Human Molecular Genetics, 2002, Vol. 11, No. 20 2385-2393
© 2002 Oxford University Press
Molecular genetics of too much bone
Department of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
Received July 1, 2002; Accepted July 24, 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bone remodelling is an important process both throughout growth and in adult life. The homeostasis of bone tissue is maintained by the balanced processes of bone resorption and formation. Imbalance can give rise to a broad spectrum of skeletal pathologies, of which osteoporosis, characterized by a decrease in bone density leading to increased fracture risk, is the best known because of its high prevalence and consequently high socio-economic impact. At the opposite end of the spectrum, several genetic conditions displaying too much bone are situated. Mainly because of their monogenic naturein contrast to the multifactorial character of osteoporosisthe underlying molecular genetic causes for several of these conditions have been revealed recently. In this review, the most important gene identifications of the last years and their impact on the understanding of bone biology are discussed.
Bone tissue, the major constituent of the human skeleton, has many metabolic and mechanical functions. Abnormalities affecting this tissue can therefore lead to an extended number of pathological conditions. Many osteochondrodysplasias involve a disturbed skeletal morphogenesis due to abnormalities in bone patterning and growth during development. In an important group of conditions, however, only or mainly the homeostasis of bone tissue throughout life is affected. This homeostasis is maintained by two balanced processes: bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In early life, the latter predominates over the former until the so-called peak bone density is reached between the ages of 25 and 35 years. Later in life, the rate of bone formation cannot fully compensate for the bone lost by resorption, resulting in a net loss of bone tissue.
Osteoporosis, by far the most common disorder affecting the skeleton, is defined by an abnormal decrease in bone mass leading to an increased fracture risk. The ethiology of this condition is multifactorial, with both genetic and environmental factors being involved. Therefore, the mainly monogenic conditions located at the other end of the spectrum are of great interest, since they nicely prove that an abnormality in one gene can dramatically influence bone balance, as illustrated in Figure 1. Three different pathogenic mechanisms can give rise to conditions with an increased bone density: decreased bone resorption, increased bone formation, or a disturbed balance between bone resorption and formation. The recent progress of the Human Genome Project, combined with the further development of molecular genetic technologies, has allowed the identification of the genes and associated pathogenic mechanisms underlying several of these conditions.
|
| DECREASED BONE RESORPTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cell responsible for the resorption of bone tissue is the osteoclast. This cell type is of hematopoietic origin and differentiates in a late phase from the monocyte/macrophage cell lineage to form a giant, multinucleated cell that can attach to mineralized bone tissue. Specific receptors are implicated in this attachment at the clear or sealing zone. The process of resorption itself takes place at the ruffled border with its highly infolded plasma membranes. The resorption of mineralized bone tissue is a two-step procedure involving the dissolution of bone mineral and the enzymatic degradation of the organic bone matrix. For both processes, an acidic environment is needed, which is created in a sealed compartment between the osteoclast and the bone surface. Recent discoveries have illustrated that impairing any of these two processes results in different forms of osteopetrosis or in pycnodysostosis, respectively.
Osteopetrosis: defects in the acidification process of the extracellular compartment
The osteopetroses are a heterogeneous group of conditions characterized by an increased bone density due to impaired bone resorption. In analogy with the existence of a large number of spontaneous osteopetrotic animal models, different human forms of osteopetrosis have been described. Currently, the underlying molecular genetic defects have been identified for three of these. Interestingly, all three genes play a role in the acidification process of the extracellular compartment located between the osteoclast and the bone tissue (Fig. 2).
|
An autosomal recessive form of osteopetrosis associated with renal tubular acidosis and cerebral calcifications (MIM 259730) is caused by mutations in the carbonic anhydrase II (CA II) gene (1). This enzyme catalyzes the intracellular conversion of CO2 and H2O to HCO3- and protons (H+). This cytoplasmic mechanism provides a source of protons, which are transferred over the plasma membrane by a proton pump to acidify the extracellular compartment. Recently, positional cloning efforts for the severe, autosomal recessive form of osteopetrosis (MIM 259700) revealed that loss-of-function mutations in the ATP6i gene encoding a transmembrane 116 kDa subunit of the vacuolar (V) H+-ATPase proton pump are present in a subset of patients with this condition (2,3). In a few patients with the same condition, loss-of-function mutations have been found in the gene encoding the chloride channel ClCN7 (4,5). The function of this osteoclastic Cl- channel is to provide an electrical shunt for the proton pump antagonizing the generation of a membrane potential built up by the transport of protons. While complete absence of Cl- transport results in the severe form of osteopetrosis, the milder, autosomal dominant form of osteopetrosis (AlbersSchönberg disease; MIM 166600) has recently been associated with mutations in the ClCN7 gene as well (4). As chloride channels are known to function as dimers, the missense mutations identified in this type of osteopetrosis exert a dominant-negative effect (Table 1).
|
In conclusion, all three genes involved in a human form of osteopetrosis take part in the mechanism of acidification. Absence of CA II results in a relatively mild form of osteopetrosis, while a more severe form is found in the case where either a functional proton pump or chloride channel is absent from the osteoclast. In the case of the ClCN7 gene, a dominant-negative effect caused by missense mutations leads to the mild, autosomal dominant form of osteopetrosis.
While some animal models of osteopetrosis are caused by a differentiation defect of osteoclasts (68), this is, at present, not the case for any human form. However, it cannot be excluded that a currently unidentified human osteopetrosis gene plays a role in this mechanism.
