Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (63)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Deutekom, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Frants, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Deutekom, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Frants, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics Pages 1997-2003 © Oxford University Press

Evidence for subtelomeric exchange of 3.3 kb tandemly repeated units between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26: implications for genetic counselling and etiology of FSHD1
Introduction
Results
   Diagnostic application of differential restriction analysis
   Subtelomeric exchange of repeated units
Discussion
Materials And Methods
   Patient and control material
   Southern blot analysis
   Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
Acknowledgements
References


Evidence for subtelomeric exchange of 3.3 kb tandemly repeated units between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26: implications for genetic counselling and etiology of FSHD1

Evidence for subtelomeric exchange of 3.3 kb tandemly repeated units between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26: implications for genetic counselling and etiology of FSHD1 Judith C. T. van Deutekom1,2, Egbert Bakker1, Richard J. L. F. Lemmers1, Michiel J. R. van der Wielen1, Elsa Bik1, Marten H. Hofker1, George W. Padberg3 and Rune R. Frants1,*

1MGC-Department of Human Genetics, Sylvius Laboratory, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 72, 2333 AL Leiden, The Netherlands, 2Department of Neurology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands and 3Department of Neurology, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Received August 6, 1996; Revised and Accepted September 30, 1996

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant myopathy, clinically characterized by asymmetric weakness of muscles in the face, shoulder girdle and upper arm. Deletion of an integral number of 3.3 kb repeated units within a highly polymorphic EcoRI fragment at chromosome 4q35, generating a relatively short EcoRI fragment (<35 kb), has been shown to cause FSHD1. Probe p13E-11 detects these short fragments in FSHD1 patients, and has therefore been used for diagnostic DNA analysis. However, the reliability of this analysis has been hampered by cross-hybridization of p13E-11 to chromosome 10q26-linked EcoRI fragments of comparable size, which also contain a variable number of 3.3 kb repeated units. Recently, a BlnI restriction site was identified within each of the repeated units derived from chromosome 10q26, which enables differentiation of the two polymorphic p13E-11 loci in most cases without haplotype analysis. Remarkably, applying the differential analysis to screen DNA of 160 Dutch cases referred to us for FSHD1 diagnosis, we obtained evidence for subtelomeric exchange of 3.3 kb repeated units between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26 in affected and unaffected individuals. Subsequently, analysis of 50 unrelated control samples indicated such exchange between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26 in at least 20% of the population. These subtelomeric rearrangements have generated a novel interchromosomal polymorphism, which has implications for the specificity and sensitivity of the differential restriction analysis for diagnostic purposes. Moreover, the high frequency of the interchromosomal exchanges of 3.3 kb repeated units suggests that they probably do not contain (part of) the FSHD1 gene, and supports position effect variegation as the most likely mechanism for FSHD1.

INTRODUCTION

Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is clinically characterized by progressive weakness of the facial, shoulder-girdle and upper arm muscles, and in some cases, also the abdominal, foot extensor and pelvic girdle muscles (1 ,2 ). The autosomal dominant inherited myopathy shows a variable phenotypic expression with a high penetrance of 95% at the age of 20, and an estimated prevalence of 1 in 20 000 (1 ,3 ).

Linkage analysis assigned the major FSHD locus (FSHD1) to chromosome 4q35 (4 ,5 ) distal to D4S139 (6 -8 ). However, genetic heterogeneity was demonstrated for a small number of FSHD families, not linked to 4q35 (9 -12 ). In patients, the FSHD1 locus on chromosome 4q35 is characterized by a DNA rearrangement within a highly polymorphic EcoRI fragment detectable using probe p13E-11 (D4F104S1) (13 ). In patients, these FSHD1-associated rearrangements generate EcoRI fragments which are shorter than 35 kb (13 -17 ), while the size of the 4q35-linked EcoRI fragments in unaffected individuals varies from 35 to 300 kb (13 ). Analysis of the p13E-11 EcoRI fragments of four unrelated FSHD1 patients and controls revealed that the polymorphic fragment contains a variable number of 3.3 kb repeated units (D4Z4), a critical number of which is deleted in patients (18 ).

As short EcoRI fragments (<35 kb) linked to 4q35 are associated with FSHD1, probe p13E-11 has been used for diagnostic DNA analysis (17 ). However, a straightforward analysis is hampered by cross-hybridization of p13E-11 to another polymorphic locus which has recently been assigned to chromosome 10q26 (12 ,19 ). This locus is similarly characterized by EcoRI fragments containing a variable number of 3.3 kb repeated units. The size of these chromosome 10 fragments can be up to 300 kb, but also less than 35 kb in 10% of the population (12 ,17 ). Hence, short EcoRI fragments derived from 10q26 may incorrectly be interpreted as chromosome 4q35 deletion fragments. Haplotype analysis in FSHD families using chromosome 4q35 and 10q26 markers had to be performed to determine the chromosomal origin of a short (<35 kb) p13E-11 fragment (17 ). However, due to the presence of small families and isolated cases, only about 50% of short p13E-11 fragments could unambiguously be assigned to chromosome 4q35, and subsequently used for diagnostic purposes (17 ).

