Skip Navigation

Human Molecular Genetics 2004 13(Review Issue 2):R289-R296; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddh249
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lovett, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hawkins, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lovett, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, Vol. 13, Review Issue 2 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

The developmental genetics of auditory hair cells

R. David Hawkins and Michael Lovett*

Division of Human Genetics, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA

Received June 15, 2004; Accepted July 27, 2004


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Loss of auditory hair cells (AHCs) is a major cause of human deafness. Considerable effort has been devoted to unraveling how these mechanotransducers of sound are specified, with a view to correcting hearing loss by gene or stem cell therapies. Recent work on signaling cascades, particularly lateral inhibition and planar cell polarity, has begun to tie together some of the known pathways. Mutations in mice and humans that cause hearing and/or balance disorders are also shedding light on how AHCs are specified and, maintained and handle ion flux. Studies on some of these genes are beginning to provide insights into the more complex genetics of later onset forms of hearing loss. Progress has also been made in solving some long-term goals of auditory biology. Cadherin23 has been identified as a component of AHC stereocilia tip links, and progress has been made towards identifying the elusive AHC mechanoreceptor channel. Preliminary steps have also been taken towards inner-ear gene therapy, and in the engineering of embryonic stem cells for eventual cell therapies. Mammals cannot regenerate AHCs, but birds and other lower vertebrates can. Genomic tools have now been brought to bear on this problem with the aim of deciphering the molecular basis of this regenerative capability. The combination of new genomic tools and the many mouse and chicken embryological and genetic resources should increasingly provide new insights into how AHCs are programed and maintained.

Congenital hearing loss affects about one in every 500 newborns. However, this comprises only a small proportion of total hearing loss. Approximately 10% of the human population have significant later onset hearing impairment, and the vast majority of this is due to sensorineural hearing loss, resulting from damage to auditory hair cells (AHCs) or their innervation (web site of the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders: http:///www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/hearing.asp). We are born with a few thousand AHCs, which are specialized and essential mechanoelectrical transducers of sound that must be retained in good working order for many decades, because we (and all mammals studied to date) cannot regenerate them. Consequently, considerable effort has been devoted to unraveling how AHCs are specified, with a view to correcting hearing loss by gene or stem cell therapies.

There is a vast literature on the anatomy and developmental genetics of the inner ear. In this review, we deal only with those events that appear to directly impact upon AHC production and maintenance. After a brief description of AHC development, we describe some of the known genetic pathways that function in hair cell development and recent insights into how they may fit together. We then discuss attempts to either discover stem cells or engineer embryonic stem (ES) cells towards an AHC fate. Finally, we discuss more global, genomics-based approaches to pathway discovery and manipulation of hair cell regeneration.


    DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Much of our current knowledge of the inner ear is derived from studies in mouse and chicken (see later). Figure 1 shows some of the steps in the developmental anatomy of these complex structures. In mouse, bona fide AHCs are not discernible until quite late in development (~E13) and they acquire mechanotransduction between E16 and E17 (2). They arise, as do their surrounding supporting cells (SCs), from a sensory primordium. Eventually, two distinct types of hair cells are formed in the organ of Corti within the cochlea, a single row of inner hair cells (IHCs) and three rows of outer hair cells (OHCs). The hair cells, together with their surrounding SCs constitute the sensory epithelia (SE).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Developmental anatomy of the mouse inner ear. (A) Diagram of an embryonic day 8 mouse embryo. All of the structures of the inner ear arise from a small ectodermal thickening (the otic placode), highlighted in red. (B) Diagrams of the structure of the dissected inner ear at days 10–15 of embryogenesis [modified from Morsli et al. (1)]. Dorsal is to the top and anterior is to the right. The areas destined to become the cochlea are shown in blue. By E13 hair cells are beginning to differentiate, by E15 they are starting to acquire mechanotransduction capabilities. (C) Diagram of part of the organ of Corti within the adult cochlea. Four rows of AHCs are surrounded by SCs and have sterocilia imbedded into the overlying tectoral membrane (shown in green). The single row of IHCs is shown in red, and the three rows of OHCs are shown in yellow. Movement of the basilar membrane (triggered by a sound wave) below the hair cells (data not shown) results in hair cell movement and sterocilia deflection.

 
In chicken, the arrangement of AHCs and SCs is somewhat different, but the most striking difference in birds (and other lower vertebrates) is that, if their AHCs are damaged, they can regenerate new ones from a population of supporting stem cells (35). Discovering the molecular basis of this regenerative capability has been a major goal of auditory research for almost two decades.


    NOTCH SIGNALING
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The Notch and Wingless signaling cascades are important regulators of lateral inhibition. This occurs when one cell sends an inhibitory signal to its neighbor, preventing it from taking on the same fate. Figures 2 and 3 summarize a large body of work from the late 1990s showing that various components of the Notch pathway are important in AHC development. For example, in mouse, the loss of the Notch ligand Jagged2 leads to two rows of IHCs and four rows of OHCs (7). Jagged2 appears to be necessary for lateral inhibition in SCs, expressing Notch1, to prevent the differentiation of excess AHCs.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The Notch and Math1 signaling cascades and the phenotypes of various knockdowns, knockouts or overexpression constructs. This figure summarizes work on mouse and zebrafish AHC phenotypes. The figure shows outer hair cells (OHCs), pillar cells (PCs) and inner hair cells (IHCs) as seen from above. (A)–(F) list the specific genes and the types of alterations (e.g. –/– indicates a homozygous null). In each case, the effect upon AHCs is shown to the right and summarized at the far right. GER is the greater epithelial ridge. Genes are color coded according to the cell type within which they appear to be expressed. Blue is AHC-specific and red is SC-specific. (G)–(I) shows the effects of specific genes on the zebrafish sensory patch of AHCs. References are as follows: Notch1 and Jagged1 antisense knockdowns in rat explants cultures (6). Jagged2 homozygous null mice (7). Jagged1 dominant missense mutation from an ENU screen (8). Hes1 homozygous null mice (9,10). Hes5 homozygous null mice (11). Math1 overexpression in rat explant cultures (11), and adenoviral mediated in vivo overexpression in guinea pigs (12). In the zebrafish an increase of hair cells in the sensory patch is seen for dominant negative alleles of deltaA (13) and 10-fold more hair cells in the mind bomb mutant (14).

