Skip Navigation

Human Molecular Genetics 2005 14(Review Issue 2):R269-R274; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi262
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smyth, I.
Right arrow Articles by Scambler, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smyth, I.
Right arrow Articles by Scambler, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The genetics of Fraser syndrome and the blebs mouse mutants

Ian Smyth1,2 and Peter Scambler2,*

1Cancer Research UK, London Research Institute, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, UK and 2Molecular Medicine Unit, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: p.scambler{at}ich.ucl.ac.uk

Received June 16, 2005; Accepted July 1, 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 FRASER SYNDROME
 THE MOUSE ‘BLEBBING’...
 IDENTIFICATION OF FS/BLEBBING...
 STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF...
 GENE EXPRESSION
 THE ROLE OF THE...
 ORGANOGENESIS
 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND...
 REFERENCES
 
Fraser syndrome is a recessive multisystem disorder characterized by embryonic epidermal blistering, cryptophthalmos, syndactyly, renal defects and a range of other developmental abnormalities. More than 17 years ago, the family of four mapped mouse blebs mutants was proposed as models of this disorder, given their striking phenotypic overlaps. In the last few years, these loci have been cloned, uncovering a family of three large extracellular matrix proteins and an intracellular adapter protein which are required for normal epidermal adhesion early in development. The proteins have also been shown to play a crucial role in the development and homeostasis of the kidney. We review the cloning and characterization of these genes and explore the consequences of their loss.


    FRASER SYNDROME
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 FRASER SYNDROME
 THE MOUSE ‘BLEBBING’...
 IDENTIFICATION OF FS/BLEBBING...
 STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF...
 GENE EXPRESSION
 THE ROLE OF THE...
 ORGANOGENESIS
 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND...
 REFERENCES
 
In 1962, George Fraser first described the syndrome bearing his name (1Go), and in more recent times, Slavotinek and Tifft compiled an excellent summary of the condition. They described several major and minor characteristics of Fraser syndrome (FS); two major and one minor or one major and four minor features being required to make a diagnosis (2Go) (FS; MIM219000). The major features include cryptophthalmos (in which skin covers the globe of the eyes) (~90%), cutaneous syndactyly of varying severity (~60%), abnormal or ambiguous genitalia (20%) and family history of the disease (~40%) (Fig. 1). All cases described so far are consistent with a recessive mode of inheritance. Although the external eye defects are striking, posterior structures are usually spared, and surgical intervention can result in the ability to distinguish light and dark and some movement. The disease is rare with a frequency of one in 10 000 still births; however, FS may account for a higher proportion of early term miscarriages.



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. FS and the blebs mutants. The mouse blebs mutants were identified in a number of genetics screens. The most obvious feature of these animals is cryptophthalmia in which skin covers the globe of the eyes (A) (wild-type left and heb right). Many of the defects, such as cryptophthalmia and syndactyly, observed in these mice are mirrored in human FS (B). Many of these defects are caused by loss of epidermal adhesion during embryonic development. These blisters, or blebs, tend to form around the head, limbs and trunk (C) and can often become haemorrhagic late in gestation. The majority resolves prior to birth. The loss of adhesion occurs below the level of the BM lamina densa (D) (LD, lamina densa; LL, lamina lucida; epi, epidermis; bc, blister cavity). Defects in organogenesis are also characteristic of the belbs mutants as FS patients. For example, compared with wild-type E17 embryos (E) (Ki, kidney and Ad, adrenal gland), Grip1 mutant mice (F) display complete absence of kidney formation (images courtesy of Dr Ralf Adams, Cancer Research UK). Adult blebs mice also develop cystic renal disease as they age (G, asterisks). Three of the blebs mutants are caused by mutations in Fras1, Frem1 and Frem2, complex multidomain extracellular matrix proteins (H) (vWFC, von Willebrand factor type C; CSPG, chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan domain; CLECT, C-type lectin; CALXb, calcium exchange domain beta; TM, transmembrane domain).

