Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (57)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, H.Y. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bonini, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, H.Y. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bonini, N. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, 2002, Vol. 11, No. 23 2895-2904
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Genetic modulation of polyglutamine toxicity by protein conjugation pathways in Drosophila

H.Y. Edwin Chan1,{dagger},{ddagger}, John M. Warrick1,{dagger},{ddagger}, Isabella Andriola2, Diane Merry2 and Nancy M. Bonini1,*

1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA and 2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Thomas Jefferson University, 208 Bluemle Life Sciences Building, 233 South 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19073, USA

Received July 3, 2002; Accepted August 16, 2002


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 NOTE ADDED IN PROOF
 REFERENCES
 
Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) is a heritable neurodegenerative disease caused by the expansion of a polyglutamine [poly(Q)] repeat within the androgen receptor (AR) protein. We studied SBMA in Drosophila using an N-terminal fragment of the human AR protein. Expression of a pathogenic AR protein with an expanded poly(Q) repeat in Drosophila results in nuclear and cytoplasmic inclusion formation, and cellular degeneration, preferentially in neuronal tissues. We have studied the influence of ubiquitin-dependent modification and the proteasome pathway on neural degeneration and AR protein fragment solubility. Compromising the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway enhances degeneration and decreases poly(Q) protein solubility. Our data further suggest that Hsp70 and the proteasome act in an additive manner to modulate neurodegeneration. Through the over-expression of a mutant of the SUMO-1 activating enzyme Uba2, we further show that poly(Q)-induced degeneration is intensified when the cellular SUMO-1 protein conjugation pathway is altered. These data suggest that post-translational protein modification, including the ubiquitin/proteasome and the SUMO-1 pathways, modulate poly(Q) pathogenesis.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 NOTE ADDED IN PROOF
 REFERENCES
 
Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) is an inherited, adult-onset neurodegenerative disease caused by expansion of a polyglutamine [poly(Q)] repeat within the androgen receptor (AR) protein (1). Huntington's disease (HD), dentatorubral–pallydiluysian atrophy (DRPLA), spinocerebellar ataxias 1, 2, 6 and 7 (SCA1, 2, 6 and 7), as well as Machado–Joseph disease (MJD/SCA3) are caused by similar poly(Q) expansions in the respective disease proteins (29). These diseases are characterized by the formation of inclusions, typically nuclear inclusions (NIs), of the expanded poly(Q) protein within degenerating neurons. Despite the fact that each of these diseases is associated with poly(Q) expansion, different populations of neurons are affected in each situation (10). Since poly(Q) expansion is the underlying cause of all the diseases, neurotoxicity in each case likely proceeds through partially common molecular pathways.

SBMA has been modeled in transfected cells and mice by expression of an N-terminal fragment of the AR protein with an expanded poly(Q) repeat (11,12). In human cell culture, mouse models, and human patients, the AR protein undergoes proteolysis to smaller fragments (1315). In patients, the protein, which is normally found within the cytoplasm of cells, now forms inclusions within nuclei (16). Molecular chaperones have been identified in the protein inclusions formed by AR and other poly(Q) proteins (12,17,18), suggesting that protein misfolding contributes to poly(Q) disease. Overexpression of the molecular chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp40 has been shown to suppress AR inclusion formation and apoptosis in transfected cells (1719). In vivo in Drosophila, the chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp40 have been shown to slow or prevent poly(Q)-induced neurodegeneration (2023).

NIs in SBMA patients are immunoreactive for ubiquitin (16), a molecular tag for protein degradation, suggesting that targeted protein turnover also plays a role in disease pathogenesis. Consistent with this, components of the proteasome macromolecular protein degradation machinery have been detected in NIs of mammalian cells in culture (17,18,24,25). Also, when expanded poly(Q) proteins are expressed in cultured cells, proteasome activity is affected (26,27). Moreover, inhibition of proteasome activity enhances both AR protein aggregation and toxicity (16), and the proteasome also appears to be required for the degradation of expanded AR protein (18).

In addition to the ubiquitin protein conjugation pathway, other ubiquitin-like (ubl) molecules have been identified. Although ubl molecules share significant sequence homology to ubiquitin and conjugate through similar enzymatic mechanisms, their cellular functions can be distinct from protein degradation (28,29). For example, one role of the small-ubiquitin-related modifier 1 (SUMO-1) is in subcellular localization of proteins. Similar to ubiquitin, SUMO-1 is processed through, firstly, the E1 Aos1/Uba2 heterodimeric SUMO-1 activating enzyme complex and, secondly, the E2 SUMO-1 conjugating enzyme Ubc9 (30). SUMO-1 modifying enzymes have been shown to localize in the nucleus in Drosophila (31), and SUMO-1 modification has been implicated in nuclear import of protein in flies (32). Additionally, recent work has shown an increase in SUMOylated proteins in human brains affected by poly(Q) disease, as well as a transgenic mouse model expressing mutant ataxin-1 (33). These data suggest that the SUMO-1 system may be involved in poly(Q) disease pathology (33).

Using the truncated form of the androgen receptor protein (ARtr) with a normal or expanded poly(Q) repeat (11,12), we have examined interactions between ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis and Hsp70 in poly(Q) protein toxicity. Our results further suggest a role of a SUMO-1-regulated pathway, in addition to ubiquitin conjugation pathways, in poly(Q) toxicity.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 NOTE ADDED IN PROOF
 REFERENCES
 
The human AR disease protein induces neurodegeneration in Drosophila
Constructs encoding a truncated form of the AR protein with a normal (Q16) and expanded (Q112) poly(Q) repeat were subcloned into the fly pUAST transformation vector. We then generated transgenic lines bearing the control UAS–ARtrQ16 transgene, and the disease protein UAS–ARtrQ112 transgene. Expression of the transgenes was directed to the Drosophila eye with the gmr–GAL4 line, which drives transgene expression in the pigment cells and photoreceptor neurons. The Drosophila eye is a highly regular structure, composed of some 800 individual units, such that any disruption of the structure is markedly apparent. We observed no phenotype upon expression of the control ARtrQ16 protein, such that the eye remained normal externally and internally (Fig. 1A and E). However, expression of the ARtrQ112 protein induced mild degeneration of the external eye and more severe degeneration of the internal eye structure (Fig. 1B, C, F and G). Re-mobilization of UAS–ARtrQ112 transgene yielded a strong expressing transgenic line such that, when outcrossed to gmr–GAL4, a severely degenerate eye phenotype was seen (see Materials and Methods; Fig. 1D and H).



View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Expression of pathogenic ARtr protein caused progressive neurodegeneration in Drosophila. (AD) Photographs of the external eye. (EH) Sections of the eye. (A and E) Expression of ARtrQ16 has no effect on the eye; 7-day-old flies. (B, C, F and G) Moderate expression of ARtrQ112 causes modest disruption of the eye structure at 1 day (B and F), and progressive degeneration by 7 days (C, G). (D and H) Strong expression of ARtrQ112 causes severe disruption of the external and internal retinal morphology at 1 day. Flies of genotype w; gmr–GAL4 in trans to UAS–ARtrQ16, UAS–ARtrQ112(M) or UAS–ARtrQ112(S).

