Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (52)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crouau-Roy, B.
Right arrow Articles by Freimer, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crouau-Roy, B.
Right arrow Articles by Freimer, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, Vol 5, 1131-1137, Copyright © 1996 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

A fine-scale comparison of the human and chimpanzee genomes: linkage, linkage disequilibrium and sequence analysis

B Crouau-Roy, S Service, M Slatkin and N Freimer
Neurogenetics Laboratory, University of California San Francisco 94143, USA.

We have performed a fine-scale comparative study of the human and chimpanzee genomes, using linkage, linkage disequilibrium and sequence analyses on microsatellite loci spanning a region of approximately 30 cM on human chromosome 4p. Our results extend the findings of previous studies that indicated virtually complete conservation between the human and chimpanzee genomes at the chromosomal and sub-chromosomal level and support the hypothesis, derived from previous analyses of mitochondrial DNA, that chimpanzee populations are more diverse than human ones. By sequencing several human and chimpanzee alleles of two microsatellites we showed that base substitutions that diminish the length of perfect repeats (but do not change allele sizes) are probably responsible for the low heterozygosity of these loci in chimpanzees; our results suggest that the evolutionary history of microsatellites should not be inferred from comparisons of mean allele lengths between populations or species.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
N. Yu, M. I. Jensen-Seaman, L. Chemnick, J. R. Kidd, A. S. Deinard, O. Ryder, K. K. Kidd, and W.-H. Li
Low Nucleotide Diversity in Chimpanzees and Bonobos
Genetics, August 1, 2003; 164(4): 1511 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
T. Kitano, C. Schwarz, B. Nickel, and S. Paabo
Gene Diversity Patterns at 10 X-Chromosomal Loci in Humans and Chimpanzees
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2003; 20(8): 1281 - 1289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
T. Varilo, T. Paunio, A. Parker, M. Perola, J. Meyer, J. D. Terwilliger, and L. Peltonen
The interval of linkage disequilibrium (LD) detected with microsatellite and SNP markers in chromosomes of Finnish populations with different histories
Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2003; 12(1): 51 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
E. Mizukoshi, M. Nascimbeni, J. B. Blaustein, K. Mihalik, C. M. Rice, T. J. Liang, S. M. Feinstone, and B. Rehermann
Molecular and Immunological Significance of Chimpanzee Major Histocompatibility Complex Haplotypes for Hepatitis C Virus Immune Response and Vaccination Studies
J. Virol., May 13, 2002; 76(12): 6093 - 6103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
F. Farnir, W. Coppieters, J.-J. Arranz, P. Berzi, N. Cambisano, B. Grisart, L. Karim, F. Marcq, L. Moreau, M. Mni, et al.
Extensive Genome-wide Linkage Disequilibrium in Cattle
Genome Res., February 1, 2000; 10(2): 220 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ScienceHome page
H. Kaessmann, V. Wiebe, and S. Pääbo
Extensive Nuclear DNA Sequence Diversity Among Chimpanzees
Science, November 5, 1999; 286(5442): 1159 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.