Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (214)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkie, A. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkie, A. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics Pages 1647-1656


Craniosynostosis: genes and mechanisms
Introduction
Mutations In MSX2, FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, FBN1 And TWIST Genes
Molecular Mechanism Of Craniosynostosis Mutations
   MSX2
   FGFR
Cranial Suture Morphogenesis And Craniosynostosis
Mutation Hotspots In FGFRs And TWIST?
Acknowledgements
References


Craniosynostosis: genes and mechanisms

Craniosynostosis: genes and mechanisms Andrew O. M. Wilkie

Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK

Received May 16, 1997

Enlargement of the skull vault occurs by appositional growth at the fibrous joints between the bones, termed cranial sutures. Relatively little is known about the developmental biology of this process, but genetically determined disorders of premature cranial suture fusion (craniosynostosis) provide one route to the identification of some of the key molecules involved. Mutations of the MSX2, FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3 and TWIST genes yield new insights, both into normal and abnormal cranial suture biogenesis and into problems of broad interest, such as the conservation of molecular pathways in development, and mechanisms of mutation and dominance.

INTRODUCTION

Craniosynostosis is important for two reasons. It provides a model system for studying the genetic and environmental factors in a pathway of developmental malformation; and it represents a significant medical problem, occurring in ~1 in 2500 individuals (1 -4 ). The abnormal skull growth may be associated with raised intracranial pressure, impaired cerebral blood flow, airway obstruction, impaired vision and hearing, learning difficulties and adverse psychological effects (5 -8 ). These remain significant problems despite important advances in surgical management over the past 20 years.

In humans, mineralisation of the cranial vault mostly occurs directly from membrane derived from paraxial mesoderm, proceeding outwards from several ossification centres from ~13 weeks of embryonic development (reviewed in 9 ). At ~18 weeks these mineralising bone fronts meet and sutures are induced along the lines of approximation. Subsequently, the skull enlarges by appositional growth at the suture with deposition of premineralised bone matrix (osteoid) along the suture margins. The major cranial sutures are shown in Figure 1 A. Premature fusion of one or more of these sutures (craniosynostosis) prevents further growth along the margin; excessive growth at other sutures leads to skull distortion (reviewed in 10 ). The suture itself is anatomically a simple structure (Fig. 1 B), comprising the two plates of bone separated by a narrow space containing immature, rapidly dividing osteogenic stem cells, a proportion of which are recruited to differentiate into osteoblasts and make new bone. Developmentally, the problem of craniosynostosis may be posed as follows (11 ): what causes the sutural tissue to fail in the execution of its proliferative and anti-differentiative functions?

Both genetic and environmental factors contribute to craniosynostosis. Abnormal mechanical forces (external pressure or deficiency in underlying brain growth) may be a predisposing cause in some cases (12 ). In others, a family history or associated anomalies suggest a genetically determined condition. Over 100 syndromes associated with craniosynostosis have been delineated (13 ,14 ): most of the common ones exhibit dominant inheritance. The clinical observation that many craniosynostosis syndromes are accompanied by limb abnormalities (see Box 1) suggests that aspects of craniofacial and limb development utilise common molecular pathways, an idea supported by experimental evidence (15 ). This insight has been an important contributor to recent success in the identification of genes mutated in craniosynostosis. All the genes identified to date were already known to be major players in the development of fruitflies and mice and were pinpointed using positional candidate approaches in relatively small families. The new findings from human syndromes reveal hitherto unsuspected aspects of the structure and biology of the mutated genes and their cognate proteins.

MUTATIONS IN MSX2, FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, FBN1 AND TWIST GENES

Table 1 catalogues all mutations that cause craniosynostosis as a primary clinical feature, a list currently comprising 64 different mutations of six genes in 474 independent patients. These range from unique missense mutations in the MSX2 (muscle segment homeobox 2) and FBN1 (fibrillin) genes described in single families, to 46 mutations in seven phenotypes for FGFR2 (fibroblast growth factor receptor 2). Mutations of FBN1 are more commonly associated with Marfan syndrome (reviewed in 64 ) and are not further discussed here. The TWIST gene is the most recent (January 1997) addition to the list; relatively few mutations have been published to date. Figure 2 illustrates the position of mutations in relation to functional motifs in MSX2, FGFR1, -2, -3 and TWIST.


Figure 1. Normal cranial suture development. (A) View of child's skull from above, showing position of the major sutures. Coronal craniosynostosis leads to a short, broad skull; conversely, sagittal synostosis leads to a long, narrow skull. (B) Diagrammatic cross section through coronal suture. The skull bones overlap slightly. In craniosynostosis, the narrow space separating the bones is obliterated.

Many interesting patterns may be discerned from scrutiny of Table 1 and Figure 2 . FGFR mutations in particular present one of the most remarkable series in human genetics of genotype-phenotype correlations for allelic and non-allelic mutations. The following points are worth highlighting; their functional significance is addressed in the subsequent section.

(i) Most of the FGFR mutations are missense, with a smaller number of splice mutations or small insertions, deletions or indels, all of which remain in-frame. No nonsense or frameshift mutations have been described. This contrasts with the TWIST gene, for which the mutations mostly comprise nonsense changes and 21 bp duplications, with relatively fewer missense mutations.

Box 1. Naming and recognition of craniosynostosis syndromes. Outside the field of clinical genetics, the basis for recognising specific syndromes carries considerable mystique. This is not always helped by disputes about definition and the use of multisyllabic eponymous terms. The naming of disorders has to be flexible, as it may need re-evaluation in the light of new clinical and molecular information. This is well illustrated by the craniosynostosis literature. Whereas some clinically defined disorders have turned out to correlate very closely with molecular pathogenesis (notably Apert syndrome), in other cases the distinction has become more blurred (for example, the Crouzon/Pfeiffer/Jackson-Weiss group). FGFR3 associated coronal craniosynostosis only became clearly defined once the specific mutation was identified (the `labels' previously attached to patients who turn out to have this mutation included Pfeiffer, Saethre-Chotzen and Crouzon syndromes, as well as Adelaide-type, non-syndromic and brachydactyly associated craniosynostosis!): the term `Muenke craniosynostosis' has been suggested by OMIM, and is used in this review. Boston craniosynostosis is a `private' syndrome defined by the MSX2 mutation in the single family currently known: as the phenotype is variable and rather non-specific, it would be difficult to recognise clinically. This box summarises the disorders mentioned in this review.

Disorder

MIM#

First
recognised
Main clinical features

Comments

Boston craniosynostosis

123101

1993

Supraorbital recession, not diagnostic Single family with MSX2 mutation

Pfeiffer syndrome

101600

1964

Broad thumbs and great toes

Clinical boundary with Jackson-Weiss disputed
Apert syndrome

101200

1906

Bony syndactyly of hands and feet  
Crouzon syndrome

123500

1912

`Normal' limbs; subtype has acanthosis nigricans Radiology reveals subtle limb abnormalities
Jackson-Weiss syndrome

123150

1976

Broad great toes, bony fusions in feet Very variable within one enormous family
Beare-Stevenson syndrome

123790

1969

Cutis gyrata and acanthosis nigricans  
Muenke craniosynostosis

134394

1996

Difficult to diagnose clinically

Defined by Pro250Arg mutation in FGFR3
Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome

182212

1982

Generalised connective tissue defect Possibly heterogeneous

Saethre-Chotzen syndrome

101400

1931

2/3 syndactyly of hands; bifid great toes Easily confused with Muenke craniosynostosis

Table 1. Mutations identified in craniosynostosis
Gene Mutationa Phenotypeb nc Referenced
MSX2 Pro148His B 1 17
FGFR1 Pro252Arg P 10 18-20 (1)
FGFR2e Tyr105Cys C 1 21
  Ser252Trp A 191 20,22-31 (39)
  Ser252Phe(CG -> TT) A 2 31,32
  Ser252Leu N,C 1 32
  934CGC -> TCT[SP -> FS] P 1 32
  Pro253Arg A 93 20,22-26,29-31 (20)
  Ser267Pro C 1 33
  982insTGG[insG] C 1 20
  Cys278Phe C,P 8 20,33
  1037del9[delHIQ] C 1 33
  Gln289Pro C,J 3 20,33,34
  Trp290Arg(T -> C) C 2 33
  Trp290Gly C 2 35,36
  Trp290Cys(G -> C) P 1 37
  Trp290Cys(G -> T) P 1 (1)
  Lys292Glu C 1 38
  1119-3T -> Gf P 1 19
  1119-2A -> Gf P,A 6 19,30,39 (1)
  1119-1G -> Cf P 1 26
  Ala314Serf P 2 19
  Asp321Ala P 1 39
  Tyr328Cys C 1 40
  Asn331Ile C 1 41
  1190ins6[insDA] C 1 41
  Gly338Arg(G -> C) C 2 34 (1)
  Gly338Glu C 2 21
  Tyr340His C 5 26,40,42-44
  Thr341Pro P 1 45
  Cys342Tyr C,P 18 20,33,34,42-46 (1)
  Cys342Arg P,C,J 14 19,20,26,35,43,45
  Cys342Phe C 2 20,33
  Cys342Ser(G -> C) P,C 4 20,34,47 (1)
  Cys342Ser(T -> A) P,C 2 20,43
  Cys342Trp C,P 5 26,35,42,44
  Ala344Ala(G -> A)f C,U 8 35,40,42,43,48-50 (2)
  Ala344Gly J,C 2 34,40
  Ala344Pro P 1 20
  Ser347Cys C 4 26,33,40
  Ser351Cys U 1 21
  Ser354Cys C 5 33-35,43
  1245del9[delWLT] C 1 41
  Val359Phe P 1 20
  1263ins6f P 1 20
  Ser372Cys BS 1 51
  Tyr375Cys BS 2 51
  Gly384Arg U 1 21
FGFR3 Pro250Arg M 33 52-56 (1)
  Ala391Glu C-A 6 57,58
FBN1 Cys1223Tyr SG 1 59,60
TWISTg Tyr103stop(308insA) S 1 61
  Tyr103stop(C -> A) S 1 62
  Glu104stop S 1 (1)
  Gln119Pro S 1 61
  Ser123stop S 1 62
  Ser123Trp S 1 (1)