Pycnodysostosis: defect in the degradation of organic bone matrix
After the demineralization process, the second step in bone resorption implies the enzymatic degradation of organic bone matrix. Cathepsin K (CTSK) is one of the most prominent acid lysosomal enzymes in osteoclasts, and is secreted into the subosteoclastic space (Fig. 2) after autocatalytic activation intracellularly as the osteoclast approaches bone (9). It cleaves collagen type I, osteopontin and osteonectin at low pH (1013). By positional cloning, the CTSK gene was identified as the gene causing pycnodysostosis (14) (MIM 265800), an autosomal recessive bone dysplasia characterized mainly by a short stature and increased bone density but with a predisposition to fractures (15,16). The mutations found affect normal transcription and/or activation of this protein, leading to ablation of collagenase activity.
| INCREASED BONE FORMATION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Osteoblasts, cells of mesenchymal origin, are the bone-forming cells. They produce an organic matrix, mainly composed of type I collagen, which is subsequently mineralized. Both the differentiation of osteoblasts and the bone formation rate by differentiated osteoblasts are under the control of local and endocrine factors. Recent efforts to clone the genes underlying conditions with phenotypic evidence of increased bone formation have led to the identification of three genes.
Sclerosteosis and Van Buchem's disease: increased BMP signaling
Sclerosteosis (MIM 269500) and Van Buchem's disease (MIM 239100) are clinically related conditions characterized by an impressive increase in the amount of bone tissue (Fig. 1). The normal structure of the bone results in increased bone strength. Genetic linkage studies suggested that both conditions are allelic, caused by mutations in the same gene (17,18). Recently, loss-of-function mutations in a previously unknown gene (SOST ) were found in sclerosteosis patients (19,20). No mutations were found in patients with Van Buchem's disease, the milder of the two conditions, but a deletion of about 52 kb is located 30 kb downstream of the SOST gene (21). Most likely, the expression of SOST is suppressed by the presence of this deletion. Functional evidence for the SOST gene product, Sclerostin, was initially based on homology (19,20) with a recently identified gene family including DAN, Gremlin and Cerberus (22). The proteins that they encode have antagonistic effects on the activity of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) by binding extracellularly to these BMPs, thus inhibiting the binding of the BMPs to their receptor complex and the induction of the BMP signaling pathway (23). Preliminary experimental data indicate that Sclerostin indeed binds with high affinity to a subset of BMPs and by doing so can block BMP-induced bone formation in vitro (24) (Fig. 3).
|
High-bone-mass phenotype: increased Wnt signaling
In 1997, Johnson et al. (25) were able to localize a gene with a major influence on bone density on chromosome 11q1213 by linkage analysis in a family with a high-bone-mass (HBM) phenotype (MIM 601884), but without any clinical implications. Recently, Gong et al. (26) identified the gene underlying the osteoporosispseudoglioma syndrome (OPS)with a bone phenotype opposite to the HBM phenotypefrom the same chromosomal region. Loss-of-function mutations in this gene, encoding the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5), result in the decreased bone formation rate of OPS. Not unexpectedly, the same gene turned out to be involved in the HBM phenotype, since a missense mutation (G171V) was found in these patients (27). LRP5 is a co-receptor for Wnt proteins, which are secreted factors with many important functions in early developmental processes (Fig. 3). Genetic studies in OPS and HBM as well as biological evidence from the Lrp5 knockout mouse indicate that Lrp5-induced Wnt signaling plays an important role in osteoblastic bone formation postnatally (28), and consequently significantly influences the peak bone density obtained in adult life (26). Experimental data indicate that the increased bone formation rate in HBM individuals is due to the inability of the mutated LRP5 to bind its antagonist Dickkopf (29). Dickkopf plays a regulatory role in this pathway, since binding to LRP5 inhibits the interaction of LRP5 with the Wntreceptor complex and the induction of the Wnt signaling pathway (30).
Craniometaphyseal dysplasia: abnormal osteoblastic shuttling of inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi)
The ANK gene, the human ortholog of the mouse progressive ankylosis gene, codes for a multipass transmembrane protein that shuttles inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi) across the cell membrane (31) (Fig. 3). PPi is a major inhibitor of calcification, bone mineralization and bone resorption (32). In 2001, two groups identified missense mutations in ANK (33,34) in patients with the autosomal dominant form of craniometaphyseal dysplasia (CMD; MIM 123000). This condition is characterized by hyperostosis and sclerosis of the skull associated with metaphyseal flaring of the long bones (35). How the missense mutations cause an increased bone formation rate in these patients is still controversial. A dominant-negative effect could impair the functioning of ANK, thus generating a decreased extracellular level of PPi and an increased bone mineralization (34). Nürnberg et al. (33), on the other hand, postulated a gain-of-function effect of the mutations, making the channel leaky and resulting in an increase in extracellular PPi levels. Under this assumption, it cannot be excluded that the CMD phenotype is partially explained by the antiresorptive capacity of PPi. Further in vivo and in vitro studies of the mutated ANK are needed to explain the increased bone density in this condition.
| DISTURBED BALANCE BETWEEN BONE FORMATION AND RESORPTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bone remodelling and the balance between bone formation and resorption are regulated by both systemic hormones and local factors. An extended list of factors has been suggested to have an influence on bone formation, bone resorption or both. Furthermore, the existence of a coupling mechanism between osteoblasts and osteoclasts that plays a major role in keeping the balance between both processes has long been postulated. The unravelling of the OPG/RANK/RANKL system (see below) provided the long-sought answer to the question of how crosstalk between preosteoblastic/stromal cells and osteoclast precursors is established. Several cytokines and hormones, including IL-1, TNF-
, TGF-ß, PTH and vitaminD3, can modulate this system.