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. An SC (red) and a HC (blue) are shown. Next to each cell is a list of color coded genes from the Math1 or Notch pathways that are specifically active in one or other cell type. In the lower part of the figure various interactions between components of these pathways are shown. Again, the genes are color coded according to cell type. Ligands and receptors are also color coded with the red and blue vertical lines indicating the SC and AHC cell surfaces, respectively. Lines ending with an arrow indicate induction, lines ending with a perpendicular line indicate repression. For a detailed review on Notch1, its ligands (Delta1, Jagged1 and Jagged2) and effectors (Hes1 and Hes5) see (15). See the text for specifics on the interaction between Math1 and Notch pathways. Math1 is capable of positive autoregulation (16) and negative autoregulation (17) and this is shown in the figure. It is also inhibited directly by Zic1 (18) and either directly or indirectly by Hes1 and Hes5 (6,10,17).

 
The expression of Delta1, another ligand of Notch, demarcates those cells that give rise to differentiating AHCs in chickens and mice (19,20). Delta1 expression in these nascent AHCs is eventually lost as the cells commit to their fate. Delta1 is also expressed during AHC regeneration in the inner ear of chicken (21). Recently, Itoh et al. (22) have added another piece to this complex pathway. They demonstrated that the zebrafish mind bomb locus (which affects numbers of hair cells) encodes a ubiquitin ligase that specifically acts upon DELTA1, targeting it for degradation.


    MATH1
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The transcription factor (TF) Math1 is specifically expressed in developing AHCs. Math1 knockout mice fail to produce any AHCs (23). In addition, overexpression of Math1 leads to supernumerary hair cells. Recent work on the effects of Math1 in other cell types has provided additional candidate downstream effectors for this pathway. For example, three transcription factors, Lh2A(LHX2), Lh2B(LHX9) and Barhl1, are no longer expressed in specific neuronal cell types in Math1 null mice (24). The TF Zic1 was recently shown to act as a repressor of Math1 in the developing nervous system (18). Additional Zic family members (e.g. Zic2) are expressed in the inner ear (25) and during avian HC regeneration (unpublished data).

Recent evidence indicates that the Notch and Math1 pathways intersect. The TF gene Hes1 is downstream in the Notch pathway (26) and suppresses the Math1 overexpression phenotype of supernumerary hair cells when it is co-transfected into explants (9). Hes1 appears to be a negative regulator of Math 1. Although loss of Hes1 leads to an increase in IHCs, loss of Hes5, a closely related member of the same TF gene family, leads to an increase in OHCs (10). Most recently, Gazit et al. (17) have directly demonstrated (albeit in a different cell type) that Math1 binds to the Hes5 promoter, thereby directly tying together these two important pathways. They propose that Math1 activates Hes5, which in turn inhibits Math1 expression (Figs 2 and 3).

Zheng and Gao (11) first showed that overexpression of Math1 could lead to ectopic hair cells in rat cochlear explants, at least as measured by surrogate hair cell markers such as Myosin7a or immature stereocilia bundles. More recently, Kawamoto et al. (12) have shown that Math1 overexpression in vivo has the same effect in the guinea pig inner ear. This study could not detect whether new hair cells arose in the sensory epithelium, but the putative new hair cells were able to attract axons. These first steps towards inner ear gene therapy are exciting and encouraging and many groups are pursuing these strategies towards eventual hair cell replacement.


    CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE INHIBITORS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Cyclin dependent kinases regulate transition through the cell cycle, whereas production of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs) leads to an exit from the cell cycle. Exit from the cell cycle coincides with the expression of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor P27/Kip1 in the developing mouse organ of Corti between E12 and E14 (27). P27/Kip1 appears to be present in SCs, but absent in AHCs. Homozygous p27/Kip1 knockout mice have supernumerary AHCs (both IHCs and OHCs), but they also retain SCs, indicating that this gene has some role in proliferation (would seem to have a role in suppressing AHCs), but not an absolute role in differentiation. Interestingly, heterozygote p27/Kip1 knockouts only have additional IHCs. Although p27/Kip1 expression is one marker of SCs in the cochlear sensory epithelia, another cell cycle kinase inhibitor is specific to hair cells. Ink4d/p19 is expressed in a similar temporal pattern to p27/Kip1 before AHC and SC differentiation (28). However, Ink4d/p19 knockout mice do not exhibit obvious morphological defects during embryonic development. At about 5 weeks after birth the mice show signs of progressive hearing loss, caused by AHCs reentering the cell cycle and dying through apoptosis.


    PAX–EYA–SIX–DACH GENES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The Pax, Eya, Six and Dach gene families are important in otic development, but defining how they fit together has proved difficult. The recent derivation of Six1 null mice is one step towards determining the complex epistatic relationships between these TF gene families (29,30). Six1 expression is lost in Eya1 nulls (29), which appears to place it downstream of Eya1. However, the relationship of Pax genes to Six and Eya expression is less clear. This may reflect functional redundancy in Pax genes [e.g. Pax5 and Pax2 (31)]. Likewise, Dach1 does not appear to be simply downstream of Pax2 or Eya1 (32), unlike the situation in Drosophila. Defining these connections and functional redundancies is a continuing challenge.


    GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR CELL POLARITY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
As AHCs differentiate they reorient to their final arrangement (33). The correct coordination of these reorientation events is necessary for hearing, and this process can be disrupted by perturbations in Wnt signaling. At least eight Wnt genes are expressed in the organ of Corti. The primary receptors for these ligands are Frizzled proteins. Frizzled genes are expressed in the developing chick ear (34), but not all the Frizzled genes are necessary for this process. These types of orientation defects can also be caused by other genes that affect planar cell polarity (PCP). Mouse mutants in Vangl2 (the ortholog to Drosophila strabismus/van gogh) and in Scrib1 (35) have orientation defects in all rows of AHCs. Protein tyrosine kinase 7 (PTK7/CCk-4) also leads to stereocilia orientation defects when mutated in mice (36). The mouse mutants Spin cycle (Scy) and Crash (Crsh) also affect PCP (37) and lead to misorientation of OHCs. Although other mouse mutants, in genes such as Myo7a and Cdh23 (see later), result in disorganized stereocilia bundles, they do not appear to be directly involved in PCP, which occurs before stereocilia develop.


    HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Many human and mouse hearing and/or balance mutations lead to defects in the development or architecture of hair cell sterocilia. These specialized structures, when deflected by transmitted sound, directly lead to gating of AHC ion channels, potassium influx and cell depolarization. The genes that underlie the various forms of Usher's Syndrome (USH) have provided particular insights into stereocilia development and/or maintenance. Of the 11 USH loci, seven have been molecularly cloned (several of these also cause non-syndromic hearing loss). Most of these genes are ‘structural’ in nature and include MYO7A, HARMONIN, CDH23, PCDH15, USH2A and USH3 (3846). Many of these proteins have recently been shown to interact with each other. For example, mutations in the SANS gene were recently identified as causing USH1G (47) and the Jackson shaker mutation in mice (48). These alterations lead to stereocilia bundle disorganization. The SANS gene product interacts with another USH protein, HARMONIN (USH1C). HARMONIN, in turn, interacts with MYOSIN7A and CADHERIN23 (CDH23), two additional USH proteins (49). Recently the Deaf circler and Deaf circler 2 mouse mutants have also been shown to result from mutations in Harmonin (50). Most USH genes encode proteins with PDZ domains (a common motif for protein–protein interaction). In this context, it is interesting to note that the Whirler mouse mutant (in which hair cells degenerate) was recently shown to result from mutations in a PDZ protein, Whirlin (51,52). This gene is also responsible for DFNB31 in humans, and plays a role in stereocilia elongation through actin polymerization.


    ION FLUX
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Ion flux is also critical for hearing and for AHC survival. Overexposure to K+ leads to prolonged depolarization, and in time is toxic. Several hearing and/or balance mutations in mouse lead to hair cell death owing to ion toxicity. For example, mutations in tight junctions and gap junctions are thought to lead to ion toxicity in HCs, resulting in postnatal hair cell death (5355). The dynamics of these degenerative processes have been recently examined in a series of mouse models. Defects in the gap junction protein CONNEXIN 26 (CX26/GJB2, DFNB1) are the leading cause of sporadic non-syndromic hearing loss in Caucasians (5658). This gene has been targeted by conditional deletion in the mouse inner ear (59), and has also been overexpressed as a dominant-negative transgene (60). In both of these models SCs die, followed by hair cell death around P14, and there is an eventual collapse of the organ of Corti, most likely due to problems in potassium homeostasis. A similar phenotype has been observed in Connexin30 knockout mice (61). Mouse models in which the gene encoding the tight junction protein Claudin14 (DFNB26 in humans) is deleted also show progressive loss of AHCs by 3 weeks of age, possibly through loss of a cation barrier (55).

Three TF genes have been implicated in hair cell maintenance/survival: when Pou4f3 (Brn3c) is knocked out, it results in a failure of hair cell maturation late in embryonic development (62). Mutations in Gfi1 appear to result in a similar phenotype to Pou4f3 (63). Gfi1 is the mouse ortholog of the Drosophila gene senseless, and its expression is directly dependent on Pou4f3 (64). The third of these TF genes is Barhl1, which was mentioned earlier as being potentially interconnected with the Math1 pathway (Figs 2 and 3). Its expression is first detected in the cochlea at E14.5 and it is still expressed in AHCs at P2 (65). Barhl1 null mice exhibit early and progressive hearing loss. However, these mice continue to express Math1, Pou4f3, Myo6 and Myo7a, indicating that Barhl1 is more likely to play a role in HC maintenance than initiation of HC differentiation. By P6, OHCs in the apical region of the null mutants show stereocilia misalignment and disorganization leading to progressive deafness.

Genes that are involved in Mendelian forms of hearing loss, such as those mentioned earlier, may provide insights into the more complex and common later onset forms. One interesting example is the Cdh23 gene, mutations in which disrupt stereocilia in USH1D, DFNB12 and the Waltzer mouse mutant (40,41,66). A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in Cdh23 was found to act as a genetic modifier of the mouse Deaf waddler mutation in age-related hearing loss (AHL) (67). This SNP (which leads to a synonomous codon substitution) is sufficient to cause exon skipping in the Cdh23 gene. Subtle genetic alterations in known deafness loci, such as those found in Cdh23, may prove to be important discriminators of risk for late onset hearing loss in humans. Interestingly, Cadherin23 has now also been shown to be a component of hair cell stereocilia tip links (a filamentous linkage between the ends of adjacent stereocilia) (68,69). Defining the components of tip links has been a long sought goal of auditory biologists that has at last been achieved.

