Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on April 27, 2005
Human Molecular Genetics 2005 14(11):1559-1568; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi164
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/11/1559    most recent
ddi164v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kol, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ast, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kol, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ast, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Human–mouse comparative analysis reveals that branch-site plasticity contributes to splicing regulation

Guy Kol, Galit Lev-Maor and Gil Ast*

Department of Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +972 36406893; Fax: +972 36409900; Email: gilast{at}post.tau.ac.il

Received February 3, 2005; Revised March 27, 2005; Accepted April 13, 2005

The formation of base-pairing between the branch-site (BS) sequence and the U2 snRNP is an important step in mRNA splicing. We developed a new algorithm to identify both the BS sequence and the polypyrimidine tract (PPT) and validated its predictions experimentally. To assess BS conservation between human and mouse, we assembled and analyzed 46 812 and 242 constitutively and alternatively spliced orthologs of human–mouse intron pairs, respectively. Combinations of BSs and PPTs can be found in most of the constitutive and alternative introns. The average distance between the BS and the 3' splice site (3'ss) is 33–34 nt. Acceptor-like AG dinucleotides that resided between the predicted BS and the 3'ss were found to appear mostly within 5 nt, but not more than 19 nt, downstream of the BS. However, although 32% of homologous alternatively spliced BS sequences were fully conserved between human and mouse, only a small fraction (3%) of homologous constitutive counterparts was fully conserved. This indicates that the full sequence of the BS is under weak purifying selection in constitutively spliced introns and further strengthens the view that the BS sequence is just one of several factors determining the ability of the splicing machinery to identify the BS location. Mutations in the putative BS revealed a shift from constitutive to alternative splicing, and it also controls the inclusion/skipping ratio in alternative splicing. This suggests a role for BS sequences in regulated splicing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RNAHome page
Z. Wang and C. B. Burge
Splicing regulation: From a parts list of regulatory elements to an integrated splicing code
RNA, May 1, 2008; 14(5): 802 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
N. Gal-Mark, S. Schwartz, and G. Ast
Alternative splicing of Alu exons--two arms are better than one
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(6): 2012 - 2023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. Gao, A. Masuda, T. Matsuura, and K. Ohno
Human branch point consensus sequence is yUnAy
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(7): 2257 - 2267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
S. Schwartz, J. Silva, D. Burstein, T. Pupko, E. Eyras, and G. Ast
Large-scale comparative analysis of splicing signals and their corresponding splicing factors in eukaryotes
Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 88 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. Akerman and Y. Mandel-Gutfreund
Does distance matter? Variations in alternative 3' splicing regulation
Nucleic Acids Res., August 17, 2007; (2007) gkm603v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K.-W. Tsai, W.-Y. Tarn, and W.-c. Lin
Wobble Splicing Reveals the Role of the Branch Point Sequence-to-NAGNAG Region in 3' Tandem Splice Site Selection
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2007; 27(16): 5835 - 5848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
H. Xia, J. Bi, and Y. Li
Identification of alternative 5'/3' splice sites based on the mechanism of splice site competition
Nucleic Acids Res., December 4, 2006; 34(21): 6305 - 6313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
I. Vorechovsky
Aberrant 3' splice sites in human disease genes: mutation pattern, nucleotide structure and comparison of computational tools that predict their utilization
Nucleic Acids Res., September 15, 2006; (2006) gkl535v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
Y. Xing, Q. Wang, and C. Lee
Evolutionary Divergence of Exon Flanks: A Dissection of Mutability and Selection
Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1787 - 1791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Kralovicova and I. Vorechovsky
Position-Dependent Repression and Promotion of DQB1 Intron 3 Splicing by GGGG Motifs
J. Immunol., February 15, 2006; 176(4): 2381 - 2388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Kralovicova, M. B. Christensen, and I. Vorechovsky
Biased exon/intron distribution of cryptic and de novo 3' splice sites
Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2005; 33(15): 4882 - 4898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.