Table 1. continued
Gene Mutationa Phenotypeb nc Referenced
  Glu126stop S 1 62
  Leu131Pro S 1 62
  405ins21[insAALRKII] S 1 61
  416ins21[insKIIPTLP] S 4 61,62 (1)
  417ins21[insKIIPTLP] S 1 62
  Asp141Tyr S 1 (1)
  433del23 S 1 61
aNotation for mutations follows ref. 16. Square brackets show amino acid changes in single letter notation.
bSyndrome abbreviations: A, Apert; B, Boston craniosynostosis; BS, Beare-Stevenson; C, Crouzon; C-A, Crouzon/acanthosis nigricans; J, Jackson-Weiss; M, Muenke craniosynostosis; N, normal phenotype; P, Pfeiffer; S, Saethre-Chotzen; SG, Shprintzen-Goldberg; U, unclassified. Where more than one phenotype has been described, the most frequent is indicated first.
cNumber of unrelated individuals.
dFigures in brackets indicate number of unpublished observations from the author's laboratory that are included in the total.
eAmino acid and DNA numbering from ref. 63.
fEffect on splicing proven or presumed.

gAmino acid and DNA numbering from ref. 61.

(ii) Many of the mutations are recurrent. In the case of FGFR1, -2 and -3, some missense mutations occur much more frequently than others; in the case of the TWIST gene, 21 bp duplications (with three distinct molecular origins) have already been recorded six times.


Figure 2. Structure of MSX2, FGFR2 and TWIST (drawn to scale) showing conserved motifs and mutations in craniosynostosis. (A) MSX2 is a transcription factor cloned by homology to the Drosophila msh gene and includes a highly conserved DNA-binding homeodomain (Ho). (B) FGFR2 is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase. Ligand binds to extracellular immunoglobulin-like domains (IgI, IgII and IgIII), each of which contains a pair of disulphide linked cysteines. Ligand-induced dimerisation leads to autophosphorylation of the split tyrosine kinase (TK1 and TK2). The relative frequency of mutations in IgII-IgIII leading to Apert, Crouzon and Pfeiffer syndromes is indicated on the histogram. Coloured dots denote other rare but important mutations. Below, amino acid sequences of IgII-IgIII linker (FGFR1, -2 and -3) and transmembrane (TM) region (FGFR2 and -3) are given, with conserved residues highlighted in black. The rectangle surrounds the membrane-spanning region. Substitutions leading to craniosynostosis (coloured letters) or bone dysplasia (black letters) are shown above each sequence (in FGFR3, the mutations R248C, S249C, G370C, S371C and Y373C cause thanatophoric dysplasia type I; G375C and G380R cause achondroplasia). The double mutation S252F, P253S in FGFR2 is omitted for clarity. (C) TWIST is a transcription factor. Molecules dimerise via the helix-loop-helix (HLH) motif, binding DNA at the basic region D. For further information see refs 17 (MSX2), 65,66 (FGFR) and 61,62 (TWIST).

(iii) Allelic missense mutations of FGFR2 and FGFR3 have widely varying phenotypes. Many FGFR3 mutations are characterised by short-limbed bone dysplasia of varying severity (hypochondroplasia, achondroplasia, thanatophoric dysplasia); craniosynostosis is rare in the first two of these disorders (reviewed in 67 ). Especially noteworthy is that mutations immediately adjacent to the P250R mutation in FGFR3 (R248C and S249C) cause thanatophoric dysplasia type I (Fig. 2 ).

(iv) Identical mutations of FGFR paralogs are observed in several regions of the molecule (Fig. 2 ). Pro -> Arg mutations of the IgII-IgIII linker cause Pfeiffer syndrome in FGFR1, Apert syndrome in FGFR2 and Muenke craniosynostosis in FGFR3; Ser or Gly -> Cys and Tyr -> Cys mutations of the juxtamembrane region cause Beare-Stevenson syndrome in FGFR2 and thanatophoric dysplasia type I in FGFR3; Gly -> Arg mutations in the transmembrane region (differing in position by two amino acids) cause unclassified craniosynostosis in FGFR2 and achondroplasia in FGFR3.

(v) Many of the other missense mutations of FGFR2 create or destroy a cysteine residue in one of the immunoglobulin-like domains. Most notably, C342 represents a mutation hotspot; all but one of the amino acid substitutions that can arise by mutating one nucleotide of the TGC codon have been observed (the exception is Cys -> Gly).

(vi) Different substitutions of the same amino acid may give different phenotypes: in FGFR2, S252W and S252F cause Apert syndrome whereas the phenotype with S252L is usually normal; C342Y tends to give a Crouzon phenotype whereas C342R tends to give a Pfeiffer phenotype (there is, however, some overlap).

(vii) Identical substitutions may be associated with variable limb phenotypes: noteworthy examples include the variable phenotype associated with the A344G mutation in the original Jackson-Weiss pedigree, and the Apert-like phenotype observed in a single instance of the 1119-2A -> G splice mutation (30 ), which is more usually associated with Pfeiffer syndrome.

Identification of these mutations has necessitated some reappraisal of the rather confusing clinical classification of the craniosynostosis disorders. Although a reasonable correlation between clinical description and mutation has emerged, a notable exception is the P250R mutation in FGFR3. The phenotype is rather non-specific and quite variable, as witnessed by the variety of labels previously attached to patients who have subsequently turned out to have this mutation (see Box 1). This is a good example of a disorder that is better classified by mutation rather than phenotype. Another area of contention is the distinctiveness, or lack of it, of the syndromic labels of Crouzon, Pfeiffer and Jackson-Weiss. Classically, these have been distinguished primarily on examination of the limb. Although the limbs in Crouzon syndrome are supposed to be normal, radiological examination often reveals subtle abnormalities (68 ). The frequently quoted assertion that the phenotypes breed true within families lacks careful documentation and has many counter-examples (20 ,26 ,38 ,48 ).

MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS MUTATIONS

All the mutations described to date are dominantly acting and, hence, the abnormal gene products must exert their effects in the presence of wild-type protein. The mechanisms of action have been the subject of keen investigation and provide some excellent examples of mechanisms of dominance (69 ).

A good starting point is to consider the effects of heterozygous null mutation. The phenotypes of Fgfr1+/- and Fgfr3+/- mice, and FGFR3+/- humans (4p- syndrome), are very different from the craniosynostosis syndromes resulting from mutation of the corresponding genes (1 3 ,70 -73 ). By contrast, possible localisation of Saethre-Chotzen syndrome to human 7p was originally investigated because the phenotype appeared similar to patients with 7p deletions (74 ), and murine twist+/- heterozygotes, although described as normal in the original report (75 ), exhibit subtle cranial and digital abnormalities strikingly reminiscent of the human disorder (62 ). These and other observations suggest that the human MSX2 and FGFR mutations involve gain of function, whereas the TWIST mutations are largely loss of function (haploinsufficiency). This is supported by evidence of frequent nonsense mutations in the TWIST gene, but not in the MSX2 or FGFR genes (Table 1 and Fig. 2 ). Several approaches have been taken to elucidate the gain of function mechanisms of the MSX2 and FGFR mutations. These are described below, and the conclusions summarised in Table 2 .