We are beginning to gain insights into hair cell maintenance and stereocilia structure from mouse and human mutations. However, identifying the gene that encodes the hair cell-specific, mechanotransduction potassium channel has proved elusive. The presence of only a small number of channels on a small population of cells has made this biochemically difficult. However, recent work in zebrafish raises the hope that this might prove tractable. By employing a combination of molecular biology and bioinformatics approaches, Sidi et al. (70) were able to isolate the zebrafish ortholog of the Drosophila nompC (no mechanoreceptor potential C) gene. This channel is expressed in all five sensory patches of the zebrafish embryonic inner ear. Morpholino-directed knockdown of this gene leads to deafness, and failure to respond to acoustic stimuli. Hair cells appear morphologically normal, but lack channel activity. NompC is a member of the TRP superfamily of channels, transient receptor potential channels implicated in a variety of sensory processes. However, the zebrafish gene shares only 45% identity with its Drosophila ortholog, and conventional computational homology searches do not identify any unequivocal orthologs in the mouse or human genomes. Thus, the search for the mammalian channel continues.


    STEM CELLS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
It is still unclear whether a stem cell population exists in the SE during late mammalian embryogenesis or in early postnatal life. Many, generally inconclusive, attempts have been made to identify such a cell type. Most recently, Li et al. (71) reported a possible stem cell population in adult mouse utricles (a component of the inner ear that senses changes in movement). These cells appeared to have pluripotent potential and exhibited many of the characteristics that might be expected of inner ear stem cells. In a parallel study, the same group took on the even more daunting task of differentiating embryonic stem cells (ES) toward a hair cell fate (72). ES cells were cultured in the presence of EGF and IGF-1, and subsequently in bFGF. Encouragingly, the resulting cultures contained cells that expressed a wide range of HC-specific markers, but these also showed expression of some SC markers. This may indicate that a mixed population is present and/or the cells were not fully differentiated. Transplantation of these mouse cells to the chick inner ear resulted in some hopeful signs of hair cell differentiation. The possibilities of stem cell therapies are exciting, but the current state-of-the-art for inner ear ES cell differentiation seems rather hit or miss at present. Various combinations of treatments are used in the hope that one will produce the correct spectrum of markers. It appears likely that a more directly engineered approach may be required in the future in order to achieve pure populations. Nevertheless, it is clear that differentiation of stem cells is a route that many investigators will continue to pursue, and one that holds great promise for possible replacement therapy.


    GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC FUNCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
With the exception of some useful but small scale Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) projects (73) the major genomic contribution to this field has been through microarray-based gene expression profiling. These present a considerable technical challenge, because the inner ear is very small, necessitating either large-scale tissue procurement or extremely robust RNA amplification methods. It also contains a wide diversity of cell types, which complicates the expression analysis. As one means to partially circumvent these problems, Rivolta et al. (74) conducted an analysis of gene expression in a conditionally immortal mouse cochlear cell line. Likewise, Chen and Corey (75) used postnatal mouse cochlear samples to analyze major gene expression changes, and as the starting point for an inner ear gene expression database (76). Both of these studies constitute important base line profiles of inner ear gene expression. Our group has investigated gene expression in pure populations of SE from the chicken inner ear (77). The chicken utricle SE is in a constant cycle of apoptosis and regeneration, whereas the cochlear SE is quiescent (if the hair cells are not damaged). We initially compared gene expression between these two SEs and identified >100 genes that showed significant differences. Of these, ~80 were TF genes identified using a cross-species TF microarray that we developed (78). We have now extended these observations to a large-scale study of TF gene expression changes that occur in chicken cochlear and utricle SEs as they regenerate in response to different forms of damage. These have been compared to data derived from damaged mouse SE to identify similarities and differences. These time courses of gene expression have allowed us to identify known pathways of gene expression, as well as a core group of TF genes that are expressed in all chicken regenerative timecourses (unpublished data). In addition to these profiling studies we have also embarked upon RNA interference studies to knockdown, phenotypically characterize and expression profile the effects of specific TF genes in chicken SE.


    FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
It is likely that ‘solving’ the developmental and regenerative gene ‘wiring diagram’ for AHCs will require connecting the currently known parts of the puzzle and discovering as yet unknown components. Hopefully, this will not occur one gene at a time. It seems likely that the elegant model systems that have been so painstakingly constructed and studied to date (and in particular, the ever increasing number of mouse mutants and knockouts), will prove amenable to more large scale technologies, such as microarray analysis, high throughput RNAi knockdowns, proteomics methods and the application of new genomics approaches such as chromatin IP to define downstream targets of TFs. These technologies should provide the types of insights that will better inform current efforts towards gene and/or stem cell therapies for AHC damage.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank Dr Anne M. Bowcock for her critical reading of this manuscript. We are particularly grateful for financial support from the National Organization for Hearing Research Foundation and from the NIDCD of the NIH for grant RO1-DC005632.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 3147473265; Email: lovett{at}genetics.wustl.edu


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 DEVELOPMENTAL ANATOMY OF AHCs
 NOTCH SIGNALING
 MATH1
 CYCLIN DEPENDENT KINASE...
 PAX-EYA-SIX-DACH GENES
 GENES THAT AFFECT PLANAR...
 HAIR CELL MAINTENANCE
 ION FLUX
 STEM CELLS
 GENOMIC APPROACHES TO AHC...
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Morsli, H., Choo, D., Ryan, A., Johnson, R. and Wu, D.K. (1998) Development of the mouse inner ear and origin of its sensory organs. J. Neurosci., 18, 3327–3335.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  2. Geloc, G.S. and Holt, J.R. (2003) Developmental acquisition of sensory transduction in hair cells of the mouse inner ear. Nat. Neurosci., 6, 1019–1020.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  3. Cruz, R.M., Lambert, P.R. and Rubel, E.W. (1987) Light microscopic evidence of hair cell regeneration after gentamicin toxicity in the chick cochlea. Arch. Otolaryngol. 113, 1058–1062.[Abstract]

