Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on June 1, 2009
Human Molecular Genetics 2009 18(16):3066-3074; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddp248
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
18/16/3066    most recent
ddp248v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Monk, D.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, G. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Monk, D.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, G. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Reciprocal imprinting of human GRB10 in placental trophoblast and brain: evolutionary conservation of reversed allelic expression

David Monk1,2,*, Philippe Arnaud3, Jennifer Frost1, Frank A. Hills4, Philip Stanier1, Robert Feil3 and Gudrun E. Moore1

1 Clinical and Molecular Genetics Unit, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK 2 Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, Gran Via s/n km 2.7, 08907L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain 3 Institute of Molecular Genetics, CNRS, UMR-5535 and University of Montpellier I and II, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier, France 4 School of Health and Social Science, Middlesex University, Enfield EN3 4SA, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +34 932607500 ext. 3165; Fax: +34 932607219; Email: dmonk{at}iconcologia.net

Received January 29, 2009; Revised April 17, 2009; Accepted May 21, 2009

Genomic imprinting may have evolved not only to regulate fetal growth and development, but also behaviour. The mouse Grb10 gene provides a remarkable model to explore this idea because it shows paternal expression in brain, whereas in the placenta and most other embryonic tissues, expression is from the maternal allele. To assess the biological relevance of this reciprocal pattern of imprinting, we explored its conservation in humans. As in mice, we find the human GRB10 gene to be paternally expressed in brain. Maternal allele-specific expression is conserved only in the placental villous trophoblasts, an essential part of the placenta involved in nutrient transfer. All other fetal tissues tested showed equal expression from both alleles. These data suggest that the maternal GRB10 expression in placenta is evolutionarily important, presumably in the control of fetal growth. As in the mouse, the maternal transcripts originate from several kilobases upstream of the imprinting control region (ICR) of the domain, from a promoter region at which we find no allelic chromatin differences. The brain-specific paternal expression from the ICR shows mechanistic similarities with the mouse as well. This conserved CpG island is DNA-methylated on the maternal allele and is marked on the paternal allele by developmentally regulated bivalent chromatin, with the presence of both H3 lysine-4 and H3 lysine-27 methylation. The strong conservation of the opposite allelic expression in placenta versus brain supports the hypothesis that GRB10 imprinting evolved to mediate diverse roles in mammalian growth and behaviour.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.