Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on July 6, 2006
Human Molecular Genetics 2006 15(16):2509-2522; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddl172
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/16/2509    most recent
ddl172v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verstraeten, V. L.R.M.
Right arrow Articles by van den Wijngaard, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verstraeten, V. L.R.M.
Right arrow Articles by van den Wijngaard, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Compound heterozygosity for mutations in LMNA causes a progeria syndrome without prelamin A accumulation

Valerie L.R.M. Verstraeten1,4,*, Jos L.V. Broers3,5,6, Maurice A.M. van Steensel1,4, Sophie Zinn-Justin7, Frans C.S. Ramaekers3,4,5, Peter M. Steijlen1,4, Miriam Kamps1,3,4, Helma J.H. Kuijpers3, Diane Merckx2, Hubert J.M. Smeets2, Raoul C.M. Hennekam8,9, Carlo L.M. Marcelis10 and Arthur van den Wijngaard2

1 Department of Dermatology and 2 Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands, 3 Department of Molecular Cell Biology, 4 Research Institute for Growth and Development (GROW) and 5 Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), University of Maastricht, The Netherlands, 6 Department of Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 7 Département d'Ingénierie et d'Etudes des Protéines, CEA Saclay, France, 8 Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK, 9 Department of Pediatrics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, T, The Netherlands and 10 Department of Clinical Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The, Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. Tel: +31 433875641; Fax: +31 433877293; Email: vve{at}sder.azm.nl

Received March 21, 2006; Accepted June 5, 2006

LMNA-associated progeroid syndromes have been reported with both recessive and dominant inheritance. We report a 2-year-old boy with an apparently typical Hutchinson–Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) due to compound heterozygous missense mutations (p.T528M and p.M540T) in LMNA. Both mutations affect a conserved region within the C-terminal globular domain of A-type lamins, defining a progeria hot spot. The nuclei of the patient showed no prelamin A accumulation. In general, the nuclear phenotype did not correspond to that previously described for HGPS. Instead, honeycomb figures predominated and nuclear blebs with reduced/absent expression of B-type lamins could be detected. The healthy heterozygous parents showed similar nuclear changes, although in a smaller percentage of nuclei. Treatment with a farnesylation inhibitor resulted in accumulation of prelamin A at the nuclear periphery, in annular nuclear membrane plaques and in intra/trans-nuclear membrane invaginations. In conclusion, these findings suggest a critical role for the C-terminal globular lamin A/C region in nuclear structure and support a major contribution of abnormal assembly to the progeroid phenotype. In contrast to earlier suggestions, we show that prelamin A accumulation is not the major determinant of the progeroid phenotype.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Lombardi, F. Gullotta, M. Columbaro, A. Filareto, M. D'Adamo, A. Vielle, V. Guglielmi, A. M. Nardone, V. Azzolini, E. Grosso, et al.
Compound Heterozygosity for Mutations in LMNA in a Patient with a Myopathic and Lipodystrophic Mandibuloacral Dysplasia Type A Phenotype
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4467 - 4471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
C. L. Navarro, P. Cau, and N. Levy
Molecular bases of progeroid syndromes
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2006; 15(suppl_2): R151 - R161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.