Imprinted X inactivation and reprogramming in the preimplantation mouse embryo
1Division of Human Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Research Organization of Information and Systems, 1111 Yata, Mishima 411-8540, Japan, 2PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), 4-1-8 Honcho, Kawaguchi, Saitama, 332-0012, Japan and 3Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 1223333750; Fax: +44 1223333786; Email: afsmith{at}mole.bio.cam.ac.uk
Received January 28, 2005; Accepted February 24, 2005
X chromosome inactivation is a developmentally regulated process that causes one of the two X chromosomes in normal female mammals to become transcriptionally silenced, thus equalizing the expression of X-linked genes between the sexes. Such dosage compensation depends upon dynamic genetic and epigenetic events occurring very early in development. X inactivation is controlled by an X inactivation centre that is associated with the expression of non-coding RNAs required for the silencing. Also associated with the inactive X are repressive histone modifications and polycomb protein-mediated states, which are progressively acquired during the inactivation process. In mouse, two forms of X inactivation have been described. Random X inactivation happens in the derivatives of the inner cell mass (ICM) giving rise to embryos where the maternally inherited X(Xm) is inactive in some cells and the paternally derived X (Xp) is inactive in others. Random X inactivation occurs around the time of implantation. Imprinted X inactivation, the preferential inactivation of the Xp chromosome, occurs earlier and, although there has been some debate as to the precise timing of initiation of this event, is apparent in all cells early in preimplantation development, then is subsequently confined to the cells of the extraembryonic lineages. A picture is emerging whereby initial epigenetic asymmetry between the two parental X chromosomes is reprogrammed in a lineage specific manner resulting in a switch from imprinted to random inactivation in embryonic derivatives. Neither the underlying reason nor the full extent of these early lineage specific epigenetic changes is known, but they may be correlated with more genome-wide reprogramming events essential for normal development.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. A. Vickers, S. J. Canning, W. L. Craig, N. M. Masson, and I. J. Wilson X Inactivation Patterns of Closely, but Not Distantly, Related Cells Are Highly Correlated: Little Evidence for Stem Cell Plasticity in Normal Females Stem Cells, November 1, 2006; 24(11): 2398 - 2405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. H. Chadwick, L. M. Pertz, K. W. Broman, M. S. Bartolomei, and H. F. Willard Genetic Control of X Chromosome Inactivation in Mice: Definition of the Xce Candidate Interval Genetics, August 1, 2006; 173(4): 2103 - 2110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Sadee and Z. Dai Pharmacogenetics/genomics and personalized medicine Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2005; 14(suppl_2): R207 - R214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|