The mouse Smcx gene exhibits developmental and tissue specific variation in degree of escape from X inactivation
The mouse Smcx gene exhibits developmental and tissue specific variation in degree of escape from X inactivationSteven Sheardown, Dominic Norris, Amanda Fisher1 and Neil Brockdorff*
Comparative Biology Group, 1Lymphocyte Development Group, MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 ONN, UK
Received June 18, 1996;Accepted July 4, 1996
The Smcx gene is the first known example of a non-pseudoautosomal X-linked gene in mouse that normally escapes X chromosome inactivation. We have analysed the kinetics of escape at different stages of development, and in adult tissues. Our results demonstrate that Smcx exhibits partial escape from X inactivation in embryos, in extraembryonic lineages where paternally imprinted X inactivation occurs and also in adult tissues. The degree of escape in different tissues is highly variable, the level of transcript from the inactive X allele representing between 20% and 70% of the active X allele. Partial escape is also seen in clones derived from haematopoietic stem cells, suggesting that partial repression of the inactive X allele is at the level of individual cells. This contrasts with classical position effect variegation (PEV), where a given gene is either active or silent in a given cell and its clonal derivatives. We discuss the implications of these results with respect to mechanisms of X inactivation and escape.
X chromosome inactivation (X inactivation) is the genetic silencing of a single X chromosome in female mammals, and provides the mechanism for dosage compensation of X-linked genes relative to males (1 ). X inactivation is regulated by a cis-acting master switch locus, termed the X inactivation centre (Xic), which is required both for the initiation of X inactivation in early embryogenesis, and in the propagation of inactive chromatin in cis (2 ). Recent studies have identified the Xist gene as being a key component of the Xic (3 ,4 ).
A complementary approach that has been employed in studying the molecular basis of propagation of X inactivation is the analysis of genes located in the pseudoautosomal region, and also elsewhere on the X chromosome, which escape X inactivation (5 ). There are two alternative explanations for the mechanism of escape: firstly, genes which escape X inactivation may lack sequences required for the efficient spread or maintenance of X inactivation, and secondly, genes which escape may be associated with elements that insulate from X inactivation. Studies on transgene insertions into the X chromosome (6 ), and more recently on human X-linked genes in the Xp11.2 interval (7 ), have led to the suggestion that escape is regulated at the level of chromosome domains. This idea is consistent with the observation that discrete bands on the late replicating inactive X chromosome are early replicating (8 ), and more recently the demonstration that discrete regions of the inactive X chromosome are enriched for acetylated histone H4, in contrast to the general feature of hypoacetylation of H4 on the inactive X chromosome (9 ).
The presence of a Y-linked homologue obviates the requirement for dosage compensation between males and females for genes located in the pseudoautosomal region of the X and Y chromosomes [for example the MIC2 and XE7 genes in man (10 ,11 )], and some genes that escape X inactivation which are located elsewhere on the X chromosome [for example the ubiquitously expressed human RPS4X/RPS4Y and ZFX/ZFY genes (12 ,13 )]. The mouse homologues of these genes (Rps4 and Zfx) do not have functionally equivalent Y-linked homologues (the mouse Zfy-1 and Zfy-2 genes have a restricted expression pattern), and consistent with the dosage compensation argument, do not escape X inactivation (14 ). There are nevertheless some examples of genes that escape X inactivation but have no functional Y-linked homologue [e.g. the human UBE1, KAL1, and SB1.8 genes (15 -17 )]. This suggests that failure to dosage compensate some X-linked genes has no detrimental effects. An alternative explanation is that these genes exhibit partial and/or variable escape from X inactivation. Conflicting data on escape for the UBE1 gene (15 ,18 ) suggest that this could be the case in this example. Partial escape has been demonstrated for the human STS locus (19 ), and is a feature of many X-linked genes in marsupials (20 ). Variable escape through ontogeny has been demonstrated in genetic studies on mouse loci which escape X inactivation with aging (21 ,22 ), and also on autosomal loci in cis with inactive X chromatin in X;autosome rearrangements (23 ).