 
We also directed expression of the AR protein to the entire nervous system using elav–GAL4. When expressed strongly in all cells of the central and peripheral nervous system, the ARtrQ112 protein conferred embryonic lethality. Moderate expression of the ARtrQ112 protein, using the same elav–GAL4 line, yielded adults that displayed an early-death phenotype, dying within 2–5 days after eclosion with poor motility and an irregular tremor. Flies expressing the non-pathogenic ARtrQ16 protein displayed normal viability with a normal lifespan (96% of the flies were still alive after 4 weeks). These studies indicate that the pathogenic ARtrQ112 protein is toxic when expressed selectively in the eye as well as broadly within the nervous system. Since motor dysfunction is observed in SBMA patients, we also expressed the ARtrQ112 protein in motor neurons using the D42–GAL4 driver (34). Moderate expression of the ARtrQ112 protein selectively in motor neurons conferred a less severe phenotype when compared with pan-neural expression with elav–GAL4, with flies starting to die 2 days after eclosion from the pupal case. All flies died within 18 days. In addition to the early-death phenotype, these flies became less active and exhibited an irregular tremor starting at 10 days.

The pathogenic ARtr protein forms inclusions in Drosophila
By western blot analysis, the expanded poly(Q) protein formed SDS-insoluble complexes that remained within the stacking gel, as is typical of expression of the expanded AR protein in transfected cells and transgenic mice (Fig. 2A: lanes 4 and 5). In contrast, the control protein ran only as a monomer (Fig. 2A: lanes 2 and 3). The molecular weights of the control protein and the pathogenic protein of the moderate ARtrQ112 lines corresponded to those of the proteins expressed in COS cells (see Fig. 4: lane 8). The protein expressed in the strong ARtrQ112 transgenic line was slightly lower in molecular weight than in the parental line from which the ARtrQ112 insertion was mobilized, indicating that the poly(Q) repeat underwent a slight contraction in that line. The more severe phenotype observed indicates that the new genomic location of the insertion allowed higher levels of transgene expression. This appears as less protein by western immunoblot, due to greater aggregation of the protein.



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The pathogenic ARtr protein undergoes aggregation. (A) Western blot of protein extracted from fly heads, detected with the N20 antibody. Arrows indicate migration position of SDS-soluble monomeric ARtrQ16 and ARtrQ112 proteins. In the strong UAS–ARtrQ112 line, the poly(Q) domain underwent a contraction, and the soluble protein migrates slightly faster. By western immunoblot, the monomeric expanded protein often migrated as a doublet (see also Fig. 4). The aggregated SDS-insoluble protein remained in the stacking gel, indicated by ‘complex’. Flies of genotype w; gmr–GAL4 in trans to w1118 (lane 1), UAS–ARtrQ16 (lanes 2 and 3; two different transgenic lines were used), UAS–ARtrQ112(M) (lane 4) and UAS–ARtrQ112(S) (lane 5), respectively. In the control lane (lane 1), no AR protein is detected. When the ARtrQ16 protein was expressed (lanes 2 and 3), SDS-soluble monomeric protein was detected (arrow) and the protein did not form SDS-insoluble aggregates. When the expanded ARtr protein was expressed at either moderate (lane 4) or high (lane 5) levels, the protein formed SDS-insoluble aggregates and remained in the stacking gel. SDS-soluble ARtr protein was detected as a monomer (arrows). (BE) Immunostained eye discs, labeled for HA to detect the ARtr protein (B–D) or stress-induced Hsp70 protein (E). (B) Expression of the control ARtrQ16 protein. The protein had a diffuse pattern of expression and was cytoplasmic. (C) Expression of the mutant ArtrQ112 protein. The protein showed an initial diffuse pattern of expression, and then became localized to brightly fluorescing NI. (D and E) Eye disc co-labeled to detect the ARtrQ112 protein (D), and for the stress-induced form of Hsp70 (E). The NIs labeled with Hsp70. Larvae of genotype w; gmr–GAL4 in trans to UAS–ARtrQ16 or UAS–ARtrQ112(S). Arrows in (B) and (C) indicate the furrow. (F and G) Immunohistochemistry of eye sections showing ubiquitination of the NIs in ARtrQ112-expressing flies. (F) Expression of the ARtrQ16 protein showed no ubiquitin staining above background. (G) In eyes of flies expressing the ARtrQ112 protein, the NIs labeled for ubiquitin (arrows). Flies of genotype w; gmr–GAL4 in trans to UAS–ArtrQ16 or UAS–ARtrQ112(S).

 


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Protein solubility changes upon co-expression of chaperone and proteasome components with the ARtrQ112 protein. Western blot analysis of AR proteins detected with N20 antibody. Top: SDS-insoluble AR protein was detected in stacking gel (indicated by ‘complex’) in all situations (lanes 2–8) except for the negative control lane (lane 1). Bottom: monomeric ARtr protein. Lane 1: negative control of flies with only the gmr–GAL4 driver; no AR immunoreactivity was detected. Genotype w; gmr–GAL4/+. Lane 2: expression of ARtrQ112 by gmr–GAL4 showed some monomer. Lane 3: more monomer was present when ARtrQ112 was co-expressed with Hsp70. Lane 4: co-expression of ARtrQ112 with proteasome mutant DTS5 showed complete loss of monomeric protein. Lane 5: co-expression of ARtrQ112 with the proteasome mutant and Hsp70 revealed that monomer was present, but in a lesser amount than with Hsp70 alone (compare with lane 3). Lanes 6 and 7: co-expression of ARtrQ112 with the Hsc70 mutant Hsc4.K71S, or both Hsc4.K71S and the proteasome mutant DTS5, respectively, resulted in no detectable momomer. Lane 8: COS-7 cells expressing the ARtrQ112 protein. Genotypes of flies: w; gmr–GAL4/+;UAS–ARtrQ112(M)/+ alone or with one copy of the appropriate transgenic line or lines, as indicated, UAS–HspA1L, UAS–DTS5–11, UAS–Hsc4.K71S.

 
By immunocytochemistry, the ARtrQ16 protein showed a diffuse cytoplasmic expression pattern, whereas the protein with an expanded poly(Q) domain formed NIs in eye imaginal discs (Fig. 2B and C). Moreover, by using an antibody that selectively detects the stress-induced form of Drosophila Hsp70 (35), we found that Hsp70 co-localized to the NIs by immunostaining (Fig. 2D and E). These studies suggest that flies bearing the ARtrQ112 protein have upregulated the stress pathway in response to the pathogenic protein. Similar to human disease tissue, NIs formed in flies were also decorated by anti-ubiquitin antibody (Fig. 2F and G), suggesting that the protein in inclusions is misfolded and targeted for degradation by the proteasome.

Effects of molecular chaperones on ARtrQ112-induced neurodegeneration
Hsp70 has been shown to be a potent suppressor of poly(Q) toxicity in several disease models, including SCA3/MJD and HD (20,36). We addressed whether Hsp70 modulated the phenotype caused by the ARtrQ112 poly(Q) disease protein. Upon co-expression of Hsp70 with the ARtrQ112 protein, the external and internal eye phenotypes were restored toward normal (Fig. 3A and F). We also addressed whether inhibition of endogenous levels of the Hsp70 chaperones would affect the phenotype by co-expressing a dominant-negative form of Hsc70, Hsc4.K71S. In this situation, the phenotype was enhanced such that the flies showed a severely degenerate eye, whereas in the background of ARtrQ112 alone the eye was only mildly affected (Fig. 3B and G; compare with Fig. 1B and F). These studies indicate that the SBMA phenotype was modulated by the levels of Hsp70-class chaperones, such that overexpression of Hsp70 suppressed degeneration, whereas dominant-negative inhibition of Hsc70 enhanced degeneration. Taken together, these data indicate that Hsp70-like chaperones appear to be universal suppressors of poly(Q) toxicity in vivo.