MSX2

The P148H substitution occurs at position 7 of the highly conserved homeodomain, which is involved in both DNA and protein interactions. Although initial studies did not demonstrate any difference in the binding properties of the mutant protein to a target DNA sequence, more recent work has shown that the P148H substitution does confer enhanced DNA binding affinity with a reduced dissociation rate, without altering target specificity (76 ). Two groups have reported the production of mice carrying inserted msx2 or MSX2 transgenes, with markedly different effects on the phenotype (77 ,78 ). In one study, said to have achieved msx2 overexpression of 2-fold or less (76 ), the mice were viable and a proportion developed premature cranial suture fusion, mimicking the human disorder (77 ). In the other study, 13-22 copies of the MSX2 transgene were integrated and the mice died around birth with severe craniofacial malformations, but with no evidence of craniosynostosis (78 ). No consistent differences in phenotype between mice carrying the normal and mutant versions of the transgene were observed in either study. The results suggest that normal craniofacial development is very sensitive to (wild-type) MSX2 dosage; the enhanced DNA binding affinity of the P148H protein may mimic the effect of a mild elevation in MSX2 dosage, sufficient to cause craniosynostosis but not the more severe malformations.

FGFR

The mechanism of FGFR craniosynostosis mutations has been reported in two experimental systems, Xenopus oocytes/embryos and HeLa cells. Blastomere injection of mRNA encoding the Xenopus FGFR2 mutation C332Y (corresponding to C342Y in the human), but not wild-type mRNA, caused elongation of animal pole ectoderm and induction of Xbra, a marker of mesodermal expression, mimicking the effects of exogenous fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1). Mutant FGFR2 protein, assayed after mRNA injection of oocytes, demonstrated greater binding to antiphosphotyrosine antibodies and higher kinase activity than wild-type, yet was unable to bind FGF1. Under non-reducing but not reducing conditions, a slower migrating form of the mutant protein was apparent, consistent with dimerisation. These data were interpreted as showing two distinct consequences of the Cys -> Tyr mutation: (i) abolition of FGF1 binding due to disruption of the IgIII domain but also (ii) the mutated cysteine leaves an unpaired partner (C268 in Xenopus, C278 in human) which is free to bond covalently with another mutant molecule, resulting in ligand-independent constitutive activation (79 ). A prediction of this model is that homozygosity for the mutation would cause early embryonic lethality, due to abolition of FGF binding.

In a follow up paper, further FGFR2 mutations were studied in Xenopus (80 ). Injection of C268F mutant mRNA gave similar results to those for C332Y. Co-injection with mRNA encoding a dominant-negative FGFR1 molecule caused the mesoderm inducing effect to be competed out (the dominant-negative FGFR1 forms non-productive heterodimers, demonstrating that the mutant FGFR2 needs to dimerise for its action). A double mutant, C268F/C332Y (which lacks an unpaired cysteine), failed to induce elongation of animal pole ectoderm although it did exhibit increased phosphotyrosine levels.

In an alternative approach, the ability of human FGFR2 mutants to induce focus formation when transfected into NIH 3T3 cells was measured (81 ). Full length FGFR2 (normal or mutant) was inactive in this assay, so chimeric molecules containing the transmembrane and/or tyrosine kinase portions of the NEU receptor were constructed. Broadly similar results to the Xenopus experiments, including evidence of mutant receptor cross-linking, were obtained for the mutations Y340H, C342Y and S354C. The findings for Y340H suggest that intermolecular cross-linking between cysteines may occur even when the cysteines remain as a pair: this may be due to unfolding of the domain leading to exposure of the buried cysteines (11 ,82 ).

The mechanism of the transmembrane mutation G384R in FGFR2 has not been studied directly, but several groups have investigated the similar (Fig. 2 ) G380R achondroplasia mutation in FGFR3. A variety of evidence suggests that this mutation shows weak ligand independent activation (reviewed in 67 ). The basic side chain Arg is presumed to form a transient hydrogen bond with the transmembrane helix of a partner molecule, rendering the receptor monomers slightly `sticky'. The Crouzon/acanthosis nigricans mutation A391E in FGFR3 might also form intermolecular hydrogen bonds, but the qualitative differences in phenotype with achondroplasia show that there must be differences in how this is executed. One suggestion is that the A391E/FGFR3 mutant might act through heterodimerisation with a normal FGFR2 molecule (67 ).

The mechanism of the paralogous Pro -> Arg mutations in the IgII-IgIII linker of FGFR1, -2 and -3 appears to be distinct. Evidence from the naturally occurring mutations shown in Figure 2 suggests that it results from a highly specific interaction (summarised in 32 ). It is of interest that in Drosophila DFR2 and Caenorhabditis egl-15, an arginine occurs naturally at the corresponding position of these FGFR homologs (83 ), indicating that in a different biological context the presence of Arg is consistent with normal receptor function. We have speculated that substitution to bulky residues in this linker region might alter the relative orientation of the IgII and IgIII domains and hence mimic or accentuate the effects of ligand binding (11 ). Tentative evidence for this was found in the Xenopus system, in which greater binding of FGF1 and FGF2 to translated receptor was consistently observed after injection of FGFR1 mRNA encoding the P160R mutation, compared with wild-type. No elongation of animal pole ectoderm or increased tyrosine kinase activity was however observed (80 ). In a different approach, surface plasmon resonance analysis has been used to investigate in real time the binding of FGFs to normal and mutant FGFR2 constructs. Reduced dissociation of FGF2 from FGFR2 constructs containing the Apert mutations S252W or P253R, compared to wild-type, was observed (J.Anderson, H.D.Burns, P.Enriquez-Harris, A.O.M.Wilkie and J.K. Heath, manuscript in preparation).

Table 2. Proposed mechanisms of dominance in craniosynostosis mutations
Mechanism Example
Haploinsufficiency TWIST
Structural disruption FBN1
Reduced dissociation of ligand

P148H in MSX2 (DNA binding)
S252W and P253R in FGFR2 (FGF2 binding)
Covalent cross-linking of Cys C278F, Y340H, C342Y, S354C in FGFR2
Transmembrane hydrogen bonding ?G384R in FGFR2, A391E in FGFR3

In summary, a variety of evidence points to the activating nature (constitutive or prolonged signalling) of FGFR2 mutations and this is largely corroborated by work on FGFR3 mutations in bone dysplasia (reviewed in 67 ). However, one study of FGF2-induced calcium signalling in fibroblasts from patients with achondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia gave results apparently inconsistent with other findings. Cells heterozygous for either R248C or S371C, or homozygous for the G380R mutation in FGFR3 (Fig. 2 ) exhibited a defective response to FGF2, leading the authors to suggest that the in vivo effect of these mutations was actually dominant-negative (84 ). A possible resolution of this paradox is discussed in the next section.

CRANIAL SUTURE MORPHOGENESIS AND CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS

The modern techniques of developmental biology have only recently been focused on the cranial sutures, following the discovery of craniosynostosis mutations in humans. There is still very little known about the molecular and cellular factors controlling the balance between proliferation and differentiation in these structures. It has been demonstrated that Msx2 (17 ) and Fgfr2 (85 ), as well as transforming growth factor [beta] 1-3 (86 ,87 ) are expressed in mouse or rat sutures. In the case of Fgfr2, the domain of RNA expression coincides with active cell proliferation, but is mutually exclusive with osteopontin, an early marker of bone differentiation (85 ). This suggests that Fgfr2 is a marker of proliferative, uncommitted cells of the suture, and is switched off as a cause or consequence of osteogenic differentiation.

This conclusion raises a paradox. If FGFR2 is associated with the undifferentiated state, why do activating mutations apparently cause differentiation, leading to craniosynostosis? Recently, use of ex-utero surgical techniques on fetal mice has shed new light on this question. Implantation of FGF2-soaked beads over the coronal suture disrupted the normal suture and resulted in the ectopic expression of osteopontin. Fgfr2 expression was absent from the immediate area underlying the bead, but was apparent as a ring surrounding its margin (8 5 ). This suggests that excessive FGF2 signalling (i) does result in osteogenic differentiation, and (ii) is associated with down-regulation of FGFR2 in the experimental system. The former conclusion is reminiscent of recent work on thanatophoric dysplasia type II, indicating that different intensities of FGFR3 signalling have qualitatively distinct cellular consequences (88 ,89 ), whilst the latter explains the finding that cranial sutures from patients with Crouzon syndrome contain a lower proportion of cells positive for FGFR2 antibody than sutures from control individuals (90 ). A reciprocal relationship between FGF production and FGFR expression has been observed previously (91 ,92 ).

Under this model, the behaviour of cells carrying FGFR2 mutations may be viewed as a subtle balance between two opposing forces: the intrinsically activating nature of the mutations, and the tendency for activation to cause down-regulation. This balance may change with time, place and cellular identity. This view would accommodate the paradoxical `dominant-negative' effect of FGFR3 mutations on FGF2-induced calcium signalling in fibroblasts, described above (84 ). More speculatively, it may also begin to explain the mystery of why these mutations are neither lethal in early embryogenesis, nor associated with marked predisposition to neoplasia in later life.

