Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on November 29, 2006
Human Molecular Genetics 2007 16(1):78-82; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddl442
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
16/1/78    most recent
ddl442v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Latchford, A.
Right arrow Articles by Silver, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Latchford, A.
Right arrow Articles by Silver, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

APC mutations in FAP-associated desmoid tumours are non-random but not ‘just right’

Andrew Latchford1,2, Emmanouil Volikos3, Victoria Johnson2, Pauline Rogers2, Nirosha Suraweera3, Ian Tomlinson3,4, Robin Phillips1 and Andrew Silver3,*

1 Polyposis Registry and 2 Colorectal Cancer Genetics, Cancer Research UK, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex HA1 3UJ, UK, 3 Institute of Cell and Molecular Science and Barts and the London Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London E1 2AT, UK and 4 Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK, London WC2A 3PX, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed at. Tel: +44 02078822590; Fax: +44 02078822200; Email: a.r.silver{at}qmul.ac.uk

Received September 15, 2006; Revised November 7, 2006; Accepted November 16, 2006

Analysis of APC mutations in colonic and duodenal tumours from familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients has shown that the site of the first hit, the germline mutation, can predict the type and position of the somatic mutation or ‘second hit’. The two APC mutations are selected on the basis of a ‘just right’ level of beta-catenin signalling in intestinal tumours achieved through retention of some of the seven 20-amino-acid beta-catenin degradation repeats. Desmoids are a life threatening extra-colonic manifestation in FAP patients. These aggressive tumours of mesenchymal origin are, at present, poorly characterized in terms of mutational APC spectra. We have investigated somatic mutations in the largest cohort of FAP-associated desmoids to date, and combined our results with previously published data. Somatic mutations were found to occur non-randomly and the position of the germline mutation shown to be a major determinant of the somatic mutation, a characteristic shared with intestinal tumours from FAP patients. In contrast to colonic polyps, loss of heterozygosity in desmoids involved deletion rather than mitotic recombination. While tumours from the colorectum and upper gastrointestinal tract usually retain one to two and three to four beta-catenin degradation repeats, respectively, most desmoids preferentially retain two repeats (P < 0.001, {chi}2 test). In addition, most desmoids with two APC hits (87%, 26/30) had one mutated allele with no 20-amino acid repeats (P < 0.001). This feature, unique among FAP tumours, indicates that a mutation deleting all repeats from one allele may be an important component in maintaining appropriate levels of beta-catenin signalling levels in desmoid tumour cells.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.