Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on June 22, 2005
Human Molecular Genetics 2005 14(15):2135-2143; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi218
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/15/2135    most recent
ddi218v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sandovici, I.
Right arrow Articles by Sapienza, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sandovici, I.
Right arrow Articles by Sapienza, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Interindividual variability and parent of origin DNA methylation differences at specific human Alu elements

Ionel Sandovici1,{dagger}, Sacha Kassovska-Bratinova1, J. Concepción Loredo-Osti3, Mark Leppert4, Alexander Suarez5,{ddagger}, Rae Stewart6, F. Dale Bautista1, Michael Schiraldi1 and Carmen Sapienza1,2,*

1Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, 2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, 3307 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA, 3The Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada, 4Eccles Institute of Human Genetics and Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, 15 N 2030 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA, 5Bucknell University, 701 Moore Avenue, Lewisburg, PA 17837, USA and 6College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 1900 North 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 2157077373; Fax: +1 2157071454; Email: sapienza{at}temple.edu

Received April 7, 2005; Revised May 30, 2005; Accepted June 14, 2005

We investigated the CpG methylation of 19 specific members of Alu sub-families in human DNA isolated from whole blood, using an assay based on methylation-sensitive restriction endonuclease digestion of genomic DNA and ‘hot-stop’ polymerase chain reaction. We found significant interindividual variability in the level of methylation for specific Alu elements among the members of 48 three-generation families. Surprisingly, some of the elements also displayed quantitative parent of origin methylation differences; i.e. the mean level of methylation differed significantly when the insertions were transmitted through paternal versus maternal meiosis. Bisulfite sequence analysis of individual elements at such loci suggests, further, that maternal and paternal elements differ in the propensity of particular CpG sites to become unmethylated. Some individuals who exhibited high levels of methylation at specific Alu elements came from families in which more than one member also exhibited abnormal patterns of methylation at the differentially methylated regions of the IGF2/H19 or IGF2R loci, suggesting that there may be heritable differences between individuals in the fidelity with which allelic DNA methylation differences are established or maintained. Quantitative parental origin differences in methylation were identified only for Alu elements that lie in sub-telomeric or sub-centromeric bands of human chromosomes, whereas those assayed at intermediate positions did not exhibit any significant differences. The centromere/telomere restricted location of the methylation differences and the fact that none of these differences occur in regions of chromosomes known to contain transcriptionally imprinted genes suggest that maternal/paternal epigenetic modifications may play additional roles in processes other than transcriptional control.


{dagger} Present address: Laboratory of Developmental Genetics and Imprinting, Developmental Genetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK.

{ddagger} Present address: Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, KBT 1044, Yale University, 219 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Williams, N. Harker, E. Ktistaki, H. Veiga-Fernandes, K. Roderick, M. Tolaini, T. Norton, K. Williams, and D. Kioussis
Position effect variegation and imprinting of transgenes in lymphocytes
Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(7): 2320 - 2329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Rodriguez, L. Vives, M. Jorda, C. Morales, M. Munoz, E. Vendrell, and M. A. Peinado
Genome-wide tracking of unmethylated DNA Alu repeats in normal and cancer cells
Nucleic Acids Res., February 11, 2008; 36(3): 770 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
R. M. Brena and J. F. Costello
Genome-epigenome interactions in cancer
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2007; 16(R1): R96 - R105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
B. T. Heijmans, D. Kremer, E. W. Tobi, D. I. Boomsma, and P. E. Slagboom
Heritable rather than age-related environmental and stochastic factors dominate variation in DNA methylation of the human IGF2/H19 locus
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2007; 16(5): 547 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. W. Santure and H. G. Spencer
Influence of Mom and Dad: Quantitative Genetic Models for Maternal Effects and Genomic Imprinting
Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2297 - 2316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.