Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on November 2, 2007
Human Molecular Genetics 2008 17(3):402-412; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm317
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/3/402    most recent
ddm317v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nornes, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lardelli, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nornes, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lardelli, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Interference with splicing of Presenilin transcripts has potent dominant negative effects on Presenilin activity

Svanhild Nornes1, Morgan Newman1, Giuseppe Verdile2,3,4, Simon Wells1, Cristi L. Stoick-Cooper5,6, Ben Tucker1, Inna Frederich-Sleptsova2,3, Ralph Martins2,3,4 and Michael Lardelli1,*

1 Discipline of Genetics, School of Molecular and Biomedical Science, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia 2 Centre of Excellence for Alzheimer’s Disease Research and Care, School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia 3 Sir James McCusker Alzheimer’s Disease Research Unit, Hollywood Private Hospital, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia 4 School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia 5 Department of Pharmacology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine 6 Graduate Program in Neurobiology and Behavior, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +61 883033212; Fax: +61 883034362; Email: michael.lardelli{at}adelaide.edu.au

Received August 19, 2007; Revised October 8, 2007; Accepted October 25, 2007

Missense mutations in the PRESENILIN1 (PSEN1) gene frequently underlie familial Alzheimer’s disease (FAD). Nonsense and most splicing mutations result in the synthesis of truncated peptides, and it has been assumed that truncated PSEN1 protein is functionless so that heterozygotes for these mutations are unaffected. Some FAD mutations affecting PSEN1 mRNA splicing cause loss of exon 8 or 9 sequences while maintaining the reading frame. We attempted to model these exon-loss mutations in zebrafish embryos by injecting morpholino antisense oligonucleotides (morpholinos) directed against splice acceptor sites in zebrafish psen1 transcripts. However, this produced cryptic changes in splicing potentially forming mRNAs encoding truncated presenilin proteins. Aberrant splicing in the region between exons 6 and 8 produces potent dominant negative effects on Psen1 protein activity, including Notch signalling, and causes a hydrocephalus phenotype. Reductions in Psen1 activity feedback positively to increase psen1 transcription through a mechanism apparently independent of {gamma}-secretase. We present evidence that the dominant negative effects are mediated through production of truncated Psen1 peptides that interfere with the normal activity of both Psen1 and Psen2. Mutations causing such truncations would be dominant lethal in embryo development. Somatic cellular changes in ageing cells that interfere with PSEN1 splicing, or otherwise cause protein truncation, might contribute to sporadic Alzheimer’s disease, cancer and other diseases.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.