 
As a group, the minor features occur frequently, and we feel that laryngeal stenosis and renal a/dysgenesis could be considered as major features. Patients may also have skeletal defects, pulmonary hyperplasia, ear malformations with conductive deafness, orofacial clefting, gastrointestinal malformations and heart defects. It has been estimated that 45% of cases are stillborn or die within the first year, primarily because of pulmonary or renal complications (3Go). However, there is no reason to suspect that those patients without these life-threatening complications cannot live a normal lifespan.


    THE MOUSE ‘BLEBBING’ MUTANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 FRASER SYNDROME
 THE MOUSE ‘BLEBBING’...
 IDENTIFICATION OF FS/BLEBBING...
 STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF...
 GENE EXPRESSION
 THE ROLE OF THE...
 ORGANOGENESIS
 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND...
 REFERENCES
 
In 1988, Robin Winter (4Go,5Go) first speculated that the mouse ‘bleb’ mutants might be a murine equivalent of FS. At that time, there were four mapped ‘bleb’ mutants which localized to different chromosomes. Each line gave affected homozygotes with combinations of eye abnormalities, renal anomalies and syndactyly, with varying severity. The common embryological phenotype of affected embryos was the presence of fluid filled blebs arising at ~12 days of gestation and occurring over the extremities, eyes or hindbrain (Fig. 1). These blisters subsequently became haemorrhagic and disappeared during late gestation leaving the characteristic covering of the eye with skin.

The first ‘bleb’ mutant to be described was myelencephalic blebs (my), which arose in an X-irradiation screen conducted by Little and Bagg (6Go). The blebbed mutation (bl) arose from offspring of a male irradiated with neutrons and, at least on the original undefined genetic background, appears to have the most severe phenotype with poor postnatal survival. It was suggested that a different mechanism might be operating during renal and skin development (7Go). The eye blebs (eb) mutation arose spontaneously, although histology gave little clue as to the basis for the abnormalities observed (8Go,9Go). In severe cases, mice failed to form the retina and the lens (10Go). The final mutant, head blebs (heb), arose spontaneously and was somewhat milder in severity than the eb and my mutants (11Go).


    IDENTIFICATION OF FS/BLEBBING GENES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 FRASER SYNDROME
 THE MOUSE ‘BLEBBING’...
 IDENTIFICATION OF FS/BLEBBING...
 STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF...
 GENE EXPRESSION
 THE ROLE OF THE...
 ORGANOGENESIS
 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND...
 REFERENCES
 
Early linkage analyses had established the approximate chromosomal location of all the extant blebbing loci, although these mapping experiments were not at a sufficiently high resolution to give a confident indication of the respective locus in man. Subsequent autozygosity mapping and gene sequencing in FS kindreds revealed the loss of function mutations in a novel gene FRAS1 (chromosome 4), the murine homologue being mutated in bl (12Go,13Go). Targeted mutation of the glutamate receptor interacting protein (Grip1) gene resulted in a phenotype closely resembling bl (14Go,15Go). Grip1 mapped to mouse chromosome 10, suggesting that it might be the eb gene, and an intragenic deletion of exons 10 and 11 confirmed this suspicion (15Go). Concurrently, another blebbing phenotype had been discovered in an ENU mutagenesis screen and shown to be allelic with the heb locus. Mutations in both alleles were found in a gene encoding a protein with similarity to Fras1, and the heb gene was named Frem1 (for Fras-related, ECM) (16Go). Although analysis of families not linked to Fras1 has identified a few pedigrees compatible with linkage to the human homologues GRIP1 (chromosome 12) and FREM1 (chromosome 9), we have not discovered any mutations within these genes.