How do TWIST and MSX2 link up with FGFR in biogenesis of the suture? Nothing is known about this at present, but there is a growing consensus that certain developmental pathways are conserved between Drosophila and vertebrates (93 ) and suture biogenesis could represent a further example. twist is well established as a critical gene for mesoderm induction in Drosophila, and later functions as a myogenic switch (94 ). Expression of a fibroblast growth factor receptor, DFR1, depends on twist (95 ,96 ) and null mutants for DFR1 (heartless) are defective in muscle formation and show abnormal directional cell migration (97 ,98 ). Mesodermal expression of the msh gene is turned on later in myogenesis and is abolished in twist mutants (99 ,100 ). Certainly, the idea that aspects of mesoderm formation in Drosophila, and development of the cranial suture (a mesodermal structure) involve conserved pathways represents a reasonable working hypothesis, which has the benefits of harnessing the power of Drosophila genetics to the study of the human.

MUTATION HOTSPOTS IN FGFRs AND TWIST?

One further problem remains. It is clear that the spectra of mutations observed in the TWIST and FGFR genes are highly non-random. Although relatively few mutations have been described in TWIST, 21 bp duplications (with three distinct molecular origins) comprise about one third. This is interesting, but the explanation can be accommodated within conventional molecular biology, as a repeat unit with 21 bp periodicity is present in this region (62 ). Something more remarkable seems to be happening with the FGFR mutations in craniosynostosis and bone dysplasia. It is unlikely to be coincidental that the three highest germline point mutation rates described in the human (elevated ~1000-fold over background) all concern FGFRs: G380R in FGFR3 (101 ), P250R in FGFR3 (54 ) and S252W in FGFR2 (25 ). Increased paternal age associated with achondroplasia and Apert syndrome has long been suspected (reviewed in 102 ), and an exclusively paternal origin of mutation was shown in studies of 57 Apert syndrome (25 ) and 10 achondroplasia patients (103 ). This implicates spermatogenesis as being specifically involved in the elevated mutation rate, but the mechanism is not known. Conventional explanations, e.g., gene conversion appear unlikely given the diverse pattern of mutations observed. Circumstantial evidence for an alternative hypothesis, that the mutation rate is not elevated per se but that germ cells carrying the mutation have a selective advantage, is discussed elsewhere (32 ).

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would particularly like to thank the past and present members of my laboratory, Sarah Slaney, Mike Oldridge, Dom Moloney, Steve Twigg and Sinead Walsh for their contribution to craniosynostosis genetics; Steve Wall and Geraldine Ashworth for their clinical support; and John Heath, Gillian Morriss-Kay and Yvonne Jones for many stimulating discussions and comments on the manuscript. Susan Malcolm, Rita Passos-Bueno, Dominique Renier and Ethylin Wang Jabs generously sent copies of papers in press. I am grateful to Sir David Weatherall and the Wellcome Trust for support. This review is dedicated to the memory of June, my mother.

REFERENCES

1 Hunter, A.G.W. and Rudd, N.L. (1976) Craniosynostosis. I. Sagittal synostosis; its genetics and associated clinical findings in 214 patients who lacked involvement of the coronal suture(s). Teratology, 14, 185-194.

2 Hunter, A.G.W. and Rudd, N.L. (1977) Craniosynostosis. II. Coronal synostosis: its familial characteristics and associated clinical findings in 109 patients lacking bilateral polysyndactyly or syndactyly. Teratology, 15, 301-310.

3 Lajeunie, E., Le Merrer, M., Bonaïti-Pellie, C., Marchac, D. and Renier, D. (1995) Genetic study of nonsyndromic coronal craniosynostosis. Am. J. Med. Genet., 55, 500-504. MEDLINE Abstract

4 Lajeunie, E., Le Merrer, M., Bonaïti-Pellie, C., Marchac, D. and Renier, D. (1996) Genetic study of scaphocephaly. Am. J. Med. Genet., 62, 282-285. MEDLINE Abstract

5 Renier, D., Sainte-Rose, C., Marchac, D. and Hirsch, J.-F. (1982) Intracranial pressure in craniostenosis. J. Neurosurg., 57, 370-377. MEDLINE Abstract

6 David, L.R., Wilson, J.A., Watson, N.E. and Argenta, L.C. (1996) Cerebral perfusion defects secondary to simple craniosynostosis. J. Craniofac. Surg., 7, 177-185. MEDLINE Abstract

7 Gosain, A.K., McCarthy, J.G. and Wisoff, J.H. (1996) Morbidity associated with increased intracranial pressure in Apert and Pfeiffer syndromes: the need for long-term evaluation. Plastic Reconstr. Surg., 97, 292-301.

8 Gonsalez, S., Hayward, R., Jones, B. and Lane, R. (1997) Upper airway obstruction and raised intracranial pressure in children with craniosynostosis. Eur. Respir. J., 10, 367-375. MEDLINE Abstract

9 Opperman, L.A., Passarelli, R.W., Nolen, A.A., Gampper, T.J and Ogle, R.C. (1996) Dura mater secretes soluble heparin-binding factors required for cranial suture morphogenesis. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol., 32, 627-632.

10 Cohen, M.M., Jr (1993) Sutural biology and the correlates of craniosynostosis. Am. J. Med. Genet., 47, 581-616. MEDLINE Abstract

11 Wilkie, A.O.M., Morriss-Kay, G.M., Jones, E.Y. and Heath, J.K. (1995) Functions of fibroblast growth factors and their receptors. Curr. Biol., 5, 500-507.

12 Graham, J.M., Jr, deSaxe, M. and Smith, D.W. (1979) Sagittal craniostenosis: fetal head constraint as one possible cause. J. Pediatr., 95, 747-750. MEDLINE Abstract

13 Cohen, M.M., Jr. (1986) In Cohen, M.M., Jr (ed.) Craniosynostosis: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Management. Raven Press, New York, pp. 413-590.

14 Winter, R.M. and Baraitser, M. (1996) The London Dysmorphology Database. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

15 Richman, J.M. and Tickle, C. (1992) Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the outgrowth of limb buds and facial primordia in chick embryos. Dev. Biol., 154, 299-308. MEDLINE Abstract

16 Beaudet, A. and Tsui, L.-C. (1993) A suggested nomenclature for designating mutations. Hum. Mutat., 2, 245-248. MEDLINE Abstract

17 Jabs, E.W., MYller, U., Li, X., Ma, L., Luo, W., Haworth, I.S., Klisak, I., Sparkes, R., Warman, M.L., Mulliken, J.B., Snead, M.L. and Maxson, R. (1993) A mutation in the homeodomain of the human MSX2 gene in a family affected with autosomal dominant craniosynostosis. Cell, 75, 443-450. MEDLINE Abstract

18 Muenke, M., Schell, U., Hehr, A., Robin, N.H., Losken, H.W., Schinzel, A., Pulleyn, L.J., Rutland, P., Reardon, W., Malcolm, S. and Winter, R.M. (1994) A common mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 gene in Pfeiffer syndrome. Nature Genet., 8, 269-274. MEDLINE Abstract

19 Schell, U., Hehr, A., Feldman, G.J., Robin, N.H., Zackai, E.H., de Die-Smulders, C., Viskochil, D.H., Stewart, J.M., Wolff, G., Ohashi, H., Price, R.A., Cohen, M.M., Jr and Muenke, M. (1995) Mutations in FGFR1 and FGFR2 cause familial and sporadic Pfeiffer syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet., 4, 323-328. MEDLINE Abstract

20 Meyers, G.A., Day, D., Goldberg, R., Daentl, D.L., Przylepa, K.A., Abrams, L.J., Graham, J.M., Jr, Feingold, M., Moeschler, J.B., Rawnsley, E., Scott, A.F. and Jabs, E.W. (1996) FGFR2 exon IIIa and IIIc mutations in Crouzon, Jackson-Weiss, and Pfeiffer syndromes: evidence for missense changes, insertions, and a deletion due to alternative RNA splicing. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 58, 491-498. MEDLINE Abstract

21 Pulleyn, L.J., Reardon, W., Wilkes, D., Rutland, P., Jones, B.M., Hayward, R., Hall, C.M., Brueton, L., Chun, N., Lammer, E., Malcolm, S. and Winter, R.M. (1996) Spectrum of craniosynostosis phenotypes associated with novel mutations at the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 locus. Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 4, 283-291. MEDLINE Abstract

22 Wilkie, A.O.M., Slaney, S.F., Oldridge, M., Poole, M.D., Ashworth, G.J., Hockley, A.D., Hayward, R.D., David, D.J., Pulleyn, L.J., Rutland, P., Malcolm, S., Winter, R.M. and Reardon, W. (1995) Apert syndrome results from localized mutations of FGFR2 and is allelic with Crouzon syndrome. Nature Genet., 9, 165-172.