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Modification of degeneration induced by the ARtr protein upon co-expression of chaperone and proteasome components. (A and F) Co-expression of Hsp70 suppressed degeneration induced by the ARtrQ112 protein as seen by the restored external (A) and internal (F) eye structures of 1-day-old flies. Flies of genotype w; gmr–GAL4UAS–HspA1L/UAS–ARtrQ112(M). (B and G) Co-expression with a dominant-negative form of Hsc70 resulted in increased loss of pigmentation and disruption of internal retinal morphology. Flies of genotype w; gmr–GAL4 /UAS–HSC4.K71S;UAS–ARtrQ112(M)/+. (C and H) Co-expression of both the proteasome mutant and Hsp70 with ARtrQ112 protein. The loss of pigmentation and disruption of internal eye structure caused by the mutant proteasome is mitigated upon co-expression of Hsp70. Flies of genotype w; gmr–GAL4/UAS–HspA1L; UAS–ARtrQ112(M)/UAS–DTS5–11. (D and I) Co-expression of a mutant proteasome component with the ARtrQ112 protein increased (D) pigmentation loss and (I) disruption of internal eye structure. Fly of genotype w; gmr–GAL4/+; UAS–ArtrQ112(M)/UAS–DTS5–11. (E and J) Co-expression of the mutant proteasome and the Hsc70 dominant-negative caused severe pigmentation loss and greatly disrupted internal retinal morphology. Flies of genotype w; gmr–GAL4/UAS–HSC4.K71S; UAS–ARtrQ112(M)/UAS–DTS5–11.

 
We also addressed the effect of the chaperones on the solubility properties of the ARtr protein. Normally, upon extraction from fly heads, the protein ran primarily as an SDS-insoluble complex within the stacking gel, with very little protein soluble and running as a monomer (Fig. 4: lane 2). Upon co-expression of Hsp70, an increased amount of the protein was detected as an SDS-soluble monomer (Fig. 4: lane 3). Consistent with soluble monomer levels being inversely correlated with toxicity of the protein, co-expression of the dominant-negative Hsc4.K71S, which enhanced degeneration, resulted in less SDS-soluble monomer (Fig. 4: lane 6).

In SBMA patients, AR immunoreactive inclusions are found in the nucleus (16). Whereas in imaginal eye tissue, the protein formed NIs, consistent with the finding in SBMA patients, ARtrQ112 immunoreactive inclusions were found in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus of adult flies (Fig. 5A), although they were predominantly nuclear. Interestingly, upon Hsp70 co-expression, the frequency of cytoplasmic inclusions appeared to be lower, while nuclear inclusions appeared unchanged (Fig. 5D).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. ARtrQ112 protein forms both cytoplasmic and nuclear aggregates, and the effect of molecular chaperones in different subcellular compartments. (AF) Expression of the ARtrQ112 protein in the adult eye. Immunostained adult head section labeled for HA to detect the ARtrQ112 protein in green (A, C, D and F) and nuclei in blue (B, C, E and F). The protein aggregates were detected in both the cytoplasm (arrows) and the nucleus (A and C). Fly of genotype w; gmr–GAL4/+; UAS–ARtrQ112(M)/+. (DF) Co-expression of the Artr–Q112 protein and Hsp70 in the adult eye. Protein aggregates were detected predominately in the nucleus (D and F). Fly of genotype w; <gmr–GAL4UAS–HspA1L/UAS–ARtrQ112(M).

 
Modulation of degeneration by proteasome activity
We then addressed whether inhibition of proteasome activity would modulate degeneration in vivo. A proteasome mutant, DTS5, has been defined in Drosophila that encodes a dominant-negative protein of the ß subunit of the proteasome complex (37). A transgenic line UAS–DTS5 was made encoding this mutant subunit under control of the GAL4–UAS transcriptional system (38). Expression of DTS5 alone in the eye with gmr–GAL4 caused a mild rough eye phenotype and occasional loss of pigmentation in ~20% of the flies, suggesting that there is a modest effect of proteasome inhibition on aspects of eye development.

We then co-expressed DTS5 with the ARtrQ112 protein. Upon co-expression, we found that degeneration induced by the ARtrQ112 protein was enhanced (Fig. 3D and I). This finding indicates that limiting the activity of the proteasome increases toxicity of the disease protein. Analysis of protein extracts revealed that the enhancement of degeneration was associated with a change in the solubility properties of the ARtrQ112 protein: DTS5 co-expression resulted in a reduction in protein monomer levels (Fig. 4: lane 4), presumably reflecting enhanced aggregation of the pathogenic protein. These results suggest that the interaction is not just an additive effect, but rather a specific enhancement of the toxic properties of the ARtrQ112 protein.

Interactions between chaperones and the proteasome in poly(Q) pathogenesis
Given that upregulation of Hsp70 mitigates neurodegeneration, and inhibition of the proteasome enhanced neurodegeneration, we were interested in elucidating the relationship between these two pathways in disease progression. Although Hsp70 is well known biochemically to modulate protein folding, Hsp70 could also be affecting protein turnover by shunting protein through the proteasome-mediated protein degradation pathway (18,3941). If Hsp70 functioned by increasing protein degradation, then inhibition of proteasome activity would prevent the suppression of toxicity conferred by Hsp70.

We co-expressed both Hsp70 and DTS5 together with the disease protein and analyzed the phenotype. In this situation, the eye phenotype was suppressed (Fig. 3C and H), suggesting that upregulation of molecular chaperone activity is either dominant to or additive with enhancement of toxicity by proteasome inhibition. Analysis of these flies for protein solubility indicated that ARtrQ112 protein monomer was present, although the levels corresponded to an intermediate level between that of Hsp70 expressed alone and Hsp70 co-expressed with DTS5 (Fig. 4: lane 5). These data suggest that the chaperone and proteasome appear to function in an additive manner to modulate degeneration, with both affecting solubility properties of the protein. Co-expression of the dominant-negative Hsc4.K71S with the proteasome mutant DTS5 also showed an additive phenotype, in this case of enhanced toxicity (Fig. 3E and J).