  4. Cotanche, D.A. (1987) Regeneration of hair cell sterociliary bundles in the chick cochlea following severe acoustic trauma. Hear. Res., 30, 181–194[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  5. Warchol, M.E. and Corwin, J.T. (1996) Regenerative proliferation in organ cultures of the avian cochlea: identification of the initial progenitors and determination of the latency of the proliferative response. J. Neurosci., 16, 5466–5477.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  6. Zine, A., Van De Water, T.R. and de Ribaupierre, F. (2000) Notch signaling regulates the pattern of auditory hair cell differentiation in mammals. Development, 127, 3373–3383.[Abstract]

  7. Lanford, P.J., Lan, Y., Jiang, R., Lindsell, C., Weinmaster, G., Gridley, T. and Kelley, M.W. (1999) Notch signalling pathway mediates hair cell development in mammalian cochlea. Nat. Genet., 21, 289–292.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  8. Tsai, H., Hardisty, R.E., Rhodes, C., Kiernan, A.E., Roby, P., Tymowska-Lalanne, Z., Mburu, P., Rastan, S., Hunter, A.J., Brown, S.D. et al. (2001) The mouse slalom mutant demonstrates a role for Jagged1 in neuroepithelial patterning in the organ of Corti. Hum. Mol. Genet., 10, 507–512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  9. Zheng, J.L., Shou, J., Guillemot, F., Kageyama, R. and Gao, W-Q. (2000) Hes1 is a negative regulator of inner ear hair cell differentiation. Development, 127, 4551–4560.[Abstract]

  10. Zine, A., Aubert, A., Qui, J., Therianos, S., Guillemot, F., Kageyama, R. and de Ribaupierre, F. (2001) Hes1 and Hes5 activities are required for the normal development of the hair cells in the mammalian inner ear. J. Neurosci., 21, 4712–4720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  11. Zheng, J.L. and Gao, W.-Q. (2000) Overexpression of Math1 induces robust production of extra hair cells in postnatal rat inner ears. Nature, 3, 580–586.

  12. Kawamoto, K., Ishimoto, S-I., Minoda, R., Brough, D.E. and Raphael, Y. (2003) Math1 gene transfer generates new cochlear hair cells in mature guinea pigs in vivo. J. Neurosci., 23, 4395–4400.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Riley, B.B., Chiang, M.-Y., Farmer, L. and Heck, R. (1999) The deltaA gene of zebrafish mediates lateral inhibition of hair cells in the inner ear and is regulated by pax2.1. Development, 126, 5669–5678.[Abstract]

  14. Haddon, C., Jiang, Y.J., Smithers, L. and Lewis, J. (1998) Delta-Notch signalling and the patterning of sensory cell differentiation in the zebrafish ear: evidence from the mind bomb mutant. Development, 125, 4637–4644.[Abstract]

  15. Bryant, J., Goodyear, R.J. and Richardson, G.P. (2002) Sensory organ development in the inner ear: molecular and cellular mechanisms. Br. Med. Bull., 63, 39–57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  16. Helms, A.W., Abney, A.L., Ben-Arie, N., Zoghbi, H.Y. and Johnson, J.E. (2000) Autoregulation and multiple enhancers control Math1 expression in the developing nervous system. Development, 127, 1185–1196.[Abstract]

  17. Gazit, R., Krizhanovsky, V. and Ben-Arie. N. (2004) Math1 controls cerebellar granule cell differentiation by regulating multiple components of the Notch signaling pathway. Development, 131, 903–913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  18. Ebert, P.J., Timmer, J.R., Nakada, Y., Helms, A.W., Parab, P.B., Liu, Y., Hunsaker, T.L. and Johnson, J.E. (2003) Zic1 represses Math1 expression via interactions with the Math1 enhancer and modulation of Math1 autoregulation. Development, 130, 1949–1959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  19. Adam, J., Myat, A., Le Roux, I., Eddison, M., Henrique, D., Ish-Horowicz, D. and Lewis, J. (1998) Cell fate choices and the expression of Notch, Delta and Serrate homologues in the chick inner ear: parallels with Drosophila sense-organ development. Development, 125, 4645–4654.[Abstract]

  20. Morrison, A., Hodgetts, C., Gossler, A., Hrabe de Angelis, M. and Lewis, J. (1999) Expression of Delta1 and Serrate1 (Jagged1) in the mouse inner ear. Mech. Dev., 84, 169–172.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  21. Stone, J.S. and Rubel, E.W. (1999) Delta1 expression during avian hair cell regeneration. Development, 126, 961–973.[Abstract]