The Frem2 and Frem3 genes were identified by genome database interrogation, Frem2 mapping precisely to a 1 cM interval defined by mapping the my locus on mouse chromosome 3. Subsequent complementation analysis showed that a gene trap mutation of Frem2 is allelic to the my mutation (17Go). Three FS families segregated a mutation in human FREM2 (E1972K), which substitutes a strongly conserved residue within the CALXß domain, a residue predicted to be important for calcium binding (discussed subsequently) (17Go). The Frem3 gene is not linked to any known blebbing locus, no mouse mutant is available and no mutations of FREM3 (chromosome 4) have been found in FS.


    STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF THE ‘BLEB’ PROTEINS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 FRASER SYNDROME
 THE MOUSE ‘BLEBBING’...
 IDENTIFICATION OF FS/BLEBBING...
 STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF...
 GENE EXPRESSION
 THE ROLE OF THE...
 ORGANOGENESIS
 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND...
 REFERENCES
 
The extracellular blebs genes, Fras1, Frem1 and Frem2, encode large multidomain proteins between 2172 and 4010 amino acids in length (Fig. 1). Fras1 and Frem2 are transmembrane proteins, whereas Frem1 contains a lectin type C domain at its C-terminus. The hallmark feature of this family is the repeated ~130 amino acid chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan (CSPG) domain, whose structure is thought to be similar to a cadherin fold (18Go). The proteins also incorporate one or more copies of the calcium exchange ß domain (CALXß), a calcium chelating motif present in a variety of calcium transporter proteins and in other cell adhesion molecules (19Go). These calcium binding motifs are also structurally similar to cadherin domains (unpublished data) and their likely functional importance is highlighted by our identification of a disease causing FREM2 CALXß missense mutation in FS patients.

In addition to these protein elements, Fras1 also bears six von Willebrand factor type C (vWFC) and 14 cysteine rich partial furin motifs at its N-terminus. The established involvement of these domains in interaction with members of the TGF-ß growth factor family (20Go) has led to the suggestion that Fras1 might modulate their activity within the extracellular matrix (ECM) (13Go). The Fras and Frem genes are a relatively recently evolved family and form a monophyletic clade found only in deuterostomes. The most distant member of the family characterized to date is the sea urchin ECM3 gene which, on the basis of domain organization and sequence conservation, is an orthologue of Frem2. ECM3 is a major component of fibres which lie on the basal surface of the embryonic ectoderm and it is thought to orchestrate primary mesenchyme cell migration during gastrulation (21Go). Finally, Grip1 encodes a 7 PDZ domain cytoplasmic protein, which has been shown to interact with the most C-terminal residues of both Fras1 and Frem2. At least, in the case of Fras1, loss of Grip1 results in the failure of the protein to localize correctly to the basal membrane of keratinocytes in culture (15Go).

Clues to the function of the Frem and Fras genes are largely provided by studies of NG2, a gene widely expressed in partially differentiated or differentiating cells (22Go–26Go). The CSPG domains in NG2 are capable of diverse interactions with other extracellular components, many of which may have direct implications for Frem and Fras protein interactions. Various studies have demonstrated their interaction with collagens V and VI (27Go,28Go), basic fibroblast growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor (29Go). There is also mounting evidence to suggest that a soluble form of the protein can be generated by matrix metalloproteases (30Go,31Go). All of these studies raise the intriguing prospect that the Fras and Frem proteins may have the ability to regulate not only the assembly of structural components of the ECM, but also subtly modulate the activity of growth factors in the extracellular milieu.


    GENE EXPRESSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 FRASER SYNDROME
 THE MOUSE ‘BLEBBING’...
 IDENTIFICATION OF FS/BLEBBING...
 STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF...
 GENE EXPRESSION
 THE ROLE OF THE...
 ORGANOGENESIS
 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND...
 REFERENCES
 