Recently, comparative sequence analysis of 3.3 kb repeated units derived from chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26 revealed the specific presence of a BlnI site within each repeated unit from chromosome 10q26. As this restriction site is not present in the repeated units from chromosome 4q35, differential restriction analysis using BlnI enabled direct differentiation of the chromosomal EcoRI fragments without haplotype analysis (19 ). By double digestion of genomic DNA with EcoRI and BlnI (or AvrII), the p13E-11 EcoRI fragments from 4q35 are reduced in size by 3 kb, while the EcoRI fragments derived from chromosome 10q26 are fragmented completely. This differential restriction analysis enabled presymptomatic and prenatal diagnosis to be performed with an improved efficiency and reliability.

Here, we report the screening of 160 independent Dutch familial or isolated cases referred to us for FSHD1 diagnosis, using the differential restriction analysis. In most cases an unequivocal diagnosis was achieved. Remarkably, a few individuals appeared to be `monosomic' or `trisomic' for the 4q35-linked p13E-11 fragment. Further analysis of these cases suggested the occurrence of subtelomeric exchanges of 3.3 kb tandemly repeated units between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26, generating hybrid EcoRI fragments. As interchromosomal exchanges would have implications for the specificity and sensitivity of the diagnostic DNA testing, the frequency of such events in the population was determined by screening 50 unrelated control DNA samples.

RESULTS

Diagnostic application of differential restriction analysis

EcoRI and EcoRI/BlnI digested DNA of FSHD patients and family members was analyzed by conventional agarose gel electrophoresis and subsequent Southern blot hybridization using probe p13E-11. To illustrate the potency of the differential restriction analysis for diagnostic purposes, the results of family 87 (17 ) are shown in Figure 1 . After EcoRI digestion only, probe p13E-11 detected a fragment of approximately 30 kb in affected as well as in some unaffected individuals. Haplotype analysis using chromosome 4q35 and 10q26 markers revealed that the 30 kb p13E-11 EcoRI fragment does not cosegregate with either the chromosome 4q35 or 10q26 haplotype (17 ) (Fig. 1 ). However, recently, differential restriction analysis using EcoRI and BlnI indicated heterogeneity of the 30 kb EcoRI fragments. In the affected individuals, the 30 kb EcoRI fragment was reduced in size by 3 kb indicating a chromosome 4 origin (Fig. 1 , haplotype `A'), whereas in the unaffected individuals the 30 kb EcoRI fragment was completely fragmented, revealing a chromosome 10 origin. The chromosomal origin of the 30 kb EcoRI fragments as suggested by the differential restriction analysis, was confirmed by haplotype analysis performed previously (17 ). Accordingly, an unequivocal diagnosis was achieved in this family.


Figure 1. Differential restriction analysis of family 87. Conventional gel electrophoresis of EcoRI and EcoRI/BlnI digested DNA and subsequent Southern blot analysis using probe p13E-11. The 30 kb EcoRI fragment observed in affected and unaffected family members appears to be heterogeneous after BlnI digestion. The fragment is 3 kb reduced in size, indicating a chromosome 4q35 origin, in the affected members only. The chromosome 4 (#4) haplotypes are indicated by `A-H', whereas the chromosome 10 (#10) haplotypes are indicated by `P-U'. The FSHD1-linked haplotype A is depicted in bold. The marker (M) is lambda DNA digested with HindIII and PstI. The Y-specific fragment detected by p13E-11 is indicated.

In total, 160 independent Dutch familial or isolated FSHD index cases were screened using the differential restriction analysis. In 46 of 160 cases long (>35 kb) EcoRI fragments were observed only. Almost all of these 46 cases were clinically unclear, and referred for exclusion of FSHD1. So far, no unambiguously diagnosed FSHD patient without short EcoRI fragment was observed, which might carry a mutation in the FSHD1 gene itself, or be linked to a second FSHD locus. In 114 of 160 cases, EcoRI digestion revealed a short (<35 kb) p13E-11 fragment. By double digestion with EcoRI and BlnI, this short fragment was found to originate from chromosome 4 in 102 of 114 cases, indicating a high probability of FSHD1. Short EcoRI fragments completely fragmented by BlnI digestion, were detected in 12 of 114 individuals. Accordingly, these fragments were assumed to originate from chromosome 10q26, suggesting a lowered probability of FSHD1. However, at least three 4q35-linked familial and three isolated cases carrying such short, apparently chromosome 10q26 derived, EcoRI fragments, were clinically unambiguously diagnosed with FSHD (GWP). Although differential restriction analysis and clinical diagnosis implied that these cases either contain a mutation in the FSHD1 gene itself or are linked to a second FSHD locus, further analysis suggested another explanation (see below).