  22. Itoh, M., Kim, C.H., Palardy, G., Oda, T., Jiang, Y.J., Maust, D., Yeo, S.Y., Lorick, K., Wright, G.J., Ariza-McNaughton, L. et al. (2003) Mind bomb is a ubiquitin ligase that is essential for efficient activation of Notch signaling by Delta. Dev. Cell., 4, 67–82.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  23. Bermingham, N.A., Hassan, B.A., Price, S.D., Vollrath, M.A., Ben-Arie, N., Eatock, R.A., Bellen, H.J., Lysakowski, A. and Zoghbi, H. (1999) Math1: an essential gene for the generation of inner ear hair cells. Science, 284, 1837–1841.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  24. Bermingham, N.A., Hassan, B.A., Wang, V.Y., Fernandez, M., Banfi, S., Bellen, H.J., Fritzsch, B. and Zoghbi, H.Y. (2001) Proprioceptor pathway development is dependent on MATH1. Neuron, 30, 411–422.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  25. Warner, S.J., Hutson, M.R., Oh, S-H., Gerlach-Bank, L.M., Lomax, M.I. and Barald, K.F. (2003) Expression of ZIC genes in the development of the chick inner ear and nervous system. Dev. Dynam., 226, 702–712.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  26. Ohtsuka, T., Ishibashi, M., Gradwohl, G., Nakanishi, S., Guillemot, F. and Kageyama, R. (1999) Hes1 and Hes5 as notch effectors in mammalian neuronal differentiation. EMBO J., 18, 2196–2207.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  27. Chen, P. and Segil, N. (1999) p27Kip1 links cell proliferation to morphogenesis in the developing organ of Corti. Development, 126,1581–1590.[Abstract]

  28. Chen, P., Zindy, F., Abdala, C., Liu, F., Li, X., Roussel, M.F. and Segil, N. (2003) Progressive hearing loss in mice lacking the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Ink4d. Nat. Cell Biol., 5, 422–426.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  29. Zheng, W., Huang, L., Wei, Z-B., Silvius, D., Tang, B. and Xu, P.-X. (2003) The role of Six1 in mammalian auditory system development. Development, 130, 3989–4000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  30. Ozaki, H., Nakamura, K., Funahashi, J., Ikeda, K., Yamada, G., Tokano, H., Okamura, H., Kitamura, K., Muto, S., Kotaki, H., Sudo, K., Horai, R., Iwakura, Y. and Kawakami, K. (2003) Six1 controls patterning of the mouse otic vesicle. Development, 131, 551–562.

  31. Bouchard, M., Pfeffer, P. and Busslinger, M. (2000) Functional equivalence of the transcription factors Pax2 and Pax5 in mouse development. Development, 127, 3703–3713.[Abstract]

  32. Heanue, T.A., Davis, R.J., Rowitch, D.H., Kispert, A., McMahon, A.P., Mardon, G. and Tabin, C.J. (2002) Dach1, a vertebrate homologue of Drosophila dachshund, is expressed in the developing eye and ear of both chick and mouse and is regulated independently of Pax and Eya genes. Mech. Dev., 111, 75–87.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  33. Dabdoub, A., Donohue, M.J., Brennan, A., Wolf, V., Montcouquiol, M., Sassoon, D.A., Hseih, J.-C., Rubin, J.S., Salinas, P.C. and Kelley, M.W. (2003) Development, 130, 2375–2384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  34. Stevens, C.B., Davies, A.L., Battista, S., Lewis, J.H. and Fekete, D.M. (2003) Forced activation of Wnt signaling alters morphogenesis and sensory organ identity in the chicken inner ear. Develop. Biol., 261, 149–164.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  35. Montcouquiol, M., Rachel, R.A., Lanford, P.J., Copeland, N.G., Jenkins, N.A. and Kelley, M.W. (2003) Identification of Vangl2 and Scrb1 as planar polarity genes in mammals. Nature, 423, 173–177.[CrossRef][Medline]

  36. Lu, X., Borchers, A.G., Jolicoeur, C., Rayburn, H., Baker, J.C., Tessier-Lavigne, M. (2004) PTK7/CCK-4 is a novel regulator of planar cell polarity in vertebrates. Nature, 430, 93–98.[CrossRef][Medline]

  37. Curtin, J.A., Quint, E., Tsipouri, V., Arkell, R.M., Cattanach, B., Copp, A.J., Henderson, D.J., Spurr, N., Stanier, P., Fisher, E.M., Nolan, P.M., Steel, K.P., Brown, S.D.M., Gray, I.C. and Murdoch, J.N. (2003) Mutation of Celsr1 disrupts planar polarity of inner ear hair cells and causes severe neural tube defects in the mouse. Curr. Biol., 13, 1129–1133.[CrossRef][Medline]

  38. Weil, D., Blanchard, S., Kaplan, J., Guilford, P., Gibson, F., Walsh, J., Mburu, P., Varela, A., Levilliers, J., Weston, M.D. et al. (1995) Defective myosin VIIA gene responsible for Usher syndrome type 1B. Nature, 374, 60–61.[CrossRef][Medline]

