Human Molecular Genetics, 2002, Vol. 11, No. 11 1311-1316
© 2002 Oxford University Press
A mutation in GJB3 is associated with recessive erythrokeratodermia variabilis (EKV) and leads to defective trafficking of the connexin 31 protein
1Department of Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 2Dermatology Unit, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel, 3Department of Biochemistry, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, 4Centre for Cutaneous Research, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, Whitechapel, UK and 5Department of Dermatology, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
Received January 28, 2002; Accepted March 13, 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Erythrokeratodermia variabilis (EKV) is a skin disorder characterized by variable (transient) erythemas and fixed keratosis. The disorder maps to chromosome 1p3435, a location that contains the GJB3 gene encoding the gap junction protein connexin 31. Until now, only heterozygote mutations in the form of dominant inheritance have been described in this gene associated with EKV. We report here a homozygote mutation in the connexin 31 gene, found in a family that shows recessive inheritance of the disorder, thus providing the first molecular support for a recessive variant of EKV. The entire GJB3 coding sequence was scanned for mutations by sequencing. We detected a T
C transition at position 101 of the coding sequence, which replaces a leucine with a proline at residue 34 of the protein (L34P). Evolutionary analysis shows that this mutation is located at a highly conserved region of connexin in the first putative transmembrane helix (TMH). In transfected keratinocytes, L34P connexin 31 had a cytoplasmic distribution, suggesting that the mutant form of this protein will not form normal gap junctions between adjacent cells. The change of leucine to proline is likely to alter the structure of the first TMH of connexin by inducing a kink, thus influencing connexon structure and function. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The erythrokeratodermas comprise a group of skin disorders characterized by erythematous hyperkeratotic plaques (1). Erythrokeratodermia variabilis (EKV) is a rare inherited form of these skin disorders characterized by the presence of transient erythematous and hyperkeratotic components. These lesions usually appear at birth or during the first years of life. Affected individuals present with sharply demarcated, relatively fixed hyperkeratotic plaques and migratory erythematous patches that appear and regress within minutes to hours. The development of these patches may be affected by various environmental factors, such as temperature changes, trauma or irritation. The inheritance pattern of EKV is primarily dominant, although there are reports of sporadic and recessive cases as well (2).
Autosomal dominant EKV was mapped to chromosome 1p3435 (3), a location that is now known to contain four genes encoding gap junction proteins, also known as connexins: GJB3 (connexin 31, Cx31), GJA4 (connexin 37, Cx37), GJB5 (connexin 31.1, Cx31.1) and GJB4 (connexin 30.3, Cx30.3) (46). Mutations associated with EKV were subsequently found in both connexin 31 and connexin 30.3 (4,5,7).
In this study, a novel mutation (L34P) in the connexin 31 gene was found in a homozygous form in affected individuals in a family that shows recessive inheritance of the disorder, thus providing molecular support for a recessive variant of EKV. Functional analysis of the expressed mutant L34P Cx31 protein suggests that it will not form gap junctions between keratinocytes.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We identified a novel mutation in the GJB3 gene segregating with EKV. In addition, this is the first connexin mutation associated with a recessive skin disease. In the family in which the mutation was segregating, both parents are unaffected and have never suffered from EKV lesions throughout their lifetime. Three out of four children are affected (Fig. 1A). The course of the disease and clinical findings were similar in all the affected members. General medical history, including hearing disturbances, was unremarkable. The eruption began during the first year of life, spreading progressively until puberty, followed by gradual improvement. The eruption consisted of two components: transient erythematous patches, changing their configuration in course of weeks, and fixed erythrokeratotic plaques. Aggravation of lesions was noted during summers. On examination, figurate erythematous patches were seen on the abdomen (Fig. 1B) and well-defined, irregular brownish thickened skin was noted on the trunk, earlobes (Fig. 1C) and extensor aspects of the upper and lower limbs. Palms, soles, scalp, hair, nails and mucosae were normal. Biopsies were taken from all affected members, showing similar histological findings. These included marked, basket-weave orthohyperkeratosis, with a dense eosinophilic keratotic band just above the granular layer. The rest of the epidermis was markedly acanthotic, with fingerlike projections of the rete ridges. Mild lymphohistiocytic infiltrate was found in the upper dermis. We have ruled out progressive symmetric erythrokeratoderma (EPS), which may be inherited in a recessive mode (8), since members of the family have two types of lesions: variable erythema and fixed erythrokeratotic plaques. The distribution of lesions included the trunk, which is extremely rare in EPS. The clinical symptoms improved with age, while in EPS the rash constantly tends to worsen. Histological findings did not include focci of parakeratosis, symptoms that are associated with EPS.
