Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lopes, J.
Right arrow Articles by LeGuern, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lopes, J.
Right arrow Articles by LeGuern, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, Vol 8, 2285-2292, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Homologous DNA exchanges in humans can be explained by the yeast double- strand break repair model: a study of 17p11.2 rearrangements associated with CMT1A and HNPP

J Lopes, S Tardieu, K Silander, I Blair, A Vandenberghe, F Palau, M Ruberg, A Brice and E LeGuern
INSERM U289, H#pital de la Salp#tri#re, 47 Boulevard de l'H#pital, 75651 Paris cedex 13, France,

Rearrangements in 17p11.2, responsible for the 1.5 Mb duplications and deletions associated, respectively, with autosomal dominant Charcot- Marie-Tooth type 1A disease (CMT1A) and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) are a suitable model for studying human recombination. Rearrangements in 17p11.2 are caused by unequal crossing-over between two homologous 24 kb sequences, the CMT1A-REPs, that flank the disease locus and occur in most cases within a 1.7 kb hotspot. We sequenced this hotspot in 28 de novo patients (25 CMT1A and three HNPP), in order to localize precisely, at the DNA sequence level, the crossing-overs. We show that some chimeric CMT1A-REPs in de novo patients (10/28) present conversion of DNA segments associated with the crossing-over. These rearrangements can be explained by the double- strand break (DSB) repair model described in yeast. Fine mapping of the de novo rearrangements provided evidence that the successive steps of this model, heteroduplex DNA formation, mismatch correction and gene conversion, occurred in patients. Furthermore, the model explains 17p11.2 recombinations between chromosome homologues as well as between sister chromatids. In addition, defective mismatch repair of the heteroduplex DNA, observed in two patients, resulted in two heterozygous chimeric CMT1A-REPs which can be explained, as in yeast, by post-meiotic segregation. This work supports the hypothesis that the DSB repair model of DNA exchange may apply universally from yeasts to humans.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
P. R. J. Bois
A Highly Polymorphic Meiotic Recombination Mouse Hot Spot Exhibits Incomplete Repair
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2007; 27(20): 7053 - 7062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K.-W. G. Lam and A. J. Jeffreys
Inaugural Article: Processes of copy-number change in human DNA: The dynamics of {alpha}-globin gene deletion
PNAS, June 13, 2006; 103(24): 8921 - 8927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
R Visser, O Shimokawa, N Harada, N Niikawa, and N Matsumoto
Non-hotspot-related breakpoints of common deletions in Sotos syndrome are located within destabilised DNA regions
J. Med. Genet., November 1, 2005; 42(11): e66 - e66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
N. Kurotaki, P. Stankiewicz, K. Wakui, N. Niikawa, and J. R. Lupski
Sotos syndrome common deletion is mediated by directly oriented subunits within inverted Sos-REP low-copy repeats
Hum. Mol. Genet., February 15, 2005; 14(4): 535 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
C. J. Shaw and J. R. Lupski
Implications of human genome architecture for rearrangement-based disorders: the genomic basis of disease
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2004; 13(90001): R57 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
P. STANKIEWICZ, K. INOUE, W. BI, K. WALZ, S.-S. PARK, N. KUROTAKI, C.J. SHAW, P. FONSECA, J. YAN, J.A. LEE, et al.
Genomic Disorders: Genome Architecture Results in Susceptibility to DNA Rearrangements Causing Common Human Traits
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2003; 68(0): 445 - 454.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Jaatinen, M. Eholuoto, T. Laitinen, and M.-L. Lokki
Characterization of a De Novo Conversion in Human Complement C4 Gene Producing a C4B5-Like Protein
J. Immunol., June 1, 2002; 168(11): 5652 - 5658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. Latour, L. Boutrand, N. Levy, R. Bernard, A. Boyer, F. Claustrat, G. Chazot, M. Boucherat, and A. Vandenberghe
Polymorphic Short Tandem Repeats for Diagnosis of the Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A Duplication
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2001; 47(5): 829 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
L.-L. Han, M. P. Keller, W. Navidi, P. F. Chance, and N. Arnheim
Unequal exchange at the Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A recombination hot-spot is not elevated above the genome average rate
Hum. Mol. Genet., July 22, 2000; 9(12): 1881 - 1889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
Y. Ji, N. A. Rebert, J. M. Joslin, M. J. Higgins, R. A. Schultz, and R. D. Nicholls
Structure of the Highly Conserved HERC2 Gene and of Multiple Partially Duplicated Paralogs in Human
Genome Res., March 1, 2000; 10(3): 319 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.