Skip Navigation

Human Molecular Genetics 2008 17(R1):R3-R9; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn074
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Reijo Pera, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Reijo Pera, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Human Molecular Genetics issue: Stem Cells and Regeneration [View the issue table of contents]

The road to pluripotence: the research response to the embryonic stem cell debate

Christopher Thomas Scott1,*,{dagger} and Renee A. Reijo Pera2,{dagger}

1 Center for Biomedical Ethics, Program on Stem Cells in Society 2 Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Program on Stem Cells in Society, 701 Welch Road, Suite A1105, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. Tel: +1 6507256103; Fax: +1 6507256111; Email: cscott{at}stanford.edu

Received January 23, 2008; Revised February 14, 2008; Accepted March 4, 2008

The controversies surrounding embryonic stem cell research have prompted scientists to invent beyond restrictive national policy and moral concerns. The impetus behind these reports comes from different sources, including individually held moral beliefs, societal pressures and resource constraints, both biological and financial. Along with other contributions to public policy such as advocacy or public testimony, experimentation and scientific curiosity are perhaps more natural responses scientists use to surmount impediments to research. In a research context, we review the history of the first stem cell discoveries, and describe scientific efforts leading up to recent reports of pluripotent lines made without the use of human embryos and eggs. We argue that despite the promise of these new lines, we must not lose sight of fundamental questions remaining at the frontiers of embryology and early human development. The answers to these questions will impact studies of genetics, cell biology and diseases such as cancer, autoimmunity and disorders of development. Human embryonic stem cell research is barely a decade old. The recent pace of discovery—in spite of federal restrictions—is testament to the potential of these cells to uncover some of biology's most intractable mysteries.


{dagger} Both authors contributed equally to this work.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.