Familial expansile osteopetrosis, expansile skeletal hyperphosphatasia, Paget's disease of bone and juvenile Paget's disease: increased NF
B signaling
The OPG/RANK/RANKL molecules play a central role in the regulation of bone turnover (Fig. 3). RANKL, the receptor activator of nuclear factor
B (RANK) ligand, is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) ligand family expressed on the surface of the preosteoblastic/stromal cell and binds to RANK on the osteoclast precursor (36,37). This activates the NF
B signaling pathway, inducing the differentiation, maturation and activation of osteoclast precursors (38,39). Osteoprotegerin (OPG), a soluble member of the TNF receptor family secreted by the preosteoblastic/stromal cell, can block the RANK/RANKL interaction by acting as a decoy receptor of RANKL (40,41). During osteoblast differentiation, RANKL is down-regulated and OPG is upregulated, so that osteoclast development is no longer stimulated (42).
Recently, several related clinical conditions have been associated with mutations in the OPG/RANK/RANKL pathway. The clinical similarities are explained by the shared pathogenic mechanism of increased NF
B signaling causing increased bone resorption, consequently compensated by increased bone formation.
Familial expansile osteolysis (FEO; MIM 174810) is a rare autosomal dominant condition characterized by focal skeletal lesions (43). After the early stage of increased resorption, both osteoclast and osteoblast activity are increased leading to expansion of the bone, deformities and an increased fracture rate. Hughes et al. (44) characterized a disease-causing tandem duplication in the signal peptide of the TNFRSF11A gene encoding RANK. In vitro assays showed that as a result of defective signal peptide cleavage, RANK accumulates intracellularly, leading to receptor self-association and thus increased constitutive RANK signaling. Recently, Whyte and Hughes (45) were able to prove that a similar duplication underlies expansile skeletal hyperphosphatasia, which is distinguishable from FEO despite strong similarities. A duplication in the RANK signal peptide was also found in a Japanese family diagnosed with Paget's disease of bone (PDB; MIM 602080) (44). This condition is a rather common disease characterized by focal areas of increased bone resorption combined with increased but disorganized bone formation. With the exception of this somewhat atypical family, no cases where shown to be caused by mutations in the RANK gene (46). Recently however, Laurin et al. (47) described the occurrence of a missense mutation (P392L) in the gene coding for p62 (sequestosome 1), causing 16% of sporadic and 46% of familial cases of PDB. Several divergent functions have been assigned to the p62 protein; one of these is its role as a downstream effector of the RANK/RANKL regulatory system, leading to NF
B activation (48). The gain-of-function mutation thus leads to increased bone resorption compensated by increased formation.
The inhibiting effect of OPG on the RANK/RANKL system suggests that loss-of-function mutations in the TNFRSF11B gene encoding OPG could also resort in an activating effect on NF
B signaling. In line with this assumption, Cundy et al. (49) found a deletion of one amino acid in OPG in a family with Juvenile Paget's disease (MIM 239000). This condition was initially considered to be an allelic variant of PDB (50), but currently it is well established that it is a separate disorder with an earlier onset and worse outcome. By in vitro studies, they showed that the mutant OPG could no longer suppress bone resorption.
In conclusion, activating mutations in RANK and p62 and inactivating mutations in OPG were shown to increase NF
B signaling, giving rise to different but pathologically related conditions.
CamuratiEngelmann disease: increased TGF-ß1 signaling
Transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1 is abundant in skeletal tissue, where it is stored in the bone matrix (51). Although data are sometimes conflicting, depending on the culture system and conditions used, it is generally assumed that TGF-ß1 is a coupling factor between bone resorption and formation, acting through the following sequence of events. Resorbing osteoclasts can activate TGF-ß1 in the low-pH environment of their ruffled border (52) (Fig. 3). Active TGF-ß1 then decreases RANKL and increases OPG expression in osteoblasts (53,54). Consequently, fewer RANKL/RANK interactions occur, leading to an inhibition of osteoclast differentiation and activation. On the other hand, TGF-ß1 stimulates osteoblast chemotaxis, proliferation and differentiation, thus promoting new bone formation (55,56).
In 2000, mutations in TGFB1 were found to cause CamuratiEngelmann disease (MIM 131300) (57,58). This is a rare, autosomal dominant craniotubular hyperostosis with bilateral symmetrical affection of the diaphyses of the long bones on both the periosteal and endosteal sides. The majority of the mutations are located near the disulfide bridges between the latency-associated peptides (LAPs). It is postulated that the mutations weaken these bonds, thereby promoting premature activation of TGF-ß1, leading to an imbalance between bone resorption and formation (59).
| CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genetic factors play an important role in determining bone mineral density (BMD) by influencing both peak bone mass and age-related bone loss. Low BMD is a major risk factor for the development of osteoporosis. Considering its high prevalence, it is not surprising that so much effort has been expended in the development of treatments. Because of the multifactorial character of osteoporosis, the identification of the genes responsible has been shown to be a tedious task. Several approaches are currently being used, including linkage studies in humans and animals and candidate gene studies. Genome-wide searches have identified loci on different chromosomal regions, but so far, the underlying genetic defects remain to be elucidated. Only in some rare cases where osteoporosis is inherited as a Mendelian trait, such as OPS and osteogenesis imperfecta, could the responsible gene be identified. Candidate gene studies have mainly focused on regulators of bone metabolism, such as cytokines and growth factors, bone matrix proteins and calciotropic hormones. Associations have been found with polymorphisms in COL1A1(60), CTR(61,62), VDR(63), TGFB1(64,65), ESR(66,67), PTH(68), IL6(69,70) and other genes, but in most cases confirmation of results in other populations has been problematic.