|
Initially, sequencing of both connexin 31 and connexin 30.3 open reading frames was performed for w427, an affected child. One silent change was found in connexin 30.3 (C420T), while a homozygous substitution, T101C, was found in the connexin 31 gene (Fig. 2A). The healthy father (w425) was found to be heterozygous for the T101C nucleotide substitution in GJB3 by sequencing (Fig. 2A). The nucleotide change causes a missense mutation, changing codon 34 from leucine to proline (L34P), and adds a BanI restriction site. The change in restriction pattern was used to test the rest of the family and the controls (Fig. 2B). Digestion of the wild-type product gave three observed fragments (64 bp, 266 and 271 bp comigrate, and 316 bp) while the homozygote mutation gives four observed fragments (64 bp, 101 bp, 215 bp, 266 and 271 bp comigrate). The mother and another affected child were found to be heterozygous and homozygous for the mutation, respectively.
|
The mutation was not found in 208 control chromosomes, examined by restriction enzyme analysis, derived from the Jewish non-Ashkenazi population (including 30 Buchari chromosomes) (data not shown).
The leucine residue is present at codon 34 in all connexin 31, 30.3 and 31.1 species, while in connexin 26, 30 and 32 a conservative substitution to another hydrophobic residue, methionine, is found. The degree of conservation of this mutated residue in connexin 31 was analyzed using ConSurf (9), a program that assigns amino acid conservation grades in the range 01, where 1 is maximal conservation. A score of 0.97 was obtained for Leu34, while the whole protein has an average score of 0.80. It is important to note that all the residues of the first helix have a score higher than 0.9, that is, the first TM domain is highly conserved (Fig. 3).
|
As the human Cx31 antibody (10) does not detect Cx31 protein particularly well on paraffin-embedded material, the effect of the L34P mutation on the localization of the Cx31 protein was investigated by transfection studies of different cell types. Following transfection of both HeLa and DT cell lines with wild-type and L34P connexin 31, the cellular localization of the chimeric proteins were compared. The wild-type Cx31EGFP was trafficked to the plasma membrane, localizing in areas of cellcell contact (Fig. 4A,D). In contrast, the majority of L34P-Cx31 had a cytoplasmic distribution (Fig. 4B,C,E,F). In a few transfected HeLa cells (<5% of transfected cells, e.g. Fig. 4B,C), a small proportion of the mutant protein was seen to have a membraneous localization. However, no membraneous localization of the mutant protein was observed in the keratinocyte-derived cell line (Fig. 4E,F).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutations described so far in relation to EKV are heterozygous and are associated with dominant inheritance (35,7). In this paper, we report a novel GJB3 mutation that segregates in a family with a recessive pattern of inheritance of EKV.
Gap junction proteins are molecules that form intercellular channels connecting adjacent cells, and are widely expressed in the human body. However, a mutation in a specific connexin will usually affect only one organ, probably because of its specific role (11). At least 10 different types of connexins are expressed in different keratinocyte populations of human skin (10). So far, mutations in four connexins have been associated with skin disorders (reviewed in 12): connexin 31 with EKV (5), connexin 30.3 with EKV associated with erythema gyratum repens-like features (4), connexin 26 with Vohwinkel's syndrome (13,14) and connexin 30 with hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (15). Interestingly, mutations in three of these connexins are also associated with hearing loss (1618). Until now, mutations in connexins have only been identified in dominantly inherited forms of EKV. We can only speculate as to why the L34P mutation is required in the recessive form in order to lead to this phenotype in keratinocyte cells. In the heterozygote form, this missense mutation may not be able to exert a dominant-negative effect, and thus will only manifest itself clinically in the homozygote. It is unclear if this is a function of the location of the missense mutation or of the particular amino acid change.