23 Park, W.-J., Theda, C., Maestri, N.E., Meyers, G.A., Fryburg, J.S., Dufresne, C., Cohen, M.M., Jr and Jabs, E.W. (1995) Analysis of phenotypic features and FGFR2 mutations in Apert syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 57, 321-328. MEDLINE Abstract

24 Slaney, S.F., Oldridge, M., Hurst, J.A., Morriss-Kay, G.M., Hall, C.M., Poole, M.D. and Wilkie, A.O.M. (1996) Differential effects of FGFR2 mutations on syndactyly and cleft palate in Apert syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 58, 923-932. MEDLINE Abstract

25 Moloney, D.M., Slaney, S.F., Oldridge, M., Wall, S.A., Sahlin, P., Stenman, G. and Wilkie, A.O.M. (1996) Exclusive paternal origin of new mutations in Apert syndrome. Nature Genet., 13, 48-53. MEDLINE Abstract

26 Hollway, G.E., Suthers, G.K., Haan, E.A., Thompson, E., David, D.J., Gecz, J. and Mulley, J.C. (1997) Mutation detection in FGFR2 craniosynostosis syndromes. Hum. Genet., 99, 251-255. MEDLINE Abstract

27 Wada, C., Ishigaki, M., Toyo-Oka, Y., Yamabe, H., Ohnuki, Y., Takada, F., Yamazaki, Y. and Ohtani, H. (1996) Nucleotide sequence at intron 6 and exon 7 junction of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 and rapid mutational analysis in Apert syndrome. Jpn J. Clin. Pathol., 44, 435-438.

28 Osada, H., Ishii, J. and Sekiya, J.S. (1996) Prenatal molecular diagnosis for Apert syndrome. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet., 55, 171-172. MEDLINE Abstract

29 Filkins, K., Russo, J.F., Boehmer, S., Camous, M., Przylepa, K.A., Jiang, W. and Jabs, E.W. (1997) Prenatal ultrasonographic and molecular diagnosis of Apert syndrome. Prenat. Diagn., in press.

30 Passos-Bueno, M.R., Sertié, A.L., Zatz, M. and Richieri-Costa, A. (1997) Pfeiffer mutation in an Apert patient: how wide is the spectrum of variability due to mutations in the FGFR2 gene? Am. J. Med. Genet., 71, 243-245. MEDLINE Abstract

31 Lajeunie, E., de Parseval, N., Renier, D., Cameron, R., Journeau, P., Gonzales, M., Delezoide, A.-L., Munnich, A. and Le Merrer, M. (1997) Analysis of the genetic and clinical variability of Apert syndrome. Hum. Genet., in press.

32 Oldridge, M., Lunt, P.W., Zackai, E.H., McDonald-McGinn, D.M., Muenke, M., Moloney, D.M., Twigg, S.R.F., Heath, J.K., Howard, T.D., Hoganson, G., Gagnon, D.M., Jabs, E.W. and Wilkie, A.O.M. (1997) Genotype-phenotype correlation for nucleotide substitutions in the IgII-IgIII linker of FGFR2. Hum. Mol. Genet., 6, 137-143. MEDLINE Abstract

33 Oldridge, M., Wilkie, A.O.M., Slaney, S.F., Poole, M.D., Pulleyn, L.J., Rutland, P., Hockley, A.D., Wake, M.J.C., Goldin, J.H., Winter, R.M., Reardon, W. and Malcolm, S. (1995) Mutations in the third immunoglobulin domain of the fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 gene in Crouzon syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet., 4, 1077-1082. MEDLINE Abstract

34 Gorry, M.C., Preston, R.A., White, G.J., Zhang, Y., Singhal, V.K., Losken, H.W., Parker, M.G., Nwokoro, N.A., Post, J.C. and Ehrlich, G.D. (1995) Crouzon syndrome: mutations in two spliceoforms of FGFR2 and a common point mutation shared with Jackson-Weiss syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet., 4, 1387-1390. MEDLINE Abstract

35 Park, W.-J., Meyers, G.A., Li, X., Theda, C., Day, D., Orlow, S.J., Jones, M.C. and Jabs, E.W. (1995) Novel FGFR2 mutations in Crouzon and Jackson-Weiss syndromes show allelic heterogeneity and phenotypic variability. Hum. Mol. Genet., 4, 1229-1233. MEDLINE Abstract

36 Steinberger, D., Mulliken, J. and Mueller, U. (1996) Accession no. Z69641.

37 Tartaglia, M., Valeri, S., Velardi, F., Di Rocco, C. and Battaglia, P.A. (1997) Trp290Cys mutation in exon IIIa of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) gene is associated with Pfeiffer syndrome. Hum. Genet., 99, 602-606. MEDLINE Abstract

38 Steinberger, D., Collmann, H., Schmalenberger, B. and Müller, U. (1997) A novel mutation (a886g) in exon 5 of FGFR2 in members of a family with Crouzon phenotype and plagiocephaly. J. Med. Genet., 34, 420-422. MEDLINE Abstract

39 Lajeunie, E., Ma, H.W., Bonaventure, J., Munnich, A., Le Merrer, M. and Renier, D. (1995) FGFR2 mutations in Pfeiffer syndrome. Nature Genet., 9, 108.

40 Jabs, E.W., Li, X., Scott, A.F., Meyers, G., Chen, W., Eccles, M., Mao, J.-i., Charnas, L.R., Jackson, C.E. and Jaye, M. (1994) Jackson-Weiss and Crouzon syndromes are allelic with mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor 2. Nature Genet., 8, 275-279. MEDLINE Abstract

41 Steinberger, D., Mulliken, J.B. and Müller, U. (1996) Crouzon syndrome: previously unrecognized deletion, duplication and point mutation within FGFR2 gene. Hum. Mutat., 8, 386-390. MEDLINE Abstract

42 Ma, H.W., Lajeunie, E., Le Merrer, M., de Parseval, N., Serville, F., Weissenbach, J., Munnich, A. and Renier, D. (1995) No evidence of genetic heterogeneity in Crouzon craniofacial dysostosis. Hum. Genet., 96, 731-735. MEDLINE Abstract

43 Reardon, W., Winter, R.M., Rutland, P., Pulleyn, L.J., Jones, B.M. and Malcolm, S. (1994) Mutations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 gene cause Crouzon syndrome. Nature Genet., 8, 98-103. MEDLINE Abstract

44 Steinberger, D., Mulliken, J.B. and Müller, U. (1995) Predisposition for cysteine substitutions in the immunoglobulin-like chain of FGFR2 in Crouzon syndrome. Hum. Genet., 96, 113-115. MEDLINE Abstract

45 Rutland, P., Pulleyn, L.J., Reardon, W., Baraitser, M., Hayward, R., Jones, B., Malcolm, S., Winter, R.M., Oldridge, M., Slaney, S.F., Poole, M.D. and Wilkie, A.O.M. (1995) Identical mutations in the FGFR2 gene cause both Pfeiffer and Crouzon syndrome phenotypes. Nature Genet., 9, 173-176. MEDLINE Abstract

46 Schwartz, M., Kreiborg, S. and Skovby, F. (1996) First-trimester prenatal diagnosis of Crouzon syndrome. Prenat. Diag., 16, 155-158.

47 Steinberger, D. and Mueller, U. (1996) Accession no. Z71929.

48 Steinberger, D., Reinhartz, T., Unsöld, R. and Müller, U. (1996) FGFR2 mutation in clinically nonclassifiable autosomal dominant craniosynostosis with pronounced phenotypic variation. Am. J. Med. Genet., 66, 81-86. MEDLINE Abstract

49 Del Gatto, F. and Breathnach, R. (1995) A Crouzon syndrome synonymous mutation activates a 5' splice site within the IIIC exon of the FGFR2 gene. Genomics, 27, 558-559. MEDLINE Abstract

50 Li, X., Park, W.-J., Pyeritz, R.E. and Jabs, E.W. (1995) Effect of splicing of a silent FGFR2 mutation in Crouzon syndrome. Nature Genet., 9, 232-233. MEDLINE Abstract

51 Przylepa, K.A., Paznekas, W., Zhang, M., Golabi, M., Bias, W., Bamshad, M.J., Carey, J.C., Hall, B.D., Stevenson, R., Orlow, S.J., Cohen, M.M., Jr and Jabs, E.W. (1996) Fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 mutations in Beare-Stevenson cutis gyrata syndrome. Nature Genet., 13, 492-494. MEDLINE Abstract

52 Bellus, G.A., Gaudenz, K., Zackai, E.H., Clark, L.A., Szabo, J., Francomano, C.A. and Muenke, M. (1996) Identical mutations in three different fibroblast growth factor receptor genes in autosomal dominant craniosynostosis syndromes. Nature Genet., 14, 174-176. MEDLINE Abstract