In this review, we illustrate that the approach of identifying genes relevant to bone metabolism and homeostasis based on the study of monogenic skeletal dysplasias has been successful in recent years, leading to the identification of previously unknown genes and the illustration of the involvement of already-known genes and pathways in bone metabolism (Table 1). Association studies using natural variants of these genes are on their way, and will give an indication of the influence of these proteins on bone density in the general population.
These new discoveries can pave the way to the development of novel therapeutic tools for osteoporosis. Currently, the most frequently used drugs are the antiresorptive agents, comprising estrogens, estrogen-receptor modulators, bisphosphonates, calcitonin, calcitriol, calcium and vitamin D. With the recent characterization of several proteins that play a role in the resorption process, more directed research can be performed to influence the activity of these proteins. For example, major efforts are ongoing to develop potent and selective inhibitors of CTSK (7173). Despite the accomplished decrease in fracture risk, antiresorptives are unable to reverse the microarchitectural damage in advanced disease. In the future, it is therefore not inconceivable that a combination of an antiresorptive and a bone-forming agent will be used. During the last few years, much attention is drawn to anabolic agents, such as parathyroid hormone (PTH), fluoride, growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and statins, which have the great advantage of stimulating bone formation dramatically. With the identification of SOST and ANK and the assignation of a major role to LRP5 and the Wnt signaling pathway in bone accrual, new potential drug targets are available. Finally, the members of the NF
B signaling pathway, including OPG, RANK, RANKL and p62, are interesting targets as well, since they interact in the crosstalk between osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Preliminary experiments with recombinant OPG have shown that this protein might indeed be used as a therapeutic agent, decreasing the bone turnover rate (74).
In conclusion, the newly identified players in bone metabolism are without doubt of major relevance to further understanding of and potential influences on bone homeostasis.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Tim Cundy for sharing unpublished data. Research in the authors' laboratory is supported by grants from the Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G.0404.00) to W.V.H. and an Interuniversity Attraction Pole grant to W.V.H. K.J. holds a predoctoral research position with the Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium. Tel: +32 38202585; Fax: +32 38202566; Email: vhul{at}uia.ua.ac.be
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Sly, W.S., Hewett, E., Whyte, M.P., Yu, Y.S. and Tashian, R.E. (1983) Carbonic anhydrase II deficiency identified as the primary defect in the autosomal recessive syndrome of osteopetrosis with renal tubular acidosis and cerebral calcification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 80, 27522756.
2 Frattini, A., Orchard, P.J., Sobacchi, C., Giliani, S., Abinun, M., Mattsson, J.P., Keeling, D.J., Andersson, A.K., Wallbrandt, P., Zecca, L. et al. (2000) Defects in TCIRG1 subunit of the vacuolar proton pump are responsible for a subset of human autosomal recessive osteopetrosis. Nat. Genet., 25, 343346.[Web of Science][Medline]
3
Kornak, U., Schulz, A., Friedrich, W., Uhlhaas, S., Kremens, B., Voit, T., Hasan, C., Bode, U., Jentsch, T.J. and Kubisch, C. (2000) Mutations in the a3 subunit of the vacuolar H+-ATPase cause infantile malignant osteopetrosis. Hum. Mol. Genet., 9, 20592063.
4
Cleiren, E., Benichou, O., Van Hul, E., Gram, J., Bollerslev, J., Singer, F.R., Beaverson, K., Aledo, A., Whyte, M.P., Yoneyama, T., de Vernejoul, M.C. and Van Hul, W. (2001) AlbersSchönberg disease (autosomal dominant osteopetrosis, type II) results from mutations in the ClCN7 chloride channel gene. Hum. Mol. Genet., 10, 28612867.
5 Kornak, U., Kasper, D., Bosl, M.R., Kaiser, E., Schweizer, M., Schulz, A., Friedrich, W., Delling, G. and Jentsch, T.J. (2001) Loss of the ClC-7 chloride channel leads to osteopetrosis in mice and man. Cell, 104, 205215.[Web of Science][Medline]
6 Yoshida, H., Hayashi, S., Kunisada, T., Ogawa, M., Nishikawa, S., Okamura, H., Sudo, T., Shultz, L.D. and Nishikawa, S. (1990) The murine mutation osteopetrosis is in the coding region of the macrophage colony stimulating factor gene. Nature, 345, 442444.[Medline]
7 Wang, Z.Q., Ovitt, C., Grigoriadis, A.E., Mohle-Steinlein, U., Ruther, U. and Wagner, E.F. (1992) Bone and haematopoietic defects in mice lacking c-fos. Nature, 360, 741745.[Medline]
8 Tondravi, M.M., McKercher, S.R., Anderson, K., Erdmann, J.M., Quiroz, M., Maki, R. and Teitelbaum, S.L. (1997) Osteopetrosis in mice lacking haematopoietic transcription factor PU.1. Nature, 386, 8184.[Medline]
9 Dodds, R.A., James, I.E., Rieman, D., Ahern, R., Mei Hwang, S., Connor, J.R., Thompson, S.D., Veber, D.F., Drake, F.H., Holmes, S. et al. (2001) Human osteoclast cathepsin K is processed intracellularly prior to attachment and bone resorption. J. Bone Miner. Res., 3, 478486.
