Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (56)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rajpar, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rajpar, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, 2001, Vol. 10, No. 16 1673-1677
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Mutation of the gene encoding the enamel-specific protein, enamelin, causes autosomal-dominant amelogenesis imperfecta

M. Helen Rajpar, Kathryn Harley1, Chris Laing2, Robin M. Davies3 and Michael J. Dixon+

School of Biological Sciences and Department of Dental Medicine and Surgery, 3.239 Stopford Building, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK, 1Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Edinburgh Dental Institute, Lauriston Building, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH13 9YW, UK, 2Centre for Nephrology, University College London, Middlesex Hospital, Mortimer Street, London W1N 8AA, UK and 3Dental Health Unit, Manchester Science Park, Lloyd Street North, Manchester M15 4SH, UK

Received April 5, 2001; Revised and Accepted June 5, 2001.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a group of inherited defects of dental enamel formation that shows both clinical and genetic heterogeneity. To date, mutations in the gene encoding amelogenin have been shown to underlie a subset of the X-linked recessive forms of AI. Although none of the genes underlying autosomal-dominant or autosomal-recessive AI have been identified, a locus for a local hypoplastic form has been mapped to human chromosome 4q11–q21. In the current investigation, we have analysed a family with an autosomal-dominant, smooth hypoplastic form of AI. Our results have shown that a splicing mutation in the splice donor site of intron 7 of the gene encoding the enamel-specific protein enamelin underlies the phenotype observed in this family. This is the first autosomal-dominant form of AI for which the genetic mutation has been identified. As this type of AI is clinically distinct from that localized previously to chromosome 4q11–q21, these findings highlight the need for a molecular classification of this group of disorders.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Dental enamel is a highly mineralized tissue with ~85% of its volume occupied by unusually large, highly organized, hydroxyapatite crystals. Enamel is unique among the mineralized tissues in that it is produced by ameloblasts, which have an epithelial origin. Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a common group of inherited defects of dental enamel formation that exhibit marked genetic and clinical heterogeneity with at least 14 different sub-types being recognized on the basis of their clinical appearance (1). Taking all forms of AI into account, the prevalence has been reported to be as high as 1:700 in northern Sweden (2). Affected individuals show either hypoplastic (thin but seemingly correctly mineralized) or hypomineralized enamel, but an overlap of these signs is seen in many cases (3). There is no apparent correlation between the phenotype and the mode of inheritance with autosomal-dominant, autosomal-recessive and X-linked recessive forms being recognized. To date, mutations in the gene encoding the protein amelogenin have been shown to cause some X-linked recessive forms of AI. This locus has been designated AIH1 (411). The heterogeneity that characterizes this group of disorders has limited further progress to the identification of additional loci by linkage analysis; however, the underlying genes have not been identified. For example, a second locus for X-linked recessive AI, AIH3, has been mapped to chromosome Xq24–q27.1 (12). Similarly, an autosomal-dominant, local hypoplastic form of AI (AIH2) has been mapped to a 4 Mb region of human chromosome 4q11–q21 that encompasses the gene encoding the ameloblast-specific protein ameloblastin, AMBN (1315). Recently, the gene encoding a second ameloblast-specific protein, enamelin, has been mapped to the AIH2 critical region within 15 kb of AMBN (16,17). Nevertheless, the genetic mutation underlying this form of AI has not been identified and additional genetic linkage studies have indicated that other genetic loci for autosomal forms of AI exist (18). In the current study, we have shown that a clinically distinct form of AI, thin and smooth hypoplastic AI, which has been estimated to account for ~1.5% of cases of AI (3), maps to the AIH2 critical region and that this type of AI results from mutation of the gene encoding enamelin.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
We are taking a positional candidate approach to identify the genetic mutations underlying the various forms of AI and have investigated a family with an autosomal-dominant form of this condition (Fig. 1A). All affected members of the family exhibit enamel hypoplasia in both the deciduous and permanent dentitions. Clinically, the teeth appear small, thin and yellow due to a lack of enamel thickness (Fig. 1B and C). Such dentitions have been classified according to the clinical appearance as thin and smooth hypoplastic AI (1). As nephrocalcinosis may be associated with this dental phenotype (19,20), all affected individuals were screened with renal ultrasonography, but none was evident.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Clinical details of the AI family. (A) Pedigree of the family; filled symbols denote affected individuals. (B and C) Photographs of individual II.8 showing the small, smooth, yellow teeth that result from the enamel hypoplasia.