Effect of SUMO-1, a ubiquitin-like conjugating protein, on poly(Q) toxicity
Ubiquitin has been found in protein inclusions of most, if not all, poly(Q) diseases (10). Further, we (this report) and others (23) have also demonstrated the involvement of the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway in poly(Q) toxicity in fly models. Ubiquitination typically targets proteins for degradation through the proteasome complex. In addition to ubiquitin, at least four ubiquitin-like (ubl) molecules, including SUMO-1, RUB, Apg12 and Urm1, have been identified and are involved in a larger variety of cellular processes, including nuclear transport (28) and regulation of the heat-shock response (42,43). For example, one characterized substrate of SUMO-1 is Ran–GAP, a GTPase activating protein involved in protein nuclear transport. Mutants in the E2 SUMO-1 conjugating enzyme ubc9 have defects in protein nuclear import in Drosophila (32). Most recently it has been found that there is an increase in SUMOylated proteins in human brain affected by poly(Q) disease and a transgenic mouse model for SCA1 (33). To address whether there was a role of SUMO conjugation in our Drosophila model of a poly(Q) disease, we co-expressed a mutant form of Uba2 with the disease protein. Uba2 is a SUMO-1 activating enzyme (28). An analogous mutation (C177S) in this particular cysteine residue of the yeast Uba2 protein has been demonstrated to be essential for its function (44). Expression of Uba2.C175S by the gmr–GAL4 driver results in pigment cell degeneration at high temperatures (45).

Overexpression of high levels of Uba2.C175S (~4–5-fold of endogenous Uba2 levels) (45) by gmr–GAL4 resulted in a variable effect on the eye of a slightly glossy, rough eye phenotype, sometimes with loss of pigmentation (Fig. 6A) (see also 45). We also observed that the effect of Uba2.C175S is temperature-dependent (data not shown). When Uba2.C175S was co-expressed with ARtrQ112, degeneration was consistently enhanced, as illustrated by severe loss of pigmentation (Fig. 6C), similar to the phenotype induced by the dominant-negative forms of the proteasome ß subunit (DTS5) and Hsc70 (Hsc4.K71S). Enhancement of degeneration was only observed when the disease protein with a pathogenic poly(Q) stretch was co-expressed, and not with the control protein with a poly(Q) stretch within the normal range (data not shown). We also addressed the versatility of these findings by confirming similar results with the MJDtr model of neurodegeneration using the ataxin-3 protein (46; and data not shown).



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. ARtr phenotype is enhanced by a mutant form of the SUMO-1 activating enzyme Uba2 through a distinct Hsp70-independent pathway. (A) Flies expressing the mutant form of Uba2, Uba2.C175S, showed no degeneration, although did have a mild rough eye phenotype. Fly of genotype w; gmr–GAL4/UAS–Uba2.C175S(92E). (B) Flies expressing the ARtrQ112 protein moderately showed mild degeneration of the external eye. Fly of genotype w; gmr–GAL4/+; UAS–ARtrQ112(M)/+. (C) Flies co-expressing the ARtrQ112 and the Uba2 mutant proteins showed enhanced degeneration. Fly of genotype w; gmr–GAL4/UAS–Uba2.C175S(92E);UAS–ARtrQ112(M)/+. (D) The ARtrQ112 protein co-expressed with Uba2.C175S and Hsp70 in the eye. In contrast to Fig. 3C, enhancement of the external eye degeneration was not suppressed. Fly of genotype w; gmr–GAL4UAS–HspA1L/UAS–Uba2.C175S(95E); UAS–ARtrQ112(M)/+.

 
It has been reported that the DNA-binding affinity of heat-shock transcription factors is affected by SUMO-1 modification (42,43). In order to address the relationship between the heat-shock response pathway and SUMO-1 modification, co-expression of Hsp70 and Uba2.C175S was performed in the presence of ARtrQ112. Unlike in the case of Hsp70 and DTS5, Uba2.C175S enhancement was poorly rescued by Hsp70 (Fig. 6D). This suggests that interference in the SUMO-1 pathway appears epistatic to the suppression effects of Hsp70.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 NOTE ADDED IN PROOF
 REFERENCES
 
In this report, we provide genetic evidence for interactions with distinctive suppression pathways of poly(Q) toxicity. Using an N-terminal fragment of the androgen receptor disease protein (ARtrQ112), we saw late-onset progressive neurodegeneration, as well as locomotor defects conferred by the disease ARtr protein. Further, we demonstrate a role for the proteasome in modulation of the disease phenotype, and this provides in vivo evidence that inhibition of proteasome activity increases protein aggregation and enhances toxicity (17). Our studies further reveal an additive relationship between the Hsp70 chaperone and the proteasome pathways, indicating that compromise of these pathways may represent at least two distinct pathogenetic pathways of poly(Q) toxicity. We also suggest a role for SUMO-1 conjugation in pathogenesis induced by toxic poly(Q) protein.

Subunits of the ubiquitin/proteasome complex have been detected in NIs of several disease proteins (12,17,23,25). In addition, specific inhibition of proteasome activity in cultured cells leads to increased inclusion formation and cell death (17,18). In contrast, in a transgenic mouse model of SCA1, absence of the E6-AP ubiquitin ligase (an enzyme that transfers ubiquitin molecules to proteins that are targeted for degradation through the proteasome pathway) results in formation of fewer nuclear inclusions in Purkinje cells, but a more severe pathology (47). Mutations in a number of different proteins in the ubiquitin and proteasome pathway enhance the rough-eye phenotype of ataxin-1 when expressed in Drosophila (23). In SCA7 patients, immunoreactivity of select proteasome subunits is altered in brain regions affected (48). This suggests that proteasome activity is involved in the metabolism of mutant ataxin-7 protein. We addressed the involvement of the proteasome pathway in poly(Q)-induced neurodegeneration by using a transgene of a dominant-negative mutant form of the ß6 proteasome subunit DTS-5 (37). Upon co-expression of DTS5 with the pathogenic ARtrQ112 protein, degeneration was strongly enhanced. This suggests that endogenous proteasome activity is normally involved in clearance of the toxic form of pathogenic poly(Q) protein. Analysis of the inclusions has revealed that the molecular chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp40 suppress toxicity in the absence of a large effect on the inclusions (20,21). Here we have found that the poly(Q) protein also forms some cytoplasmic inclusions, visible in the lamina of adult flies where the photoreceptor axon terminals are found. These are lessened upon chaperone co-expression (see Fig. 5). Interestingly, cytoplasmic inclusions have been noted to correlate more closely with pathology in human disease tissue (49). Our studies have the limitation that only a fragment of the AR protein was used. Studies with the full-length protein may reveal interesting aspects of normal AR protein function, in ligand- and DNA-binding activities, that become modulated by poly(Q) expansion and are specific to SBMA. Such a model may also reveal different and additional modifier pathways.

To address potential crosstalk between pathways regulated by chaperones and the proteasome, we co-expressed Hsp70 and the dominant-negative proteasome subunit transgenes. In this situation, we determined whether Hsp70 could still effect suppression when proteasome activity was compromised. We anticipated that if the effects of Hsp70 were fully dependent upon a functional proteasome pathway, then Hsp70 would not be able to suppress the enhanced degeneration observed upon DTS5 co-expression. However, the effect of the proteasome mutant was largely suppressed by Hsp70 (see Fig. 3C and H). Moreover, we observed an additive, rather than synergistic, effect when both dominant-negative Hsc70 and DTS5 mutants were co-expressed with the ARtrQ112 disease protein. Taken together, these results suggest that the Hsp70 pathway and the proteasome pathways interact in an additive manner to modulate poly(Q) protein toxicity. Recently a chaperone-interacting protein, CHIP, has been demonstrated to play a pivotal role in the interactions between the chaperone and ubiquitin/proteasome pathways (40,41). Although this particular kind of crosstalk is only observed for specific proteasome substrates (40), detailed characterization of CHIP and/or other related proteins will be required to determine if similar interactions exist between these pathways in poly(Q) pathogenesis.