The recently described SMCX/Smcx gene (also referred to as Xe169) escapes X inactivation in man and mouse (24 ,25 ), and has a putative functional Y linked homologue (SMCY/Smcy), which has recently been shown to encode a male-specific transplantation (H-Y) epitope (26 ). Both Smcx and Smcy are ubiquitously expressed, suggesting that functional equivalence may provide dosage compensation. Smcx is the first example of a non-pseudoautosomal gene escaping X inactivation in mouse, and therefore provides an opportunity to analyse escape at the initiation stage of X inactivation early in development. In this paper we descibe analysis of the kinetics of escape from inactivation for the mouse Smcx gene. We show that at early embryonic stages, expression of the Smcx allele on the inactive X chromosome is markedly reduced relative to the active X allele. This is also the case in adult tissues but levels are variable in different tissues. Partial escape is also seen in clones derived from haematopoietic stem cells, suggesting that our observations reflect partial repression at the level of individual cells rather than a combined effect of cell clones exhibiting full repression or activation of the inactive X allele.
We have carried out this analysis based on initial observations which suggested that Smcx is inactivated following in vitro differentiation and X inactivation in XX embryonic stem (ES) cells (4 ). To investigate whether near complete X inactivation of Smcx also occurs at the time of initiation of X inactivation in vivo, we have quantitated relative expression levels of Smcx on the active and inactive X chromosome using early female embryos carrying the T(X;16)16H translocation (T16H). T16H results in complete secondary non-random X inactivation of the normal X chromosome (27 ). This occurs within 2-3 days following the initiation of random X inactivation at 5-5.5 days post coitum (d.p.c.) (27 ,28 ).
We first analysed relative expression levels in 8.5-9.5 d.p.c. female T16H embryos. To identify balanced T16H female embryos, we analysed expression of Pgk-1 alleles by SNuPE. Examples are illustrated in Figure 2 . Embryos 10.2, 10.5 and 11.3 only express the Pgk-1ballele, and are therefore balanced T16H carriers. This result clearly demonstrates that selection against cells which elect to inactivate the 16X translocation product is complete by 8.5 d.p.c. In each of the T16H embryos both alleles of Smcx are detected, but at a markedly reduced level from the inactive PGK strain allele. Embryos 10.3 and 11.2 do not carry the T16H translocation as they express Pgk-1 from both alleles. Subsequent quantitation of these results shows that the Smcx RNA level from the inactive allele is 25-30% of that seen from the active allele (Table 1 ). The mean value for the relative RNA level of the inactive X Smcx allele in embryos at this stage is 29% (Fig. 3 ).
To determine whether levels of escape increase through development we next analysed 12.5-14.5 d.p.c. embryos. In this experiment extraembryonic endoderm tissue was also isolated in order to quantitate escape from X inactivation in tissues that have undergone paternally imprinted X inactivation (the paternal PGK strain X chromosome is always inactive in extraembryonic tissues so both translocation and non-translocation bearing embryos could be used). Four of six female embryos analysed expressed the Pgk-1b allele exclusively and were therefore balanced T16H carriers. Quantitation of allelic Smcx RNA levels in the T16H embryos gave values similar to those obtained for 8.5-9.5 d.p.c. embryos, i.e. low levels of partial escape (Table 1 and Fig. 3 ). The levels of escape were also similar in extraembryonic endoderm samples where imprinted X inactivation occurs (Table 1 and Fig. 3 ).