Subtelomeric exchange of repeated units

In applying the differential restriction analysis we observed several FSHD index cases and unaffected spouses which appeared to be either `monosomic' or `trisomic' for the p13E-11 fragment on chromosome 4q35. To demonstrate such aberrant BlnI restriction patterns, a very interesting family (family 28, Fig. 2 a) was selected. In this family, a 25 kb EcoRI fragment was detected which cosegregates with FSHD1 and which was reduced in size by 3 kb after BlnI digestion (Fig. 2 b). Therefore, a clear diagnosis was achieved. Remarkably, the father (individual 28.1) who is asymptomatic, also carries a second short BlnI-resistant EcoRI fragment (22 kb). As the father is transmitting both his chromosomes 4 and both his chromosomes 10 whereas the 22 kb fragment is not inherited by any of his children (Fig. 2 a), he is considered somatic mosaic for this 22 kb fragment. In addition, the father strikingly showed two other BlnI-resistant, 4q35-like fragments. In his offspring, three BlnI-resistant EcoRI fragments were also detected in sons 28.4 and 28.5, while one BlnI-resistant EcoRI fragment only was observed in the youngest son 28.6. Moreover, the unaffected mother (individual 28.2) also shows one BlnI-resistant EcoRI fragment only. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was performed (Fig. 2 b), which confirmed the apparent `mono- and trisomy' observed by conventional gel electrophoresis. We hypothesized that an exchange of 3.3 kb repeated units between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26 might have occurred, generating hybrid p13E-11 fragments (Fig. 3 ). In cases 28.1, 28.4 and 28.5, one of the chromosome 10q26 fragments contain repeated units without BlnI sites, probably derived from chromosome 4q35. In cases 28.2 and 28.6 one of the chromosome 4q35 fragments contains 10q26-like repeated units including BlnI sites. Haplotype analysis using chromosome 4q35 and 10q26 markers (D4S163-D4S139 and D10S555-D10S590, respectively) was performed to differentiate the chromosomes 4 and 10 segregating in this family (Fig. 2 a). One of the 4q35-like EcoRI/BlnI fragments observed in individuals 28.1, 28.4 and 28.5 indeed segregates with a chromosome 10q26 haplotype indicating it to be a hybrid p13E-11 fragment. In addition, one of the 10q26-like fragments observed in individuals 28.2 and 28.6 segregates with a chromosome 4q35 haplotype, also supporting the interchromosomal exchange hypothesis.


Figure 2. (a) Haplotype analysis of family 28 using chromosome 4q35 and 10q26 markers. The sizes of the p13E-11 fragments after EcoRI (E) and EcoRI/BlnI (EB) are shown. EcoRI fragments containing repeated units derived from chromosome 10q26 are completely digested by BlnI (-). Haplotypes including hybrid p13E-11 EcoRI fragments are depicted by filled (chromosome 4q35) or open (chromosome 10q26) bars with swopped ends. The asterisk indicates that the father (28.1) is mosaic, carrying an additional 22 kb fragment possibly derived from the 25 kb fragment (b). (b) Differential restriction analysis of family 28. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of EcoRI (E) and EcoRI/BlnI (EB) digested DNA and subsequent Southern blot analysis using probe p13E-11, revealed that cases 28.1, 28.4 (upper band contains two fragments) and 28.5 are apparently `trisomic' and cases 28.2 and 28.6 `monosomic'. The chromosomal origins of the EcoRI fragments were confirmed by haplotype analysis (a). The sizes (in kilobases) of the EcoRI fragments are depicted above or below the fragments. The marker (M) is a 48 kb lambda DNA ladder. The Y-specific fragment detected by p13E-11 is indicated.


Figure 3. Model to explain the aberrant BlnI restriction patterns observed after differential restriction analysis, which suggest some cases to be `monosomic' or `trisomic' for the chromosome 4q35 EcoRI fragment. On top, the subtelomeric regions of chromosomes 4q35 (filled bars) and 10q26 (open bars) and potential subtelomeric exchanges are depicted. Below, normal and hybrid and long or short EcoRI fragments derived from chromosome 4q35 or 10q26, are shown. As the origin of the telomeric regions of the hybrid fragments might be either chromosome 4q35 or 10q26, they are indicated by grey bars. Note that short, 4q35-linked, hybrid EcoRI fragments containing BlnI-sensitive repeated units are also diagnostic for FSHD1, but might lead to misdiagnosis when based on differential restriction analysis only.

Subtelomeric exchange of 3.3 kb repeated units between chromosome 4q35 and 10q26 has implications for the specificity and sensitivity of the differential restriction analysis as a method for diagnostic DNA analysis. As illustrated in Figure 3 , short EcoRI fragments linked to chromosome 4q35 may be either BlnI-sensitive or BlnI-resistant. Healthy individuals may carry short hybrid EcoRI fragments linked to chromosome 10q26, while a chromosome 4q35 origin and therefore a high probability of FSHD1 would be suggested by the differential restriction analysis. In parallel, cases carrying short, 4q35-linked EcoRI fragments exhibiting BlnI-sensitive repeated units, might incorrectly be diagnosed with a low probability of FSHD1. Examples of such cases are mentioned in the previous paragraph: in six of 114 cases which were unambiguously diagnosed with FSHD, a short chromosome 10q26-like EcoRI fragment was observed. One of these cases is member of a well-studied 4q35-linked FSHD1 family (family 25) (18 ,20 ) in which a short 15 kb EcoRI fragment is cosegregating with the disease. This 15 kb fragment was cloned from the index case (patient 250301) in a previous study (18 ). Detailed Southern blot analysis using probes p13E-11 (D4F104S1), 9B6A (D4Z4) and pLAM1 (D4Z3) (Fig. 4 ), indicated this fragment to contain repeated units each carrying a BlnI site, incorrectly suggesting a chromosome 10q26 origin.