Protein conjugation pathways include not only the ubiquitin–proteasomal pathway but also cellular chemistries involving ubiquitin-like molecules. These pathways share similar conjugation mechanisms but have diverse cellular functions (29). We tested the effect of an Uba2 mutant protein in order to address the potential role of the SUMO-1 protein conjugation system in poly(Q) pathogenesis. A number of lines of evidence indicate that Uba2 is specific for SUMO modification. In yeast, overexpression of Uba2 cannot rescue the growth arrest phenotype of uba1{Delta} [Uba1 is the ubiquitin activating enzyme in yeast (44)]. In addition, a number of biochemical assays have been performed, but have failed to demonstrate that Uba2 forms thioester linkage with ubiquitin, while under the same reaction conditions Uba1–ubiquitin thioesters were detected (44). We found that interference of the SUMO-1 protein conjugation system appears to enhance poly(Q) degeneration. In the semushi mutant of the E2 SUMO-1 conjugating enzyme Ubc9 in Drosophila (32), nuclear import of bicoid protein is blocked (32). We tested, but could not find, a change in nuclear/cytoplasmic partitioning of the ARtrQ112 protein (H.Y.E. Chan and N.M. Bonini, unpublished observations). SUMO-1 has also been implicated in the regulation of DNA-binding affinity of heat-shock transcription factors, and it is possible that deregulation of global heat-shock response (42,43) as well as other cellular pathways (50,51) contribute to pathogenesis. We were not able to see a consistent effect of the Uba2 mutant protein on Hsp70 levels in the presence of the ARtrQ112 protein (M. Watson and N. Bonini, unpublished observations). By genetic analysis, we revealed an epistatic relationship between SUMO-1 and Hsp70 pathways (see Fig. 6). Although our data suggest a role of SUMO-1 in poly(Q) pathogenesis, it is also possible that the effects that we see are additive, since interference with Uba2 has effects on its own (44). Further investigation is needed to elucidate the relationship of SUMO-1 modification and poly(Q) diseases fully. In addition to Ran–GAP, proteins that undergo SUMO-1 modification have been identified and a number of them reside in the nucleus (28). Consistent with this, SUMO modification enzymes are found in the nucleus (31). As poly(Q) inclusions are also found in the nucleus, it is possible that SUMO modification is affected in poly(Q) diseases (see (32)).

The promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML), a nuclear matrix-associated protein, is modified by SUMO-1 at three major lysine residues in the protein (52). Although SUMO modification of PML has recently been reported to be important for its interaction with a dual-function nuclear protein, Daxx, the subnuclear localization of PML itself does not seem to be affected by SUMO modification (53). Daxx has been shown to be able to mediate Fas-mediated apoptosis (54) and transcriptional repression (53). Daxx interacts with histone deacetylase (HDAC), and administration of an HDAC inhibitor reversed its transcription repression (53). This suggests that histone deacetylation is involved in Daxx repression. In a recently described fly model of Huntington's disease, progressive degeneration of photoreceptor neurons, as revealed by the optical neutralization technique, was arrested upon administration of HDAC inhibitors (55). It is possible that Daxx may play a role in transcription repression in poly(Q) diseases through SUMO modification of PML. The ataxin-1 protein has already been shown to reside in the nuclear matrix and co-localize with PML in a cell model of SCA1 (56). As SUMO appears to be involved in the regulation of subcellular localization and activities of proteins, it is possible that the phenotypic enhancement of Uba2.C175S that we observed is the result of a number of cellular pathways that have gone awry.

Chaperone-mediated suppression of neural degeneration is associated with an increase in the solubility properties of poly(Q) disease protein (22). In the present study, the solubility properties of ARtrQ112 also increased under conditions when degeneration was suppressed, indicating that this feature may be general to chaperone suppression of poly(Q) toxicity. Moreover, we also observed that protein solubility decreased when degeneration was enhanced, both upon inhibition of chaperone as well as proteasome activities. Phenotypic rescue of the DTS5 enhancement by Hsp70 also showed a net increase in solubility of the pathogenic ARtrQ112 protein. The amount of monomer in the latter situation was only comparable to the normal disease condition; this is consistent with an independent effect of Hsp70 and DTS5 on poly(Q) pathogenesis (see above).

Our data indicate that both the chaperones and the proteasome have modulatory effects on disease phenotype that are associated with alteration of protein solubility properties. The chaperones presumably modulate the protein structure or protein interactions, potentially restoring or maintaining the protein in a native conformation, which results in a lessening of the toxicity. Although morphological changes of NIs were not observed, partial solubilization of poly(Q) protein, and possibly other recruited cellular proteins, from NIs may be sufficient for suppression. Studies of aggregate formation, using poly(Q) proteins tagged with GFP and derivatives, indicate that the inclusions can be remarkably stable, and can sequester select proteins effectively (57,58), although the relationship of the visible aggregates to toxicity still remains unresolved (e.g. 59). Protofibril forms of poly(Q) protein, as for other neurodegenerative disease-associated proteins (60,61), may be the critical entity for toxicity, with the structure of these forms being modulated by chaperones.

These and other studies suggest that modulation by chaperones and by conjugation systems, including the ubiquitin–proteasome and SUMO pathways, have modulatory effects on poly(Q) disease pathogenesis. In addition to poly(Q) disease, a number of other human genetic diseases are associated with abnormal protein aggregation, such as Alzheimer's disease (6264), and Parkinson's disease (65,66). Potentially, these findings have application to human neurodegenerative diseases in addition to poly(Q) disease.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 NOTE ADDED IN PROOF
 REFERENCES
 
Fly stocks and transgenic lines
All crosses were carried out at 25°C on standard medium according to standard protocols. Fly lines used include UAS–HspA1L, Hsp70 (20), UAS–Hsc4.K71S (67), UAS–DTS5–11 (38) and UAS–Uba2.C175S(92E) (45). Transgenic flies were made bearing constructs of the AR. The AR constructs (11) were subcloned into the pUAST vector (68). Transformant lines were generated according to standard procedures using w1118 as the parental line. DNA sequencing was performed on PCR products that had been amplified from single fly genomic DNA templates of UAS–ARtrQ112(M) and UAS–ARtrQ112(S) lines. Primers ARtrF and ARtrR were used anneal to amplify and sequence the CAG repeat domain (ARtrF: 5'-CGA AGT GAT CCA GAA CCC GG-3'; ARtrR: 5'-TGC TGT TCC TCA TCC AGG AC-3'). We remobilized a UAS–ARtrQ112 transgenic insertion by crossing the flies to those bearing P-element transposase activity, and obtained several new transgenic lines that, when outcrossed to gmr–GAL4, showed a severely degenerate eye phenotype [UAS–ARtrQ112(S)]. This line had a poly(Q) contraction of two poly(Q) repeats. The constructs have an HA tag at the N terminus (11).

Microscopy
Flies were aged appropriately, then prepared for sectioning by fixing heads in 2% paraformaldehyde/1% glutaraldehyde, embedded in Epon, then sectioned (~1 µm thick), as previously described (20).

