Skip Navigation

Human Molecular Genetics 2006 15(Review Issue 1):R45-R49; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddl049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foster, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foster, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Ethical issues in medical-sequencing research: implications of genotype–phenotype studies for individuals and populations

Morris W. Foster1,* and Richard R. Sharp2

1Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA and 2Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Anthropology, 455 W. Lindsey, Rm. 505C, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA. Tel: +1 4053252491; Fax: +1 4053216936; Email: morris.w.foster-1{at}ou.edu

Received January 30, 2006; Accepted March 3, 2006

Advances and declining costs in sequencing technology will result in increasing number of studies with individual sequence data linked to phenotypic information, which has been dubbed medical sequencing. At least some of this linked information will be publicly available. Medical sequencing raises ethical issues for both individuals and populations, including data release and identifiability, adequacy of consent, reporting research results, stereotyping and stigmatization, inclusion and differential benefit and culturally and community-specific concerns. Those issues are reviewed, along with possible solutions to them.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.