Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greally, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zemel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greally, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zemel, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, Vol 7, 91-95, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

The mouse H19 locus mediates a transition between imprinted and non- imprinted DNA replication patterns

JM Greally, DJ Starr, S Hwang, L Song, M Jaarola and S Zemel
Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208081, New Haven, CT 06520-8081, USA.

Genes subject to genomic imprinting generally occur in clusters of hundreds of kilobases. These domains exhibit several gamete of origin- dependent manifestations, including a pattern of asynchronous replication when studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We find a transition from asynchronous replication at the imprinted mouse H19 gene to synchronous replication at the downstream Rpl23 gene, the human homologue of which appears to be non-imprinted. Two-colour FISH demonstrates that this transition is due solely to a difference in replication timing between the upstream and downstream chromatin on the later-replicating (maternal) chromosome. This difference is lost in mice deleted for the H19 gene body and 9.9 kb of upstream DNA when this deletion is maternally inherited, with synchronous replication patterns extending over 110 kb upstream from the deleted area. No effect is seen when the deletion is paternally inherited. The presence of a boundary element in this region has been suggested by observations of position- independent expression of H19 -containing transgenes and the blocking of accessibility of downstream enhancers to the upstream Igf2 and Ins2 genes on the maternal chromosome. The FISH studies presented here demonstrate the insulation of replication patterns within the imprinted domain from downstream, non-imprinted chromatin, mediated by an element at the H19 locus which is subject to genomic imprinting.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
F. Cerrato, W. Dean, K. Davies, K. Kagotani, K. Mitsuya, K. Okumura, A. Riccio, and W. Reik
Paternal imprints can be established on the maternal Igf2-H19 locus without altering replication timing of DNA
Hum. Mol. Genet., December 1, 2003; 12(23): 3123 - 3132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. W. State, J. M. Greally, A. Cuker, P. N. Bowers, O. Henegariu, T. M. Morgan, M. Gunel, M. DiLuna, R. A. King, C. Nelson, et al.
Epigenetic abnormalities associated with a chromosome 18(q21-q22) inversion and a Gilles de la Tourette syndrome phenotype
PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4684 - 4689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
J. Gribnau, K. Hochedlinger, K. Hata, E. Li, and R. Jaenisch
Asynchronous replication timing of imprinted loci is independent of DNA methylation, but consistent with differential subnuclear localization
Genes & Dev., March 15, 2003; 17(6): 759 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
K. Ishihara and H. Sasaki
An evolutionarily conserved putative insulator element near the 3' boundary of the imprinted Igf2/H19 domain
Hum. Mol. Genet., July 1, 2002; 11(14): 1627 - 1636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
T. Watanabe, A. Yoshimura, Y. Mishima, Y. Endo, T. Shiroishi, T. Koide, H. Sasaki, H. Asakura, and R. Kominami
Differential chromatin packaging of genomic imprinted regions between expressed and non-expressed alleles
Hum. Mol. Genet., December 1, 2000; 9(20): 3029 - 3035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
S.-i. Horike, K. Mitsuya, M. Meguro, N. Kotobuki, A. Kashiwagi, T. Notsu, T. C. Schulz, Y. Shirayoshi, and M. Oshimura
Targeted disruption of the human LIT1 locus defines a putative imprinting control element playing an essential role in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 2000; 9(14): 2075 - 2083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Lai, H. Goepfert, A. M. Gillenwater, M. A. Luna, and A. K. El-Naggar
Loss of Imprinting and Genetic Alterations of the Cyclin-dependent Kinase Inhibitor p57KIP2 Gene in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2000; 6(8): 3172 - 3176.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
B. E. Hayward and D. T. Bonthron
An imprinted antisense transcript at the human GNAS1 locus
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 22, 2000; 9(5): 835 - 841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
R. Drewell, J. Brenton, J. Ainscough, S. Barton, K. Hilton, K. Arney, L Dandolo, and M. Surani
Deletion of a silencer element disrupts H19 imprinting independently of a DNA methylation epigenetic switch
Development, January 8, 2000; 127(16): 3419 - 3428.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
S. Khosla, A. Aitchison, R. Gregory, N. D. Allen, and R. Feil
Parental Allele-Specific Chromatin Configuration in a Boundary-Imprinting-Control Element Upstream of the Mouse H19 Gene
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 1999; 19(4): 2556 - 2566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.