Connexins share a common structure of four transmembrane (TM) helices connected by two extracellular loops and one cytoplasmic loop; thus, both their C and N termini are cytoplasmic. The mutated leucine residue identified in this study lies in the first TM helix of the protein. Different functions are predicted for each domain of the protein (reviewed in 19). Initially, it had been suggested that the location of the dominant mutation in connexin 31 could determine which organ will be affected skin or inner ear. Mutations in the extracellular loops, implicated in the specificity of connexinconnexin interactions, would result in hearing loss, whereas mutations in other domains, such as those associated with voltage gating, would result in EKV (19). However, as the number of EKV-associated mutations has risen, this correlation has proven to be untrue. From this study, it is also evident that distinct recessive GJB3 mutations can also cause skin disease or deafness.
ConSurf evolutionary analysis shows that the leucine residue is highly conserved throughout different species and different connexins. The change of this residue to proline may change the structure of the TM helix, thus influencing the connexin structure and function. The change from a leucine to a proline is particularly significant; proline provides a unique conformational property not found with any other residues (20). The replacement of a leucine by a proline may introduce a kink in the
helix that will compromise connexin function.
Further support for the likely deleterious effect of the L34P mutation in connexin 31 comes from the functional and genetic analysis of the M34T mutation in connexin 26. Recent genetic studies support M34T in connexin 26 acting as a recessive mutation associated with mild to moderate hearing loss (21,22). Functional studies indicate that M34T connexin 26 oligomerizes poorly and has limited trafficking to the plasma membrane (23; W-L. Di and D.P. Kelsell, unpublished data).
The wild-type Cx31EGFP was concentrated in areas of cellcell contact, suggesting that they were forming gap junctions between adjacent transfected cells. In HeLa cells, while the majority of L34P-Cx31 had a cytoplasmic distribution, there was some membraneous localization in a minority of cells, suggesting that it is capable of forming some gap-junctionplaque-like structures under certain cellular conditions. In a keratinocyte-derived cell line, the L34P-Cx31 protein was only expressed in the cytoplasm.
The high conservation of the residue, the location of the mutation, the previous association of connexin 31 with EKV and the functional data all strongly support that L34P is the basis of recessive EKV in this family.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients and clinical examination
A Jewish family originating from Buchara, Uzbekistan was studied. Both parents were healthy, whereas three out of four siblings were affected (Fig. 1A). The parents and three affected children were personally examined by two of the authors (M.L. and B.M.) on two different occasions, while the unaffected child was reluctant to cooperate with the study and therefore was not included. This project was approved by the Helsinki Committee at the Edith Wolfson Medical Center. After informed consent, blood samples were taken from the parents and two affected children, while skin biopsies were taken for histological examination from all the affected members. Human control DNA samples were obtained from The National Laboratory for the Genetics of Israeli Populations at Tel Aviv University, Israel (http://www.tau.ac.il/medicine/NLGIP/nlgip.htm).
DNA extraction, sequencing and restriction enzyme analysis
DNA was extracted from blood using a DNA isolation kit for mammalian blood (Boehringer-Mannheim). A 917 bp fragment containing the connexin 31 open reading frame (ORF) (GenBank XM_018110) was amplified using the primers 1F: TCACCTATTCATTCATACGATGG and 2R: GGCAGCCCGCATGTTGCCC, in an MJ Research Thermocycler (PTC 200), under the following conditions: 94°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 0.5 min, 60°C for 0.5 min, 72°C for 1 min; and 72°C for 5 min. The connexin 30.3 ORF (GenBank AL121988) was amplified as an 801 bp fragment under the same conditions, using primers 1F: 5'-CAATCGCACCAGCATTAAGGG-3' and R: 5'-TGATCTTATCTGCTGATCTCGCAG-3' (4). Sequencing was performed using the same primers as those used for PCR, the ABI Prism BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems) and an ABI 377 DNA sequencer. Mutations were confirmed by sequencing in both directions. The mutation that we detected causes a replacement of a single nucleotide, forming an additional BanI restriction site in the connexin 31 gene. The PCR product generated as described above was digested with BanI (New England Biolabs), and the restriction products were run on a 4% agarose gel.
Evolutionary analysis
The degree of conservation of the mutated residue was analyzed using ConSurf (http://bioinfo.tau.ac.il/ConSurf/) (9). This software examines the closest homologues of a given protein and assigns a score to each of the protein's residues according to its conservation amongst the homologues. The scores range between 0 and 1; the higher the conservation level, the higher the score.
