Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on November 29, 2006
Human Molecular Genetics 2007 16(1):15-23; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddl437
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
16/1/15    most recent
ddl437v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, R.
Right arrow Articles by Takeda, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, R.
Right arrow Articles by Takeda, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The DYRK1A gene, encoded in chromosome 21 Down syndrome critical region, bridges between ß-amyloid production and tau phosphorylation in Alzheimer disease

Ryo Kimura1,{dagger}, Kouzin Kamino1,*,{dagger}, Mitsuko Yamamoto1, Aidaralieva Nuripa1, Tomoyuki Kida1, Hiroaki Kazui1, Ryota Hashimoto1, Toshihisa Tanaka1, Takashi Kudo1, Hidehisa Yamagata2, Yasuharu Tabara3, Tetsuro Miki4, Hiroyasu Akatsu5, Kenji Kosaka5, Eishi Funakoshi6, Kouhei Nishitomi7, Gaku Sakaguchi7, Akira Kato7, Hideyuki Hattori8, Takeshi Uema9 and Masatoshi Takeda1

1 Department of Psychiatry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-D3 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan, 2 Department of Preventive Medicine, 3 Department of Basic Medical Research and Education and 4 Department of Geriatric Medicine, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Ehime, Japan, 5 Choju Medical Institute, Fukushimura Hospital, Toyohashi, Aichi, Japan, 6 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Setsunan University, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan, 7 Pain and Neurology, Discovery Research Laboratories, Shionogi & Co., Ltd, Shiga, Japan, 8 Department of Psychiatry, Chubu National Hospital, Ohbu, Japan and 9 Department of Psychiatry, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +81 668793051; Fax: +81 668793059; Email: kkamino{at}psy.med.osaka-u.ac.jp

Received September 7, 2006; Accepted November 13, 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
We scanned throughout chromosome 21 to assess genetic associations with late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD) using 374 Japanese patients and 375 population-based controls, because trisomy 21 is known to be associated with early deposition of ß-amyloid (Aß) in the brain. Among 417 markers spanning 33 Mb, 22 markers showed associations with either the allele or the genotype frequency (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis with age, sex and apolipoprotein E (APOE)-{varepsilon}4 dose supported genetic risk of 17 markers, of which eight markers were linked to the SAMSN1, PRSS7, NCAM2, RUNX1, DYRK1A and KCNJ6 genes. In logistic regression, the DYRK1A (dual-specificity tyrosine-regulated kinase 1A) gene, located in the Down syndrome critical region, showed the highest significance [OR = 2.99 (95% CI: 1.72–5.19), P = 0.001], whereas the RUNX1 gene showed a high odds ratio [OR = 23.3 (95% CI: 2.76–196.5), P = 0.038]. DYRK1A mRNA level in the hippocampus was significantly elevated in patients with AD when compared with pathological controls (P < 0.01). DYRK1A mRNA level was upregulated along with an increase in the Aß-level in the brain of transgenic mice, overproducing Aß at 9 months of age. In neuroblastoma cells, Aß induced an increase in the DYRK1A transcript, which also led to tau phosphorylation at Thr212 under the overexpression of tau. Therefore, the upregulation of DYRK1A transcription results from Aß loading, further leading to tau phosphorylation. Our result indicates that DYRK1A could be a key molecule bridging between ß-amyloid production and tau phosphorylation in AD.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Alzheimer disease (AD) is the major cause of dementia in the elderly and is pathologically characterized by senile plaques with ß-amyloid deposition (Aß) and neurofibrillary tangles harboring hyperphosphorylated tau in the brain. It is well established that familial autosomal-dominant early onset AD is mostly caused by mutations of the amyloid protein precursor (APP) and presenilin 1 and 2 (PS1 and PS2) genes (1). In contrast, Down syndrome (DS) is also highlighted as a model condition predisposing to AD, because patients with DS develop early deposition of Aß in the brain (2). Therefore, it has been speculated that genetic factors related to AD could exist on chromosome 21, independent of the {varepsilon}4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE-{varepsilon}4), a known strong risk for late-onset AD (3,4). Using the candidate approach, it was reported that duplication of the APP gene was transmitted in patients with familial autosomal-dominant early onset AD with cerebral angiopathy (5), whereas an association with the APP gene, to the best of our knowledge, was not supported in case–control studies (68). The BACE2 gene, encoding ß-secretase of APP, was not associated with AD; however, recent studies showed weak associations (911). In contrast, with the positional approach, genome scans of late-onset AD showed positive linkage on chromosome 21 (12,13). Although this linkage remains controversial (1416), a locus strongly influencing age at onset was also found on chromosome 21 (17). To search for genetic factors for late-onset AD on chromosome 21, we scanned throughout this chromosome using patients with Japanese late-onset AD and population-based controls, by a stepwise single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) scan. We report that the DYRK1A gene is a genetic factor related to the progression of AD.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Chromosome 21 scan
An exploratory scan of chromosome 21 was performed in 188 AD and 375 controls, using 417 SNPs at an average interval of <100 kb, including at least one SNP in each coding region. Selected SNP markers were distributed between base positions 14 440 543 and 46 915 057 based on NCBI Build 35, whereas no SNP closer to the centromere was included because of the duplicated region in the chromosome 21 sequence (18). Using a threshold of P < 0.05 for allele frequency, we detected 14 SNPs, which is less than the predicted 21 markers. Therefore, to reduce type II error, we also tested genotype frequency in both dominant and recessive models (Fig. 1). Finally, the exploratory scan detected 42 SNPs in total (10.0%), among which 14 SNPs were significant in both allele and genotype frequencies, of which one positive region was identified in the Down syndrome critical region (DSCR) (1921). The confirmatory scan targeting the selected 42 SNPs indicated that 22 SNPs were still significant for either allele or genotype frequency (Table 1). Among those, 17 SNPs were also significant by logistic regression for the risk genotype with age, sex and APOE-{varepsilon}4 dose. Genes linked to these SNPs were the SAMSN1, PRSS7, NCAM2, RUNX1, DYRK1A and KCNJ6 genes and those linked to unknown open reading frames were C21ORF 63, 55 and 5. In logistic regression, the DYRK1A gene, located in the middle of the DSCR, showed the highest significance [OR = 2.99 (95% CI: 1.72–5.19), P = 0.001], whereas the RUNX1 gene showed a very high odds ratio [OR = 23.3 (95% CI: 2.76–196.5), P = 0.038].