The blebs genes are expressed in a diverse pattern during embryonic development. As a general rule, they are all expressed at high levels in tissues in which a differentiating and remodelling epidermis is interacting with an underlying mesenchyme (Fig. 2), lending credence to the concept that the proteins play both structural and developmental roles during tissue differentiation. With only a few exceptions, the expression of Frem1 is restricted to the mesenchymal components of these structures, whereas Frem2/Fras1 and Grip1 are expressed in the epithelial specializations. In the developing skin, Fras1 is expressed very strongly throughout the developing epidermis (12Go,13Go), whereas Frem1 and Frem2 expression in the interfollicular regions tends to be markedly reduced in comparison (16Go,17Go). Frem2 is also expressed in a highly dynamic pattern in the endoderm and ectoderm of the branchial arches and in a number of important neural signalling centres including the midline of the dorsal forebrain and midbrain/hindbrain boundary (17Go). Grip1 is expressed in a variety of other locations, probably reflecting its diverse role in modulating protein trafficking (15Go,32Go,33Go).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Embryonic expression of the blebs genes. Frem1, Frem2 and Fras1 are widely expressed during embryonic development. Although Fras1 is broadly and strongly expressed in the embryonic epidermis, expression of Frem1 and Frem2 is comparatively reduced in the inter-follicular epidermis. Expression of both of these genes is restricted to site of epithelial/mesenchymal interactions including the hair follicle, whisker vibrissae, mammary glands and apical ectodermal ridge (AER) (A, C and D, Frem2) (B, Frem1). The genes are also strongly expressed in developing organs affected both in the blebs mutants and in the FS patients, including the kidney and lung (E, Frem2 expression in Lu, lung and Ki, kidney). In most cases, Frem1 expression in the mesenchyme mirrors Frem2 and Fras1 expression in the overlying epithelium.

 

    THE ROLE OF THE Frem AND Fras GENES IN EPIDERMAL ADHESION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 FRASER SYNDROME
 THE MOUSE ‘BLEBBING’...
 IDENTIFICATION OF FS/BLEBBING...
 STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF...
 GENE EXPRESSION
 THE ROLE OF THE...
 ORGANOGENESIS
 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND...
 REFERENCES
 
Cryptophthalmos and syndactyly are the most striking physical features of FS and the blebs mice. We reason that they both arise as a consequence of loss of epidermal adhesion, leading to interrupted epidermal/mesenchymal interactions between the eyelid epithelia or limb AER and the underlying mesenchyme. In all the mutants, the separation between the epidermis and the dermis occurs below the level of the lamina densa, the lowermost, collagen IV rich component of the basement membrane (BM). Given the established interaction between the NG2 protein and the collagens V and VI (which also contribute to the BM), we and others have studied the deposition of these proteins in the blebs mutants. Grip1 and Fras1 mutants display defects in deposition of these proteins and this may contribute to epidermal delamination (12Go,13Go,15Go); however, the same is not true in Frem1 and Frem2 null mice (16Go,17Go). Thus, the steps leading to blistering are only partly understood.

What is perhaps most striking about all of the mutants is the ability of the epidermis to repair itself, often after suffering delamination, which is frequently sufficient to kill the embryo. This observation, and the absence of postnatal skin blistering in the blebs mice, suggests that there is a temporal developmental window when these proteins are required for epidermal adhesion, but that later in gestation, other components of the ECM can functionally compensate for their loss. The blistering defects in the blebs mice mirror the effects of loss of collagen VII, which causes dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) in humans (34Go). Collagen VII contributes to the anchoring fibrils, which consolidate the interaction between the dermis and the epidermis; however, its loss results primarily in postnatal rather than in utero blistering (34Go). In addition, collagen VII deposition is unaffected in Fras1 mutants and is only partly defective in mice lacking Grip1, suggesting that epidermal separation in DEB is distinct from that of FS or the blebs mice.