Adult head cryosections
Fly heads to be cryosectioned were saturated in OCT for 10–15 min, then frozen by immersion in liquid nitrogen. Ten-micrometer sections were cut at -20°C, dried on a slide warmer at 37°C for 30–90 mins, then fixed in 0.5% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 30 min. The slides were rinsed in PBS, blocked in PBSG (1% goat serum, 0.2% BSA and 0.01% saponin in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature, and stained with antibodies. The primary antibody was anti-HA (Y11, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) at 1 : 50 concentration in blocking solution overnight at 4°C. The secondary antibody was conjugated to fluorescein (FITC) (Jackson ImmunoResearch), also used at 1 : 50 concentration in blocking solution for 2 h at room temperature.

Cytoplasmic and nuclear fractionation
Fractionation was performed using Pierce NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents, and the manufacturer's instructions were followed. In summary, 26 heads were homogenized in 100 µl of CERI buffer, followed by subsequent addition of 5.5 µl CERII and 50 µl of NER buffers.

Immunocytochemistry and immunoblot analysis
Immunocytochemistry and western blot analysis were performed as described previously (11,20,46). The antibodies used were anti-HA (Y-11, 1 : 300, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); anti-Hsp70 (35); N20 (anti-AR; 1 : 1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), fluorescein-conjugated anti-rat and cyanine-3-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1 : 2500; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA), and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1 : 2500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Images were analyzed by NIH Image version 1.61.


    NOTE ADDED IN PROOF
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 NOTE ADDED IN PROOF
 REFERENCES
 
A Drosophila model for SBMA using the full length AR protein has been published, which reveals interesting features of the full length protein (Takeyama et al. (2002) Neuron 35, 855--864).


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank Susan Lindquist for Hsp70 antibodies, and Karen Palter, Francois Schweisguth, Leslie Griffith and the Bloomington Stock Center for fly lines. This research was funded, in part, by the Wellcome Trust (H.Y.E.C.), the Wills Foundation and the Age Related Neurodegenerative Diseases Training Program Grant T32AG00255 (J.M.W.), and the NEI and the David and Lucile Packard Foundation (N.M.B.). N.M.B. is an assistant investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: nbonini{at}sas.upenn.edu Back

{dagger} The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be considered as joint First Authors. Back

{ddagger} Present addresses: H.Y.E. Chan, Department of Biochemistry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin NT, Hong Kong. J.M. Warrick, Department of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173, USA. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 NOTE ADDED IN PROOF
 REFERENCES
 
1 La Spada, A.R., Wilson, E.M., Lubahn, D.B., Harding, A.E. and Fischbeck, K.H. (1991) Androgen receptor gene mutations in X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Nature, 352, 77–79.[Medline]

2 The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group (1993) A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. Cell, 72, 971–983.[ISI][Medline]

3 Orr, H.T., Chung, M.Y., Banfi, S., Kwiatkowski, T.J., Servadio, A., Beaudet, A.L., McCall, A.E., Duvick, L.A., Ranum, L.P. and Zoghbi, H.Y. (1993) Expansion of an unstable trinucleotide CAG repeat in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1. Nat. Genet., 4, 221–226.[ISI][Medline]

4 Kawaguchi, Y., Okamoto, T., Taniwaki, M., Aizawa, M., Inoue, M., Katayama, S., Kawakami, H., Nakamura, S., Nishimura, M. and Akiguchi, I. (1994) CAG expansions in a novel gene for Machado–Joseph disease at chromosome 14q32.1. Nat. Genet., 8, 221–228.[ISI][Medline]

5 Imbert, G., Saudou, F., Yvert, G., Devys, D., Trottier, Y., Garnier, J.M., Weber, C., Mandel, J.L., Cancel, G., Abbas, N. et al. (1996) Cloning of the gene for spinocerebellar ataxia 2 reveals a locus with high sensitivity to expanded CAG/glutamine repeats. Nat. Genet., 14, 237–238.[ISI][Medline]

6 Pulst, S.M., Nechiporuk, A., Nechiporuk, T., Gispert, S., Chen, X.N., Lopes-Cendes, I., Pearlman, S., Starkman, S., Orozco-Diaz, G., Lunkes, A. et al. (1996) Moderate expansion of a normally biallelic trinucleotide repeat in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Nat. Genet., 14, 269–276.[ISI][Medline]

7 Sanpei, K., Takano, H., Igarashi, S., Sato, T., Oyake, M., Sasaki, H., Wakisaka, A., Tashiro, K., Ishida, Y., Ikeuchi, T. et al. (1996) Identification of the spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 gene using a direct identification of repeat expansion and cloning technique, DIRECT. Nat. Genet., 14, 277–284.[ISI][Medline]

8 Lindblad, K., Savontaus, M.L., Stevanin, G., Holmberg, M., Digre, K., Zander, C., Ehrsson, H., David, G., Benomar, A., Nikoskelainen, E. et al. (1996) An expanded CAG repeat sequence in spinocerebellar ataxia type 7. Genome Res., 6, 965–971.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 Zhuchenko, O., Bailey, J., Bonnen, P., Ashizawa, T., Stockton, D.W., Amos, C., Dobyns, W.B., Subramony, S.H., Zoghbi, H.Y. and Lee, C.C. (1997) Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (SCA6) associated with small polyglutamine expansions in the alpha 1A-voltage-dependent calcium channel. Nat. Genet., 15, 62–69.[ISI][Medline]

10 Zoghbi, H.Y. and Orr, H.T. (2000) Glutamine repeats and neurodegeneration. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 23, 217–247.[ISI][Medline]

11 Merry, D.E., Kobayashi, Y., Bailey, C.K., Taye, A.A. and Fischbeck, K.H. (1998) Cleavage, aggregation and toxicity of the expanded androgen receptor in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet., 7, 693–701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12 Abel, A., Walcott, J., Woods, J., Duda, J. and Merry, D.E. (2001) Expression of expanded repeat androgen receptor produces neurologic disease in transgenic mice. Hum. Mol. Genet., 10, 107–116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13 Ellerby, L.M., Hackam, A.S., Propp, S.S., Ellerby, H.M., Rabizadeh, S., Cashman, N.R., Trifiro, M.A., Pinsky, L., Wellington, C.L., Salvesen, G.S. et al. (1999) Kennedy's disease: caspase cleavage of the androgen receptor is a crucial event in cytotoxicity. J. Neurochem., 72, 185–195.[ISI][Medline]

14 Abdullah, A., Trifiro, M.A., Panet-Raymond, V., Alvarado, C., de Tourreil, S., Frankel, D., Schipper, H.M. and Pinsky, L. (1998) Spinobulbar muscular atrophy: polyglutamine-expanded androgen receptor is proteolytically resistant in vitro and processed abnormally in transfected cells. Hum. Mol. Genet., 7, 379–384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15 Butler, R., Leigh, P.N., McPhaul, M.J. and Gallo, J.M. (1998) Truncated forms of the androgen receptor are associated with polyglutamine expansion in X-linked spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet., 7, 121–127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16 Li, M., Miwa, S., Kobayashi, Y., Merry, D.E., Yamanishi, M., Tanaka, F., Doyu, M., Hashizume, Y., Fischbeck, K.H. and Sobue, G. (1998) Nuclear inclusions of the androgen receptor in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Ann. Neurol., 44, 249–254.[ISI][Medline]