Figure 4371
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Exploratory scan using 417 markers. (A) P-values for allele frequency in chi-squared test. (B) P-values for genotype frequency in better fitting models. Genomic position is based on NCBI Build 35.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Genes linked to markers associated with AD on chromosome 21

 
Haplotype analysis of DYRK1A
SNPs located in the DYRK1A gene region were genotyped to determine the haplotype associated with AD. Linkage disequilibrium was identified in the control group from 30 kb upstream of exon 1 to intron 9, but not in exon 13 genotyped by rs1803439 which was not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, and the AD group showed similar results (Fig. 2). Haplotype analysis indicated that three haplotypes had significantly different frequencies between AD and controls, whereas the permutation test supported significant differences in two haplotypes. Considering the haplotype frequencies, rs8126696 alleles could represent the risk haplotype (Table 2). We also sequenced all coding regions of the DYRK1A gene in six patients and three controls homozygous for the risk allele, but no sequence alteration was found.


Figure 4372
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Linkage disequilibrium in DYRK1A gene region. (A) Genomic structure of the DYRK1A gene is shown. Horizontal bar indicates exons, and letters indicate SNPs, such as rs28360609 (A), rs2251085 (B), rs2835740 (C), rs10470178 (D), rs11701810 (E), rs1024294 (F), rs2835773 (G), rs2835774 (H) and rs1803439 (I). (B) r2 (upper right) and |D'| values (lower left) were judged significant at less than 0.5 and 0.9, respectively, and significant values are shown by dark boxes.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Haplotype case–control study for DYRK1A gene

 
DYRK1A mRNA in hippocampus of AD
DYRK1A mRNA in the hippocampus was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to examine the relation with the occurrence of AD and with the genotype of rs8126696. DYRK1A mRNA level in the patients was significantly different (P < 0.01), being ~7-fold greater than that in pathological controls (Fig. 3A). In contrast, patients homozygous for the risk rs8126696-c allele showed a tendency for a decrease in DYRK1A mRNA level compared with the others, but this was not significant (Fig. 3B). Thus, the increased expression of DYRK1A mRNA is possibly a consequence of AD.


Figure 4373
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Expression of DYRK1A mRNA in human hippocampus. (A) Quantitative real-time PCR of DYRK1A mRNA in AD (n = 22) and controls (n = 12). (B) DYRK1A mRNA level in AD brain divided by rs28360609 genotypes, where CC is the risk genotype. DYRK1A mRNA level was expressed as the ratio of that of GAPDH. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.01 by Mann–Whitney's U-test.

 
DYRK1A mRNA and Aß in transgenic mouse brain
We examined whether Aß loading is related to DYRK1A mRNA level in the brain in PS1I213TKI and Tg-PS1/APP mice. Aß1–40 level in PS1I213TKI mice was low, but Aß1–40 was almost undetectable, whereas both Aß1–40 and Aß1–42 were elevated in Tg-PS1/APP mice (Fig. 4A and B), suggesting that Tg-PS1/APP mice have an Aß burden in their brain. Quantitative PCR showed that the DYRK1A mRNA level was significantly increased in Tg-PS1/APP mice when compared with that in PS1I213TKI mice (P < 0.05) by 1.2-fold (Fig. 4C). Thus, the expression of DYRK1A mRNA increased along with Aß loading in the mouse brain.


Figure 4374
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Aß-level and expression of DYRK1A mRNA in transgenic mouse brain. Heterozygous PS1I213TKI (PS1, n = 6) and Tg-APP/PS1 (APP/PS1, n = 6) mice were sacrificed at 9 months of age. Aß-level was measured by ELISA. DYRK1A mRNA level was measured by quantitative real-time PCR. (A) Aß1–40 level, (B) Aß1–42 level and (C) amount of DYRK1A mRNA. DYRK1A mRNA level was expressed as the ratio of that of GAPDH. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.01 by Student's t-test.

