© 1994 Oxford University Press
RESEARCH-ARTICLE |
Non-disjunction of chromosome 21 in maternal meiosis I: evidence for a maternal age-dependent mechanism involving reduced recombination
Department of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine 1462 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322 1Danish Centre for Human Genome Research, J.F.Kennedy Institute Glostrup, Denmark 2Department of Genetics an The Center for Human Genetics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed
Received April 17, 1994; Revised June 24, 1994; Accepted June 24, 1994
Over 300 cases of trisomy 21 were analyzed to characterize the causes of maternal non-disjunction and to evaluate the basis for maternal age-dependent trisomy 21. We confirmed the observation that recombination along 21q is reduced among non-disjoined chromosomes 21 and further demonstrated that the alterations in recombination are restricted to meiosis I origin. Analysis of the crossover distribution Indicates that reduction In recombination is not due simply to failure of pairing and/or absence of recombination In a proportion of cases. Instead, we observed an increase in both zero- and one-exchange events among trisomy 21-generating meloses suggesting that an overall reduction In recombination may be the underlying cause of non-disjunction. Lastly, we observed an age-related reduction In recombination among the melosis I cases, with older women having less recombination along 21q than younger women. Thus, reduced genetic recombination may be responsible, at least in part, for the association between advancing maternal age and trisomy 21.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Garcia-Cruz, A. Casanovas, M. Brieno-Enriquez, P. Robles, I. Roig, A. Pujol, L. Cabero, M. Durban, and M. Garcia Caldes Cytogenetic analyses of human oocytes provide new data on non-disjunction mechanisms and the origin of trisomy 16 Hum. Reprod., October 14, 2009; (2009) dep347v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. V. Subramanian and S. E. Bickel Heterochromatin-Mediated Association of Achiasmate Homologs Declines With Age When Cohesion Is Compromised Genetics, April 1, 2009; 181(4): 1207 - 1218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Barton, M. R. Pekosz, R. S. Kurvathi, and D. B. Kaback Meiotic Recombination at the Ends of Chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1221 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bugge, A. Collins, J. M. Hertz, H. Eiberg, C. Lundsteen, C. A. Brandt, M. Bak, C. Hansen, C. D. deLozier, J. Lespinasse, et al. Non-disjunction of chromosome 13 Hum. Mol. Genet., August 15, 2007; 16(16): 2004 - 2010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Fragouli, D. Wells, A. Thornhill, P. Serhal, M.J.W. Faed, J.C. Harper, and J.D.A. Delhanty Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2319 - 2328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kuliev and Y. Verlinsky Meiotic and mitotic nondisjunction: lessons from preimplantation genetic diagnosis Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2004; 10(5): 401 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Underkoffler, L. E. Mitchell, A. R. Localio, S. M. Marchegiani, J. Morabito, J. N. Collins, and R. J. Oakey Molecular Analysis of Nondisjunction in Mice Heterozygous for a Robertsonian Translocation Genetics, July 1, 2002; 161(3): 1219 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Thomas, S. Ennis, A. J. Sharp, M. Durkie, T. J. Hassold, A. R. Collins, and P. A. Jacobs Maternal sex chromosome non-disjunction: evidence for X chromosome-specific risk factors Hum. Mol. Genet., February 1, 2001; 10(3): 243 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lynn, C. Kashuk, M. B. Petersen, J. A. Bailey, D. R. Cox, S. E. Antonarakis, and A. Chakravarti Patterns of Meiotic Recombination on the Long Arm of Human Chromosome 21 Genome Res., September 1, 2000; 10(9): 1319 - 1332. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Shonn, R. McCarroll, and A. W. Murray Requirement of the Spindle Checkpoint for Proper Chromosome Segregation in Budding Yeast Meiosis Science, July 14, 2000; 289(5477): 300 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Brown, E. Feingold, K. W. Broman, and S. L. Sherman Genome-wide variation in recombination in female meiosis: a risk factor for non-disjunction of chromosome 21 Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2000; 9(4): 515 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Krawchuk and W. P. Wahls Centromere Mapping Functions for Aneuploid Meiotic Products: Analysis of rec8, rec10 and rec11 Mutants of the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Genetics, September 1, 1999; 153(1): 49 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Krawchuk, L. C. DeVeaux, and W. P. Wahls Meiotic Chromosome Dynamics Dependent Upon the rec8+, rec10+ and rec11+ Genes of the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Genetics, September 1, 1999; 153(1): 57 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Zwick, J. L. Salstrom, and C. H. Langley Genetic Variation in Rates of Nondisjunction: Association of Two Naturally Occurring Polymorphisms in the Chromokinesin nod With Increased Rates of Nondisjunction in Drosophila melanogaster Genetics, August 1, 1999; 152(4): 1605 - 1614. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||