Figure 4. Detailed analysis of the 15 kb EcoRI fragment ([lambda]250301) cloned from FSHD patient 250301. On top, the KpnI and BlnI restriction maps are shown. Sizes of fragments are indicated in kilobases. The 3.3 kb repeated units (D4Z4) are depicted by arrows. Below, Southern blot analysis of the EcoRI (E) fragment digested by BlnI (EB), KpnI (EK), or by KpnI and BlnI (EKB) using probes p13E-11 (D4F104S1), 9B6A (D4Z4) and pLAM1 (D4Z3). The marker (M) is a 1 kb lambda DNA ladder. Both repeated units were found to contain a BlnI site. The chromosomal origin of the telomeric part of the EcoRI fragment could not unambiguously be determined.

To determine the frequency of subtelomeric exchanges of repeated units between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26 in the population, 50 male control individuals were screened using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of EcoRI/BlnI double digested DNA. In five cases (10%) apparent `monosomy' was observed, while in five other cases (10%) `trisomy' was detected. One `monosomic' case and one `trisomic' case are shown in Figure 5 . Accordingly, the frequency of interchromosomal exchanges was estimated to be 20% (10 of 50). However, the frequency is probably higher given the higher frequency of recombination events in females, not included in this control study. Moreover, ~1% of cases may contain two types of hybrid fragments. These cases appear to be `disomic' and will remain unnoticed (see Fig. 5 , control 2).

DISCUSSION

The differential restriction analysis of FSHD cases is based on the presence of a BlnI restriction site in each of the 3.3 kb repeated units derived from chromosome 10q26 (19 ). As this BlnI site is not present in the repeated units of chromosome 4q35, differentiation between the two polymorphic p13E-11 loci can easily be achieved in most cases. Therefore, especially in isolated cases suspected of having FSHD, the differential restriction analysis accounts for an important improvement of the diagnostic DNA analysis. In addition, in some familial cases haplotype analysis may not reveal clear differentiation between chromosome 4q35 and 10q26 derived EcoRI fragments due to either non-informative marker data or short EcoRI fragments of similar size segregating in the family. In this paper, we describe one such family (family 87, Fig. 1 ) which remained diagnostically inconclusive after haplotype analysis, but which could reliably be diagnosed after EcoRI/BlnI double digestion. Applying the differential restriction analysis, most of 160 index cases clinically suspected of having FSHD and referred for DNA analysis, were diagnosed unequivocally.

Although the diagnostic value and the specificity and sensitivity of the differential restriction analysis were found to be high, we observed several FSHD index cases and unaffected spouses exhibiting unanticipated BlnI restriction patterns. In family 28 (Fig. 2 ) apparent `monosomy' and `trisomy' for chromosome 4q35-linked p13E-11 fragments was detected. We hypothesized that an exchange of 3.3 kb repeated units between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26 might have occurred. This exchange would generate hybrid p13E-11 EcoRI fragments: chromosome 4q35- linked EcoRI fragments containing chromosome 10q26-like or BlnI-sensitive repeats and conversely, chromosome 10q26-linked EcoRI fragments containing chromosome 4q35-like or BlnI- resistant repeats. Further analysis of family 28 using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to separate the individual chromosomal EcoRI and EcoRI/BlnI restriction fragments, and subsequent haplotype analysis using markers from the chromosome 4q35 and 10q26 regions, supported this subtelomeric exchange hypothesis.

As subtelomeric exchange of the 3.3 kb repeated units between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26 would have implications for the specificity and sensitivity of the differential restriction analysis, we estimated the frequency of interchromosomal exchange in the population. Apparent `trisomy' or `monosomy' for a 4q35-linked EcoRI fragment was observed in at least 20% of the population. The specificity of the differential restriction analysis is determined by the percentages of unaffected individuals carrying a short 10q26-linked EcoRI fragment which contains BlnI-resistant repeated units (mostly `trisomics'), whereas the sensitivity is determined by the percentages of FSHD patients carrying a short 4q35-linked EcoRI fragment which contains BlnI-sensitive repeated units (mostly `monosomics'). Differential restriction analysis of 50 unrelated controls revealed two `trisomic' samples and one apparent `disomic' sample (Fig. 5 , control 2), exhibiting a short (<35 kb) chromosome 10q26-linked EcoRI fragment containing BlnI-resistant repeated units. Therefore, at present the specificity of the differential restriction analysis is estimated to be 94% (47 of 50). In addition, differential restriction analysis of 160 Dutch FSHD index cases revealed in 12 of 114 Dutch index cases a short (<35 kb) EcoRI fragment containing BlnI-sensitive repeated units. Based on clinical signs, at least six of these cases were unambiguously diagnosed with FSHD. The other six cases were either not analyzed by our neurologist (GWP) and therefore considered to be `clinically uncertain', or possibly misdiagnosed. As an EcoRI fragment which is completely fragmented by BlnI suggests a chromosome 10q26 origin, the six clinically certain FSHD cases would have been predicted to have a low probability of FSHD1. However, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis revealed that these cases are `monosomic' after EcoRI/BlnI double-digestion, and carry a short hybrid chromosome 4q35-linked EcoRI fragment containing BlnI-sensitive repeated units. Therefore, the sensitivity of the differential restriction analysis is estimated to be 95% (108 of 114).

