Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on February 12, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/7/751    most recent
ddh085v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kantor, B.
Right arrow Articles by Razin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kantor, B.
Right arrow Articles by Razin, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, 2004, Vol. 13, No. 7 751-762
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddh085

Control elements within the PWS/AS imprinting box and their function in the imprinting process

Boris Kantor, Kirill Makedonski, Yael Green-Finberg, Ruth Shemer and Aharon Razin*

Department of Cellular Biochemistry and Human Genetics, The Hebrew University, Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem 91120, Israel

Received December 15, 2003; Accepted February 4, 2004

A cluster of imprinted genes on human chromosome 15q11–q13 (the PWS/AS domain) and its ortholog on mouse chromosome 7c is believed to be regulated by an imprinting control center. Although minideletions in this region in Angelman syndrome (AS) and Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) patients revealed that two elements, shortest deletion regions of overlap in AS families and PWS families (AS–SRO and PWS–SRO), respectively, constitute the IC, the molecular mechanism that governs this regional control remains obscure. To understand how this imprinting center works, a mouse model was sought. The striking similarity between the human and mouse sequences allowed the generation of a minitransgene (AS–SMP) composed of AS–SRO and the Snrpn minimal promoter (SMP) the mouse ortholog of PWS–SRO. This minitransgene carries out, in a highly reliable and reproducible manner, all steps of the imprinting process. In an attempt to decipher the molecular mechanism of the imprinting process, we generated and tested for imprinting five minitransgenes based on AS–SMP, in which various parts of the 160 bp SMP were deleted. These experiments revealed a set of five cis elements that carry out the various steps of the imprinting process. This set includes: (i) two copies of a de novo methylation signal (DNS) that establish the maternal imprint during oogenesis; (ii) an allele discrimination signal that establishes the paternal imprint; and (iii) two elements that act together to maintain the paternal imprint. Two functionally redundant sets of the five elements were found on the respective endogenous mouse sequence explaining the previously published contradictory results of targeted deletion experiments. Together with the fact that all five elements bind specific proteins that are presumably the factors acting in trans in the imprinting process, our observations set the stage for a comprehensive study of the molecular mechanism involved in the control of the imprinting process.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +972 26758172; Fax: +972 26415848; Email: razina{at}md2.huji.ac.il


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Kaufman, M. Heled, J. Perk, A. Razin, and R. Shemer
Protein-binding elements establish in the oocyte the primary imprint of the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes domain
PNAS, June 23, 2009; 106(25): 10242 - 10247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
K. Goodin, M. Chen, E. Lose, F. M. Mikhail, and B. R. Korf
Advances in Genetic Testing and Applications in Newborn Medicine
NeoReviews, July 1, 2008; 9(7): e282 - e290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
R. Holmes, Y. Chang, and P. D. Soloway
Timing and Sequence Requirements Defined for Embryonic Maintenance of Imprinted DNA Methylation at Rasgrf1
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2006; 26(24): 9564 - 9570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. D. Federman
The Biology of Human Sex Differences
N. Engl. J. Med., April 6, 2006; 354(14): 1507 - 1514.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
B. Yoon, H. Herman, B. Hu, Y. J. Park, A. Lindroth, A. Bell, A. G. West, Y. Chang, A. Stablewski, J. C. Piel, et al.
Rasgrf1 Imprinting Is Regulated by a CTCF-Dependent Methylation-Sensitive Enhancer Blocker
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2005; 25(24): 11184 - 11190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Rodriguez-Jato, R. D. Nicholls, D. J. Driscoll, and T. P. Yang
Characterization of cis- and trans-acting elements in the imprinted human SNURF-SNRPN locus
Nucleic Acids Res., August 22, 2005; 33(15): 4740 - 4753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
B. Kantor, Y. Kaufman, K. Makedonski, A. Razin, and R. Shemer
Establishing the epigenetic status of the Prader-Willi/Angelman imprinting center in the gametes and embryo
Hum. Mol. Genet., November 15, 2004; 13(22): 2767 - 2779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Landers, D. L. Bancescu, E. Le Meur, C. Rougeulle, H. Glatt-Deeley, C. Brannan, F. Muscatelli, and M. Lalande
Regulation of the large (~1000 kb) imprinted murine Ube3a antisense transcript by alternative exons upstream of Snurf/Snrpn
Nucleic Acids Res., June 29, 2004; 32(11): 3480 - 3492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.