Transfection with chimeric Cx31EGFP plasmids
A full-length clone of the connexin 31 wild-type gene was fused inframe to the N terminus of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) by a two-step cloning procedure. First, the authentic connexin stop codon was changed from TGA to GGA by PCR using the primers with a restriction site sequence SacII, 5'-GCCCCGCGGATGGACTGGAAGACACTC-3' for forward and 5'-GCCCCGCGGCTCCGATGGGGGTCAGGTT-3' for reverse, and was cloned directly into a TA cloning vector, pGEM-T (Promega). Second, the SacII fragment of connexin 31 from pGEM-T/Cx31 was further cloned into a pEGFP-N3 vector (Clontech). In this orientation, the EGFP is at the C terminus of the connexin 31 protein, and the stop codon of connexin 31 was altered to allow read through and expression of the EGFP protein. All positive clones were identified by restriction enzyme analysis and automated DNA sequencing to determine that there were no introduced nucleotide errors in the cloned connexin 31. The L34P was manufactured by a site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) using the mutagenic forward primer 5'-GTCTTCCGGGTGCCGGTATACGTGGTGG-3' and reverse primer, 5'-CCACCACGTATACCGGCACCCGGAAGAC-3' (mutation site is bold and underlined). The supercoiled double-stranded DNA from pCx31WT/EGFP was used as a template. The nucleotide T was substituted for a C, resulting in a substitution of a leucine for a proline at residue 34. DNA sequence analysis indicated that this was the only nucleotide alteration.
HeLa Ohio cells (ECACC, CRUK) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin/streptomycin and L-glutamine. DT cells, which were immortalized from normal keratinocytes with SV40 T antigen (24), were cultured as described by Leigh and Watt (25). Both cell lines were transfected with the pCx31WT/EGFP or pCx31L34P/EGFP using Transfast (Promega). Briefly, the cells (7x105/60 mm dish) were transfected with 7 µg of plasmid DNA in 1 : 2 Transfast reagent. Twenty-four hours post transfection, the cells were fixed with 4% buffered paraformaldehyde, and the morphologies of Cx31EGFP fusion proteins were visualized by virtue of the inherent fluorescence of EGFP and recorded using a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss).
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank the members of the family for their cooperation and support. We also thank Professor Mary-Claire King, Professor Irene M. Leigh, and Dr Elon Pras for for discussion and support. This research was supported by the European Commission (QLG2-CT-1999-00988) (K.B.A.), the Adams Brain Center at Tel Aviv University (K.B.A., N.B.-T.) and the Cancer Research UK Fund (D.P.K).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Human Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. Tel: 972 3 640 7030; Fax: 972 3 640 9900; Email: karena{at}post.tau.ac.il
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Hohl, D. (2000) Towards a better classification of erythrokeratodermias. Br. J. Dermatol., 143, 11331137.[Web of Science][Medline]
2 Armstrong, D.K., Hutchinson, T.H., Walsh, M.Y. and McMillan, J.C. (1997) Autosomal recessive inheritance of erythrokeratoderma variabilis. Pediatr. Dermatol., 14, 355358.[Web of Science][Medline]
3 Richard, G., Lin, J.P., Smith, L., Whyte, Y.M., Itin, P., Wollina, U., Epstein, E., Hohl, D., Giroux, J.M., Charnas, L. et al. (1997) Linkage studies in erythrokeratodermias: fine mapping, genetic heterogeneity and analysis of candidate genes. J. Invest. Dermatol., 109, 666671.[Web of Science][Medline]