53 Muenke, M., Gripp, K.W., McDonald-McGinn, D.M., Gaudenz, K., Whitaker, L.A., Bartlett, S.P., Markowitz, R.I., Robin, N.H., Nwokoro, N., Mulvihill, J.J., Losken, H.W., Mulliken, J.B., Guttmacher, A.E., Wilroy, R.S., Clarke, L.A., Hollway, G., Adès, L.C., Haan, E.A., Mulley, J.C., Cohen, M.M., Jr, Bellus, G.A., Francomano, C.A., Moloney, D.M., Wall, S.A., Wilkie, A.O.M. and Zackai, E.H. (1997) A unique point mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene (FGFR3) defines a new craniosynostosis syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 60, 555-564. MEDLINE Abstract

54 Moloney, D.M., Wall, S.A., Ashworth, G.J., Oldridge, M., Glass, I.A., Francomano, C.A., Muenke, M. and Wilkie, A.O.M. (1997) Prevalence of Pro250Arg mutation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 in coronal craniosynostosis. Lancet, 349, 1059-1062. MEDLINE Abstract

55 Golla, A., Lichtner, P., von Gernet, S., Winterpacht, A., Fairley, J., Murken, J. and Schuffenhauer, S. (1997) Phenotypic expression of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation P250R in a large craniosynostosis family. J. Med. Genet., 34, 683-684. MEDLINE Abstract

56 Reardon, W., Wilkes, D., Rutland, P., Pulleyn, L.J., Malcolm, S., Dean, J.C.S., Jones, B.M., Hayward, R., Hall, C.M., Nevin, N.C., Baraitser, M. and Winter, R.M. (1997) Craniosynostosis associated with FGFR3 pro250arg mutation results in a range of clinical presentations including unisutural sporadic craniosynostosis. J. Med. Genet., 34, 632-636. MEDLINE Abstract

57 Meyers, G.A., Orlow, S.J., Munro, I.R., Przylepa, K.A. and Jabs, E.W. (1995) Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) transmembrane mutation in Crouzon syndrome with acanthosis nigricans. Nature Genet., 11, 462-464.

58 Wilkes, D., Rutland, P., Pulleyn, L.J., Reardon, W., Moss, C., Ellis, J.P., Winter, R.M. and Malcolm, S. (1996) A recurrent mutation, ala391glu, in the transmembrane region of FGFR3 causes Crouzon syndrome and acanthosis nigricans. J. Med. Genet., 33, 744-748. MEDLINE Abstract

59 Sood, S., Eldadah, Z.A., Krause, W.L., McIntosh, I. and Dietz, H.C. (1996) Mutation in fibrillin-1 and the Marfanoid-craniosynostosis (Shprintzen-Goldberg) syndrome. Nature Genet., 12, 209-211.

60 Wang, M., Mathews, K.R., Imaizumi, K., Beiraghi, S., Blumberg, B., Scheuner, M., Graham, J.M., Jr and Godfrey, M. (1997) P1148A in fibrillin-1 is not a mutation anymore. Nature Genet., 15, 12. MEDLINE Abstract

61 Howard, T.D., Paznekas, W.A., Green, E.D., Chiang, L.C., Ma, N., De Luna, R.I.O., Delgado, C.G., Gonzalez-Ramos, M., Kline, A.D. and Jabs, E.W. (1997) Mutations in TWIST, a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, in Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Nature Genet., 15, 36-41. MEDLINE Abstract

62 El Ghouzzi, V., Le Merrer, M., Perrin-Schmitt, F., Lajeunie, E., Benit, P., Renier, D., Bourgeois, P., Bolcato-Bellemin, A.-L., Munnich, A. and Bonaventure, J. (1997) Mutations of the TWIST gene in the Saethre-Chotzen syndrome. Nature Genet., 15, 42-46. MEDLINE Abstract

63 Dionne, C.A., Crumley, G., Bellot, F., Kaplow, J.M., Searfoss, G., Ruta, M., Burgess, W.H., Jaye, M. and Schlessinger, J. (1990) Cloning and expression of two distinct high-affinity receptors cross-reacting with acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors. EMBO J., 9, 2685-2692. MEDLINE Abstract

64 Ramirez, F. (1996) Fibrillin mutations in Marfan syndrome and related phenotypes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 6, 309-315. MEDLINE Abstract

65 Johnson, D.E. and Williams, L.T. (1993) In Vande Woude, G.F. and Klein, G. (eds) Advances in Cancer Research, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Vol 60, pp. 1-41.

66 Spivak-Kroizman, T., Lemmon, M.A., Dikic, I., Ladbury, J.E., Pinchasi, D., Huang, J., Jaye, M., Crumley, G., Schlessinger, J. and Lax, I. (1994) Heparin-induced oligomerization of FGF molecules is responsible for FGF receptor dimerisation, activation, and cell proliferation. Cell, 79, 1015-1024. MEDLINE Abstract

67 Webster, M.K. and Donoghue, D.J. (1997) FGFR activation in skeletal disorders: too much of a good thing. Trends Genet., 13, 178-182. MEDLINE Abstract

68 Anderson, P.J., Hall, C.M., Evans, R.D., Jones, B.M. and Hayward, R.D. (1997) Hand anomalies in Crouzon syndrome. Skeletal Radiol., 26, 113-115. MEDLINE Abstract

69 Wilkie, A.O.M. (1994) The molecular basis of genetic dominance. J. Med. Genet., 31, 89-98.

70 Yamaguchi, T.P., Harpal, K., Henkemeyer, M. and Rossant, J. (1994) fgfr-1 is required for embryonic growth and mesodermal patterning during mouse gastrulation. Genes Dev., 8, 3032-3044.

71 Deng, C.-X., Wynshaw-Boris, A., Shen, M.M., Daugherty, C., Ornitz, D.M. and Leder, P. (1994) Murine FGFR-1 is required for early postimplantation growth and axial organization. Genes Dev., 8, 3045-3057. MEDLINE Abstract

72 Deng, C., Wynshaw-Boris, A., Zhou, F., Kuo, A. and Leder, P. (1996) Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 is a negative regulator of bone growth. Cell, 84, 911-921. MEDLINE Abstract

73 Colvin, J.S., Bohne, B.A., Harding, G.W., McEwen, D.G. and Ornitz, D.M. (1996) Skeletal overgrowth and deafness in mice lacking fibroblast growth factor receptor 3. Nature Genet., 12, 390-397. MEDLINE Abstract

74 Brueton, L.A., van Herwerden, L., Chotai, K.A. and Winter, R.M. (1992) The mapping of a gene for craniosynostosis: evidence for linkage of the Saethre-Chotzen syndrome to distal chromosome 7p. J. Med. Genet., 29, 681-685. MEDLINE Abstract

75 Chen, Z.-F. and Behringer, R.R. (1995) twist is required in head mesenchyme for cranial neural tube morphogenesis. Genes Dev., 9, 686-699.

76 Ma, L., Golden, S., Wu, L. and Maxson, R. (1996) The molecular basis of Boston-type craniosynostosis: the Pro148-His mutation in the N-terminal arm of the MSX2 homeodomain stabilizes DNA binding without altering nucleotide sequence preferences. Hum. Mol. Genet., 5, 1915-1920. MEDLINE Abstract

77 Liu, Y.H., Kundu, R., Wu, L., Luo, W., Ignelzi, M.A., Jr., Snead, M.L. and Maxson, R.E., Jr (1995) Premature suture closure and ectopic cranial bone in mice expressing Msx2 transgenes in the developing skull. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 6137-6141. MEDLINE Abstract

78 Winograd, J., Reilly, M.P., Roe, R., Lutz, J., Laughner, E., Xu, X., Hu, L., Asakura, T., vander Kolk, C., Strandberg, J.D. and Semenza, G.L. (1997) Perinatal lethality and multiple craniofacial malformations in MSX2 transgenic mice. Hum. Mol. Genet., 6, 369-379. MEDLINE Abstract

79 Neilson, K.M. and Friesel, R.E. (1995) Constitutive activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 by a point mutation associated with Crouzon syndrome. J. Biol. Chem., 270, 26037-26040. MEDLINE Abstract

80 Neilson, K.M. and Friesel, R. (1996) Ligand-independent activation of fibroblast growth factor receptors by point mutations in the extracellular, transmembrane, and kinase domains. J. Biol. Chem., 271, 25049-25057. MEDLINE Abstract

81 Galvin, B.D., Hart, K.C., Meyer, A.N., Webster, M.K. and Donoghue, D.J. (1996) Constitutive receptor activation of Crouzon syndrome mutations in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)2 and FGFR2/Neu chimeras. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 7894-7899.

82 Bateman, A. and Chothia, C. (1995) Outline structures for the extracellular domains of the fibroblast growth factor receptors. Nature Struct. Biol., 2, 1068-1074.

83 Coulier, F., Pontarotti, P., Roubin, R., Hartung, H., Goldfarb, M. and Birnbaum, D. (1997) Of worms and men: an evolutionary perspective on the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and FGF receptor families. J. Mol. Evol., 44, 43-56.