 
DYRK1A mRNA, Aß and tau phosphorylation in cell models
We examined whether Aß, a major component of senile plaques in the AD brain, induces expression of DYRK1A mRNA in cultured neuroblastoma cells. SH-SY5Y cells were incubated with Aß, and then total RNA was extracted and quantified (Fig. 5). DYRK1A mRNA level was significantly increased by 1.6-fold (P < 0.05) with 0.5 µM Aß1–42 and by 1.3-fold (P < 0.01) with 25 µM Aß25–35, compared with the level in non-treated cells, but was not changed with control 25 µM Aß35-25. Thus, Aß loading resulted in an increase in the DYRK1A transcription. In an in vitro experiment, DYRK1A protein not only phosphorylates itself, but also has a large repertoire of phosphorylation (22). Therefore, we examined whether DYRK1A overexpression induces phosphorylation of tau at the cellular level. An immunoblot of HEK293T cells transiently transfected with the MAPT expression vector showed a detectable amount of tau along with those phosphorylated at Thr212 (Fig. 6A). Tau phosphorylated at Thr212 was increased by co-transfection of the DYRK1A expression vector, compared with that of mock vector, whereas tau level was similar (Fig. 6A). Densitometric quantification supported the induction of phosphorylation by 1.5-fold (P < 0.01) (Fig. 6B). Thus, the increase in the DYRK1A transcription under overexpression of tau induced tau phosphorylation at Thr212.


Figure 4375
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. Aß-induced expression of DYRK1A mRNA in SH-SY5Y cells. SH-SY5Y cells were incubated with Aß1–42, Aß25–35 and Aß35–25. DYRK1A mRNA level was measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Values were normalized to those in untreated cells. DYRK1A mRNA level was expressed as the ratio of that of GAPDH. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of four independent measurements. **P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05 by Student's t-test compared with control.

 


Figure 4376
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6. Tau hyperphosphorylation in DYRK1A-overexpressing cells. (A) HEK293T cells were transfected with either the MAPT expression vector (Tau) or both the MAPT and DYRK1A expression vectors (Tau + DYRK1A). After 24 h incubation, lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG M2 agarose and then subjected to immunoblotting with anti-DYRK1A (DYRK1A), anti-tau (Tau) or anti-phosphotau (P-TauThr212). (B) P-TauThr212/Tau ratio was measured as integrated optical density values. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of four independent measures. *P < 0.01 by Student's t-test.

 
Discussion
Genome scanning using case–control studies, based on linkage disequilibrium, is a strategy to identify genetic factors of polygenetic diseases. In general, many susceptibility genes have been reported, but it remains difficult to replicate the results in different studies. This could possibly be caused by selection bias in patients as well as in controls, because hospital-based control subjects often suffer from another disease, leading to an additional background of that disease. Therefore, we used population-based controls to match the phenotypic background. From the exploratory and confirmatory scans, we identified 22 candidate SNPs associated with late-onset AD on chromosome 21. Although we showed their risk effects in logistic regression with age, sex and APOE-{varepsilon}4 dose, a known major risk for AD (3), these candidates need to be confirmed, because P-values were inconclusive when considering the comparison of multiple loci.

We found associations of AD with markers linked to six known genes, but not with reported candidates, the APP and BACE2 genes. The SAMSN1 gene encodes a member of putative adaptors and scaffold proteins containing SH3 and sterile alpha motif domains, expressed mainly in immune tissues and hematopoietic cells and also at lower levels in the heart, brain, placenta and lung (23). The DYRK1A gene, located in the DSCR, is a candidate gene responsible for learning and memory impairment in patients with DS (24,25). The PRSS7 gene encodes enteropeptidase (EC 3.4.21.9 [EC] ), an intestinal enzyme initiating activation of pancreatic proteolytic proenzymes such as trypsin, chymotrypsin and carboxypeptidase A, which are highly expressed in the intestines and at a low level in the brain of rat (26), but is downregulated in amniotic fluid cells in patients with DS (27). The neural cell adhesion molecule 2 (NCAM2) gene is expressed in fetal and adult brains (28), sharing many features with immunoglobulins and mediating adhesion among neurons and between neurons and muscle (29) and having a potential regulatory role in the formation of selective axonal projections of olfactory sensory neurons in mice (30). The RUNX1 gene, also called AML1, encodes runt-related transcription factor 1, which is required for active repression in CD4-negative/CD8-negative thymocytes, and a defective RUNX1 gene causes a familial platelet disorder with predisposition to acute myelogenous leukemia (31). The mouse RUNX1 homolog is expressed in selected populations of post-mitotic neurons of the embryonic central and peripheral nervous systems (32). The KCNJ6 gene, located in the DSCR, encodes a G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channel and is expressed in the brain and pancreatic beta cells (33,34). A kcnj6 mutation was found in the weaver mouse characterized by ataxia with reduced size of the cerebellum because of depletion of granule cell neurons (35).

DYRK1A is a mammalian ortholog of the Drosophila minibrain gene, which is essential for normal post-embryonic neurogenesis (36). In rodents, DYRK1A mRNA is expressed ubiquitously in various tissues during development and is also strongly expressed in the adult brain and heart (20,3739). In humans, DYRK1A mRNA is expressed especially in the brain, and immunoreactive DYRK1A is found in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum and is overexpressed in the DS brain in a dose-dependent manner (40,41). Transgenic mice overexpressing full-length DYRK1A mRNA exhibit neurodevelopmental delay, motor abnormalities and cognitive deficit, suggesting a causative role of the DYRK1A gene in mental retardation and motor anomalies of DS (24,25). It was noted that all adults with DS over the age of 40 years develop sufficient neuropathology for a diagnosis of AD (42). The identification of the DYRK1A gene as a genetic factor strongly supports that the DYRK1A gene is involved in the development of AD.