  39. Verpy, E., Leibovici, M., Zwaenepoel, I., Liu, X.-Z., Gal, Z., Salem, N., Mansour, A., Blanchard, S., Kobayashi, I., Keats, B.J.B. et al. (2000) A defect in harmonin, a PDZ domain-containing protein expressed in the inner ear sensory hair cells, underlies usher syndrome type 1C. Nat. Genet., 26, 51–55.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  40. Bitner-Glindzicz, M., Lindley, K.J., Rutland, P., Blaydon, D., Smith, V.V., Milla, P.J., Hussain, K., Furth-Lavi, J., Cosgrove, K.E., Shepherd, R.M. et al. (2000) A recessive contiguous gene deletion causing infantile hyperinsulinism, enteropathy and deafness identifies the Usher type 1C gene. Nat. Genet., 26, 56–60.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  41. Bork, J.M., Peters, L.M., Riazuddin, S., Bernstein, S.L., Ahmed, Z.M., Ness, S.L., Polomeno, R., Ramesh, A., Schloss, M., Srisailpathy, C.R. et al. (2001) Usher syndrome 1D and nonsyndromic autosomal recessive deafness DFNB12 are caused by allelic mutations of the novel cadherin-like gene CDH23. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 68, 26–37.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  42. Bolz, H., von Brederlow, B., Ramirez, A., Bryda, E.C., Kutsche, K., Nothwang, H.G., Seeliger, M., del C-Salcedo, Cabrera, M., Vila, M.C. et al. (2001) Mutation of CDH23, encoding a new member of the cadherin gene family, causes Usher syndrome type 1D. Nat. Genet., 27, 108–112.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  43. Ahmed, Z.M., Riazuddin, S., Bernstein, S.L., Ahmed, Z., Khan, S., Griffith, A.J., Morell, R.J., Friedman, T.B., Riazuddin, S. and Wilcox, E.R. (2001) Mutations of the protocadherin gene PCDH15 cause Usher syndrome type 1F. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 69, 25–34.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  44. Alagramam, K.N., Yuan, H., Kuehn, M.H., Murcia, C.L., Wayne, S., Srisailpathy, C.R., Lowry, R.B., Knaus, R., Van Laer, L., Bernier, F.P. et al. (2001) Mutations in the novel protocadherin PCDH15 cause Usher syndrome type 1F. Hum. Mol. Genet., 10, 1709–1718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  45. Eudy, J.D., Weston, M.D., Yao, S., Hoover, D.M., Rehm, H.L., Ma-Edmonds, M., Yan, D., Ahmad, I., Cheng, J.J., Ayuso, C. et al. (1998) Mutation of a gene encoding a protein with extracellular matrix motifs in Usher syndrome type IIa. Science, 280, 1753–1757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  46. Joensuu, T., Hamalainen, R., Yuan, B., Johnson, C., Tegelberg, S., Gasparini, P., Zelante, L., Pirvola, U., Pakarinen, L., Lehesjoki, A.E. et al. (2001) Mutations in a novel gene with transmembrane domains underlie Usher syndrome type 3. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 69, 673–684.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  47. Weil, D., El-Amraoui, A., Masmoudi, S., Mustapha, M., Kikkawa, Y., Laine, S., Delmaghani, S., Adato, A., Nadifi, S., Zina, Z.B. et al. (2003) Usher syndrome type I G (USH1G) is caused by mutations in the gene encoding SANS, a protein that associates with the USH1C protein, harmonin. Hum. Mol. Genet., 12, 463–471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  48. Kikkawa, Y., Shitara, H., Wakana, S., Kohara, Y., Takada, T., Okamoto, M., Taya, C., Kamiya, K., Yoshikawa, Y., Tokano, H. et al. (2003) Mutations in a new scaffold protein Sans cause deafness in Jackson shaker mice. Hum. Mol. Genet., 12, 453–461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  49. Boeda, B., El-Amraoui, A., Bahloul, A., Goodyear, R., Daviet, L., Blanchard, S., Perfettini, I., Fath, K.R., Shorte, S., Reiners, J. et al. (2002) Myosin VIIa, harmonin and cadherin 23, three Usher I gene products that cooperate to shape the sensory hair cell bundle. EMBO J., 21, 6689–6699.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  50. Johnson, K.R., Gagnon, L.H., Webb, L.S., Peters, L.L., Hawes, N.L., Chang, B. and Zheng, Q.Y. (2003) Mouse models of USH1C and DFNB18: phenotypic and molecular analyses of two new spontaneous mutations of the Ush1c gene. Hum. Mol. Genet., 12, 3075–3086.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  51. Holme, R.H., Kiernan, B.W., Brown, S.D.M. and Steel, K.P. (2002) Elongation of hair cell stereocilia is defective in the mouse mutant whirler. J. Comp. Neurol., 450, 94–102.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  52. Mburu, P., Mustapha, M., Varela, A., Weil, D., El-Amraoui, A., Holme, R.H., Rump, A., Hardisty, R.E., Blanchard, S., Coimbra, R.S., et al. (2003) Defects in whirlin, a PDZ domain molecule involved in sterrocilia elongation, cause deafness in the whirler mouse and families with DFNB31. Nat. Genet., 34, 421–424.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  53. Zenner, H.P. (1986) K+-induced motility and depolarization of cochlear hair cells. Direct evidence for a new pathophysiological mechanism in Meniere's disease. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 243, 108–111.[CrossRef][Medline]

  54. Zenner, H.P., Reuter, G., Zimmermann, U., Gitter, A.H., Fermin, C., LePage, E.L. (1994) Transitory endolymph leakage induced hearing loss and tinnitus: depolarization, biphasic shortening and loss of electromotility of outer hair cells. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 251, 143–153.[Medline]

  55. Ben-Yosef, T., Belyantseva, I.A., Saunders, T.L., Hughes, E.D., Kawamoto, K., Van Itallie, C.M., Beyer, L.A., Halsey, K., Gardner, D.J., Wilcox, E.R. et al. (2003) Claudin 14 knockout mice, a model for autosomal recessive deafness DFNB29, are deaf due to cochlear hair cell degeneration. Hum. Mol. Genet., 12, 2049–2061.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  56. Kelsell, D.P., Dunlop, J., Stevens, H.P., Lench, N.J., Liang, J.N., Parry, G., Mueller, R.F. and Leigh, I.M. (1997) Connexin 26 mutations in hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural deafness. Nature, 387, 80–83.[CrossRef][Medline]

  57. Zelante, L., Gasparini, P., Estivill, X., Melchionda, S., D'Agruma, L., Govea, N., Mila, M., Monica, M.D., Lutfi, J., Shohat, M. et al. (1997) Connexin26 mutations associated with the most common form of non-syndromic neurosensory autosomal recessive deafness (DFNB1) in Mediterraneans. Hum. Mol. Genet., 6, 1605–1609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  58. Li, S., Price, S.M., Cahill, H., Ryugo, D.K., Shen, M.M., Xiang, M. (2002) Hearing loss caused by progressive degeneration of cochlear hair cells in mice deficient for the Barhll homeobox gene. Development, 129, 3523–3532.

