Skip Navigation

Human Molecular Genetics 2005 14(Review Issue 1):R27-R32; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi112
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skuse, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skuse, D. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

X-linked genes and mental functioning

David H. Skuse*

Behavioural and Brain Sciences Unit, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 207 831 0975; Fax: +44 207 831 7050; Email: dskuse{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk

Received January 20, 2005; Revised February 3, 2005; Accepted February 17, 2005

The X-chromosome has played a crucial role in the development of sexually selected characteristics for over 300 million years. During that time it has accumulated a disproportionate number of genes concerned with mental functions. Evidence is emerging, from studies of both humans and mice, for a general influence upon intelligence (as indicated by the large number of X-linked mental retardation syndromes). In addition, there is evidence for relatively specific effects of X-linked genes on social–cognition and emotional regulation. Sexually dimorphic processes could be influenced by several mechanisms. First, a small number of X-linked genes are apparently expressed differently in male and female brains in mouse models. Secondly, many human X-linked genes outside the X–Y pairing pseudoautosomal regions escape X-inactivation. Dosage differences in the expression of such genes (which might comprise at least 20% of the total) are likely to play an important role in male–female neural differentiation. To date, little is known about the process but clues can be gleaned from the study of X-monosomic females who are haploinsufficient for expression of all non-inactivated genes relative to 46,XX females. Finally, from studies of both X-monosomic humans (45,X) and mice (39,X), we are learning more about the influences of X-linked imprinted genes upon brain structure and function. Surprising specificity of effects has been described in both species, and identification of candidate genes cannot now be far off.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Shen, Y. Matsuno, S. D. Fouse, N. Rao, S. Root, R. Xu, M. Pellegrini, A. D. Riggs, and G. Fan
X-inactivation in female human embryonic stem cells is in a nonrandom pattern and prone to epigenetic alterations
PNAS, March 25, 2008; 105(12): 4709 - 4714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
H. Yamasue, O. Abe, M. Suga, H. Yamada, M. A. Rogers, S. Aoki, N. Kato, and K. Kasai
Sex-Linked Neuroanatomical Basis of Human Altruistic Cooperativeness
Cereb Cortex, January 29, 2008; (2008) bhm254v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
L. A. Weiss, S. Purcell, S. Waggoner, K. Lawrence, D. Spektor, M. J. Daly, P. Sklar, and D. Skuse
Identification of EFHC2 as a quantitative trait locus for fear recognition in Turner syndrome
Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 107 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. J. Hart, M. L. Davenport, S. R. Hooper, and A. Belger
Visuospatial executive function in Turner syndrome: functional MRI and neurocognitive findings
Brain, May 1, 2006; 129(5): 1125 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.