We demonstrated an increase in the DYRK1A mRNA level in post-mortem brains, coinciding with the recent report of DYRK1A immunoreactivity in the neocortex and hippocampus in AD (41). The risk genotype of the DYRK1A gene showed a tendency for a decrease in the DYRK1A mRNA level, but our observation needs to be carefully considered because the result might be caused by the reduction of neuronal cells in the AD brain. However, no studies have yet examined the relationship between the DYRK1A gene and Aß. Genetic and pathological evidence strongly supports the amyloid cascade hypothesis that Aß42, a proteolytic derivative of the APP protein, has an early and pivotal role in all cases of AD. It is thought that Aß42 forms aggregates that initiate the pathogenic cascade, leading ultimately to neural loss and dementia (43). We demonstrated that Aß, especially Aß42, results in an increase of DYRK1A transcription in human neuroblastoma cells and is also observed in transgenic mouse models. Therefore, the increase in DYRK1A transcription is a common feature of AD and DS and could relate to the cognitive impairment in patients with AD.

The DYRK1A enzyme has dual substrate specificity: autophosphorylation for self-activation takes place on the Tyr321 residue in the active loop of the catalytic domain (44) and target protein phosphorylation occurs on serine/threonine residues in several proteins, including STAT3, FHKR, Gli-1, eIF2B{varepsilon}, tau, dynamin, glycogen synthase, 14-3-3, CREB, cyclin L2, Arip4, Hip-1 and PAHX-AP1, indicating that DYRK1A may participate in many biological pathways (22). We showed that overexpression of the DYRK1A gene phosphorylates tau at Thr212 in HEK293T cells overproducing tau, suggesting that tau phosphorylation at Thr212 by DYRK1A could be a downstream consequence of Aß overproduction. It was shown in an in vitro experiment that DYRK1A phosphorylates tau at Thr212, which primes tau for phosphorylation by GSK3-ß at Ser208, leading to the formation of paired helical filaments composed of highly phosphorylated tau, a component of neurofibrillary tangles (41). However, transgenic mice overexpressing DYRK1A did not show this phosphorylation, and this phosphorylation is highly susceptible to dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase-1, which is expressed in the frontal lobes of the brain, indicating that tau phosphorylation at Thr212 could be prohibited in vivo (45,46). On the contrary, it was noted that peptides of tau phosphorylated at Thr212 completely block Aß binding, and DYRK1A mediated phosphorylation of Huntingtin-interacting protein 1 (Hip-1) in response to ßFGF, resulting in the blockade of Hip-1-mediated neuronal cell death as well as the enhancement of neurite outgrowth (47,48). Therefore, tau phosphorylation at Thr212 could be a protective response against neuronal cell death. Although overexpression of DYRK1A could be a common phenomenon between AD and DS, neuropathological studies might elucidate how the pathway from overexpression of DYRK1A to phosphorylation of tau is related to the severity of Alzheimer pathology.

Our study provides evidence that the DYRK1A gene is a genetic factor for AD, whose expression is increased by Aß loading in neuroblastoma cells and transgenic mice, resulting in hyperphosphorylation of tau at Thr212 under overexpression of tau. The DYRK1A gene could be responsible for learning and memory deterioration in DS (24,25), and a DYRK1A inhibitor has been proposed as a novel drug to address learning and memory deficit in DS (49). Our findings suggest that DYRK1A upregulation is a key phenomenon as a consequence of Aß loading in AD, connecting the condition to DS, and we propose a possible relation between the DYRK1A gene and memory impairment in AD.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 
Sample-set characteristics
Patients with late-onset AD were diagnosed as having definite or probable AD according to the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke–Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (50). Non-demented control subjects, tested by a questionnaire including the date, orientation and past history, were obtained from population-based elderly subjects. Written informed consent to participate in this study was obtained, and then peripheral blood was drawn and subjected to DNA extraction. The number of patients for the scan was 374 (70.6% female), composed of 73 with definite and 301 with probable AD; mean ± SD age at onset was 73.0 ± 8.0, range 60–94 years and age at blood drawing was 78.2 ± 8.3, range 60–98 years. Controls were composed of 375 individuals (54.7% female); age at assessment was 75.5 + 4.85, range 66–92 years. Brain hippocampal tissue was also obtained from the post-mortem brains of 22 patients with AD (age: 82.8 ± 8.5 years, 63.6% female) and 12 pathological controls (age: 89.0 ± 7.0 years, age at onset: 72.9 ± 7.2 years and 58.0% female). DNA was extracted from peripheral blood nuclear cells by phenol–chloroform method or using a QIAamp DNA Blood Kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan). The procedure to obtain the specimens was approved by the Genome Ethical Committee of Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime University and the Ethical Committee of Fukushimura Hospital.

Genotyping and sequencing
An exploratory scan was performed in 188 patients (67.0% female) (age at onset: 75.0 ± 7.2 and range 60–92 years) and 375 controls matched for age. A confirmatory scan was performed in 374 patients including 175 who underwent exploratory scan, and the data were compared with the genotype data of controls in the exploratory scan. The whole genomic DNA was amplified by degenerate oligonucleotide-primed-PCR and used in the confirmatory scan, because of the small amount of DNA (51). The accuracy of genotyping in the confirmatory scan was monitored by comparison with data obtained in the exploratory scan. The selected markers were 417 SNPs distributed in chromosome 21, spanning a region of 33 Mb, which was sequenced and reported by the Chromosome 21 Mapping and Sequencing Consortium (18). Mean interval of the markers in NCBI Build 35 was 78.1 kb, and their range was 7.7–240.0 kb, and 15 intervals were over 100 kb where no coding region was predicted on the basis of the SNP information in using SNPbrowser Software Version 3.5 on NCBI Build 35, available from http://www.appliedbiosystems.com/. Genotyping was performed by a quantitative genotyping method using the TaqMan SNP Genotyping System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). DNA obtained from six patients and three controls homozygous for the risk genotype of the DYRK1A gene was subjected to direct sequencing of its exons, using the primers listed in Table 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Primer sequences for DYRK1A gene