10 Brömme, D. and Okamoto, K. (1995) Human cathepsin O2, a novel cysteine protease highly expressed in osteoclastomas and ovary molecular cloning, sequencing and tissue distribution. Biol. Chem. Hoppe Seyler, 376, 379384.[Web of Science][Medline]
11 Inaoka, T., Bilbe, G., Ishibashi, O., Tezuka, K., Kumegawa, M. and Kokubo, T. (1995) Molecular cloning of human cDNA for cathepsin K: novel cysteine proteinase predominantly expressed in bone. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 206, 8996.[Web of Science][Medline]
12 Shi, G.P., Chapman, H.A., Bhairi, S.M., DeLeeuw, C., Reddy, V.Y. and Weiss, S.J. (1995) Molecular cloning of human cathepsin O, a novel endoproteinase and homologue of rabbit OC2. FEBS Lett., 357, 129134.[Web of Science][Medline]
13 Li, Y.P., Alexander, M., Wucherpfennig, A.L., Yelick, P., Chen, W. and Stashenko, P. (1995) Cloning and complete coding sequence of a novel human cathepsin expressed in giant cells of osteoclastomas. J. Bone Miner. Res., 10, 11971202.[Web of Science][Medline]
14 Gelb, B.D., Shi, G.P., Chapman, H.A. and Desnick, R.J. (1996) Pycnodysostosis, a lysosomal disease caused by cathepsin K deficiency. Science, 273, 12361238.[Abstract]
15 Maroteaux, P. and Lamy, M. (1962) La pyknodysostose. Presse Med., 70, 9991002.[Medline]
16 Andrén, L., Dymling, J., Hogeman, K. and Weinberg, B. (1962) Osteopetrosis acroosteolytica. Acta Chir. Scand., 124, 496507.[Medline]
17 Van Hul, W., Balemans, W., Van Hul, E., Dikkers, F.G., Obee, H., Stokroos, R.J., Hildering, P., Vanhoenacker, F., Van Camp, G. and Willems, P.J. (1998) Van Buchem disease (hyperostosis corticalis generalisata) maps to chromosome 17q12q21. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 62, 391399.[Web of Science][Medline]
18 Balemans, W., Van Den Ende, J., Paes-Alves, A.F., Dikkers, F.G., Willems, P.J., Vanhoenacker, F., de Almeida-Melo, M., Freire Alves, C., Stratakis, C.A., Hill, S.C. and Van Hul, W. (1999) Localization of the gene for sclerosteosis to the van Buchem disease-gene region on chromosome 17q12q21. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 64, 16611669.[Web of Science][Medline]
19
Balemans, W., Ebeling, M., Patel, N., Van Hul, E., Olson, P., Dioszegi, M., Lacza, C., Wuyts, W., Van Den Ende, J., Willems, P. et al. (2001) Increased bone density in sclerosteosis is due to the deficiency of a novel secreted protein (SOST). Hum. Mol. Genet., 10, 537543.
20 Brunkow, M.E., Gardner, J.C., Van Ness, J., Paeper, B.W., Kovacevich, B.R., Proll, S., Skonier, J.E., Zhao, L., Sabo, P.J., Fu, Y. et al. (2001) Bone dysplasia sclerosteosis results from loss of the SOST gene product, a novel cystine knot-containing protein. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 68, 577589.[Web of Science][Medline]
21
Balemans, W., Patel, N., Ebeling, M., Van Hul, E., Wuyts, W., Lacza, C., Dioszegi, M., Dikkers, F.G., Hildering, P., Willems, P.J. et al. (2002) Identification of a 52 kb deletion downstream of the SOST gene in patients with van Buchem disease. J. Med. Genet., 39, 9197.
22 Pearce, J.J., Penny, G. and Rossant, J. (1999) A mouse cerberus/Dan-related gene family. Dev. Biol., 209, 98110.[Web of Science][Medline]
23 Balemans, W. and Van Hul, W. (2002) Extracellular regulation of BMP signaling in vertebrates: a cocktail of modulators. Genes Dev., in press.
24 Van Bezooijen, R.L., Karperien, M., Visser, A., Hamersma, H., Winkler, D., Hayes, T., Skonier, J., Staehling-Hampton, K., Latham, J.A., Papapoulos, S.E. et al. (2001) BMP-antagonist sclerostin is expressed in mineralized bone and blocks BMP-induced bone formation in vitro. J. Bone Miner. Res., 16, S163.
