and G. Kelsey
Stochastic imprinting in the progeny of Dnmt3L-/- females
Hum. Mol. Genet., February 15, 2006; 15(4): 589 - 598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
Y. Yamasaki, T. Kayashima, H. Soejima, A. Kinoshita, K.-i. Yoshiura, N. Matsumoto, T. Ohta, T. Urano, H. Masuzaki, T. Ishimaru, et al.
Neuron-specific relaxation of Igf2r imprinting is associated with neuron-specific histone modifications and lack of its antisense transcript Air
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2005; 14(17): 2511 - 2520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Lewis, K. Mitsuya, M. Constancia, and W. Reik
Tandem Repeat Hypothesis in Imprinting: Deletion of a Conserved Direct Repeat Element Upstream of H19 Has No Effect on Imprinting in the Igf2-H19 Region
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(13): 5650 - 5656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
F. Cerrato, W. Dean, K. Davies, K. Kagotani, K. Mitsuya, K. Okumura, A. Riccio, and W. Reik
Paternal imprints can be established on the maternal Igf2-H19 locus without altering replication timing of DNA
Hum. Mol. Genet., December 1, 2003; 12(23): 3123 - 3132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C. Coombes, P. Arnaud, E. Gordon, W. Dean, E. A. Coar, C. M. Williamson, R. Feil, J. Peters, and G. Kelsey
Epigenetic Properties and Identification of an Imprint Mark in the Nesp-Gnasxl Domain of the Mouse Gnas Imprinted Locus
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2003; 23(16): 5475 - 5488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.