    ORGANOGENESIS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 FRASER SYNDROME
 THE MOUSE ‘BLEBBING’...
 IDENTIFICATION OF FS/BLEBBING...
 STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF...
 GENE EXPRESSION
 THE ROLE OF THE...
 ORGANOGENESIS
 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND...
 REFERENCES
 
Renal defects are a hallmark of FS and all of the ‘bleb’ alleles identified so far. The agenesis apparent in these models is triggered very early during the development of the kidney, with reduced and apoptotic mesenchymal condensations surrounding the ureteric bud as early as E11.5 (13Go,15Go). Frem2 and Fras1 are both strongly expressed in the nephric epithelium, especially in the tips of the buds, whereas Frem1 is expressed at lower levels in the stroma, a pattern which continues as the ureteric tree branches and differentiates (16Go,17Go). Cystic disease in the blebs mice has been best studied in Frem2 and Fras1 mutants. Animals homozygous for mutations in either or both of these genes develop cortical renal cysts by 12 weeks of age (17Go). The hyper-proliferative and hyper-apoptotic cysts express markers of both the collecting ducts and the thick ascending loops of Henle. In wild-type mice, Frem2 is expressed strongly in adult kidneys in the collecting ducts, proximal convoluted tubules and arterioles which, in combination with the development of renal cysts in the mutant animals, suggest that the protein is required for the maintenance of the differentiated state of the mature renal epithelia. Fras1 also has a role in regulating the normal lobular development of the lung and of the vascular tissue in the terminal air sacs (35Go).


    FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 FRASER SYNDROME
 THE MOUSE ‘BLEBBING’...
 IDENTIFICATION OF FS/BLEBBING...
 STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF...
 GENE EXPRESSION
 THE ROLE OF THE...
 ORGANOGENESIS
 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND...
 REFERENCES
 
Given their multidomain structure, it is highly likely that the Frem and Fras proteins interact with many different components of the ECM and that some of these interactions are required for the normal epidermal adhesion (Fig. 3). Their similarity to NG2 and the observation of some defects in collagen deposition in the BM indicate that one of these interactions is with collagens V and VI, although mice null for these proteins do not display a ‘bleb’ like phenotype (36Go,37Go). Given the complementary expression pattern of Frem1 and Frem2/Fras1 and the similarity of the CSPG domains to cadherin, we have proposed that the proteins may form homodimeric or heterodimeric associations. Engagement of ligands to the ectodomain of NG2 induces cell spreading and alterations in the actin cytoskeletion mediated by Rac1, cdc42, Ack1 and p130cas (38Go,39Go), raising the possibility of signalling via engagement of Fras1/Frem2. A recent study by Kiyozumi et al. (40Go) has also demonstrated that Frem1 is capable of mediating cellular adhesion in vitro through interactions with {alpha}v and {alpha}8 containing integrins. Mice null for these integrin subunits display no obvious skin defects, which means that it is unlikely to be the sole mechanism by which Frem1 mediates epidermal adhesion. However, mice lacking the {alpha}8 subunit are characterized by severe renal dysgenesis (41Go), suggesting that its interaction with Frem1 might be of functional importance.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. A model for blebs protein interactions in the embryonic epidermis. Mouse studies have shown that the PDZ domain protein Grip1 can bind to the intracellular C-terminus of the transmembrane domain proteins Fras1 and Frem2 and is required for normal localization of the proteins to the basal side of keratinocytes. Loss of Grip1, Fras1 and Frem2 gives rise to the eye blebs (eb), blebbed (bl) and myelencephalic blebs (my) mutants, respectively. Loss of the dermally expressed secreted protein Frem1 results in the head blebs (heb) phenotype. Frem1 has been shown to interact with integrins {alpha}v and {alpha}8, whereas all of the proteins are predicted to interact with collagens and other components of the basement membrane zone (BMZ). Mutations in FRAS1 and FREM2 have been shown to cause FS in humans.