 
Although this form of AI is clinically distinct from that previously localized to chromosome 4q, we commenced our analysis in this region of the genome. Initially, we focussed our attention on the AMBN locus and identified a short tandem repeat polymorphism in intron 11 of this gene. Segregation analysis revealed no evidence for recombination between AMBN and the disease phenotype in this family (Zmax = 2.06) suggesting linkage to chromosome 4q11–q21. Mutation screening of all 13 exons of AMBN (21) by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis failed to reveal any AI-specific mobility shifts in this gene. As these results effectively excluded mutations in AMBN from a causative role in the pathogenesis of the AI in this family, we extended our studies to the gene encoding enamelin, which has recently been shown to map within 15 kb of AMBN (16). RT–PCR analysis showed that in the panel of human cDNAs tested, enamelin transcript could only be detected in cDNA derived from tooth germs (Fig. 2A) extending previous results from the rabbit, pig and mouse to man (17,22,23).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Molecular analysis of the enamelin gene. (A) RT–PCR analysis indicates that, unlike the Treacher Collins syndrome gene, TCOF1, which is widely expressed, the gene encoding enamelin is tooth-specific, a single PCR amplicon of 797 bp being detected in cDNA generated from human tooth germ RNA but not in other tissue sources. (B) SSCP analysis of genomic DNA from the AI family reveals the presence of an abnormal conformer in individuals I.1, II.1, II.3, II.6, II.8, III.2, III.5 and III.6, which is not detected in the unaffected family members. (C) Sequencing of DNA from individual II.1 reveals the presence of the mutation nt841+1 (G->A) (arrowed), which is not present in a control sample. (D) The mutation deletes an HphI site. Digestion of DNA from affected individuals produces bands of 214, 116 and 98 bp, whereas the 214 bp band is not detected in unaffected individuals, confirming that the mutation co-segregates with the disease phenotype.

 
In silico screening of the genomic sequence of human chromosome 4 with human cDNA sequence using the BLAST algorithm subsequently indicated that the gene encoding enamelin contains nine exons, separated by eight introns. All of the intron–exon boundaries were found to be type 0, with splicing occurring between exons and the splice donor and acceptor sites conforming to the published consensus sequences (24) (Table 1). SSCP analysis performed using primers designed to screen each exon and the associated splice junctions for mutations, revealed an abnormal conformer that was present in all affected family members, but not the unaffected individuals (Fig. 2B). Direct sequencing revealed a heterozygous mutation in the splice donor site of intron 7, nt841+1 (G->A) (Fig. 2C). This mutation deletes an HphI site, which allowed us to confirm that the mutation co-segregates with the disease phenotype (Fig. 2D). The mutation was not detected in 200 control chromosomes of similar ethnic origin.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Genomic organization of the human enamelin gene
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Recent evidence from genetic studies has implicated a number of molecules in the biomineralization events underlying tooth development. For example, mutation of the dentine sialophosphoprotein gene causes dentinogenesis imperfecta type II (25,26). However, this condition is thought to be genetically homogeneous. Conversely, the search for the genetic mutations underlying AI has been frustrated by the clinical and genetic heterogeneity observed in this condition. Progress in this area has been limited to the finding that mutations in the gene encoding amelogenin underlie a subset of cases of X-linked recessive AI (411) and the delineation of at least three additional genetic loci (12,13,18). Here we report the first genetic mutation underlying an autosomal form of AI, thereby providing definitive evidence that enamelin is essential for dental enamel formation. Moreover, we demonstrate that the locus for smooth hypoplastic AI maps to the same genetic interval as that for the clinically distinct local hypoplastic form. Therefore, our findings suggest that these two AI subtypes are allelic and support the need for a molecular classification of this heterogeneous group of disorders (27).