  59. Cohen-Salmon, M., Ott, T., Michel, V., Hardelin, J.P., Perfettini, I., Eybalin, M., Wu, T., Marcus, D.C., Wangemann, P., Willecke, K. et al. (2002) Targeted ablation of connexin26 in the inner ear epithelial gap junction network causes hearing impairment and cell death. Curr. Biol., 12, 1106–1111.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  60. Kudo, T., Kure, S., Ikeda, K., Xia, A-P., Katori, Y., Suzuki, M., Kojima, K., Ichinohe, A., Suzuki, Y., Aoki, Y. et al. (2003) Transgenic expression of a dominant-negative connexin26 causes degeneration of the organ of Corti and non-syndromic deafness. Hum. Mol. Genet., 12, 995–1004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  61. Teubner, B., Michel, V., Pesch, J., Lautermann, J., Cohen-Salmon, M., Sohl, G., Jahnke, K., Winterhager, E., Herberhold, C., Hardelin, J.-P. et al. (2003) Connexin30 (Gjb6)-deficiency causes severe hearing impairment and lack of endocochlear potential. Hum. Mol. Genet., 12, 13–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  62. Xiang, M., Gan, L., Li, D., Chen, Z., Zhou, L., O'Malley, B.W., Jr, Klein, W. and Nathans, J. (1997) Essential role of POU-domain factor Brn-3c in auditory and vestibular hair cell development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 9445–9450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  63. Wallis, D., Hamblen, M., Zhou, Y., Venken, K.J., Schumacher, A., Grimes, H.L., Zoghbi, H.Y., Orkin, S.H. and Bellen, H.J. (2003) The zinc finger transcription factor Gfi1, implicated in lymphomagenesis, is required for inner ear hair cell differentiation and survival. Development, 130, 221–232.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  64. Hertzano, R., Montcouquiol, M., Rashi-Elkeles, S., Elkon, R., Yucel, R., Frankel, W.N., Rechavi, G., Moroy, T., Friedman, T.B., Kelley, M.W. and Avraham, K.B. (2004) Transcription profiling of inner ears from Pou4f3ddl/ddl identifies Gfi1 as a target of the Pou4f3 deafness gene. Hum. Mol. Genet., in press.

  65. Estivill, X., Fortina, P., Surrey, S., Rabionet, R., Melchionda, S., D'Agruma, L., Mansfield, E., Rappaport, E., Govea, N., Mila, M. et al. (1998) Connexin-26 mutations in sporadic and inherited sensorineural deafness. Lancet, 351, 394–398.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  66. Di Palma, F., Holme, R.H., Bryda, E.C., Belyantseva, I.A., Pellegrino, R., Kachar, B., Steel, K.P. and Noben-Trauth, K. (2001) Mutations in Cdh23, encoding a new type of cadherin, cause stereocilia disorganization in waltzer, the mouse model for Usher syndrome type 1D. Nat. Genet., 27, 103–107.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  67. Noben-Trauth, K., Zheng, Q.Y. and Johnson, K.R. (2003) Association of cadherin 23 with polygenic inheritance and genetic modification of sensorineural hearing loss. Nat. Genet., 35, 21–23.

  68. Siemens, J., Lillo, C., Dumont, R.A., Reynolds, A., Williams, D.S., Gillespie, P.G. and Muller, U. (2004) Cadherin 23 is a component of the tip link in hair-cell sterocilia. Nature, 428, 950–954.[CrossRef][Medline]

  69. Sollner, C., Rauch, G.-J., Siemens, J., Geisler, R., Schuster, S.C., The Tubingen 2000 Screen Consortium, Muller, U. and Nicolson, T. (2004) Mutations in cadherin 23 affect tip links in zebrafish sensory hair cells. Nature, 428, 955–959.[CrossRef][Medline]

  70. Sidi, S., Friedrich, R.W. and Nicolson, T. (2003) NompC TRP channel required for vertebrate sensory hair cell mechanotransduction. Science, 301, 96–99.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  71. Li, H., Liu, H. and Heller, S. (2003) Pluripotent stem cells from the adult mouse inner ear. Nat. Med., 9, 1293–1299.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  72. Li, H., Roblin, G., Liu, H. and Heller, S. (2003) Generation of hair cells by stepwise differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 13495–13500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  73. Resendes, B.L., Williamson, R.E. and Morton, C.C. (2001) At the speed of sound: gene discovery in the auditory system. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 69, 923–935.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  74. Rivolta, M.N., Halsall, A., Johnson, C.M., Tones, M.A. and Holley, M.C. (2002) Transcript profiling of functionally related groups of genes during conditional differentiation of a mammalian cochlear hair cell line. Genome Res., 12, 1091–1099.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  75. Chen, Z.-Y. and Corey, D.P. (2002) Understanding inner ear development with gene expression profiling. J. Neurobiol., 53, 276–285.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  76. Chen, Z.-Y. and Corey, D.P. (2002) An inner ear gene expression database. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol., 3, 140–148.[CrossRef][Medline]

  77. Hawkins, R.D., Bashiardes, S., Helms, C.A., Hu, L., Saccone, N.L., Warchol, M.E. and Lovett, M. (2003) Gene expression differences in quiescent versus regenerating hair cells of avian sensory epithelia: implications for human hearing and balance disorders. Hum. Mol. Genet., 12, 1261–1272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]