17 Stenoien, D.L., Cummings, C.J., Adams, H.P., Mancini, M.G., Patel, K., DeMartino, G.N., Marcelli, M., Weigel, N.L. and Mancini, M.A. (1999) Polyglutamine-expanded androgen receptors form aggregates that sequester heat shock proteins, proteasome components and SRC-1, and are suppressed by the HDJ-2 chaperone. Hum. Mol. Genet., 8, 731–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18 Bailey, C.K., Andriola, I.F., Kampinga, H.H. and Merry, D.E. (2002) Molecular chaperones enhance the degradation of expanded polyglutamine repeat androgen receptor in a cellular model of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Hum. Mol. Genet., 11, 515–523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19 Kobayashi, Y., Kume, A., Li, M., Doyu, M., Hata, M., Ohtsuka, K. and Sobue, G. (2000) Chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp40 suppress aggregate formation and apoptosis in cultured neuronal cells expressing truncated androgen receptor protein with expanded polyglutamine tract. J. Biol. Chem., 275, 8772–8778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20 Warrick, J.M., Chan, H.Y.E., Gray-Board, G.L., Chai, Y., Paulson, H.L. and Bonini, N.M. (1999) Suppression of polyglutamine-mediated neurodegeneration in Drosophila by the molecular chaperone HSP70. Nat. Genet., 23, 425–428.[ISI][Medline]

21 Kazemi-Esfarjani, P. and Benzer, S. (2000) Genetic suppression of polyglutamine toxicity in Drosophila. Science, 287, 1837–1840.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22 Chan, H.Y.E., Warrick, J.M., Gray-Board, G.L., Paulson, H.L. and Bonini, N.M. (2000) Mechanisms of chaperone suppression of polyglutamine disease: selectivity, synergy, and modulation of protein solubility in Drosophila. Hum. Mol. Genet., 19, 2811–2820.

23 Fernandez-Funez, P., Nino-Rosales, M.L., de Gouyon, B., She, W., Luchak, J.M., Martinez, P., Turiegano, E., Benito, J., Capovilla, M., Skinner, P.J. et al. (2000) Identification of genes that modify ataxin-1-induced neurodegeneration. Nature, 408, 101–106.[Medline]

24 Wyttenbach, A., Carmichael, J., Swartz, J., Furlong, R.A., Narain, Y., Rankin, J. and Rubinsztein, D.C. (2000) Effects of heat shock, heat shock protein 40 (HDJ-2), and proteasome inhibition on protein aggregation in cellular models of Huntington's disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 2898–2903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25 Chai, Y., Koppenmhafer, S.L., Shoesmith, S.J., Perez, M.K. and Paulson, H.L. (1999) Evidence for proteasome involvement in polyglutamine disease: localization to nuclear inclusions in SCA3/MJD and suppression of polyglutamine aggregation in vitro. Hum. Mol. Genet., 8, 673–682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26 Ding, Q., Lewis, J.J., Dimayuga, E., Bruce-Keller, A.J., Dunn, J.C. and Keller, J.N. (2002) Polyglutamine expansion, protein aggregation, proteasome activity, and neural survival. J. Biol. Chem., 277, 13935–13942.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27 Jana, N.R., Zemskov, E.A., Wang, G. and Nukina, N. (2001) Altered proteasomal function due to the expression of polyglutamine-expanded truncated N-terminal huntingtin induces apoptosis by caspase activation through mitochondrial cytochrome c release. Hum. Mol. Genet., 10, 1049–1059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28 Yeh, E.T., Gong, L. and Kamitani, T. (2000) Ubiquitin-like proteins: new wines in new bottles. Gene, 248, 1–14.[ISI][Medline]

29 Hochstrasser, M. (2000) Evolution and function of ubiquitin-like protein-conjugation systems. Nat. Cell Biol., 2, E153–E157.[ISI][Medline]

30 Melchior, F. (2000) Sumo nonclassical ubiquitin. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol., 16, 591–626.[ISI][Medline]

31 Rodriguez, M.S., Dargemont, C. and Hay, R.T. (2001) SUMO-1 conjugation in vivo requires both a consensus modification motif and nuclear targeting. J. Biol. Chem., 276, 12654–12659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32 Epps, J.L. and Tanda, S. (1998) The Drosophila semushi mutation blocks nuclear import of bicoid during embryogenesis. Curr. Biol., 8, 1277–1280.[ISI][Medline]

33 Ueda, H., Goto, J., Hashida, H., Lin, X., Oyanagi, K., Kawano, H., Zoghbi, H.Y., Kanazawa, I. and Okazawa, H. (2002) Enhanced SUMOylation in polyglutamine diseases. Biochem. Biophys. Comm., 293, 307–313.[ISI][Medline]

34 Parkes, T.L., Elia, A.J., Dickinson, D., Hilliker, A.J., Phillips, J.P. and Boulianne, G.L. (1998) Extension of Drosophila lifespan by overexpression of human SOD1 in motorneurons. Nat. Genet., 19, 171–174.[ISI][Medline]

35 Velazquez, J.M., Sonoda, S., Bugaisky, G. and Lindquist, S. (1983) Is the major Drosophila heat shock protein present in cells that have not been heat shocked? J. Cell. Biol., 96, 286–290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36 Muchowski, P.J., Schaffar, G., Sittler, A., Wanker, E.E., Hayer-Hartl, M.K. and Hartl, F.U. (2000) Hsp70 and Hsp40 chaperones can inhibit self-assembly of polyglutamine proteins into amyloid-like fibrils. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 7841–7846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37 Saville, K.J. and Belote, J.M. (1993) Identification of an essential gene, l(3)73Ai, with a dominant temperature-sensitive lethal allele, encoding a Drosophila proteasome subunit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA., 90, 8842–8846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38 Schweisguth, F. (1999) Dominant-negative mutation in the ß2 and ß6 proteasome subunit genes affect alternative cell fate decisions in the Drosophila sense organ lineage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 11382–11386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39 Bercovich, B., Stancovski, I., Mayer, A., Blumenfeld, N., Laszlo, A., Schwartz, A.L. and Ciechanover, A. (1997) Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of certain protein substrates in vitro requires the molecular chaperone Hsc70. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 9002–2010.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40 Meacham, G.C., Patterson, C., Zhang, W., Younger, J.M. and Cyr, D.M. (2000) The Hsc70 co-chaperone CHIP targets immature CFTR for proteasomal degradation. Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 100–105.

41 Connell, P., Ballinger, C.A., Jiang, J., Wu, Y., Thompson, L.J., Hohfeld, J. and Patterson, C. (2000) The co-chaperone CHIP regulates protein triage decisions mediated by heat-shock proteins. Nat. Cell Biol., 3, 93–96.