The calcium phosphate hydroxyapatite crystals that comprise the bulk of the mature enamel are unusually large, uniform and regularly disposed within the tissue. This highly organized and unusual structure is thought to be rigorously controlled through the interaction of a number of organic matrix molecules that include amelogenin, enamelin, ameloblastin, tuftelin, dentine sialophosphoprotein and a variety of enzymes (28). In porcine enamel, enamelin is synthesized and secreted by ameloblasts as a 186 kDa precursor, the unprocessed form concentrating along the secretory face of the ameloblast Tomes process. Proteolytic processing towards the C-terminus produces 142 kDa enamelin via a 155 kDa intermediate. Subsequent cleavages generate an 89 kDa polypeptide encompassing the first 627 amino acids of the secreted protein and a 34 kDa polypeptide beginning at residue 632. Processing of 89 kDa enamelin results in polypeptides of 32 kDa (amino acids 136–238) and 25 kDa, commencing at residue 477 (29). Intact enamelin and cleavage products containing the C-terminus are limited to the most superficial layer of the developing enamel matrix, while other cleavage products accumulate in the deeper layers of this tissue in the maturing rod and inter-rod enamel (30).

Due to the ameloblast-specific nature of enamelin and the transient nature of ameloblasts during development, it was not possible to prepare cDNA from affected individuals to confirm the effect of the mutation on the enamelin transcript. Nevertheless, numerous studies have demonstrated that mutations of the type observed in this study lead to aberrant splicing (31). While skipping of exon 7 remains the most likely scenario, a failure of splicing at the splice donor site of intron 7 with read through into the intron remains a possibility. In the latter case, this would result in the introduction of a termination codon after nine amino acids with the likely loss of enamelin protein function due to nonsense-mediated mRNA degradation (32). Conversely, exon skipping would result in an in-frame deletion of the 21 amino acids encoded by exon 7. Alignment of the amino acid sequences of porcine and human enamelin indicates that deletion of exon 7 would remove the 32 kDa proteolytic cleavage site. Among the enamelin cleavage products, the 32 kDa polypeptide is the most characterized. For example, it undergoes phosphorylation and asparagine-linked glycosylation (29,33). Moreover, 32 kDa enamelin has been proposed to play a role in amelogenin processing (34). Intriguingly, amelogenin processing products have been suggested to inhibit hydroxyapatite crystal growth during amelogenesis, and removal of such inhibitory proteins is thought to be crucial to enamel maturation (28). Although the 89 kDa precursor polypeptide is also active, cleavage to the 32 kDa form in immature enamel to from ‘amelogeninase’ has been proposed to be essential for full function in degrading amelogenins in maturing enamel (34). The 32 kDa enamelin polypeptide may therefore play an important role in enamel mineralization in vivo, and a failure of enamelin cleavage with resulting reduced ‘amelogeninase’ activity may account for the mechanism underlying the amelogenesis imperfecta observed in this family. The delineation of additional mutations in families with a history of AI and complementary functional studies will be important in clarifying this hypothesis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Family
The pedigree of the family is presented in Figure 1A. Each member of the family was examined clinically and, where appropriate, radiographically by K.Harley. Renal sonography of affected individuals was performed by C.Laing.

RT–PCR
Total RNA was either extracted according to the method of Chomczynski and Saachi (35) or purchased commercially. RT–PCR analyses were performed and analysed as described previously (36) using a forward primer in exon 6 (5'-CATAACAAGACTGATCAGACC-3') and a reverse primer in exon 9 (5'-ACTGGATTTCCTGGACGAGC-3') of the enamelin gene. These primers generate an amplicon of 797 bp from cDNA.