In conclusion, the differential restriction analysis facilitates an efficient and unequivocal diagnosis in approximately 95% of cases. However, index cases which show clear clinical FSHD signs but carry a short EcoRI fragment completely fragmented by BlnI suggesting a chromosome 10q26 origin, should be further analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and haplotype analysis to confirm the chromosomal origin of the short fragment, and to prevent misdiagnosis.

The molecular mechanism behind the subtelomeric exchanges between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26 remains to be elucidated. Chromosomal rearrangements occur more often in (sub)telomeric regions than in other parts of the genome. Translocations of chromosome ends have recently been reported as the cause for idiopathic mental retardation syndrome (21 ), [alpha]-thalassemia mental retardation syndrome (22 ), Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (23 ), Miller-Dieker syndrome (24 ) and cri-du-chat syndrome (25 ). However, in this paper we report an interchromosomal polymorphism without phenotype, which is to our knowledge a remarkable novelty in human genetics. Owing to high homology between the chromosome 4q35 and 10q26 subtelomeric regions, it is plausible that there is an interchromosomal `cross-talk' during meiosis. Two types of chromosomal rearrangements might have generated the exchange of 3.3 kb repeated units: either translocations including the particular telomeres, or gene conversions limited to the repeated units only. As the respective telomeric regions of chromosomes 4q and 10q contain non-unique sequences only, it will be difficult to determine whether the telomeres are involved in the interchromosomal exchanges. In addition, in most cases analyzed the p13E-11 EcoRI fragments revealed BlnI restriction patterns as expected; either completely fragmented, or reduced in size by 3 kb. Therefore, probably complete arrays of repeated units have been exchanged, suggesting that in case of telomeric translocations the proximal breakpoint might even be proximal to the repeated units. However, in rare cases the EcoRI fragment was found to be reduced in size by more than 3 kb after BlnI digestion, indicating that hybrid p13E-11 EcoRI fragments may also contain a mixture of BlnI-resistant and BlnI-sensitive repeated units. Finally, whether the hybrid EcoRI fragments are due to a recurrent event of interchromosomal exchange in the population, or part of a polymorphism which is due to one unique interchromosomal exchange event in evolution, remains to be elucidated.


Figure 5. Differential restriction analysis of six of 50 unaffected male control individuals. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of EcoRI (E) and EcoRI/BlnI (EB) digested DNA and subsequent Southern blot analysis using probe p13E-11. Control 3 appears to be `monosomic', whereas control 6 appears to be `trisomic'. Although control 2 is unaffected, he exhibits a short (28 kb), BlnI-resistant EcoRI fragment. Presumably, this short fragment is linked to chromosome 10q26. As control 2 is `disomic', he probably carries another hybrid fragment which is linked to chromosome 4q35. The marker (M) is a 48 kb lambda DNA ladder.

Independent of the molecular mechanism, the interchromosomal exchanges of repeated units have implications for the etiology of FSHD1; a short 4q35-linked EcoRI fragment will give FSHD1, irrespective of origin of the repeated units. A de novo exchange generating a short 4q35-linked fragment containing BlnI-sensitive repeated units from chromosome 10q26, will cause FSHD1 in the same way as a chromosome 4q35 intra-fragment deletion. However, the frequency of such an event is bound to be low given the low percentage (<10%) of short chromosome 10q26-linked EcoRI fragments (12 ,17 ). Interchromosomal exchanges of the 3.3 kb repeated units between chromosomes 4q35 and 10q26 with a rather high frequency (20%) suggest that it is unlikely that the FSHD1 gene (partially) resides within the repeated units at chromosome 4q35. Moreover, an Italian family was reported recently, in which an abnormal chromosome 4, a derivative of an unbalanced translocation of 4q35 with an acrocentric chromosome, segregates through three generations in phenotypically normal individuals (26 ). The resulting monosomy of the 4q35 region in unaffected individuals supports the hypothesis that the 3.3 kb repeated units do not contain (part of) the FSHD1 gene. These observations favour the position effect variegation (PEV) model to be the most likely underlying molecular mechanism of FSHD1.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient and control material

Familial and isolated cases are referred to us through one of the seven Clinical Genetics Centres in the Netherlands. They are referred by neurologists after being diagnosed clinically as possibly having FSHD. In this study, 160 FSHD index cases are included. Further analysis was performed on two particular 4q35-linked families. In family 87 (17 ) a 30 kb EcoRI fragment, and in the Turkish family 28 a 25 kb EcoRI fragment segregates with the disease. DNA isolated from 50 unaffected male individuals was used in the control study.