 
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was isolated from frozen brains using the acid guanidine–phenol–chloroform RNA extraction method provided as ISOGEN (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan), and purified using an RNAeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). RNA samples with an A260/A280 absorption ratio over 1.9 were subjected to cDNA synthesis using a High-Capacity cDNA Archive Kit (Applied Biosystems). Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out in an ABI PRISM 7900HT (Applied Biosystems), and primers/probe sets for the DYRK1A and GAPDH genes of human and mouse were purchased from TaqMan Gene Expression Assay Products (Applied Biosystems). All quantitative PCR reactions were duplicated, and the ratio of the amount of DYRK1A cDNA to that of GAPDH internal control cDNA at a threshold in the mid-log phase of amplification was used to compare the amount of DYRK1A mRNA.

Transgenic mice
The PS1I213TKI mouse, with a ‘knocked-in’ human PS1 I213T mutation in the mouse presenilin 1 gene (52,53), was bred with Tg2576 mice expressing the human APP gene harboring the K670N/M671L Swedish mutation (Taconic) (54). PS1I213TKI and double transgenic (Tg-APP/PS1) mice were maintained on the B6 background. Six heterozygous Tg-APP/PS1 and six PS1I213TKI mice were sacrificed at age 9 months under anesthesia, and their brains were dissected and stored at –80°C until use. All animal procedures were reviewed by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shionogi & Co., Ltd. Every effort was made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering.

Cell culture
Human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells were grown in F12 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (JRH Bioscience, Lenexa, KS, USA), and human embryonic kidney (HEK293T) cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) with 10% FBS. Amyloid peptides (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) were dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline, followed by incubation at 37°C for 72 h. SH-SY5Y cells were incubated for 20 h with Aß at 0.5 µM for Aß1–42 and at 25 µM for Aß25–35 and Aß35–25. Total RNA was isolated from harvested cells using an RNAeasy Mini kit, and then synthesized cDNA was subjected to quantitative PCR. The human long isoform of MAPT cDNA, obtained from Dr Goedert (Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK), was cloned in pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen), and the FLAG epitope-tagged DYRK1A expression vector was cloned in pEGFPC2 (55,56). These vectors were transfected into HEK293T cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen), followed by their expression for 24 h, and the cells were harvested and subjected to biochemical experiments.

Biochemical experiments
In transgenic mice, the hemisphere of each brain was homogenized in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) composed of 137 mM NaCl and 20 mM Tris, pH 7.6, containing 1% Triton X-100 with CompleteTM protease inhibitor (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), followed by ultracentrifugation, and the supernatant was subjected to measurement of Aß1–40 and Aß1–42 levels using a sandwich ELISA kit (Biosource International, Camarillo, CA, USA). In cell experiments, cells were lysed in lysis buffer composed of 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 1% NP-40, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma-Aldrich) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). After centrifugation at 10 000g for 15 min at 4°C, protein extracts were obtained as the supernatant and quantified using BCA Protein Assay (Pierce). For immunoprecipitation, 300 µg of protein lysate was incubated with 20 µl anti-FLAG M2 agarose (Sigma-Aldrich) with gentle rotation at 4°C overnight, and after centrifugation, the precipitate was dissolved in SDS sample buffer, electrophoresed in 8% SDS–PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA). After blocking with 5% milk in TBS buffer composed of 0.1% Tween-20, 140 mM NaCl and 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.6, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies, such as polyclonal antibody to phosphotau (P-TauThr212) (Biosource International) diluted to 1:500 or polyclonal antibodies to DYRK1A (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) at 1:200 or to tau (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 1:500. The membranes were washed and then incubated with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies against mouse, rabbit or sheep immunoglobulin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), followed by washing and developing with an ECL Plus Western Blotting Detection System (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences). The immunoreactive bands on films were digitized with an HP 2355 and subjected to densitometric quantification using Image J version 1.36 (National Institute of Health).

Statistical analysis
To reduce type II errors, the exploratory and confirmatory scans were assessed for associations by one-sided chi-squared test for both allele and genotype frequencies in dominant and recessive models, where each {alpha}-level was 0.05. For markers showing significant associations in the confirmatory scan, the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was tested. The risk genotypes in the better fitting model were given a value of 1 and the other genotypes 0, and then logistic regression was performed along with age, sex and the APOE-{varepsilon}4 dose under no interaction, using StatView software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Linkage disequilibrium in the DYRK1A gene was also assessed by |D'| and r2 values; those less than 0.9 and 0.5, respectively, were judged significant (57). Case–control haplotype analysis was performed with the EM algorithm (58) and with the permutation test at 1000 iterations (59), using SNPAlyze software (DYNACOM, Japan). Normally distributed variables were compared by Student's t-test; otherwise non-parametric Mann–Whitney's U-test was applied. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
We thank Drs Y. Ikejiri, T. Nishikawa, H. Yoneda, Y. Moto, A. Sawa, S. Fujinaga, T. Matsubayashi, K. Taniguchi, Y. Ikemura, T. Mori and J. Okuda for clinical evaluation and E. Miyamura for assistance. This work was funded by the Future Program and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas ‘Applied Genomics’ from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

Conflict of Interest statement. None of the authors has any conflict of interest.