42 Goodson, M.L., Hong, Y., Rogers, R., Matunis, M.J., Park-Sarge, O. and Sarge, K.D. (2001) SUMO-1 modification regulates the DNA binding activity of heat shock transcription factor 2, a promyelocytic leukemia nuclear body associated transcription factor. J. Biol. Chem., 276, 18513–18518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43 Hong, Y., Rogers, R., Matunis, M.J., Mayhew, C.N., Goodson, M.L., Park-Sarge, O.K. and Sarge, K.D. (2001) Regulation of HSF1 by stress-induced SUMO-1 modification. J Biol. Chem., 276, 40263–40267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44 Dohmen, R.J., Stappen, R., McGrath, J.P., Forrov, H., Kolarov, J., Goffeau, A. and Varshavsky, A. (1995) An essential yeast gene encoding a homolog of ubiquitin-activating enzyme. J. Biol. Chem., 270, 18099–18109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45 Long, X. and Griffith, L.C. (2000) Identification and characterization of a SUMO-1 conjugation system that modifies neuronalcalcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biol. Chem., 275, 40765–40776.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46 Warrick, J.M., Paulson, H., Gray-Board, G.L., Bui, Q.T., Fischbeck, K., Pittman, R.N. and Bonini, N.M. (1998) Expanded polyglutamine protein forms nuclear inclusions and causes neural degeneration in Drosophila. Cell, 93, 939–949.[ISI][Medline]

47 Cummings, C.J., Reinstein, E., Sun, Y., Antalffy, B., Jiang, Y., Ciechanover, A., Orr, H.T., Beaudet, A.L. and Zoghbi, H.Y. (1999) Mutation of the E6-AP ubiquitin ligase reduces nuclear inclusion frequency while accelerating polyglutamine-induced pathology in SCA1 mice. Neuron, 24, 879–892.[ISI][Medline]

48 Matilla, A., Gorbea, C., Einum, D.D., Townsend, J., Michalik, A., van Broeckhoven, C., Jensen, C.C., Murphy, K.J., Ptacek, L.J. and Fu, Y.H. (2001) Association of ataxin-7 with the proteasome subunit S4 of the 19S regulatory complex. Hum. Mol. Genet., 10, 2821–2831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49 DiFiglia, M., Sapp, E., Chase, K.O., Davies, S.W., Bates, G.P., Vonsattel, J.P. and Aronin, N. (1997) Aggregation of huntingtin in neuronal intranuclear inclusions and dystrophic neurites in brain. Science, 277, 1990–1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50 Kwek, S.S., Derry, J., Tyner, A.L., Shen, Z. and Gudkov, A.V. (2001) Functional analysis and intracellular localization of p53 modified by SUMO-1. Oncogene, 20, 2587–2599.[ISI][Medline]

51 Seeler, J.S., Marchio, A., Losson, R., Desterro, J.M., Hay, R.T., Chambon, P. and Dejean, A. (2001) Common properties of nuclear body protein SP100 and TIF1{alpha} chromatin factor: role of SUMO modification. Mol. Cell Biol., 21, 3314–3324.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

52 Kamitani, T., Kito, K., Nguyen, H.P., Wada, H., Fukuda-Kamitani, T. and Yeh, E.T.H. (1998) Identification of three major sentrinization sites in PML. J. Biol. Chem., 273, 26675–26682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

53 Li, H., Leo, C., Zhu, J., Wu, X., O'Neil, J., Park, E. and Chen, J.D. (2000) Sequestration and inhibition of Daxx-mediated transcriptional repression by PML. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20, 1784–1796.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

54 Chang, H.Y., Nishitoh, H., Yang, X., Ichijo, H. and Baltimore, D. (1998) Activation of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) by the adaptor protein Daxx. Science, 281, 1860–1863.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

55 Steffan, J.S., Bodai, L., Pallow, J., Poelman, M., McCampbell, A., Apostol, B.L., Kazantsev, A., Schmidt, E., Zhu, Y., Greenwald, M. et al. (2001) Histone deacetylase inhibitors arrest polyglutamine-dependent neurodegeneration in Drosophila. Nature, 413, 739–743.[Medline]

56 Skinner, P.J., Koshy, B.T., Cummings, C.J., Klement, I.A., Helin, K., Servadio, A., Zoghbi, H.Y. and Orr, H.T. (1997) Ataxin-1 with an expanded glutamine tract alters nuclear matrix-associated structures. Nature, 389, 971–974.[Medline]

57 Chai, Y., Shao, J., Miller, V.M., Williams, A. and Paulson, H.L. (2002) Live-cell imaging reveals divergent intracellular dynamics of polyglutamine disease proteins and supports a sequestration model of pathogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 9310–9315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

58 Morley, J.F., Brignull, H.R., Weyers, J.J. and Morimoto, R.I. (in press) The threshold for polyglutamine-expansion, protein aggregation and cellular toxicity is dynamic and influenced by aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 10417–10422.

59 Watase, K., Weeber, E.J., Xu, B., Anatalffy, B., Yuva-Paylor, L., Hashimoto, K., Kano, M., Atkinson, R., Sun, Y., Armstrong, D.L. et al. (2002) A long CAG repeat in the mouse Sca1 locus replicates SCA1 features and reveals the impact of protein solubility on selective neurodegeneration. Neuron, 34, 905–919.[ISI][Medline]

60 Bucciantini, M., Giannoni, E., Chiti, F., Baroni, F., Formigli, L., Zurdo, J., Taddei, N., Ramponi, G., Dobson, C.M. and Stefani, M. (2002) Inherent toxicity of aggregates implies a common mechanism for protein misfolding diseases. Nature, 416, 507–511.[Medline]

61 Walsh, D.M., Klyubin, I., Fadeeva, J.V., Cullen, W.K., Anwyl, R., Wolfe, M.S., Rowan, M.J. and Selkoe, D.J. (2002) Naturally secreted oligomers of amyloid beta protein potentially inhibit hippocampal long-term potentiation. Nature, 416, 535–539.[Medline]

62 Lam, Y.A., Pickart, C.M., Alban, A., Landon, M., Jamieson, C., Ramage, R., Mayer, R.J. and Layfield, R. (2000) Inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in Alzheimer's disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 9902–9906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

63 Gregori, L., Hainfeld, J.F., Simon, M.N. and Goldgaber, D. (1997) Binding of amyloid beta protein to the 20S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 58–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

64 Van Gassen, G., De Jonghe, C., Pype, S., Van Criekinge, W., Julliams, A., Vanderhoeven, I., Woodrow, S., Beyaert, R., Huylebroeck, D. and Van Broeckhoven, C. (1999) Alzheimer's disease associated presenilin 1 interacts with HC5 and ZETA, subunits of the catalytic 20S proteasome. Neurobiol. Dis., 6, 376–391.[ISI][Medline]

65 Leroy, E., Boyer, R., Auburger, G., Leube, B., Ulm, G., Mezey, E., Harta, G., Brownstein, M.J., Jonnalagada, S., Chernova, T. et al. (1998) The ubiquitin pathway in Parkinson's disease. Nature, 395, 451–452.[Medline]

66 Shimura, H., Hattori, N., Kubo, S., Mizuno, Y., Asakawa, S., Minoshima, S., Shimizu, N., Iwai, K., Chiba, T., Tanaka, K. et al. (2000) Familial Parkinson disease gene product, parkin, is a ubiquitin-protein ligase. Nat. Genet., 25, 302–305.[ISI][Medline]

67 Elefant, F. and Palter, K. (1999) Tissue-specific expression of dominant negative mutant Drosophila HSC70 causes developmental defects and lethality. Mol. Biol. Cell, 10, 2101–2117.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

68 Brand, A.H. and Perrimon, N. (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development, 118, 401–415.[Abstract]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page