25 Johnson, M.L., Gong, G., Kimberling, W., Recker, S.M., Kimmel, D.B. and Recker, R.B. (1997) Linkage of a gene causing high bone mass to human chromosome 11 (11q1213). Am. J. Hum. Genet., 60, 13261332.[Web of Science][Medline]
26 Gong, Y., Slee, R.B., Fukai, N., Rawadi, G., Roman, R., Reginato, A.M., Wang, H., Cundy, T., Glorieux, F.H., Lev, D. et al. (2001) LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell, 107, 513523.[Web of Science][Medline]
27 Little, R.D., Carulli, J.P., Del, M., Dupuis, J., Osborne, M., Folz, C., Manning, S.P., Swain, P.M., Zhao, S.C., Eustace, B. et al. (2002) A mutation in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 gene results in the autosomal dominant high-bone-mass trait. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 70, 1119.[Web of Science][Medline]
28
Kato, M., Patel, M.S., Levasseur, R., Lobov, I., Chang, B.H., Glass, D.A., Hartmann, C., Li, L., Hwang, T.H., Brayton, C.F. et al. (2002) Cbfa1-independent decrease in osteoblast proliferation, osteopenia, and persistent embryonic eye vascularization in mice deficient in Lrp5, a Wnt coreceptor. J. Cell. Biol., 157, 303314.
29
Boyden, L.M., Mao, J., Belsky, J., Mitzner, L., Farhi, A., Mitnick, M.A., Wu, D., Insogna, K. and Lifton, R.P. (2002) High bone density due to a mutation in LDL-receptor-related protein 5. N. Engl. J. Med., 346, 15131521.
30 Wu, W., Glinka, A., Delius, H. and Niehrs, C. (2000) Mutual antagonism between dickkopf1 and dickkopf2 regulates Wnt/ß-catenin signalling. Curr. Biol., 10, 16111614.[Web of Science][Medline]
31
Ho, A.M., Johnson, M.D. and Kingsley, D.M. (2000) Role of the mouse ank gene in control of tissue calcification and arthritis. Science, 289, 265270.
32 Fleisch, H. (1981) Diphosphonates: history and mechanisms of action. Metab. Bone. Dis. Relat. Res., 3, 279287.[Web of Science][Medline]
33 Nürnberg, P., Thiele, H., Chandler, D., Hohne, W., Cunningham, M.L., Ritter, H., Leschik, G., Uhlmann, K., Mischung, C., Harrop, K. et al. (2001) Heterozygous mutations in ANKH, the human ortholog of the mouse progressive ankylosis gene, result in craniometaphyseal dysplasia. Nat. Genet., 28, 3741.[Web of Science][Medline]
34 Reichenberger, E., Tiziani, V., Watanabe, S., Park, L., Ueki, Y., Santanna, C., Baur, S.T., Shiang, R., Grange, D.K., Beighton, P. et al. (2001) Autosomal dominant craniometaphyseal dysplasia is caused by mutations in the transmembrane protein ANK. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 68, 13211326.[Web of Science][Medline]
35 Jackson, W.P.U., Albright, F., Drewry, G., Hanelin, J. and Rubin, M.I. (1954) Metaphyseal dysplasia, epiphyseal dysplasia and related conditions. I. Familial metaphyseal dysplasia and craniometaphyseal dysplasia: their relation to leontiasis ossea and osteopetrosis: disorders of bone remodeling. Arch. Intern. Med., 94, 871885.[Medline]
36 Anderson, D.M., Maraskovsky, E., Billingsley, W.L., Dougall, W.C., Tometsko, M.E., Roux, E.R., Teepe, M.C., DuBose, R.F., Cosman, D. and Galibert, L. (1997) A homologue of the TNF receptor and its ligand enhance T-cell growth and dendritic-cell function. Nature, 390, 175179.[Medline]
37
Wong, B.R., Rho, J., Arron, J., Robinson, E., Orlinick, J., Chao, M., Kalachikov, S., Cayani, E., Bartlett, F.S. 3rd, Frankel, W.N. et al. (1997) TRANCE is a novel ligand of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family that activates c-Jun N-terminal kinase in T cells. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 2519025194.
38
Jimi, E., Akiyama, S., Tsurukai, T., Okahashi, N., Kobayashi, K., Udagawa, N., Nishihara, T., Takahashi, N. and Suda, T. (1999) Osteoclast differentiation factor acts as a multifunctional regulator in murine osteoclast differentiation and function. J. Immunol., 163, 434442.
39
Wei, S., Teitelbaum, S.L., Wang, M.W. and Ross, F.P. (2001) Receptor activator of nuclear factor-
B ligand activates nuclear factor-
B in osteoclast precursors. Endocrinology, 142, 12901295.
40 Simonet, W.S., Lacey, D.L., Dunstan, C.R., Kelley, M., Chang, M.S., Luthy, R., Nguyen, H.Q., Wooden, S., Bennett, L., Boone, T. et al. (1997) Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell, 89, 309319.[Web of Science][Medline]
41
Yasuda, H., Shima, N., Nakagawa, N., Mochizuki, S.I., Yano, K., Fujise, N., Sato, Y., Goto, M., Yamaguchi, K., Kuriyama, M. et al. (1998) Identity of osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor (OCIF) and osteoprotegerin (OPG): a mechanism by which OPG/OCIF inhibits osteoclastogenesis in vitro. Endocrinology, 139, 13291337.
42
Gori, F., Hofbauer, L.C., Dunstan, C.R., Spelsberg, T.C., Khosla, S. and Riggs, B.L. (2000) The expression of osteoprotegerin and RANK ligand and the support of osteoclast formation by stromal-osteoblast lineage cells is developmentally regulated. Endocrinology, 141, 47684776.
