Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on March 12, 2008
Human Molecular Genetics 2008 17(12):1838-1844; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn077
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/12/1838    most recent
ddn077v2
ddn077v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guzman, V. B.
Right arrow Articles by Morgun, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guzman, V. B.
Right arrow Articles by Morgun, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2008

New approach reveals CD28 and IFNG gene interaction in the susceptibility to cervical cancer

Valeska B. Guzman1,{dagger}, Anatoly Yambartsev2,{dagger}, Amador Goncalves-Primo1,{dagger}, Ismael D.C.G. Silva3, Carmen R.N. Carvalho3, Julisa C.L. Ribalta3, Luiz Ricardo Goulart4, Natalia Shulzhenko1,5, Maria Gerbase-DeLima1,{ddagger} and Andrey Morgun1,5,*,{ddagger}

1 Immunogenetics Division, Pediatrics Department, Federal University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil 2 Mathematics and Statistics Institute, University of São Paulo, Brazil 3 Department of Gynecology, Federal University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil 4 Genetics Department, Federal University of Uberlândia, MG, Brazil 5 TCMTS "Ghost lab", LCMI, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed at: TCMTS "Ghost lab", LCMI, NIAID, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bldg 4, room 111, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Tel: +55 3014355817; Fax: +55 3014964286; Email: anemorgun{at}hotmail.com or morguna{at}niaid.nih.gov

Received September 19, 2007; Accepted March 5, 2008

Cervical cancer is a complex disease with multiple environmental and genetic determinants. In this study, we sought an association between polymorphisms in immune response genes and cervical cancer using both single-locus and multi-locus analysis approaches. A total of 14 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) distributed in CD28, CTLA4, ICOS, PDCD1, FAS, TNFA, IL6, IFNG, TGFB1 and IL10 genes were determined in patients and healthy individuals from three independent case/control sets. The first two sets comprised White individuals (one group with 82 cases and 85 controls, the other with 83 cases and 85 controls) and the third was constituted by non-white individuals (64 cases and 75 controls). The multi-locus analysis revealed higher frequencies in cancer patients of three three-genotype combinations [CD28+17(TT)/IFNG+874(AA)/TNFA-308(GG), CD28+17(TT)/IFN+847(AA)/PDCD1+7785(CT), and CD28 +17(TT)/IFNG+874(AA)/ICOS+1564(TT)] (P < 0.01, Monte Carlo simulation). We hypothesized that this two-genotype [CD28(TT) and IFNG(AA)] combination could have a major contribution to the observed association. To address this question, we analyzed the frequency of the CD28(TT), IFNG(AA) genotype combination in the three groups combined, and observed its increase in patients (P = 0.0011 by Fisher’s exact test). The contribution of a third polymorphism did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.1). Further analysis suggested that gene–gene interaction between CD28 and IFNG might contribute to susceptibility to cervical cancer. Our results showed an epistatic effect between CD28 and IFNG genes in susceptibility to cervical cancer, a finding that might be relevant for a better understanding of the disease pathogenesis. In addition, the novel analytical approach herein proposed might be useful for increasing the statistical power of future genome-wide multi-locus studies.


{dagger} The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first three authors should be regarded as joint First Authors.

{ddagger} M.G.D. and A.M. are co-senior authors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.