Mutation analysis
SSCP analysis of genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood leucocytes was performed according to the method of Orita et al. (37) using the primers 5'-TTTTCAATACCACATCACTCTG-3' and 5'-ACTGATTGGTATATGGTATTCC-3'. To determine the sequence variant underlying the SSCP mobility shift, PCR products were sequenced directly via the dideoxy chain termination method using dye primer chemistry. To confirm that the mutation co-segregated with the disease phenotype, PCR amplified genomic DNA was digested with the restriction enzyme HphI and the resulting products were resolved on a 9% polyacrylamide gel.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank the test family for providing samples. This work is supported by an MRC Industrial Collaborative Studentship with Colgate (G216/4098) and by the Wellcome Trust (051938).


    FOOTNOTES
 
+ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 161 275 5620; Fax: +44 161 275 5620; Email: mike.dixon@man.ac.uk Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
1 Witkop, C.J. (1988) Amelogenesis imperfecta, dentinogenesis imperfecta and dentin dysplasia revisited: problems in classification. J. Oral Pathol., 17, 547–553.[Web of Science][Medline]

2 Bäckman, B. and Holm, A.-K. (1986) Amelogenesis imperfecta: prevalence and incidence in a northern Swedish county. Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol., 14, 43–47.[Web of Science][Medline]

3 Bäckman, B. (1988) Amelogenesis imperfecta – clinical manifestations in 51 families in a northern Swedish county. Scand. J. Dent. Res., 96, 505–516.[Web of Science][Medline]

4 Lagerström, M., Dahl, N., Nakahori, Y., Nakagome, Y., Backman, B., Landegren, U. and Pettersson, U. (1991) A deletion in the amelogenin gene (AMG) causes X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta (AIH1). Genomics, 10, 971–975.[Web of Science][Medline]

5 Aldred, M.J., Crawford, P.J., Roberts, E. and Thomas, N.S. (1992) Identification of a nonsense mutation in the amelogenin gene (AMELX) in a family with X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta (AIH1). Hum. Genet., 90, 413–416.[Web of Science][Medline]

6 Lench, N.J., Brook, A.H. and Winter, G.B. (1994) SSCP detection of a nonsense mutation in exon 5 of the amelogenin gene (AMGX) causing X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta (AIH1). Hum. Mol. Genet., 3, 827–828.[Free Full Text]

7 Lagerström-Fermer, M., Nilsson, M., Backman, B., Salido, E., Shapiro, L., Pettersson, U. and Landegren, U. (1995) Amelogenin signal peptide mutation: correlation between mutations in the amelogenin gene (AMGX) and manifestations of X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta. Genomics, 26, 159–162.[Web of Science][Medline]

8 Lench, N.J. and Winter, G.B. (1995) Characterisation of molecular defects in X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta (AIH1). Hum. Mutat., 5, 251–259.[Web of Science][Medline]

9 Collier, P.M., Sauk, J.J., Rosenbloom, S.J., Yuan, Z.A. and Gibson, C.W. (1997) An amelogenin gene defect associated with human X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta. Arch. Oral Biol., 42, 235–242.[Web of Science][Medline]

10 Ravassipour, D.B., Hart, P.S., Hart, T.C., Ritter, A.V., Yamauchi, M., Gibson, C. and Wright, J.T. (2000) Unique enamel phenotype associated with amelogenin gene (AMELX) codon 41 point mutation. J. Dent. Res., 79, 1476–1481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11 Kindelan, S.A., Brook, A.H., Gangemi, L., Lench, N., Wong, F.S., Fearne, J., Jackson, Z., Foster, G. and Stringer, B.M. (2000) Detection of a novel mutation in X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta. J. Dent. Res., 79, 1978–1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12 Aldred, M.J., Crawford, P.J.M., Roberts, E., Gillespie, C.M., Thomas, N.S., Fenton, I., Sandkuijl, L.A. and Harper, P.S. (1992) Genetic heterogeneity in X-linked amelogenesis imperfecta. Genomics, 14, 567–573.[Web of Science][Medline]

