Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savage, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Savage, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, Vol 7, 1221-1227, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Elucidating the mechanisms of paternal non-disjunction of chromosome 21 in humans

AR Savage, MB Petersen, D Pettay, L Taft, K Allran, SB Freeman, G Karadima, D Avramopoulos, C Torfs, M Mikkelsen, TJ Hassold and SL Sherman
Department of Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Paternal non-disjunction of chromosome 21 accounts for 5-10% of Down syndrome cases, therefore, relative to the maternally derived cases, little is known about paternally derived trisomy 21. We present the first analysis of recombination and non-disjunction for a large paternally derived population of free trisomy 21 conceptuses ( n = 67). Unlike maternal cases where the ratio of meiosis I (MI) to meiosis II (MII) errors is 3:1, a near 1:1 ratio exists among paternal cases, with a slight excess of MII errors. We found no paternal age effect for the overall population nor when classifying cases according to stage of non- disjunction error. Among 22 MI cases, only five had an observable recombinant event. This differs significantly from the 11 expected events ( P < 0.02, Fisher's exact), suggesting reduced recombination along the non-disjoined chromosomes 21 involved in paternal MI non- disjunction. No difference in recombination was detected among 27 paternal MII cases as compared with controls. However, cases exhibited a slight increase in the frequency of proximal and medial exchange when compared with controls (0.37 versus 0.28, respectively). Lastly, this study confirmed previous reports of excess male probands among paternally derived trisomy 21 cases. However, we report evidence suggesting an MII stage-specific sex ratio disturbance where 2.5 male probands were found for each female proband. Classification of MII cases based on the position of the exchange event suggested that the proband sex ratio disturbance was restricted to non-telomeric exchange cases. Based on these findings, we propose new models to explain the association between paternally derived trisomy 21 and excessive male probands.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Garcia-Cruz, A. Casanovas, M. Brieno-Enriquez, P. Robles, I. Roig, A. Pujol, L. Cabero, M. Durban, and M. Garcia Caldes
Cytogenetic analyses of human oocytes provide new data on non-disjunction mechanisms and the origin of trisomy 16
Hum. Reprod., October 14, 2009; (2009) dep347v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Sun, M. Mikhaail-Philips, M. Oliver-Bonet, E. Ko, A. Rademaker, P. Turek, and R.H. Martin
The relationship between meiotic recombination in human spermatocytes and aneuploidy in sperm
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1691 - 1697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
K. A. Ferguson, E. C. Wong, V. Chow, M. Nigro, and S. Ma
Abnormal meiotic recombination in infertile men and its association with sperm aneuploidy
Hum. Mol. Genet., December 1, 2007; 16(23): 2870 - 2879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Sun, M. Oliver-Bonet, T. Liehr, H. Starke, P. Turek, E. Ko, A. Rademaker, and R.H. Martin
Analysis of non-crossover bivalents in pachytene cells from 10 normal men
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2335 - 2339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
F. Sun, M. Oliver-Bonet, T. Liehr, H. Starke, P. Turek, E. Ko, A. Rademaker, and R. H. Martin
Variation in MLH1 distribution in recombination maps for individual chromosomes from human males
Hum. Mol. Genet., August 1, 2006; 15(15): 2376 - 2391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ma, K.A. Ferguson, S. Arsovska, P. Moens, and V. Chow
Reduced recombination associated with the production of aneuploid sperm in an infertile man: a case report
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 980 - 985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Codina-Pascual, M. Campillo, J. Kraus, M.R. Speicher, J. Egozcue, J. Navarro, and J. Benet
Crossover frequency and synaptonemal complex length: their variability and effects on human male meiosis
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 12(2): 123 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Nikolettos, B. Asimakopoulos, and I. Hatzissabas
Intrafamilial sperm donation: ethical questions and concerns
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 933 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
N Rives, G Langlois, A Bordes, N Simeon, and B Mace
Cytogenetic analysis of spermatozoa from males aged between 47 and 71 years
J. Med. Genet., October 1, 2002; 39(10): e63 - 63.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
A. S. Brown, E. Feingold, K. W. Broman, and S. L. Sherman
Genome-wide variation in recombination in female meiosis: a risk factor for non-disjunction of chromosome 21
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2000; 9(4): 515 - 523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.