Southern blot analysis

Genomic DNA was isolated from freshly collected blood as previously described (27 ). DNA was digested with restriction enzymes EcoRI and BlnI according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pharmacia). Conventional gel electrophoresis was performed as reported by Bakker et al. (17 ). DNA was transferred to a Hybond N+ membrane (Amersham). The inserts of probes p13E-11(D4F104S1) (13 ), 9B6A (D4Z4) (13 ) and pLAM1 (D4Z3) (18 ) were labelled by random priming with [alpha]32P-dCTP, using the megaprime DNA labelling system (Amersham). Hybridizations were performed for 16 h at 65oC as described (28 ). The blots were washed at 65oC and at a stringency of 2* SSC/0.1% SDS, followed by autoradiography for 16-36 h at -70oC using Konica AX film with an intensifying screen.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

Electrophoresis was performed in 0.5* TBE (45 mM Tris, 45 mM boric acid, 1 mM EDTA, adjusted to pH 8.0) at 18oC. EcoRI and EcoRI/BlnI double digested DNA in solution was run for 30 h at an electric field of 8.5 V/cm. In four identical cycles, switch times were increased linearly from 1 s at the beginning and 20 s at the end of each cycle. A pause interval of 2% of the forward switch time was included. After electrophoresis, gels were stained with ethidium bromide. The high molecular weight DNA molecules were fragmented by a UV-Cross-Linker (Stratagene) at 180 000 J/cm3.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Dr J. Hewitt and Dr R. Fodde for comments on the manuscript. This study was funded by the Prinses Beatrix Fonds (the Netherlands), the Muscular Dystrophy Association (USA) and the Association Française contre les Myopathies.

REFERENCES

1 Padberg, G.W. (1982) Facioscapulohumeral disease. Thesis, Leiden University.

2 Munsat, T.L. (1986) Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy and the scapuloperoneal syndrome. In: Myology. McGraw-Hill, New York.

3 Lunt, P.W. and Harper, P.S. (1991) Genetic counselling in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. J. Med. Genet., 28, 655-664. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Upadhyaya, M., Lunt, P.W., Sarfarazi, M., Broadhead, W., Daniels, J., Owen, M. and Harper, P.S. (1990) DNA marker applicable to presymptomatic and prenatal diagnosis of facioscapulohumeral disease. Lancet, 336, 1320-1321. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Wijmenga, C., Frants, R.R., Brouwer, O.F., Moerer, P., Weber, J.L. and Padberg, G.W. (1990) Location of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy gene on chromosome 4. Lancet, 336, 651-653. MEDLINE Abstract

6 Upadhyaya, M., Lunt, P.W., Sarfarazi, M., Broadhead, W., Daniels, J., Owen, M. and Harper, P.S. (1991) A closely linked DNA marker for facioscapulohumeral disease on chromosome 4q. J. Med. Genet., 28, 665-671 MEDLINE Abstract

7 Wijmenga, C., Padberg, G.W., Moerer, P., Wiegant, J., Liem, L., Brouwer, O.F., Milner, E.C.B., Weber, J.L., Van Ommen, G-J., Sandkuijl, L.A. and Frants, R.R. (1991) Mapping of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy gene to chromosome 4q35-qter by multipoint linkage analysis and in situ hybridization. Genomics, 9, 570-575. MEDLINE Abstract

8 Sarfarazi, M., Wijmenga, C., Upadhyaya, M., Weiffenbach, B., Hyser, C., Mathews, K., Murray, J.C., Gilbert, J., Pericak-Vance, M., Lunt, P., Frants, R.R., Jacobsen, S., Harper, P.S., Padberg, G.W. (1992) Regional mapping of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy gene on 4q35. Combined analysis of an international consortium. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 51, 396-403. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Gilbert, J.R., Stajich, J.M., Speer, M.C., Vance, J.M., Stewart, C.S., Yamaoka, L.H., Samson, F.M., Fardeau, M., Potter, T.G., Roses, A.D., Pericak-Vance, M.A. (1992) Linkage studies in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). Am. J. Hum. Genet., 51, 424 - 427. MEDLINE Abstract

10 Gilbert, J.R., Stajich, J.M., Wall, S., Carter, S.C., Qiu, H., Vance, J.M., Stewart, C.S., Speer, M.C., Pufky, J., Yamaoka, L.H., Rozear, M., Samson, F., Fardeau, M., Roses, A.D., Pericak-Vance, M.A. (1993) Evidence for heterogeneity in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). Am. J. Hum. Genet., 53, 401-408. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Iqbal, Z., Roper, H., Pericak-Vance, M.A., Hung, W.Y., Delong, R., Cummings, W.J., Siddique, T. (1992) Genetic heterogeneity in facioscapulohumeral disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet., Suppl. 51, A191.