    FOOTNOTES
 
{dagger} The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 RESULTS
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Sorbi S., Forleo P., Tedde A., Cellini E., Ciantelli M., Bagnoli S., Nacmias B. (2001) Genetic risk factors in familial Alzheimer's disease. Mech. Ageing Dev. 122:1951–1960.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  2. Wisniewski K.E., Wisniewski H.M., Wen G.Y. (1985) Occurrence of neuropathological changes and dementia of Alzheimer's disease in Down's syndrome. Ann. Neurol. 17:278–282.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  3. Corder E.H., Saunders A.M., Strittmatter W.J., Schmechel D.E., Gaskell P.C., Small G.W., Roses A.D., Haines J.L., Pericak-Vance M.A. (1993) Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families. Science 261:921–923.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  4. Farrer L.A., Cupples L.A., Haines J.L., Hyman B., Kukull W.A., Mayeux R., Myers R.H., Pericak-Vance M.A., Risch N., van Duijn C.M. (1997) Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer Disease Meta Analysis Consortium. JAMA 278:1349–1356.[Abstract]

  5. Rovelet-Lecrux A., Hannequin D., Raux G., Le Meur N., Laquerriere A., Vital A., Dumanchin C., Feuillette S., Brice A., Vercelletto M., et al. (2006) APP locus duplication causes autosomal dominant early-onset Alzheimer disease with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Nat. Genet. 38:24–26.[ISI][Medline]

  6. Li L., Perry R., Wu J., Pham D., Ohman T., Harrell L.E., Go R.C., Fukuchi K. (1998) Polymorphic tetranucleotide repeat site within intron 7 of the ß-amyloid precursor protein gene and its lack of association with Alzheimer's disease. Hum. Genet. 103:86–89.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  7. Athan E.S., Lee J.H., Arriaga A., Mayeux R.P., Tycko B. (2002) Polymorphisms in the promoter of the human APP gene: functional evaluation and allele frequencies in Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. 59:1793–1799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  8. Clarimon J., Bertranpetit J., Calafell F., Boada M., Tarraga L., Comas D. (2003) Joint analysis of candidate genes related to Alzheimer's disease in a Spanish population. Psychiatr. Genet. 13:85–90.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  9. Nowotny P., Kwon J.M., Chakraverty S., Nowotny V., Morris J.C., Goate A.M. (2001) Association studies using novel polymorphisms in BACE1 and BACE2. Neuroreport 12:1799–1802.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  10. Myllykangas L., Wavrant-De Vrieze F., Polvikoski T., Notkola I.L., Sulkava R., Niinisto L., Edland S.D., Arepalli S., Adighibe O., Compton D., et al. (2005) Chromosome 21 BACE2 haplotype associates with Alzheimer's disease: a two-stage study. J. Neurol. Sci. 236:17–24.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  11. Li Y., Hollingworth P., Moore P., Foy C., Archer N., Powell J., Nowotny P., Holmans P., O'Donovan M., Tacey K., et al. (2005) Genetic association of the APP binding protein 2 gene (APBB2) with late onset Alzheimer disease. Hum. Mutat. 25:270–277.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  12. Kehoe P., Wavrant-De Vrieze F., Crook R., Wu W.S., Holmans P., Fenton I., Spurlock G., Norton N., Williams H., Williams N., et al. (1999) A full genome scan for late onset Alzheimer's disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8:237–245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  13. Myers A., Wavrant-De Vrieze F., Holmans P., Hamshere M., Crook R., Compton D., Marshall H., Meyer D., Shears S., Booth J., et al. (2002) Full genome screen for Alzheimer disease: stage II analysis. Am. J. Med. Genet. 114:235–244.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  14. Wu W.S., Holmans P., Wavrant-DeVrieze F., Shears S., Kehoe P., Crook R., Booth J., Williams N., Perez-Tur J., Roehl K., et al. (1998) Genetic studies on chromosome 12 in late-onset Alzheimer disease. JAMA 280:619–622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  15. Pericak-Vance M.A., Grubber J., Bailey L.R., Hedges D., West S., Santoro L., Kemmerer B., Hall J.L., Saunders A.M., Roses A.D., et al. (2000) Identification of novel genes in late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Exp. Gerontol. 35:1343–1352.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  16. Farrer L.A., Bowirrat A., Friedland R.P., Waraska K., Korczyn A.D., Baldwin C.T. (2003) Identification of multiple loci for Alzheimer disease in a consanguineous Israeli-Arab community. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12:415–422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  17. Holmans P., Hamshere M., Hollingworth P., Rice F., Tunstall N., Jones S., Moore P., Wavrant-DeVrieze F., Myers A., Crook R., et al. (2005) Genome screen for loci influencing age at onset and rate of decline in late onset Alzheimer's disease. Am. J. Med. Genet. B. Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 135:24–32.[Medline]

  18. The Chromosome 21 Mapping Sequencing Consortium. (2000) The DNA sequence of human chromosome 21. Nature 405:311–319.[CrossRef][Medline]

  19. Ohira M., Ichikawa H., Suzuki E., Iwaki M., Suzuki K., Saito-Ohara F., Ikeuchi T., Chumakov I., Tanahashi H., Tashiro K., et al. (1996) A 1.6-Mb P1-based physical map of the Down syndrome region on chromosome 21. Genomics 33:65–74.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  20. Guimera J., Casas C., Pucharcos C., Solans A., Domenech A., Planas A.M., Ashley J., Lovett M., Estivill X., Pritchard M.A. (1996) A human homologue of Drosophila minibrain (MNB) is expressed in the neuronal regions affected in Down syndrome and maps to the critical region. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5:1305–1310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  21. Shindoh N., Kudoh J., Maeda H., Yamaki A., Minoshima S., Shimizu Y., Shimizu N. (1996) Cloning of a human homolog of the Drosophila minibrain/rat Dyrk gene from ‘the Down syndrome critical region’ of chromosome 21. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 225:92–99.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  22. Galceran J., de Graaf K., Tejedor F.J., Becker W. (2003) The MNB/DYRK1A protein kinase: genetic and biochemical properties. J. Neural Transm. Suppl. 67:139–148.