4 Macari, F., Landau, M., Cousin, P., Mevorah, B., Brenner, S., Panizzon, R., Schorderet, D.F., Hohl, D. and Huber, M. (2000) Mutation in the gene for connexin 30.3 in a family with erythrokeratodermia variabilis. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 67, 12961301.[Web of Science][Medline]
5 Richard, G., Smith, L.E., Bailey, R.A., Itin, P., Hohl, D., Epstein, E.H., DiGiovanna, J.J., Compton, J.G. and Bale, S.J. (1998) Mutations in the human connexin gene GJB3 cause erythrokeratodermia variabilis. Nat. Genet., 20, 366369.[Web of Science][Medline]
6 Van Camp, G., Coucke, P., Speleman, F., Van Roy, N., Beyer, E.C., Oostra, B.A. and Willems, P.J. (1995) The gene for human gap junction protein connexin37 (GJA4) maps to chromosome 1p35.1, in the vicinity of D1S195. Genomics, 30, 402403.[Web of Science][Medline]
7 Wilgoss, A., Leigh, I.M., Barnes, M.R., Dopping-Hepenstal, P., Eady, R.A., Walter, J.M., Kennedy, C.T. and Kelsell, D.P. (1999) Identification of a novel mutation R42P in the gap junction protein beta-3 associated with autosomal dominant erythrokeratoderma variabilis. J. Invest. Dermatol., 113, 11191122.[Web of Science][Medline]
8 Ruiz-Maldonado, R., Tamayo, L., del Castillo, V., and Lozoya, I. (1982) Erythrokeratodermia progressiva symmetrica: report of 10 cases. Dermatologica, 164, 133141.[Web of Science][Medline]
9 Armon, A., Graur, D. and Ben-Tal, N. (2001) ConSurf: an algorithmic tool for the identification of functional regions in proteins by surface mapping of phylogenetic information. J. Mol. Biol., 307, 447463.[Web of Science][Medline]
10 Di, W.L., Rugg, E.L., Leigh, I.M. and Kelsell, D.P. (2001) Multiple epidermal connexins are expressed in different keratinocyte subpopulations including connexin 31. J. Invest. Dermatol., 117, 958964.[Web of Science][Medline]
11 Simon, A.M. and Goodenough, D.A. (1998) Diverse functions of vertebrate gap junctions. Trends Cell Biol., 8, 477483.[Web of Science][Medline]
12 Kelsell, D.P., Di, W.L. and Houseman, M.J. (2001) Connexin mutations in skin disease and hearing loss. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 68, 559568.[Web of Science][Medline]
13 Kelsell, D.P., Wilgoss, A.L., Richard, G., Stevens, H.P., Munro, C.S. and Leigh, I.M. (2000) Connexin mutations associated with palmoplantar keratoderma and profound deafness in a single family. Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 8, 141144.[Web of Science][Medline]
14
Maestrini, E., Korge, B.P., Ocana-Sierra, J., Calzolari, E., Cambiaghi, S., Scudder, P.M., Hovnanian, A., Monaco, A.P. and Munro, C.S. (1999) A missense mutation in connexin26, D66H, causes mutilating keratoderma with sensorineural deafness (Vohwinkel's syndrome) in three unrelated families. Hum. Mol. Genet., 8, 12371243.
15 Lamartine, J., Munhoz Essenfelder, G., Kibar, Z., Lanneluc, I., Callouet, E., Laoudj, D., Lemaitre, G., Hand, C., Hayflick, S.J., Zonana, J. et al. (2000) Mutations in GJB6 cause hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Nat. Genet., 26, 142144.[Web of Science][Medline]
16 Kelsell, D.P., Dunlop, J., Stevens, H.P., Lench, N.J., Liang, J.N., Parry, G., Mueller, R.F. and Leigh, I.M. (1997) Connexin 26 mutations in hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural deafness. Nature, 387, 8083.[Medline]
17 Grifa, A., Wagner, C.A., D'Ambrosio, L., Melchionda, S., Bernardi, F., Lopez-Bigas, N., Rabionet, R., Arbones, M., Monica, M.D., Estivill, X. et al. (1999) Mutations in GJB6 cause nonsyndromic autosomal dominant deafness at DFNA3 locus. Nat. Genet., 23, 1618.[Web of Science][Medline]
18
Liu, X.Z., Xia, X.J., Xu, L.R., Pandya, A., Liang, C.Y., Blanton, S.H., Brown, S.D., Steel, K.P. and Nance, W.E. (2000) Mutations in connexin31 underlie recessive as well as dominant non-syndromic hearing loss. Hum. Mol. Genet., 9, 6367.