13 Forsman, K., Lind, L., Backman, B., Westemark, E. and Holmgren, G. (1994) Localization of a gene for autosomal dominant amelogenesis imperfecta (ADAI) to chromosome 4q. Hum. Mol. Genet., 3, 1621–1625.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14 Kärrman, C., Backman, B., Dixon, M., Holmgren, G. and Forsman, K. (1997) Mapping of the locus for autosomal dominant amelogenesis imperfecta (AIH2) to a 4-Mb YAC contig on chromosome 4q11–q21. Genomics, 39, 164–170.[Web of Science][Medline]

15 MacDougall, M., DuPont, B.R., Simmons, D., Reus, B., Krebsbach, P., Karrman, C., Holmgren, G., Leach, R.J. and Forsman, K. (1997) Ameloblastin gene (AMBN) maps within the critical region for autosomal dominant amelogenesis imperfecta at chromosome 4q21. Genomics, 41, 115–118.[Web of Science][Medline]

16 Dong, J., Gu, T.T., Simmons, D. and MacDougall, M. (2000) Enamelin maps to human chromosome 4q21 within the autosomal dominant amelogenesis imperfecta locus. Eur. J. Oral. Sci., 108, 353–358.[Web of Science][Medline]

17 Hu, C.-C., Hart, T.C., DuPont, B.R., Chen, J.J., Sun, X., Qian, Q., Zhang, C.H., Jiang, H., Mattern, V.L., Wright, J.T. et al. (2000) Cloning human enamelin cDNA, chromosomal localization, and analysis of expression during tooth development. J. Dent. Res., 79, 912–919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18 Kärrman, C., Bäckman, B., Holmgren, G. and Forsman, K. (1996) Genetic heterogeneity of autosomal dominant amelogenesis imperfecta demonstrated by its exclusion from the AIH2 region on human chromosome 4q. Arch. Oral Biol., 41, 893–900.[Web of Science][Medline]

19 MacGibbon, D. (1972) Generalized enamel hypoplasia and renal dysfunction. Aust. Dent. J., 17, 61–63.[Medline]

20 Lubinsky, M., Angle, C., Marsh, P.W. and Witkop, C.J. (1985) Syndrome of amelogenesis imperfecta, nephrocalcinosis, impaired renal concentration, and possible abnormality of calcium metabolism. Am. J. Med. Genet., 20, 233–243.[Web of Science][Medline]

21 Toyosawa, S., Fujiwara, T., Ooshima, T., Shintani, S., Sato, A., Ogawa, Y., Sobue, S. and Ijuhin, N. (2000) Cloning and characterization of the human ameloblastin gene. Gene, 256, 1–11.[Web of Science][Medline]

22 Zeichner-David, M., MacDougall, M. and Slavkin, H.C. (1983) Enamelin gene expression during fetal and neonatal rabbit tooth organogenesis. Differentiation, 25, 148–155.[Web of Science][Medline]

23 Dohi, N., Murakami, C., Tanabe, T., Yamakoshi, Y., Fukae, M., Yamamoto, Y., Wakida, K., Shimizu, M., Simmer, J.P., Kurihara, H. et al. (1998) Immunocytochemical and immunochemical study of enamelins, using antibodies against porcine 89-kDa enamelin and its N-terminal synthetic peptide, in porcine tooth germs. Cell Tissue Res., 293, 313–325.[Web of Science][Medline]

24 Breathnach, R. and Chambon, P. (1981) Organization and expression of eucaryotic split genes coding for proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 50, 349–383.[Web of Science][Medline]

25 Zhang, X., Zhao, J., Li, C., Gao, S., Qiu, C., Liu, P., Wu, G., Qiang, B., Lo, W.H.Y. and Shen, Y. (2001) DSPP mutation in dentinogenesis imperfecta Shields type II. Nat. Genet., 27, 151–152.[Web of Science][Medline]