 

    FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 FRASER SYNDROME
 THE MOUSE ‘BLEBBING’...
 IDENTIFICATION OF FS/BLEBBING...
 STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF...
 GENE EXPRESSION
 THE ROLE OF THE...
 ORGANOGENESIS
 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND...
 REFERENCES
 
The cloning of the blebs mutants and the identification of FS mutations have finally proven a genetic association first proposed some 17 years ago. This has given us a new insight into the early events in epidermal differentiation and BM assembly and nephrogenesis. The proteins involved are largely uncharacterized, and their interactions with components of the ECM are only just beginning to be understood. Various aspects of human disease are also puzzling. Why are the majority of mutations found in Fras1 when the phenotypes of the different blebs mutants are so similar? Does loss of Frem1 and Grip1 in humans lead to more severe phenotypes, and if this is the case, are we aware of the full influence of these proteins on early development? Although the large size and complex domain organization of these proteins will make dissecting their function challenging, knowledge of the human and mouse phenotypes which result from their loss is already providing avenues by which to pursue these studies.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We would like to thank the Wellcome Trust and Cancer Research UK for support. I.S. was funded by a Wellcome Trust Travelling Research Fellowship. We would also like to thank the families and clinicians who have helped support our work.

Conflict of Interest statement. None declared.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 FRASER SYNDROME
 THE MOUSE ‘BLEBBING’...
 IDENTIFICATION OF FS/BLEBBING...
 STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF...
 GENE EXPRESSION
 THE ROLE OF THE...
 ORGANOGENESIS
 FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS
 FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND...
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Fraser, G.R. (1962) Our genetical ‘load’. A review of some aspects of genetical variation. Ann. Hum. Genet., 25, 387–415.

  2. Slavotinek, A.M. and Tifft, C.J. (2002) Fraser syndrome and cryptophthalmos: review of the diagnostic criteria and evidence for phenotypic modules in complex malformation syndromes. J. Med. Genet., 39, 623–633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  3. Boyd, P.A., Keeling, J.W. and Lindenbaum, R.H. (1988) Fraser syndrome (cryptophthalmos–syndactyly syndrome): a review of eleven cases with postmortem findings. Am. J. Med. Genet., 31, 159–168.[ISI][Medline]

  4. Winter, R.M. (1988) Malformation syndromes: a review of mouse/human homology. J. Med. Genet., 25, 480–487.[Abstract]

  5. Winter, R.M. (1990) Fraser syndrome and mouse ‘bleb’ mutants. Clin. Genet., 37, 494–495.[ISI][Medline]

  6. Little, C.C. and Bagg H.J. (1923) The occurence of two heritable types of abnormality among desccendants of X-rayed mice. Am J Roentgenol., 10, 975–989.

  7. Darling, S. and Gossler, A. (1994) A mouse model for Fraser syndrome? Clin. Dysmorphol., 3, 91–95.[Medline]

  8. Center, E.M. and Polizotto, R.S. (1992) Etiology of the developing eye in myelencephalic blebs (my) mice. Histol. Histopathol., 7, 231–236.[ISI][Medline]

  9. Center, E.M. and Emery, K.E. (1997) Acidic glycosaminoglycans and laminin-1 in renal corpuscles of mutant blebs (my) and control mice. Histol. Histopathol., 12, 901–907.[ISI][Medline]