84 Nguyen, H.B., Estacion, M. and Gargus, J.J. (1997) Mutations causing achondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia alter bFGF-induced calcium signals in human diploid fibroblasts. Hum. Mol. Genet., 6, 681-688. MEDLINE Abstract

85 Iseki, S., Wilkie, A.O.M., Heath, J.K., Ishimaru, T., Eto, K. and Morriss-Kay, G.M. (1997) Fgfr2 and osteopontin domains in the developing skull vault are mutually exclusive and can be altered by locally applied FGF2. Development, in press.

86 Opperman, L.A., Nolen, A.A. and Ogle, R.C. (1997) TGF-[beta]1, TGF-[beta]2, and TGF-[beta]3 exhibit distinct patterns of expression during cranial suture formation and obliteration in vivo and in vitro. J. Bone Miner. Res., 12, 301-310. MEDLINE Abstract

87 Roth, D.A., Longaker, M.T., McCarthy, J.G., Rosen, D.M., McMullen, H.F., Levine, J.P., Sung, J. and Gold, L.I. (1997) Studies in cranial suture biology: Part I. Increased immunoreactivity for TGF-[beta] isoforms ([beta]1, [beta]2, and [beta]3) during rat cranial suture fusion. J. Bone Miner. Res., 12, 311-321.

88 Su, W.-C.S., Kitagawa, M., Xue, N., Xie, B., Garofalo, S., Cho, J., Deng, C., Horton, W.A. and Fu, X.-Y. (1997) Activation of Stat1 by mutant fibroblast growth-factor receptor in thanatophoric dysplasia type II dwarfism. Nature, 386, 288-292. MEDLINE Abstract

89 Marshall, C.J. (1995) Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cell, 80, 179-185. MEDLINE Abstract

90 Bresnick, S. and Schendel, S. (1995) Crouzon's disease correlates with low fibroblastic growth factor receptor activity in stenosed cranial sutures. J. Craniofac. Surg., 6, 245-248. MEDLINE Abstract

91 Moscatelli, D. (1994) Autocrine downregulation of fibroblast growth factor receptors in F9 teratocarcinoma cells. J. Cell. Physiol., 160, 555-562. MEDLINE Abstract

92 Yayon, A. and Klagsbrun, M. (1990) Autocrine transformation by chimeric signal peptide-basic fibroblast growth factor: reversal of suramin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 5346-5350. MEDLINE Abstract

93 Gaunt, S.J. (1997) Chick limbs, fly wings and homology at the fringe. Nature, 386, 324-325. MEDLINE Abstract

94 Baylies, M.K. and Bate, M. (1996) twist: a myogenic switch in Drosophila. Science, 272, 1481-1484. MEDLINE Abstract

95 Shishido, E., Higashijima, S.-i., Emori, Y. and Saigo, K. (1993) Two FGF-receptor homologues of Drosophila: one is expressed in mesodermal primordium in early embryos. Development, 117, 751-761. MEDLINE Abstract

96 Casal, J. and Leptin, M. (1996) Identification of novel genes in Drosophila reveals the complex regulation of early gene activity in the mesoderm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 10327-10332. MEDLINE Abstract

97 Beiman, M., Shilo, B.-Z. and Volk, T. (1996) Heartless, a Drosophila FGF receptor homolog, is essential for cell migration and establishment of several mesodermal lineages. Genes Dev., 10, 2993-3002. MEDLINE Abstract

98 Gisselbrecht, S., Skeath, J.B., Doe, C.Q. and Michelson, A.M. (1996) heartless encodes a fibroblast growth factor receptor (DFR1/DFGF-R2) involved in the directional migration of early mesodermal cells in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev., 10, 3003-3017.

99 Lord, P.C.W., Lin, M.-H., Hales, K.H. and Storti, R.V. (1995) Normal expression and the effects of ectopic expression of the Drosophila muscle segment homeobox (msh) gene suggest a role in differentiation and patterning of embryonic muscles. Dev. Biol., 171, 627-640.

100 D'Alessio, M. and Frasch, M. (1996) msh may play a conserved role in dorsoventral patterning of the neuroectoderm and mesoderm. Mechan. Dev., 58, 217-231.

101 Bellus, G.A., Hefferon, T.W., Ortiz de Luna, R.I., Hecht, J.T., Horton, W.A., Machado, M., Kaitila, I., McIntosh, I. and Francomano, C.A. (1995) Achondroplasia is defined by recurrent G380R mutations of FGFR3. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 56, 368-373. MEDLINE Abstract

102 Risch, N., Reich, E.W., Wishnick, M.M. and McCarthy, J.G. (1987) Spontaneous mutation and parental age in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 41, 218-248. MEDLINE Abstract

103 Szabo, J., Bellus, G.A., Kaitila, I. and Francomano, C.A. (1996) Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutations in sporadic cases of achondroplasia occur exclusively on the paternally derived chromosome. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 59 (Supplement), A287.


Tel: +44 1865 222619; Fax: +44 1865 222500; Email: awilkie@worf.molbiol.ox.ac.uk

-->
This page is maintained by OUP admin. Last updated Fri Sep 12 18:09:23 BST 1997. Part of the OUP Journals World Wide Web service. Copyright Oxford University Press, 1997