26 Xiao, S., Yu, C., Chou, X., Yuan, W., Wang, Y., Bu, L., Fu, G., Qian, M., Yang, J., Shi, Y. et al. (2001) Dentinogenesis imperfecta 1 with or without progressive hearing loss is associated with distinct mutations in DSPP. Nat. Genet., 27, 201–204.[Web of Science][Medline]

27 Aldred, M.J. and Crawford, P.J. (1995) Amelogenesis imperfecta–towards a new classification. Oral Dis., 1, 2–5.[Medline]

28 Robinson, C., Brookes, S.J., Shore, R.C. and Kirkham, J. (1998) The developing enamel matrix: nature and function. Eur. J. Oral Sci., 106 (Suppl. 1), 282–291.

29 Fukae, M., Tanabe, T., Murakami, C., Dohi, N., Uchida, T. and Shimizu, M. (1996) Primary structure of the porcine 89-kDa enamelin. Adv. Dent. Res., 10, 111–118.

30 Hu, C.C., Fukae, M., Uchida, T., Qian, Q., Zhang, C.H., Ryu, O.H., Tanabe, T., Yamakoshi, Y., Murakami, C., Dohi, N. et al. (1997) Cloning and characterization of porcine enamelin mRNAs. J. Dent. Res., 76, 1720–1729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31 Krawczak, M., Reiss, J. and Cooper, D.N. (1992) The mutational spectrum of single base-pair substitutions in mRNA splice junctions of human genes: causes and consequences. Hum. Genet., 90, 41–54.[Web of Science][Medline]

32 Frischmeyer, P.A. and Dietz, H.C. (1999) Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in health and disease. Hum. Mol. Genet., 8, 1893–1900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33 Yamakoshi, Y., Pinheiro, F.H., Tanabe, T., Fukae, M. and Shimizu, M. (1998) Sites of asparagine-linked oligosaccharides in porcine 32 kDa enamelin. Connect. Tissue Res., 39, 39–46.[Medline]

34 Moradian-Oldak, J., Leung, W., Simmer, J.P., Zeichner-David, M. and Fincham, A.G. (1996) Identification of a novel proteinase (ameloprotease-1) responsible for the complete degradation of amelogenin during enamel maturation. Biochem. J., 318, 1015–1021.

35 Chomczynski, P. and Saachi, N. (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocynate–phenol–chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem., 162, 156–159.[Web of Science][Medline]