43 Osterberg, P.H., Wallace, R.G., Adams, D.A., Crone, R.S., Dickson, G.R., Kanis, J.A., Mollan, R.A., Nevin, N.C., Sloan, J. and Toner, P.G. (1988) Familial expansile osteolysis. A new dysplasia. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 70, 255260.[Medline]
44 Hughes, A.E., Ralston, S.H., Marken, J., Bell, C., MacPherson, H., Wallace, R.G., Van Hul, W., Whyte, M.P., Nakatsuka, K., Hovy, L. et al. (2000) Mutations in TNFRSF11A, affecting the signal peptide of RANK, cause familial expansile osteolysis. Nat. Genet., 24, 4548.[Web of Science][Medline]
45 Whyte, M.P. and Hughes, A.E. (2002) Expansile skeletal hyperphosphatasia is caused by a 15-base pair tandem duplication in TNFRSF11A encoding RANK and is allelic to familial expansile osteolysis. J. Bone Miner. Res., 17, 2629.[Web of Science][Medline]
46 Wuyts, W., Van Wesenbeeck, L., Morales-Piga, A., Ralston, S.H., Hocking, L., Vanhoenacker, F., Westhovens, R., Verbruggen, L., Anderson, D., Hughes, A. et al. (2001) Evaluation of the role of RANK and OPG genes in Paget's disease of bone. Bone, 28; 104107.[Medline]
47 Laurin, N., Brown, J.P., Morissette, J. and Raymond, V. (2002) Recurrent mutation of the gene encoding sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1/p62) in Paget disease of bone. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 70, 15821588.[Web of Science][Medline]
48
Sanz, L., Sanchez, P., Lallena, M.J., Diaz, M. and Moscat, J. (1999) The interaction of p62 with RIP links the atypical PKCs to NF-
B activation. EMBO J., 18, 30443053.[Web of Science][Medline]
49
Cundy, T., Hedge, M., Naot, D., Chong, B., King, A., Wallace, R., Mulley, J., Love, D.R., Seidel, J., Fawkner, M. et al. (2002) A mutation in the gene TNFRSF11B encoding osteoprotegerin causes an idiopathic hyperphosphatasia phenotype. Hum. Mol. Genet., 11, 21192127.
50 Mirra, J.M., Picci, P. and Gold, R.H. (1989) Bone Tumors: Clinical, Radiologic and Pathological Correlations. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.
51 Centrella, M., McCarthy, T.L. and Canalis, E. (1988) Skeletal tissue and transforming growth factor ß. FASEB J., 2, 30663073.[Abstract]
52 Oreffo, R.O., Mundy, G.R., Seyedin, S.M. and Bonewald, L.F. (1989) Activation of the bone-derived latent TGFß complex by isolated osteoclasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 158, 817823.[Web of Science][Medline]
53
Takai, H., Kanematsu, M., Yano, K., Tsuda, E., Higashio, K., Ikeda, K., Watanabe, K. and Yamada, Y. (1998) Transforming growth factor-ß stimulates the production of osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor by bone marrow stromal cells. J. Biol. Chem., 273, 2709127096.
54 Quinn, J.M., Itoh, K., Udagawa, N., Hausler, K., Yasuda, H., Shima, N., Mizuno, A., Higashio, K., Takahashi, N., Suda, T. et al. (2001) Transforming growth factor ß affects osteoclast differentiation via direct and indirect actions. J. Bone Miner. Res., 16, 17871794.[Web of Science][Medline]
55 Beck, L.S., Ammann, A.J., Aufdemorte, T.B., Deguzman, L., Xu, Y., Lee, W.P., McFatridge, L.A. and Chen, T.L. (1991) In vivo induction of bone by recombinant human transforming growth factor ß1. J. Bone Miner. Res., 6, 961968.[Web of Science][Medline]
56
Noda, M. and Camilliere, J.J. (1989) In vivo stimulation of bone formation by transforming growth factor-ß. Endocrinology, 124, 29912994.
57 Janssens, K., Gershoni, B., Guañabens, N., Migone, N., Ralston, S., Bonduelle, M., Lissens, W., Van Hul, E., Vanhoenacker, F., Verbruggen, L. et al. (2000) Mutations in the gene encoding the latency-associated peptide of TGF-ß1 cause CamuratiEngelmann disease. Nat. Genet., 26, 273275.[Web of Science][Medline]
58 Kinoshita, A., Saito, T., Tomita, H., Makita, Y., Yoshida, K., Ghadami, M., Yamada, K., Kondo, S., Ikegawa, S., Nishimura, G. et al. (2000) Domain-specific mutations in TGFB1 result in CamuratiEngelmann disease. Nat. Genet., 26, 1920.[Web of Science][Medline]
59
Saito, T., Kinoshita, A., Yoshiura, K., Makita, Y., Wakui, K., Honke, K., Niikawa, N. and Taniguchi, N. (2001) Domain-specific mutations of a transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß1 latency-associated peptide cause CamuratiEngelmann disease because of the formation of a constitutively active form of TGF-ß1. J. Biol. Chem., 276, 1146911472.