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M.-C. Ting, N. L. Wu, P. G. Roybal, J. Sun, L. Liu, Y. Yen, and R. E. Maxson Jr
EphA4 as an effector of Twist1 in the guidance of osteogenic precursor cells during calvarial bone growth and in craniosynostosis
Development, March 1, 2009; 136(5): 855 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
I. Shams, E. Rohmann, V. P. Eswarakumar, E. D. Lew, S. Yuzawa, B. Wollnik, J. Schlessinger, and I. Lax
Lacrimo-Auriculo-Dento-Digital Syndrome Is Caused by Reduced Activity of the Fibroblast Growth Factor 10 (FGF10)-FGF Receptor 2 Signaling Pathway
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2007; 27(19): 6903 - 6912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
H. Guenou, K. Kaabeche, C. Dufour, H. Miraoui, and P. J. Marie
Down-Regulation of Ubiquitin Ligase Cbl Induced by Twist Haploinsufficiency in Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome Results in Increased PI3K/Akt Signaling and Osteoblast Proliferation
Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2006; 169(4): 1303 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
A. Liasis, K. K. Nischal, B. Walters, D. Thompson, S. Hardy, A. Towell, D. Dunaway, B. Jones, R. Evans, and R. Hayward
Monitoring Visual Function in Children With Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparison of 3 Methods.
Arch Ophthalmol, August 1, 2006; 124(8): 1119 - 1126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. Desai, M. E. Shannon, M. D. Johnson, D. W. Ruff, L. A. Hughes, M. K. Kerley, D. A. Carpenter, D. K. Johnson, E. M. Rinchik, and C. T. Culiat
Nell1-deficient mice have reduced expression of extracellular matrix proteins causing cranial and vertebral defects
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2006; 15(8): 1329 - 1341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
R. A. Deckelbaum, A. Majithia, T. Booker, J. E. Henderson, and C. A. Loomis
The homeoprotein engrailed 1 has pleiotropic functions in calvarial intramembranous bone formation and remodeling
Development, January 1, 2006; 133(1): 63 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
H. Guenou, K. Kaabeche, S. L. Mee, and P. J. Marie
A role for fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 in the altered osteoblast phenotype induced by Twist haploinsufficiency in the Saethre-Chotzen syndrome
Hum. Mol. Genet., June 1, 2005; 14(11): 1429 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
K. F. Oram and T. Gridley
Mutations in Snail Family Genes Enhance Craniosynostosis of Twist1 Haplo-insufficient Mice: Implications for Saethre-Chotzen Syndrome
Genetics, June 1, 2005; 170(2): 971 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
T. Aberg, R. Rice, D. Rice, I. Thesleff, and J. Waltimo-Siren
Chondrogenic Potential of Mouse Calvarial Mesenchyme
J. Histochem. Cytochem., May 1, 2005; 53(5): 653 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
A. Mansukhani, D. Ambrosetti, G. Holmes, L. Cornivelli, and C. Basilico
Sox2 induction by FGF and FGFR2 activating mutations inhibits Wnt signaling and osteoblast differentiation
J. Cell Biol., March 28, 2005; 168(7): 1065 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
G. S. Sellick, C. Longman, J. Tolmie, R. Newbury-Ecob, L. Geenhalgh, S. Hughes, M. Whiteford, C. Garrett, and R. S. Houlston
Genomewide linkage searches for Mendelian disease loci can be efficiently conducted using high-density SNP genotyping arrays
Nucleic Acids Res., November 23, 2004; 32(20): e164 - e164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Zamurovic, D. Cappellen, D. Rohner, and M. Susa
Coordinated Activation of Notch, Wnt, and Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling Pathways in Bone Morphogenic Protein 2-induced Osteogenesis: Notch TARGET GENE Hey1 INHIBITS MINERALIZATION AND Runx2 TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem., September 3, 2004; 279(36): 37704 - 37715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
V. P. Eswarakumar, M. C. Horowitz, R. Locklin, G. M. Morriss-Kay, and P. Lonai
A gain-of-function mutation of Fgfr2c demonstrates the roles of this receptor variant in osteogenesis
PNAS, August 24, 2004; 101(34): 12555 - 12560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. Sato, N. Katsumata, M. Kagami, T. Hasegawa, N. Hori, S. Kawakita, S. Minowada, A. Shimotsuka, Y. Shishiba, M. Yokozawa, et al.
Clinical Assessment and Mutation Analysis of Kallmann Syndrome 1 (KAL1) and Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 (FGFR1, or KAL2) in Five Families and 18 Sporadic Patients
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2004; 89(3): 1079 - 1088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
M. Ishii, A. E. Merrill, Y.-S. Chan, I. Gitelman, D. P. C. Rice, H. M. Sucov, and R. E. Maxson Jr
Msx2 and Twist cooperatively control the development of the neural crest-derived skeletogenic mesenchyme of the murine skull vault
Development, December 15, 2003; 130(24): 6131 - 6142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CROBMHome page
I. Nishimura, T. A. Drake, A. J. Lusis, K. M. Lyons, J. H. Nadeau, and J. Zernik
ENU LARGE-SCALE MUTAGENESIS AND QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LINKAGE (QTL) ANALYSIS IN MICE: NOVEL TECHNOLOGIES FOR SEARCHING POLYGENETIC DETERMINANTS OF CRANIOFACIAL ABNORMALITIES
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, September 1, 2003; 14(5): 320 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K. Yu, J. Xu, Z. Liu, D. Sosic, J. Shao, E. N. Olson, D. A. Towler, and D. M. Ornitz
Conditional inactivation of FGF receptor 2 reveals an essential role for FGF signaling in the regulation of osteoblast function and bone growth
Development, July 1, 2003; 130(13): 3063 - 3074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CROBMHome page
T. Thyagarajan, S. Totey, M. J. S. Danton, and A. B. Kulkarni
GENETICALLY ALTERED MOUSE MODELS: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, May 1, 2003; 14(3): 154 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
V. P. Eswarakumar, E. Monsonego-Ornan, M. Pines, I. Antonopoulou, G. M. Morriss-Kay, and P. Lonai
The IIIc alternative of Fgfr2 is a positive regulator of bone formation
Development, March 10, 2003; 129(16): 3783 - 3793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. Tiemann-Boege, W. Navidi, R. Grewal, D. Cohn, B. Eskenazi, A. J. Wyrobek, and N. Arnheim
The observed human sperm mutation frequency cannot explain the achondroplasia paternal age effect
PNAS, November 12, 2002; 99(23): 14952 - 14957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
D. M. Ornitz and P. J. Marie
FGF signaling pathways in endochondral and intramembranous bone development and human genetic disease
Genes & Dev., June 15, 2002; 16(12): 1446 - 1465.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
N. Ohbayashi, M. Shibayama, Y. Kurotaki, M. Imanishi, T. Fujimori, N. Itoh, and S. Takada
FGF18 is required for normal cell proliferation and differentiation during osteogenesis and chondrogenesis
Genes & Dev., April 1, 2002; 16(7): 870 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
A. K. Corsi, T. M. Brodigan, E. M. Jorgensen, and M. Krause
Characterization of a dominant negative C. elegans Twist mutant protein with implications for human Saethre-Chotzen syndrome
Development, January 6, 2002; 129(11): 2761 - 2772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
P. Bellosta, A. Iwahori, A. N. Plotnikov, A. V. Eliseenkova, C. Basilico, and M. Mohammadi
Identification of Receptor and Heparin Binding Sites in Fibroblast Growth Factor 4 by Structure-Based Mutagenesis
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2001; 21(17): 5946 - 5957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
X. Li, Y. Chen, S. Scheele, E. Arman, R. Haffner-Krausz, P. Ekblom, and P. Lonai
Fibroblast Growth Factor Signaling and Basement Membrane Assembly Are Connected during Epithelial Morphogenesis of the Embryoid Body
J. Cell Biol., May 14, 2001; 153(4): 811 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. K. Hajihosseini, S. Wilson, L. De Moerlooze, and C. Dickson
A splicing switch and gain-of-function mutation in FgfR2-IIIc hemizygotes causes Apert/Pfeiffer-syndrome-like phenotypes
PNAS, March 27, 2001; 98(7): 3855 - 3860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. D. Lalioti and J. K. Heath
A new method for generating point mutations in bacterial artificial chromosomes by homologous recombination in Escherichia coli
Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2001; 29(3): e14 - e14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
J. A. Greenwald, B. J. Mehrara, J. A. Spector, S. M. Warren, P. J. Fagenholz, L. P. Smith, P. J. Bouletreau, F. E. Crisera, H. Ueno, and M. T. Longaker
In Vivo Modulation of FGF Biological Activity Alters Cranial Suture Fate
Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2001; 158(2): 441 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CROBMHome page
M. Mina
Regulation of Mandibular Growth and Morphogenesis
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 2001; 12(4): 276 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
A. Mansukhani, P. Bellosta, M. Sahni, and C. Basilico
Signaling by Fibroblast Growth Factors (Fgf) and Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 (Fgfr2)-Activating Mutations Blocks Mineralization and Induces Apoptosis in Osteoblasts
J. Cell Biol., June 12, 2000; 149(6): 1297 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
T C Hart, P S Hart, M D Michalec, Y Zhang, E Firatli, T E Van Dyke, A Stabholz, A Zlorogorski, L Shapira, and W A Soskolne
Haim-Munk syndrome and Papillon-Lefevre syndrome are allelic mutations in cathepsin C
J. Med. Genet., February 1, 2000; 37(2): 88 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
D. Rice, T Aberg, Y Chan, Z Tang, P. Kettunen, L Pakarinen, R. Maxson, and I Thesleff
Integration of FGF and TWIST in calvarial bone and suture development
Development, January 5, 2000; 127(9): 1845 - 1855.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CROBMHome page
T.C. Hart, M.L. Marazita, and J.T. Wright
The Impact of Molecular Genetics on Oral Health Paradigms
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 2000; 11(1): 26 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
W. Reardon, A. Smith, J. W Honour, P. Hindmarsh, D. Das, G. Rumsby, I. Nelson, S. Malcolm, L. Adès, D. Sillence, et al.
Evidence for digenic inheritance in some cases of Antley-Bixler syndrome?
J. Med. Genet., January 1, 2000; 37(1): 26 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
T. Higashimoto, S. Yano, M. Ito, N. C. Clark-Sheehan, L. Cowan, and R. G. Boles
Rapid Detection of FGFR Mutations in Syndromic Craniosynostosis by Temporal Temperature Gradient Gel Electrophoresis
Clin. Chem., November 1, 1999; 45(11): 2005 - 2006.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
J. KUNZ, M. HUDLER, B. FRITZ, G. GILLESSEN-KAESBACH, and E. PASSARGE
Identification of a frameshift mutation in the gene TWIST in a family affected with Robinow-Sorauf syndrome
J. Med. Genet., August 1, 1999; 36(8): 650 - 652.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Orthod.Home page
P. A. Mossey
The Heritability of Malocclusion: Part 1—Genetics, Principles and Terminology
J. Orthod., June 1, 1999; 26(2): 103 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
D STEINBERGER, U MÜLLER, T H JÜNGER, H P HOWALDT, and P CHRISTOPHIS
Mutation of FGFR2 (cys278phe) in craniolacunia and pansynostosis
J. Med. Genet., June 1, 1999; 36(6): 499 - 500.
[Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Wang, M. K. Spatz, K. Kannan, H. Hayk, A. Avivi, M. Gorivodsky, M. Pines, A. Yayon, P. Lonai, and D. Givol
A mouse model for achondroplasia produced by targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor 3
PNAS, April 13, 1999; 96(8): 4455 - 4460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
S. M. Vickers, L. A. MacMillan-Crow, M. Green, C. Ellis, and J. A. Thompson
Association of Increased Immunostaining for Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase and Nitrotyrosine With Fibroblast Growth Factor Transformation in Pancreatic Cancer
Arch Surg, March 1, 1999; 134(3): 245 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
S Iseki, A. Wilkie, and G. Morriss-Kay
Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 have distinct differentiation- and proliferation-related roles in the developing mouse skull vault
Development, January 12, 1999; 126(24): 5611 - 5620.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C Tribioli and T Lufkin
The murine Bapx1 homeobox gene plays a critical role in embryonic development of the axial skeleton and spleen
Development, January 12, 1999; 126(24): 5699 - 5711.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
E. Lajeunie, V. El Ghouzzi, M. Le Merrer, A. Munnich, J. Bonaventure, and D. Renier
Sex related expressivity of the phenotype in coronal craniosynostosis caused by the recurrent P250R FGFR3 mutation
J. Med. Genet., January 1, 1999; 36(1): 9 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (214)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkie, A. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkie, A. O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?