Human Molecular Genetics, Vol 7, 1221-1227, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press
AR Savage, MB Petersen, D Pettay, L Taft, K Allran, SB Freeman, G Karadima, D Avramopoulos, C Torfs, M Mikkelsen, TJ Hassold and SL Sherman
Paternal non-disjunction of chromosome 21 accounts for 5-10% of Down
syndrome cases, therefore, relative to the maternally derived cases, little
is known about paternally derived trisomy 21. We present the first analysis
of recombination and non-disjunction for a large paternally derived
population of free trisomy 21 conceptuses ( n = 67). Unlike maternal cases
where the ratio of meiosis I (MI) to meiosis II (MII) errors is 3:1, a near
1:1 ratio exists among paternal cases, with a slight excess of MII errors.
We found no paternal age effect for the overall population nor when
classifying cases according to stage of non- disjunction error. Among 22 MI
cases, only five had an observable recombinant event. This differs
significantly from the 11 expected events ( P < 0.02, Fisher's exact),
suggesting reduced recombination along the non-disjoined chromosomes 21
involved in paternal MI non- disjunction. No difference in recombination
was detected among 27 paternal MII cases as compared with controls.
However, cases exhibited a slight increase in the frequency of proximal and
medial exchange when compared with controls (0.37 versus 0.28,
respectively). Lastly, this study confirmed previous reports of excess male
probands among paternally derived trisomy 21 cases. However, we report
evidence suggesting an MII stage-specific sex ratio disturbance where 2.5
male probands were found for each female proband. Classification of MII
cases based on the position of the exchange event suggested that the
proband sex ratio disturbance was restricted to non-telomeric exchange
cases. Based on these findings, we propose new models to explain the
association between paternally derived trisomy 21 and excessive male
probands.
ARTICLES
Elucidating the mechanisms of paternal non-disjunction of chromosome 21 in humans
Department of Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Garcia-Cruz, A. Casanovas, M. Brieno-Enriquez, P. Robles, I. Roig, A. Pujol, L. Cabero, M. Durban, and M. Garcia Caldes Cytogenetic analyses of human oocytes provide new data on non-disjunction mechanisms and the origin of trisomy 16 Hum. Reprod., October 14, 2009; (2009) dep347v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Sun, M. Mikhaail-Philips, M. Oliver-Bonet, E. Ko, A. Rademaker, P. Turek, and R.H. Martin The relationship between meiotic recombination in human spermatocytes and aneuploidy in sperm Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1691 - 1697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Ferguson, E. C. Wong, V. Chow, M. Nigro, and S. Ma Abnormal meiotic recombination in infertile men and its association with sperm aneuploidy Hum. Mol. Genet., December 1, 2007; 16(23): 2870 - 2879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Sun, M. Oliver-Bonet, T. Liehr, H. Starke, P. Turek, E. Ko, A. Rademaker, and R.H. Martin Analysis of non-crossover bivalents in pachytene cells from 10 normal men Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2335 - 2339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Sun, M. Oliver-Bonet, T. Liehr, H. Starke, P. Turek, E. Ko, A. Rademaker, and R. H. Martin Variation in MLH1 distribution in recombination maps for individual chromosomes from human males Hum. Mol. Genet., August 1, 2006; 15(15): 2376 - 2391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ma, K.A. Ferguson, S. Arsovska, P. Moens, and V. Chow Reduced recombination associated with the production of aneuploid sperm in an infertile man: a case report Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 980 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Codina-Pascual, M. Campillo, J. Kraus, M.R. Speicher, J. Egozcue, J. Navarro, and J. Benet Crossover frequency and synaptonemal complex length: their variability and effects on human male meiosis Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 12(2): 123 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nikolettos, B. Asimakopoulos, and I. Hatzissabas Intrafamilial sperm donation: ethical questions and concerns Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 933 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Rives, G Langlois, A Bordes, N Simeon, and B Mace Cytogenetic analysis of spermatozoa from males aged between 47 and 71 years J. Med. Genet., October 1, 2002; 39(10): e63 - 63. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Brown, E. Feingold, K. W. Broman, and S. L. Sherman Genome-wide variation in recombination in female meiosis: a risk factor for non-disjunction of chromosome 21 Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2000; 9(4): 515 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