36 Dixon, J., Hovanes, K., Shiang, R. and Dixon, M.J. (1997) Sequence analysis, identification of evolutionary conserved motifs and expression analysis of murine tcof1 provide further evidence for a potential function for the gene and its human homologue, TCOF1. Hum. Mol. Genet., 6, 727–737.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37 Orita, M., Iwahana, H., Kanazawa, H., Hayashi, K. and Sekiya, T. (1989) Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by gel electrophoresis as single-strand conformation polymorphisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 2766–2770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. C.-C. Hu, Y. Hu, C. E. Smith, M. D. McKee, J. T. Wright, Y. Yamakoshi, P. Papagerakis, G. K. Hunter, J. Q. Feng, F. Yamakoshi, et al.
Enamel Defects and Ameloblast-specific Expression in Enam Knock-out/lacZ Knock-in Mice
J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10858 - 10871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. L. Kelley and W. J. Swanson
Dietary Change and Adaptive Evolution of enamelin in Humans and Among Primates
Genetics, March 1, 2008; 178(3): 1595 - 1603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
M. Kida, Y. Sakiyama, A. Matsuda, S. Takabayashi, H. Ochi, H. Sekiguchi, S. Minamitake, and T. Ariga
A Novel Missense Mutation (p.P52R) in Amelogenin Gene Causing X-linked Amelogenesis Imperfecta
Journal of Dental Research, January 1, 2007; 86(1): 69 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
T. J. Pemberton, J. Gee, and P. I. Patel
Gene discovery for dental anomalies: A primer for the dental professional.
J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2006; 137(6): 743 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
G. Stephanopoulos, M.-E. Garefalaki, and K. Lyroudia
Genes and Related Proteins Involved in Amelogenesis Imperfecta
Journal of Dental Research, December 1, 2005; 84(12): 1117 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
D. Ozdemir, P.S. Hart, O.H. Ryu, S.J. Choi, M. Ozdemir-Karatas, E. Firatli, N. Piesco, and T.C. Hart
MMP20 Active-site Mutation in Hypomaturation Amelogenesis Imperfecta
Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 2005; 84(11): 1031 - 1035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
D. Ozdemir, P.S. Hart, E. Firatli, G. Aren, O.H. Ryu, and T.C. Hart
Phenotype of ENAM Mutations is Dosage-dependent
Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 2005; 84(11): 1036 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
J.-W. Kim, F. Seymen, B.P.-J. Lin, B. Kiziltan, K. Gencay, J.P. Simmer, and J.C.-C. Hu
ENAM Mutations in Autosomal-dominant Amelogenesis Imperfecta
Journal of Dental Research, March 1, 2005; 84(3): 278 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
H. Masuya, K. Shimizu, H. Sezutsu, Y. Sakuraba, J. Nagano, A. Shimizu, N. Fujimoto, A. Kawai, I. Miura, H. Kaneda, et al.
Enamelin (Enam) is essential for amelogenesis: ENU-induced mouse mutants as models for different clinical subtypes of human amelogenesis imperfecta (AI)
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2005; 14(5): 575 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
H. Seedorf, I.N. Springer, E. Grundner-Culemann, H.-K. Albers, A. Reis, H. Fuchs, M. Hrabe de Angelis, and Y. Acil
Amelogenesis Imperfecta in a New Animal Model--a Mutation in Chromosome 5 (human 4q21)
Journal of Dental Research, August 1, 2004; 83(8): 608 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
T C Hart, P S Hart, M C Gorry, M D Michalec, O H Ryu, C Uygur, D Ozdemir, S Firatli, G Aren, and E Firatli
Novel ENAM mutation responsible for autosomal recessive amelogenesis imperfecta and localised enamel defects
J. Med. Genet., December 1, 2003; 40(12): 900 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CROBMHome page
J.C.-C. Hu and Y. Yamakoshi
ENAMELIN AND AUTOSOMAL-DOMINANT AMELOGENESIS IMPERFECTA
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, November 1, 2003; 14(6): 387 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. J. Caterina, Z. Skobe, J. Shi, Y. Ding, J. P. Simmer, H. Birkedal-Hansen, and J. D. Bartlett
Enamelysin (Matrix Metalloproteinase 20)-deficient Mice Display an Amelogenesis Imperfecta Phenotype
J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 2002; 277(51): 49598 - 49604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
M. Kida, T. Ariga, T. Shirakawa, H. Oguchi, and Y. Sakiyama
Autosomal-dominant Hypoplastic Form of Amelogenesis Imperfecta Caused by an Enamelin Gene Mutation at the Exon-Intron Boundary
Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 2002; 81(11): 738 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
C. K. Mardh, B. Backman, G. Holmgren, J. C.-C. Hu, J. P. Simmer, and K. Forsman-Semb
A nonsense mutation in the enamelin gene causes local hypoplastic autosomal dominant amelogenesis imperfecta (AIH2)
Hum. Mol. Genet., May 1, 2002; 11(9): 1069 - 1074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
C. Klein, C. E. Page, P. LeWitt, M. F. Gordon, D. de Leon, Y. Awaad, X. O. Breakefield, M. F. Brin, and L. J. Ozelius
Genetic analysis of three patients with an 18p- syndrome and dystonia
Neurology, February 1, 1999; 52(3): 649 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (56)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rajpar, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rajpar, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?