12 Bakker, E., Wijmenga, C., Vossen, R.H., Padberg, G.W., Hewitt, J.E., van der Wielen, M., Rasmussen, K., Frants, R.R. (1995) The FSHD-linked locus D4F104S1 (p13E-11) on 4q35 has a homologue on 10qter. Muscle Nerve, Suppl. 2, S39-44.

13 Wijmenga, C., Hewitt, J.E., Sandkuijl, L.A., Clark, L.N., Wright, T.J., Dauwerse, J.G., Gruter, A-M., Hofker, M.H., Moerer, P., Williamson, R., Van Ommen, G-J., Padberg G.W. and Frants, R.R. (1992) Chromosome 4q DNA rearrangements associated with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. Nature Genet., 2, 26-30. MEDLINE Abstract

14 Passos-Bueno, M.R., Wijmenga, C., Takata, R.E., Marie, S.K., Vainzof, M., Pavanello, R.C., Hewitt, J.E., Bakker, E., Carvalho, A., Akiyama, J., Frants, R.R., Zatz, M. (1993) No evidence of genetic heterogeneity in Brazilian facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy families (FSHD) with 4q markers. Hum. Mol. Genet., 2, 557-562. MEDLINE Abstract

15 Upadhyaya, M., Jardine, P., Maynard, J., Farnham, J., Sarfarazi, M., Wijmenga, C., Hewitt, J.E., Frants, R.R., Harper, P.S., Lunt, P.W. (1993) Molecular analysis of British facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy families for 4q DNA rearrangements. Hum. Mol. Genet., 2, 981-987.

16 Weiffenbach, B., Dubois, J., Storvick, D., Tawil, R., Jacobsen, S.J., Gilbert, J., Wijmenga, C., Mendell, J.R., Winokur, S., Altherr, M.R., Schultz, P., Olandt, S., Frants, R.R., Pericak-Vance, M., Griggs, R.C. (1993) Mapping the facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy gene is complicated by chromosome 4q35 recombination events. Nature Genet., 4, 165-169. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Bakker, E., van der Wielen, M.J., Voorhoeve, E., Ippel, P.F., Padberg, G.W., Frants, R.R., Wijmenga, C. (1996) Diagnostic, predictive, and prenatal testing for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: diagnostic approach for sporadic and familial cases. J. Med. Genet., 33, 29-35. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Van Deutekom, J.C.T., Wijmenga, C., Van Tienhoven, E.A.E., Gruter, A-M., Hewitt, J.E., Padberg, G.W., Van Ommen, G-J., Hofker, M.H. and Frants, R.R. (1993) FSHD associated DNA rearrangements are due to deletions of integral copies of a 3.2 kb tandemly repeated unit. Hum. Mol. Genet., 2, 2037-2042.

19 Deidda, G., Cacurri, S., Piazzo, N., Felicetti, L. (1996) Direct detection of 4q35 rearrangements implicated in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). J. Med. Genet., 33, 361-365. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Wijmenga, C., Sandkuijl, L.A., Moerer, P., van der Boorn, N., Bodrug, S.E., Ray, P.N.,Worton, R.G., Murray, J.C., van Ommen, G-J.B., Padberg, G.W., Frants, R.R. (1992) Genetic linkage map of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy and five polymorphic loci on chromosome 4q35-qter. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 51, 411-415. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Flint, J., Wilkie, A.O., Buckle, V.J., Winter, R.M., Holland, A.J., McDermid, H.E. (1995) The detection of subtelomeric chromosomal rearrangements in idiopathic mental retardation. Nature Genet., 9, 132-140. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Lamb, J., Wilkie, A.O., Harris, P.C., Buckle, V.J., Lindenbaum, R.H., Barton, N.J., Reeders, S.T., Weatherall, D.J., Higgs, D.R. (1989) Detection of breakpoints in submicroscopic chromosomal translocation, illustrating an important mechanism for genetic disease. Lancet, ii, 819-824.

23 Altherr, M.R., Bengtsson, U., Elder, F.F., Ledbetter, D.H., Wasmuth, J.J., McDonald, M.E., Gusella, J.F., Greenberg, F. (1991) Molecular confirmation of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome with a subtle translocation of chromosome 4. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 49, 1235-1242. MEDLINE Abstract

24 Kuwano, A., Ledbetter, S.A., Dobyns, W.B., Emanuel, B.S., Ledbetter, D.H. (1991) Detection of deletions and cryptic translocations in Miller-Dieker syndrome by in situ hybridization. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 49, 707-714. MEDLINE Abstract

25 Sonoda, T., Kawaguchi, K., Ohba, K., Madokoro, H., Ohdo, S. (1989) Partial monosomy 5p and partial trisomy 5q due to paternal pericentric inversion 5(p15.1q35.1). Jinrui Idengaku Zasshi, 34, 129-134. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Tupler, R., Berardinelli, A., Barbierato, L., Frants, R.R., Hewitt, J.E., Lanzi, G., Maraschio, P., Tiepolo, L. (1996) Monosomy of distal 4q does not cause facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. J. Med. Genet., 33, 366-370. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Miller, S.A., Dykes, D.D., Polesky, H.F. (1988) A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res., 16, 1215. MEDLINE Abstract