1 Lyon, M.F. (1992) Some milestones in the history of X-chromosome inactivation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 26, 16-28.MEDLINE Abstract
2 Rastan, S., and Brown, S.D. (1990) The search for the X inactivation centre. Genet. Res.56, 99-103.MEDLINE Abstract
3 Rastan, S. (1994) X chromosome inactivation and the Xist gene. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.4, 292-299.MEDLINE Abstract
4 Penny, G., Kay, G.F., Sheardown, S., Rastan, S., and Brockdorff, N. (1996) Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 379, 131-138.MEDLINE Abstract
5 Disteche, C.M. (1995) Escape from X inactivation in human and mouse. Trends Genet 11, 17-22. MEDLINE Abstract
7 Miller, A.P., Gustashaw, K., Wolff, D.J., Rider, S.H., Monaco, A.P., Eble, B., et al. (1995) Three genes that escape X chromosome inactivation are clustered with a 6 Mb YAC contig and STS map in Xp11.21- p11.22. Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 731-739. MEDLINE Abstract
8 Schempp, W., Meer, B. (1983) Cytologic evidence for three human X-chromosomal segments escaping inactivation. Hum. Genet. 63, 171-174. MEDLINE Abstract
9 Jeppesen, P., Turner, B.M. (1993) The inactive X chromosome in female mammals is distinguished by a lack of histone H4 acetylation, a cytogenetic marker for gene expression. Cell 74, 281-289. MEDLINE Abstract
11 Ellison, J.W., Ramos, C., Yen, P.H., Shapiro, L.J. (1992) Structure and expression of the human pseudoautosomal gene XE7. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1, 691-696. MEDLINE Abstract
12 Fisher, E.M., Beer Romero, P., Brown, L.G., Ridley, A., McNeil, J.A., Lawrence, J.B., et al. (1990) Homologous ribosomal protein genes on the human X and Y chromosomes: escape from X inactivation and possible implications for Turner syndrome. Cell 63, 1205-1218.MEDLINE Abstract
13 Schneider Gadicke, A., Beer Romero, P., Brown, L.G., Nussbaum, R., Page, D.C. (1989) ZFX has a gene structure similar to ZFY, the putative human sex determinant, and escapes X inactivation. Cell 57, 1247-1258.
14 Ashworth, A., Rastan, S., Lovell Badge, R., Kay, G. (1991) X-chromosome inactivation may explain the difference in viability of XO humans and mice. Nature 351, 406-408. MEDLINE Abstract
15 Brown, C.J., Willard, H.F. (1989) Noninactivation of a selectable human X-linked gene that complements a murine temperature-sensitive cell cycle defect. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 45, 592-598. MEDLINE Abstract
16 Franco, B., Guioli, S., Pragliola, A., Incerti, B., Bardoni, B., Tonlorenzi, R., et al. (1991) A gene deleted in Kallmann's syndrome shares homology with neural cell adhesion and axonal path-finding molecules. Nature 353, 529-536. MEDLINE Abstract
17 Sultana, R., Adler, D.A., Edelhoff, S., Carrel, L., Lee, K.H., Chapman, V.C., et al. (1995) The mouse Sb1.8 gene located at the distal end of the X chromosome is subject to X inactivation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 257-263. MEDLINE Abstract
18 Zacksenhaus, E., Sheinin, R. (1990) Molecular cloning, primary structure and expression of the human X linked A1S9 gene cDNA which complements the ts A1S9 mouse L cell defect in DNA replication. EMBO J. 9, 2923-2929. MEDLINE Abstract
19 Shapiro, L.J., Mohandas, T., Weiss, R., and Romeo, G. (1979) Non-inactivation of an X chromosome locus in man. Science204, 1224-1226.MEDLINE Abstract
20 Cooper, D.W., Johnston, P.G., Watson, J.M., Graves, J.A. (1993) X-inactivation in marsupials and monotremes. Devel. Biol. 4, 117-128.