19 Steel, K.P. (1998) One connexin, two diseases. Nat. Genet., 20, 319320.[Web of Science][Medline]
20 Reiersen, H. and Rees, A.R. (2001) The hunchback and its neighbours: proline as an environmental modulator. Trends Biochem. Sci., 26, 679684.[Web of Science][Medline]
21 Cucci, R.A., Prasad, S., Kelley, P.M., Green, G.E., Storm, K., Willcox, S., Cohn, E.S., Van Camp, G. and Smith, R.J. (2000) The M34T allele variant of connexin 26. Genet. Test., 4, 335344.[Web of Science][Medline]
22
Houseman, M.J., Ellis, L.A., Pagnamenta, A., Di, W.L., Rickard, S., Osborn, A.H., Dahl, H.H., Taylor, G.R., Bitner-Glindzicz, M., Reardon, W., Mueller, R.F. et al. (2001) Genetic analysis of the connexin-26 M34T variant: identification of genotype M34T/M34T segregating with mild-moderate non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss. J. Med. Genet., 38, 2025.
23
Martin, P.E., Coleman, S.L., Casalotti, S.O., Forge, A. and Evans, W.H. (1999) Properties of connexin26 gap junctional proteins derived from mutations associated with non-syndromal heriditary deafness. Hum. Mol. Genet., 8, 23692376.
24 Morley, S.M., Dundas, S.R., James, J.L., Gupta, T., Brown, R.A., Sexton, C.J., Navsaria, H.A., Leigh, I.M. and Lane, E.B. (1995) Temperature sensitivity of the keratin cytoskeleton and delayed spreading of keratinocyte lines derived from EBS patients. J. Cell Sci., 108, 34633471.[Abstract]
25 Leigh, I.M. and Watt, F.M. (1994) Keratinocyte Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26
Bairoch, A. and Apweiler, R. (2000) The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 4548.
27 Rost, B. (1996) PHD: predicting one-dimensional protein structure by profile-based neural networks. Methods Enzymol., 266, 525539.[Web of Science][Medline]
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Schnichels, P. Worsdorfer, R. Dobrowolski, C. Markopoulos, M. Kretz, G. Schwarz, E. Winterhager, and K. Willecke The Connexin31 F137L mutant mouse as a model for the human skin disease Erythrokeratodermia variabilis (EKV) Hum. Mol. Genet., May 15, 2007; 16(10): 1216 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Unsworth, T. Aasen, S. McElwaine, and D. P. Kelsell Tissue-specific effects of wild-type and mutant connexin 31: a role in neurite outgrowth Hum. Mol. Genet., January 15, 2007; 16(2): 165 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Fleishman, A. D. Sabag, E. Ophir, K. B. Avraham, and N. Ben-Tal The Structural Context of Disease-causing Mutations in Gap Junctions J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2006; 281(39): 28958 - 28963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Abrams, M. M. Freidin, V. K. Verselis, T. A. Bargiello, D. P. Kelsell, G. Richard, M. V. L. Bennett, and F. F. Bukauskas Properties of human connexin 31, which is implicated in hereditary dermatological disease and deafness PNAS, March 28, 2006; 103(13): 5213 - 5218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Minogue, X. Liu, L. Ebihara, E. C. Beyer, and V. M. Berthoud An Aberrant Sequence in a Connexin46 Mutant Underlies Congenital Cataracts J. Biol. Chem., December 9, 2005; 280(49): 40788 - 40795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Essenfelder, R. Bruzzone, J. Lamartine, A. Charollais, C. Blanchet-Bardon, M. T. Barbe, P. Meda, and G. Waksman Connexin30 mutations responsible for hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia cause abnormal hemichannel activity Hum. Mol. Genet., August 15, 2004; 13(16): 1703 - 1714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E.M. Martin and W.H. Evans Incorporation of connexins into plasma membranes and gap junctions Cardiovasc Res, May 1, 2004; 62(2): 378 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Plantard, M. Huber, F. Macari, P. Meda, and D. Hohl Molecular interaction of connexin 30.3 and connexin 31 suggests a dominant-negative mechanism associated with erythrokeratodermia variabilis Hum. Mol. Genet., December 15, 2003; 12(24): 3287 - 3294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kretz, C. Euwens, S. Hombach, D. Eckardt, B. Teubner, O. Traub, K. Willecke, and T. Ott Altered connexin expression and wound healing in the epidermis of connexin-deficient mice J. Cell Sci., August 15, 2003; 116(16): 3443 - 3452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. K. Marziano, S. O. Casalotti, A. E. Portelli, D. L. Becker, and A. Forge Mutations in the gene for connexin 26 (GJB2) that cause hearing loss have a dominant negative effect on connexin 30 Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2003; 12(8): 805 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||