  10. Swiergiel, J.J., Funderburgh, J.L., Justice, M.J. and Conrad, G.W. (2000) Developmental eye and neural tube defects in the eye blebs mouse. Dev. Dyn., 219, 21–27.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  11. Varnum, D.S. and Fox, S.C. (1981) Head blebs: a new mutation on chromosome 4 of the mouse. J. Hered., 72, 293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  12. Vrontou, S., Petrou, P., Meyer, B.I., Galanopoulos, V.K., Imai, K., Yanagi, M., Chowdhury, K., Scambler, P.J. and Chalepakis, G. (2003) Fras1 deficiency results in cryptophthalmos, renal agenesis and blebbed phenotype in mice. Nat. Genet., 34, 209–214.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  13. McGregor, L., Makela, V., Darling, S.M., Vrontou, S., Chalepakis, G., Roberts, C., Smart, N., Rutland, P., Prescott, N., Hopkins, J. et al. (2003) Fraser syndrome and mouse blebbed phenotype caused by mutations in FRAS1/Fras1 encoding a putative extracellular matrix protein. Nat. Genet., 34, 203–208.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  14. Bladt, F., Tafuri, A., Gelkop, S., Langille, L. and Pawson, T. (2002) Epidermolysis bullosa and embryonic lethality in mice lacking the multi-PDZ domain protein GRIP1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 6816–6821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Takamiya, K., Kostourou, V., Adams, S., Jadeja, S., Chalepakis, G., Scambler, P.J., Huganir, R.L. and Adams, R.H. (2004) A direct functional link between the multi-PDZ domain protein GRIP1 and the Fraser syndrome protein Fras1. Nat. Genet., 36, 172–175.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  16. Smyth, I., Du, X., Taylor, M.S., Justice, M.J., Beutler, B. and Jackson, I.J. (2004) The extracellular matrix gene Frem1 is essential for the normal adhesion of the embryonic epidermis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 13560–13565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Jadeja, S., Smyth, I., Pitera, J.E., Taylor, M.S., van Haelst, M., Bentley, E., McGregor, L., Hopkins, J., Chalepakis, G., Philip, N. et al. (2005) Identification of a new gene mutated in Fraser syndrome and mouse myelencephalic blebs. Nat. Genet., 37, 520–525.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  18. Staub, E., Hinzmann, B. and Rosenthal, A. (2002) A novel repeat in the melanoma-associated chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan defines a new protein family. FEBS Lett., 527, 114–118.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  19. Schwarz, E.M. and Benzer, S. (1997) Calx, a Na–Ca exchanger gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 10249–10254.

  20. Thomas, G. (2002) Furin at the cutting edge: from protein traffic to embryogenesis and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 3, 753–766.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  21. Hodor, P.G., Illies, M.R., Broadley, S. and Ettensohn, C.A. (2000) Cell–substrate interactions during sea urchin gastrulation: migrating primary mesenchyme cells interact with and align extracellular matrix fibers that contain ECM3, a molecule with NG2-like and multiple calcium-binding domains. Dev. Biol., 222, 181–194.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  22. Levine, J.M. and Card, J.P. (1987) Light and electron microscopic localization of a cell surface antigen (NG2) in the rat cerebellum: association with smooth protoplasmic astrocytes. J. Neurosci., 7, 2711–2720.[Abstract]

  23. Pluschke, G., Vanek, M., Evans, A., Dittmar, T., Schmid, P., Itin, P., Filardo, E.J. and Reisfeld, R.A. (1996) Molecular cloning of a human melanoma-associated chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 9710–9715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  24. Stallcup, W.B. (2002) The NG2 proteoglycan: past insights and future prospects. J. Neurocytol., 31, 423–435.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  25. Legg, J., Jensen, U.B., Broad, S., Leigh, I. and Watt, F.M. (2003) Role of melanoma chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan in patterning stem cells in human interfollicular epidermis. Development, 130, 6049–6063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Fukushi, J.I., Makagiansar, I.T. and Stallcup, W.B. (2004) NG2 proteoglycan promotes endothelial cell motility and angiogenesis via engagement of galectin-3 and {alpha}3{beta}1 integrin. Mol. Biol. Cell, 15, 3580–3590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  27. Burg, M.A., Tillet, E., Timpl, R. and Stallcup, W.B. (1996) Binding of the NG2 proteoglycan to type VI collagen and other extracellular matrix molecules. J. Biol. Chem., 271, 26110–26116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  28. Tillet, E., Gential, B., Garrone, R. and Stallcup, W.B. (2002) NG2 proteoglycan mediates beta1 integrin-independent cell adhesion and spreading on collagen VI. J. Cell Biochem., 86, 726–736.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  29. Goretzki, L., Burg, M.A., Grako, K.A. and Stallcup, W.B. (1999) High-affinity binding of basic fibroblast growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor-AA to the core protein of the NG2 proteoglycan. J. Biol. Chem., 274, 16831–16837.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  30. Larsen, P.H., Wells, J.E., Stallcup, W.B., Opdenakker, G. and Yong, V.W. (2003) Matrix metalloproteinase-9 facilitates remyelination in part by processing the inhibitory NG2 proteoglycan. J. Neurosci., 23, 11127–11135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  31. Asher, R.A., Morgenstern, D.A., Properzi, F., Nishiyama, A., Levine, J.M. and Fawcett, J.W. (2005) Two separate metalloproteinase activities are responsible for the shedding and processing of the NG2 proteoglycan in vitro. Mol. Cell Neurosci., 29, 82–96.