21 Wareham, K.A., Lyon, M.F., Glenister, P.H., Williams, E.D. (1987) Age related reactivation of an X-linked gene. Nature 327, 725-727. MEDLINE Abstract
22 Brown, S., Rastan, S. (1988) Age related reactivation of an X-linked gene close to the inactivation centre in the mouse. Genet. Res. 52, 151-154. MEDLINE Abstract
23 Cattanach, B.M. (1974) Position effect variegation in the mouse. Genet. Res. 23, 291-306. MEDLINE Abstract
24 Agulnik, A.I., Mitchell, M.J., Mattei, M.G., Borsani, G., Avner, P.A., Lerner, J.L., et al. (1994) A novel X gene with a widely transcribed Y-linked homologue escapes X-inactivation in mouse and human. Hum. Mol. Genet. 3, 879-884. MEDLINE Abstract
25 Wu, J., Salido, E.C., Yen, P.H., Mohandas, T.K., Heng, H.H., Tsui, L.C., et al. (1994) The murine Xe169 gene escapes X-inactivation like its human homologue. Nature Genet. 7, 491-496. MEDLINE Abstract
26 Scott, D.M., Ehrmann, I.E., Ellis, P.S., Bishop, C.E., Agulnik, A.I., Simpson, E. et al. (1995) Identification of a male-specific transplantation antigen, H-Y. Nature376, 695-698.MEDLINE Abstract
27 Takagi, N. (1980) Primary and secondary non-random X chromosome inactivation in early mouse embryos carrying Searles translocation, T(X;16)16H. Chromosoma81, 439-459.MEDLINE Abstract
28 McMahon, A., Monk, M. (1983) X-chromosome activity in female embryos heterozygous for Pgk-1 and Searle's translocation, T(X;16)16H. Genet. Res. 41, 69-83. MEDLINE Abstract
29 Singer Sam, J., LeBon, J.M., Dai, A., Riggs, A.D. (1992) A sensitive, quantitative assay for measurement of allele-specific transcripts differing by a single nucleotide. PCR Methods Appl 1, 160-163.
30 Singer Sam, J., Chapman, V., LeBon, J.M., Riggs, A.D. (1992) Parental imprinting studied by allele-specific primer extension after PCR: paternal X chromosome-linked genes are transcribed prior to preferential paternal X chromosome inactivation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10469-10473.
31 Samollow, P.B., Robinson, E.S., Ford, A.L., VandeBerg, J.L. (1995) Developmental progression of Gpd expression from the inactive X chromosome of the Virginia opossum. Dev. Genet. 16, 367-378. MEDLINE Abstract
32 Walters, M.C., Magis, W., Fiering, S., Eidemiller, T., Scalzo, D., Groudine, M., and Martin, D.I.K. (1996) Transcriptional enhancers act in cis to suppress position-effect variegation. Gene Develop.10, 185-195.
33 Wijgerde, M., Grosveld, F., and Fraser, P. (1995) Transcription complex stability and chromatin dynamics in vivo. Nature377, 209-213.MEDLINE Abstract
34 Jones, J., Peters, J., Rasberry, C., and Cattanach, B.M. (1989) X-inactivation of the Sts locus in the mouse: an anomaly of the dosage compensation mechanism. Genet. Res. 53, 193-199.MEDLINE Abstract
35 Salido, E.C., Li, M.X., Yen, P.H., Martin, N., Mohandas, T.K., and Shapiro, L.J. (1996) Cloning and expression of the mouse pseudoautosomal steroid sulphatase gene (Sts). Nature Genet.13, 83-86.MEDLINE Abstract
36 Hogan, B., Costantini, F., and Lacy, E. (1986) In Manipulating the mouse embryo. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
37 Norris, D.P., Patel, D., Kay, G.F., Penny, G.D., Brockdorff, N., Sheardown, S.A., et al. (1994) Evidence that random and imprinted Xist expression is controlled by preemptive methylation. Cell 77, 41-51. MEDLINE Abstract
38 Kay, G.F., Penny, G.D., Patel, D., Ashworth, A., Brockdorff, N., Rastan, S. (1993) Expression of Xist during mouse development suggests a role in the initiation of X chromosome inactivation. Cell 72, 171-82. MEDLINE Abstract
39 Rastan, S. (1983) Non-random X-chromosome inactivation in mouse X-autosome translocation embryos-location of the inactivation centre. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol.78, 1-22.MEDLINE Abstract
40 Ball, T.C., Hirayama, F., and Ogawa, M. (1995) Lymphohaemopoietic progenitors of normal mice. Blood85, 3086-3092.MEDLINE Abstract
41 Carrel, L., Hunt, P.A., Willard, H.F. (1996) Tissue and lineage-specific variation in inactive X chromosome expression of the murine Smcx gene. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 1361-1366.MEDLINE Abstract
*To whom correspondence should be addressed
This page is maintained by OUP admin. Last updated Thu Oct 31 15:27:05 GMT 1996. Part of the OUP Journals World Wide Web service.Copyright Oxford University Press, 1996