Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on February 12, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/7/771    most recent
ddh086v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaillard, I.
Right arrow Articles by Giorgi, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaillard, I.
Right arrow Articles by Giorgi, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, 2004, Vol. 13, No. 7 771-780
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddh086

Amino-acid changes acquired during evolution by olfactory receptor 912-93 modify the specificity of odorant recognition

Isabelle Gaillard1,{dagger}, Sylvie Rouquier1, Alain Chavanieu2, Patrice Mollard3 and Dominique Giorgi1,*

1IGH, CNRS UPR 1142, rue de la Cardonille, 34396 Montpellier cedex 5, France, 2CBS, CNRS-INSERM, 15, avenue Charles Flahault, 34093 Montpellier cedex 5, France and 3CCIPE, INSERM U469, rue de la Cardonille, 34094 Montpellier cedex 5, France

Received December 18, 2003; Revised January 26, 2004; Accepted February 2, 2004

The sense of smell in mammals can perceive and discriminate a wide variety of volatile odorants. Odorants bind to specific olfactory receptors (ORs) to initiate an action potential that transduces olfactory information to the olfactory cortex. We previously identified the structural motifs of odorant molecules (aliphatic 2- or 3-ketones) required to activate mouse OR912-93 by detection of the odorant response using calcium measurement in transfected cells. In order to study changes in the specificity of this receptor that might have occurred during evolution, we cloned the orthologous genes from six primate species and pig and assayed the encoded receptors for responses to odorants. Primate OR912-93 orthologs share 88–97% sequence identity. All the receptors responded to 2- and 3-heptanone except the squirrel-monkey OR, which responded only to 3-heptanone, and the human and orangutan ORs, which were not functional. Directed mutagenesis allowed us to convert the squirrel-monkey response to that of the other functional 912-93 ORs by substituting three amino acids in the second extracellular loop. Orangutan and human 912-93 ORs regained function after restoration of the arginine residue in the DRY motif required for G-protein activation. However, the human receptor was constitutively activated in the absence of ligand stimulation. Using natural mutants of the OR912-93 receptor, we provide evidence that squirrel-monkeys evolved towards a restriction of the specificity of this receptor and therefore that slight alterations in the sequence of a receptor can induce subtle changes in recognition specificity.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: giorgi{at}igh.cnrs.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. Binet, B. Duthey, J. Lecaillon, C. Vol, J. Quoyer, G. Labesse, J.-P. Pin, and L. Prezeau
Common Structural Requirements for Heptahelical Domain Function in Class A and Class C G Protein-coupled Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2007; 282(16): 12154 - 12163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
H. Rompler, C. Staubert, D. Thor, A. Schulz, M. Hofreiter, and T. Schoneberg
G Protein-Coupled Time Travel: Evolutionary Aspects of GPCR Research
Mol. Interv., February 1, 2007; 7(1): 17 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
Y. Gilad, O. Man, and G. Glusman
A comparison of the human and chimpanzee olfactory receptor gene repertoires
Genome Res., February 1, 2005; 15(2): 224 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
G. Sanz, C. Schlegel, J.-C. Pernollet, and L. Briand
Comparison of Odorant Specificity of Two Human Olfactory Receptors from Different Phylogenetic Classes and Evidence for Antagonism
Chem Senses, January 1, 2005; 30(1): 69 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.