28 Church, G.M., Gilbert, W. (1984) Genome sequencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 81, 1991-1995. MEDLINE Abstract


*To whom correspondence should be addressed


This page is maintained by OUP admin. Last updated Sun Jan 12 13:36:46 GMT 1997. Part of the OUP Journals World Wide Web service.Copyright Oxford University Press, 1996


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
X. Xu, K. Tsumagari, J. Sowden, R. Tawil, A. P. Boyle, L. Song, T. S. Furey, G. E. Crawford, and M. Ehrlich
DNaseI hypersensitivity at gene-poor, FSH dystrophy-linked 4q35.2
Nucleic Acids Res., October 9, 2009; (2009) gkp833v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Arashiro, I. Eisenberg, A. T. Kho, A. M. P. Cerqueira, M. Canovas, H. C. A. Silva, R. C. M. Pavanello, S. Verjovski-Almeida, L. M. Kunkel, and M. Zatz
Transcriptional regulation differs in affected facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy patients compared to asymptomatic related carriers
PNAS, April 14, 2009; 106(15): 6220 - 6225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. A. Greenberg and G. W. Padberg
Pushing the genetic frontier with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
Neurology, February 20, 2007; 68(8): 544 - 545.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
T Rijkers, G Deidda, S van Koningsbruggen, M van Geel, R J L F Lemmers, J C T van Deutekom, D Figlewicz, J E Hewitt, G W Padberg, R R Frants, et al.
FRG2, an FSHD candidate gene, is transcriptionally upregulated in differentiating primary myoblast cultures of FSHD patients
J. Med. Genet., November 1, 2004; 41(11): 826 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
K Goto, I Nishino, and Y K Hayashi
Very low penetrance in 85 Japanese families with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy 1A
J. Med. Genet., January 1, 2004; 41(1): e12 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Wohlgemuth, R. J. Lemmers, E. L. van der Kooi, M. J. van der Wielen, P. G. van Overveld, H. Dauwerse, E. Bakker, R. R. Frants, G. W. Padberg, and S. M. van der Maarel
Possible phenotypic dosage effect in patients compound heterozygous for FSHD-sized 4q35 alleles
Neurology, October 14, 2003; 61(7): 909 - 913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
H. RIETHMAN, A. AMBROSINI, C. CASTANEDA, J.M. FINKLESTEIN, X.-L. HU, S. PAUL, and J. WEI
Human Subtelomeric DNA
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2003; 68(0): 39 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. Yamanaka, K. Goto, T. Matsumura, M. Funakoshi, T. Komori, Y. K. Hayashi, and K. Arahata
Tongue atrophy in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy
Neurology, August 28, 2001; 57(4): 733 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
P. G.M. v. Overveld, R. J.F.L. Lemmers, G. Deidda, L. Sandkuijl, G. W. Padberg, R. R. Frants, and S. M. van der Maarel
Interchromosomal repeat array interactions between chromosomes 4 and 10: a model for subtelomeric plasticity
Hum. Mol. Genet., November 1, 2000; 9(19): 2879 - 2884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. J. Felice, W. A. North, S. A. Moore, and K. D. Mathews
FSH dystrophy 4q35 deletion in patients presenting with facial-sparing scapular myopathy
Neurology, May 23, 2000; 54(10): 1927 - 1931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
T. Kondo, M. P. Bobek, R. Kuick, B. Lamb, X. Zhu, A. Narayan, D. Bourc'his, E. Viegas-Pequignot, M. Ehrlich, and S. M. Hanash
Whole-genome methylation scan in ICF syndrome: hypomethylation of non-satellite DNA repeats D4Z4 and NBL2
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2000; 9(4): 597 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
S. M van der Maarel, G. Deidda, R. J L F Lemmers, E. Bakker, M. J R van der Wielen, L. Sandkuijl, J. E Hewitt, G. W Padberg, and R. R Frants
A new dosage test for subtelomeric 4;10 translocations improves conventional diagnosis of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD)
J. Med. Genet., November 1, 1999; 36(11): 823 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. Coleman, D. M. Baird, and N. J. Royle
The plasticity of human telomeres demonstrated by a hypervariable telomere repeat array that is located on some copies of 16p and 16q
Hum. Mol. Genet., September 1, 1999; 8(9): 1637 - 1646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
R. W. Orrell, R. Tawil, J. Forrester, J. T. Kissel, J. R. Mendell, and D. A. Figlewicz
Definitive molecular diagnosis of facioscapulohumeral dystrophy
Neurology, June 1, 1999; 52(9): 1822 - 1822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
E. A. Carver and L. Stubbs
Zooming in on the Human-Mouse Comparative Map: Genome Conservation Re-examined on a High-Resolution Scale
Genome Res., December 1, 1997; 7(12): 1123 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
H. Riethman
Closing in on Telomeric Closure
Genome Res., September 1, 1997; 7(9): 853 - 855.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (63)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Deutekom, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Frants, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Deutekom, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Frants, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?