60
Grant, S.F., Reid, D.M., Blake, G., Herd, R., Fogelman, I. and Ralston, S.H. (1996) Reduced bone density and osteoporosis associated with a polymorphic Sp1 binding site in the collagen type I
1 gene. Nat. Genet., 14, 203205.[Web of Science][Medline]
61 Masi, L., Becherini, L., Colli, E., Gennari, L., Mansani, R., Falchetti, A., Becorpi, A.M., Cepollaro, C., Gonnelli, S., Tanini, A. et al. (1998) Polymorphisms of the calcitonin receptor gene are associated with bone mineral density in postmenopausal Italian women. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 248, 190195.[Web of Science][Medline]
62
Taboulet, J., Frenkian, M., Frendo, J.L., Feingold, N., Jullienne, A. and de Vernejoul, M.C. (1998) Calcitonin receptor polymorphism is associated with a decreased fracture risk in post-menopausal women. Hum. Mol. Genet., 7, 21292133.
63 Morrison, N.A., Qi, J.C., Tokita, A., Kelly, P.J., Crofts, L., Nguyen, T.V., Sambrook, P.N. and Eisman, J.A. (1994) Prediction of bone density from vitamin D receptor alleles. Nature, 367, 284287.[Medline]
64 Langdahl, B.L., Knudsen, J.Y., Jensen, H.K., Gregersen, N. and Eriksen, E.F. (1997) A sequence variation: 713-8delC in the transforming growth factor-ß1 gene has higher prevalence in osteoporotic women than in normal women and is associated with very low bone mass in osteoporotic women and increased bone turnover in both osteoporotic and normal women. Bone, 20, 289294.[Medline]
65 Yamada, Y., Miyauchi, A., Goto, J., Takagi, Y., Okuizumi, H., Kanematsu, M., Hase, M., Takai, H., Harada, A. and Ikeda, K. (1998) Association of a polymorphism of the transforming growth factor-ß1 gene with genetic susceptibility to osteoporosis in postmenopausal Japanese women. J. Bone Miner. Res., 13, 15691576.[Web of Science][Medline]
66 Sano, M., Inoue, S., Hosoi, T., Ouchi, Y., Emi, M., Shiraki, M. and Orimo, H. (1995) Association of estrogen receptor dinucleotide repeat polymorphism with osteoporosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 217, 378383.[Web of Science][Medline]
67 Kobayashi, S., Inoue, S., Hosoi, T., Ouchi, Y., Shiraki, M. and Orimo, H. (1996) Association of bone mineral density with polymorphism of the estrogen receptor gene. J. Bone Miner. Res., 11, 306311.[Web of Science][Medline]
68 Hosoi, T., Miyao, M., Inoue, S., Hoshino, S., Shiraki, M., Orimo, H. and Ouchi, Y. (1999) Association study of parathyroid hormone gene polymorphism and bone mineral density in Japanese postmenopausal women. Calcif. Tissue Int., 64, 205208.[Web of Science][Medline]
69 Murray, R.E., McGuigan, F., Grant, S.F., Reid, D.M. and Ralston, S.H. (1997) Polymorphisms of the interleukin-6 gene are associated with bone mineral density. Bone, 21, 8992.[Medline]
70 Tsukamoto, K., Yoshida, H., Watanabe, S., Suzuki, T., Miyao, M., Hosoi, T., Orimo, H., Emi, M. (1999) Association of radial bone mineral density with CA repeat polymorphism at the interleukin 6 locus in postmenopausal Japanese women. J. Hum. Genet., 44, 148151.[Web of Science][Medline]
71
Thompson, S.K., Halbert, S.M., Bossard, M.J., Tomaszek, T.A., Levy, M.A., Zhao, B., Smith, W.W., Abdel, M., Janson, C.A., Alessio, K.J. et al. (1997) Design of potent and selective human cathepsin K inhibitors that span the active site. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 1424914254.
72 Votta, B.J., Levy, M.A., Badger, A., Bradbeer, J., Dodds, R.A., James, I.E., Thompson, S., Bossard, M.J., Carr, T., Connor, J.R. et al. (1997) Peptide aldehyde inhibitors of cathepsin K inhibit bone resorption both in vitro and in vivo. J. Bone Miner. Res., 12, 13961406.[Web of Science][Medline]
73 Stroup, G.B., Lark, M.W., Veber, D.F., Bhattacharyya, A., Blake, S., Dare, L.C., Erhard, K.F., Hoffman, S.J., James, I.E., Marquis, R.W. et al. (2001) Potent and selective inhibition of human cathepsin K leads to inhibition of bone resorption in vivo in a nonhuman primate. J. Bone Miner. Res., 16, 17391746.[Web of Science][Medline]
74
Min, H., Morony, S., Sarosi, I., Dunstan, C.R., Capparelli, C., Scully, S., Van, G., Kaufman, S., Kostenuik, P.J., Lacey, D.L. et al. (2000) Osteoprotegerin reverses osteoporosis by inhibiting endosteal osteoclasts and prevents vascular calcification by blocking a process resembling osteoclastogenesis. J. Exp. Med., 192, 463474.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Pata, C. Heraud, and J. Vacher OSTM1 Bone Defect Reveals an Intercellular Hematopoietic Crosstalk J. Biol. Chem., November 7, 2008; 283(45): 30522 - 30530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Balemans and W. Van Hul The Genetics of Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein 5 in Bone: A Story of Extremes Endocrinology, June 1, 2007; 148(6): 2622 - 2629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Ralston and B. de Crombrugghe Genetic regulation of bone mass and susceptibility to osteoporosis Genes & Dev., September 15, 2006; 20(18): 2492 - 2506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Langston and S. H. Ralston Management of Paget's disease of bone Rheumatology, August 1, 2004; 43(8): 955 - 959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