  23. Claudio J.O., Zhu Y.X., Benn S.J., Shukla A.H., McGlade C.J., Falcioni N., Stewart A.K. (2001) HACS1 encodes a novel SH3-SAM adaptor protein differentially expressed in normal and malignant hematopoietic cells. Oncogene 20:5373–5377.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  24. Smith D.J., Stevens M.E., Sudanagunta S.P., Bronson R.T., Makhinson M., Watabe A.M., O'Dell T.J., Fung J., Weier H.U., Cheng J.F., et al. (1997) Functional screening of 2 Mb of human chromosome 21q22.2 in transgenic mice implicates minibrain in learning defects associated with Down syndrome. Nat. Genet. 16:28–36.[Medline]

  25. Altafaj X., Dierssen M., Baamonde C., Marti E., Visa J., Guimera J., Oset M., Gonzalez J.R., Florez J., Fillat C., et al. (2001) Neurodevelopmental delay, motor abnormalities and cognitive deficits in transgenic mice overexpressing Dyrk1A (minibrain), a murine model of Down's syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10:1915–1923.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  26. Yahagi N., Ichinose M., Matsushima M., Matsubara Y., Miki K., Kurokawa K., Fukamachi H., Tashiro K., Shiokawa K., Kageyama T., et al. (1996) Complementary DNA cloning and sequencing of rat enteropeptidase and tissue distribution of its mRNA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 219:806–812.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  27. Chung I.H., Lee S.H., Lee K.W., Park S.H., Cha K.Y., Kim N.S., Yoo H.S., Kim Y.S., Lee S. (2005) Gene expression analysis of cultured amniotic fluid cell with Down syndrome by DNA microarray. J. Korean Med. Sci. 20:82–87.[ISI][Medline]

  28. Paoloni-Giacobino A., Chen H., Antonarakis S.E. (1997) Cloning of a novel human neural cell adhesion molecule gene (NCAM2) that maps to chromosome region 21q21 and is potentially involved in Down syndrome. Genomics 43:43–51.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  29. Rutishauser U., Acheson A., Hall A.K., Mann D.M., Sunshine J. (1988) The neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) as a regulator of cell–cell interactions. Science 240:53–57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  30. Alenius M. and Bohm S. (2003) Differential function of RNCAM isoforms in precise target selection of olfactory sensory neurons. Development 130:917–927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  31. Song W.J., Sullivan M.G., Legare R.D., Hutchings S., Tan X., Kufrin D., Ratajczak J., Resende I.C., Haworth C., Hock R., et al. (1999) Haploinsufficiency of CBFA2 causes familial thrombocytopenia with propensity to develop acute myelogenous leukaemia. Nat. Genet. 23:166–175.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  32. Theriault F.M., Roy P., Stifani S. (2004) AML1/Runx1 is important for the development of hindbrain cholinergic branchiovisceral motor neurons and selected cranial sensory neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101:10343–10348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  33. Sakura H., Bond C., Warren-Perry M., Horsley S., Kearney L., Tucker S., Adelman J., Turner R., Ashcroft F.M. (1995) Characterization and variation of a human inwardly-rectifying K-channel gene (KCNJ6): a putative ATP-sensitive K-channel subunit. FEBS Lett. 367:193–197.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  34. Tsaur M.L., Menzel S., Lai F.P., Espinosa R. III, Concannon P., Spielman R.S., Hanis C.L., Cox N.J., Le Beau M.M., German M.S., et al. (1995) Isolation of a cDNA clone encoding a K(ATP) channel-like protein expressed in insulin-secreting cells, localization of the human gene to chromosome band 21q22.1 and linkage studies with NIDDM. Diabetes 44:592–596.[Abstract]

