Skip Navigation

Human Molecular Genetics 2004 13(Review Issue 2):R177-R185; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddh247
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Tomlinson, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Tomlinson, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, Vol. 13, Review Issue 2 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

An update on the genetics of colorectal cancer

Zoe Kemp1, Cristina Thirlwell1, Oliver Sieber1, Andrew Silver2 and Ian Tomlinson1,2,*

1Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, UK and 2Colorectal Cancer Unit, Cancer Research UK, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ, UK

Received July 23, 2004; Accepted July 27, 2004

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) remains a frequent cause of cancer-associated mortality in the UK and still has a relatively poor outcome. Single gene defects account for up to 2–6% of cases, but twin studies suggest a hereditary component in 35%. CRC represents a paradigm for cancer genetics. Almost all the major-gene influences on CRC have been identified, and the identification of the remaining susceptibility alleles is proving troublesome. Only a few low-penetrance alleles, such as methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase C677T, appear convincingly to be associated with CRC risk. To identify the remaining CRC genes, parallel approaches, including strategies based on linkage and association and complementary analyses such as searches for modifier genes, must be employed. To gain sufficient evidence to prove that a gene is involved in CRC predisposition, it is probably necessary for multiple, adequately-powered studies to demonstrate an association with the disease, especially if the allelic variants have only a small differential effect on risk. It may also be possible to show how genes interact with each other and the environment, although this will be even more difficult. Accurate quantitation of the allele-specific risks in different populations will be necessary, but problematic, especially if those risks combine in a fashion which is not of a straightforward additive or multiplicative type. Without any good prior evidence of the nature of the remaining genetic influence on CRC, the possibility remains that this is a truly polygenic trait or that multiple, rare variants contribute to the increased risk; in these cases, identification of the genes involved will be very difficult. Despite these potential problems, the effectiveness of preventive measures for CRC, especially in high-risk individuals, means that the search for new predisposition genes is justified.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 1712692884; Fax: +44 1712692885; Email: i.tomlinson{at}cancer.org.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. Castellvi-Bel, A. Castells, R. de Cid, J. Munoz, F. Balaguer, V. Gonzalo, C. Ruiz-Ponte, M. Andreu, X. Llor, R. Jover, et al.
Association of the ARLTS1 Cys148Arg variant with sporadic and familial colorectal cancer
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2007; 28(8): 1687 - 1691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
Y. Xu and B. Pasche
TGF-{beta} signaling alterations and susceptibility to colorectal cancer
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2007; 16(R1): R14 - R20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.