Skip Navigation

Human Molecular Genetics 2008 17(R2):R143-R150; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn268
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tian, C.
Right arrow Articles by Seldin, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tian, C.
Right arrow Articles by Seldin, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Accounting for ancestry: population substructure and genome-wide association studies

Chao Tian1, Peter K. Gregersen2 and Michael F. Seldin1,*

1 Rowe Program in Human Genetics, Departments of Biological Chemistry and Medicine, One Shield Avenue, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA 2 The Robert S. Boas Center for Genomics and Human Genetics, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, North Shore LIJ Health System, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel:+1 5307546016; Fax: +1 5307546015; Email: mfseldin{at}ucdavis.edu

Received June 11, 2008; Revised July 28, 2008; Accepted August 28, 2008

Accounting for the genetic substructure of human populations has become a major practical issue for studying complex genetic disorders. Allele frequency differences among ethnic groups and subgroups and admixture between different ethnic groups can result in frequent false-positive results or reduced power in genetic studies. Here, we review the problems and progress in defining population differences and the application of statistical methods to improve association studies. It is now possible to take into account the confounding effects of population stratification using thousands of unselected genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms or, alternatively, selected panels of ancestry informative markers. These methods do not require any demographic information and therefore can be widely applied to genotypes available from multiple sources. We further suggest that it will be important to explore results in homogeneous population subsets as we seek to define the extent to which genomic variation influences complex phenotypes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. Saetrom, J. Biesinger, S. M. Li, D. Smith, L. F. Thomas, K. Majzoub, G. E. Rivas, J. Alluin, J. J. Rossi, T. G. Krontiris, et al.
A Risk Variant in an miR-125b Binding Site in BMPR1B Is Associated with Breast Cancer Pathogenesis
Cancer Res., September 15, 2009; 69(18): 7459 - 7465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
C. Zhu and J. Yu
Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling Corrects for Population Structure in Association Mapping With Different Sample Types
Genetics, July 1, 2009; 182(3): 875 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.