  32. Jourdi, H., Iwakura, Y., Narisawa-Saito, M., Ibaraki, K., Xiong, H., Watanabe, M., Hayashi, Y., Takei, N. and Nawa, H. (2003) Brain-derived neurotrophic factor signal enhances and maintains the expression of AMPA receptor-associated PDZ proteins in developing cortical neurons. Dev. Biol., 263, 216–230.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  33. Stegmuller, J., Werner, H., Nave, K.A. and Trotter, J. (2003) The proteoglycan NG2 is complexed with alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors by the PDZ glutamate receptor interaction protein (GRIP) in glial progenitor cells. Implications for glial-neuronal signaling. J. Biol. Chem., 278, 3590–3598.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  34. Christiano, A.M., Greenspan, D.S., Hoffman, G.G., Zhang, X., Tamai, Y., Lin, A.N., Dietz, H.C., Hovnanian, A. and Uitto, J. (1993) A missense mutation in type VII collagen in two affected siblings with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Nat. Genet., 4, 62–66.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  35. Petrou, P., Pavlakis, E., Dalezios, Y., Galanopoulos, V.K. and Chalepakis, G. (2005) Basement membrane distortions impair lung lobation and capillary organization in the mouse model for Fraser syndrome. J. Biol. Chem., 280, 10350–10356. Epub 28 December 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  36. Andrikopoulos, K., Liu, X., Keene, D.R., Jaenisch, R. and Ramirez, F. (1995) Targeted mutation in the col5a2 gene reveals a regulatory role for type V collagen during matrix assembly. Nat. Genet., 9, 31–36.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  37. Bonaldo, P., Braghetta, P., Zanetti, M., Piccolo, S., Volpin, D. and Bressan, G.M. (1998) Collagen VI deficiency induces early onset myopathy in the mouse: an animal model for Bethlem myopathy. Hum. Mol. Genet., 7, 2135–2140.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  38. Eisenmann, K.M., McCarthy, J.B., Simpson, M.A., Keely, P.J., Guan, J.L., Tachibana, K., Lim, L., Manser, E., Furcht, L.T. and Iida, J. (1999) Melanoma chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan regulates cell spreading through Cdc42, Ack-1 and p130cas. Nat. Cell Biol., 1, 507–513.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  39. Majumdar, M., Vuori, K. and Stallcup, W.B. (2003) Engagement of the NG2 proteoglycan triggers cell spreading via rac and p130cas. Cell Signal., 15, 79–84.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  40. Kiyozumi, D., Osada, A., Sugimoto, N., Weber, C.N., Ono, Y., Imai, T., Okada, A. and Sekiguchi, K. (2005) Identification of a novel cell-adhesive protein spatiotemporally expressed in the basement membrane of mouse developing hair follicle. Exp. Cell Res., 306, 9–23.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  41. Muller, U., Wang, D., Denda, S., Meneses, J.J., Pedersen, R.A. and Reichardt, L.F. (1997) Integrin alpha8beta1 is critically important for epithelial–mesenchymal interactions during kidney morphogenesis. Cell, 88, 603–613.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smyth, I.
Right arrow Articles by Scambler, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smyth, I.
Right arrow Articles by Scambler, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?