  35. Patil N., Cox D.R., Bhat D., Faham M., Myers R.M., Peterson A.S. (1995) A potassium channel mutation in weaver mice implicates membrane excitability in granule cell differentiation. Nat. Genet. 11:126–129.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  36. Tejedor F., Zhu X.R., Kaltenbach E., Ackermann A., Baumann A., Canal I., Heisenberg M., Fischbach K.F., Pongs O. (1995) minibrain: a new protein kinase family involved in postembryonic neurogenesis in Drosophila. Neuron 14:287–301.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  37. Song W.J., Sternberg L.R., Kasten-Sportes C., Keuren M.L., Chung S.H., Slack A.C., Miller D.E., Glover T.W., Chiang P.W., Lou L., et al. (1996) Isolation of human and murine homologues of the Drosophila minibrain gene: human homologue maps to 21q22.2 in the Down syndrome ‘critical region’. Genomics 38:331–339.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  38. Marti E., Altafaj X., Dierssen M., de la Luna S., Fotaki V., Alvarez M., Perez-Riba M., Ferrer I., Estivill X. (2003) Dyrk1A expression pattern supports specific roles of this kinase in the adult central nervous system. Brain Res. 964:250–263.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  39. Okui M., Ide T., Morita K., Funakoshi E., Ito F., Ogita K., Yoneda Y., Kudoh J., Shimizu N. (1999) High-level expression of the Mnb/Dyrk1A gene in brain and heart during rat early development. Genomics 62:165–171.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  40. Guimera J., Casas C., Estivill X., Pritchard M. (1999) Human minibrain homologue (MNBH/DYRK1): characterization, alternative splicing, differential tissue expression, and overexpression in Down syndrome. Genomics 57:407–418.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  41. Ferrer I., Barrachina M., Puig B., Martinez de Lagran M., Marti E., Avila J., Dierssen M. (2005) Constitutive Dyrk1A is abnormally expressed in Alzheimer disease, Down syndrome, Pick disease, and related transgenic models. Neurobiol. Dis. 20:392–400.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  42. Mann D.M. and Esiri M.M. (1989) The pattern of acquisition of plaques and tangles in the brains of patients under 50 years of age with Down's syndrome. J. Neurol. Sci. 89:169–179.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  43. Selkoe D.J. (2002) Alzheimer's disease is a synaptic failure. Science 298:789–791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  44. Himpel S., Panzer P., Eirmbter K., Czajkowska H., Sayed M., Packman L.C., Blundell T., Kentrup H., Grotzinger J., Joost H.G., et al. (2001) Identification of the autophosphorylation sites and characterization of their effects in the protein kinase DYRK1A. Biochem. J. 359:497–505.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  45. Woods Y.L., Cohen P., Becker W., Jakes R., Goedert M., Wang X., Proud C.G. (2001) The kinase DYRK phosphorylates protein-synthesis initiation factor eIF2B{varepsilon} at Ser539 and the microtubule-associated protein tau at Thr212: potential role for DYRK as a glycogen synthase kinase 3-priming kinase. Biochem. J. 355:609–615.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  46. Rahman A., Grundke-Iqbal I., Iqbal K. (2005) Phosphothreonine-212 of Alzheimer abnormally hyperphosphorylated tau is a preferred substrate of protein phosphatase-1. Neurochem. Res. 30:277–287.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  47. Guo J.P., Arai T., Miklossy J., McGeer P.L. (2006) Aß and tau form soluble complexes that may promote self aggregation of both into the insoluble forms observed in Alzheimer's disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103:1953–1958.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  48. Kang J.E., Choi S.A., Park J.B., Chung K.C. (2005) Regulation of the proapoptotic activity of huntingtin interacting protein 1 by Dyrk1 and caspase-3 in hippocampal neuroprogenitor cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 81:62–72.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  49. Kim N.D., Yoon J., Kim J.H., Lee J.T., Chon Y.S., Hwang M.K., Ha I., Song W.J. (2006) Putative therapeutic agents for the learning and memory deficits of people with Down syndrome. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16:3772–3776.[CrossRef][Medline]

  50. McKhann G., Drachman D., Folstein M., Katzman R., Price D., Stadlan E.M. (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease; report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 34:939–944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  51. Sanchez-Cespedes M., Cairns P., Jen J., Sidransky D. (1998) Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR (DOP-PCR): evaluation of its reliability for screening of genetic alterations in neoplasia. Biotechniques 25:1036–1038.[ISI][Medline]

  52. Kamino K., Sato S., Sakaki Y., Yoshiiwa A., Nishiwaki Y., Takeda M., Tanabe H., Nishimura T., Ii K., St George-Hyslop P.H., et al. (1996) Three different mutations of presenilin 1 gene in early-onset Alzheimer's disease families. Neurosci. Lett. 208:195–198.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  53. Nakano Y., Kondoh G., Kudo T., Imaizumi K., Kato M., Miyazaki J.I., Tohyama M., Takeda J., Takeda M. (1999) Accumulation of murine amyloidß42 in a gene-dosage-dependent manner in PS1 ‘knock-in’ mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 11:2577–2581.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  54. Hsiao K., Chapman P., Nilsen S., Eckman C., Harigaya Y., Younkin S., Yang F., Cole G. (1996) Correlative memory deficits, Aß elevation, and amyloid plaques in transgenic mice. Science 274:99–103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

  55. Goedert M., Spillantini M.G., Potier M.C., Ulrich J., Crowther R.A. (1989) Cloning and sequencing of the cDNA encoding an isoform of microtubule-associated protein tau containing four tandem repeats: differential expression of tau protein mRNAs in human brain. EMBO J. 8:393–399.[ISI][Medline]

  56. Funakoshi E., Hori T., Haraguchi T., Hiraoka Y., Kudoh J., Shimizu N., Ito F. (2003) Overexpression of the human MNB/DYRK1A gene induces formation of multinucleate cells through overduplication of the centrosome. BMC Cell Biol. 4:12.[CrossRef][Medline]

  57. Devlin B. and Risch N. (1995) A comparison of linkage disequilibrium measures for fine-scale mapping. Genomics 29:311–322.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

  58. Excoffier L. and Slatkin M. (1995) Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:921–927.[Abstract]

  59. Fallin D., Cohen A., Essioux L., Chumakov I., Blumenfeld M., Cohen D., Schork N.J. (2001) Genetic analysis of case/control data using estimated haplotype frequencies: application to APOE locus variation and Alzheimer's disease. Genome Res. 11:143–151.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
P. Thomas and M. Fenech
Chromosome 17 and 21 aneuploidy in buccal cells is increased with ageing and in Alzheimer's disease
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 57 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
16/1/15    most recent
ddl437v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Google Scholar