| Human Molecular Genetics | Pages |
Aberrant processing of the Fugu HD (FrHD) mRNA in mouse cells and in transgenic mice
Introduction
Results
Expression profile of the FrHD gene
The FrHD gene is expressed from its own promoter in mouse cells
Generation of mice transgenic for FrHD
Expression of the FrHD gene in mouse in vivo and in vitro
Discussion
Materials And Methods
Generation and characterisation of L-cell transfectants and transgenic mice
Expression analysis
DNA sequencing
Acknowledgements
References
Aberrant processing of the Fugu HD (FrHD) mRNA in mouse cells and in transgenic mice
INTRODUCTION
Brenner et al. have recently proposed that the pufferfish (Fugu rubripes) provides an ideal model vertebrate for the discovery of human genes (
A more detailed characterisation of the Fugu genome is emerging from the initial comparative sequencing projects (
Comparative sequence analysis between the Fugu and mammalian genomes should also be useful in pinpointing the position of sequences important in the control of gene expression. This approach has been successful in the discovery of poorly mapped enhancers in the Hox-b cluster (
Figure
The HD gene was one of the first genes for which a sequence comparison between human and Fugu homologues has been conducted ( The Fugu homologue of the HD gene (FrHD) covers 23 kb, which is 7.4-fold smaller than the human gene (170 kb) and is consistent with the relative genome sizes. All 67 exons and the exon-intron boundaries are conserved and the coding region is 69% identical at the nucleotide level ( One possible further application of Fugu genes is their use in transgenic mouse assays (
Table
Position
Name
Primer sequence
Direction
Exon 1
43567
5[prime] CCACCAACCGCCGAGGAAATC 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 3
43566
5[prime] TCCAGAATTTCAGAAACTGCTCGG 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 6
43568
5[prime] GTGTCCCAGAGCAGCCATGATC 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 8
45292
5[prime] GTCAACACCATCAGCCTGAAAGG 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 8
45293
5[prime] GGCCTCCTTCTGCATGACGCC 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 10
45294
5[prime] GGTCTACCTGCAGTCCACTCCT 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 12
40022
5[prime] AACATCACTCCAGAAACGGTCGAA 3[prime]
Forward
Intron 12
40028
5[prime] TAGAACGTAACCCACGGTTACGGT 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 13
45295
5[prime] CGATCTGCATCCCAGAATACTGG 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 14
40023
5[prime] AGGTTCGTCTTTGGGTATGAAACG 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 16
45296
5[prime] TGCTGACAGGACAGAAGAATGGG 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 16
45297
5[prime] CACGCGCACGTCCCTGTCCG 3'
Reverse
Exon 19
44555
5[prime] TGGTGGACCTGTTCGCGCTCAAGGACT 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 19
40069
5[prime] TGCTGCCACACAGCGACATGATG 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 22
40070
5[prime] CTCGTCTCCAGGTTGTTCTTTGAT 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 22
40071
5[prime] TCAACTGCGAGGGAGGTTGTGTT 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 25
40024
5[prime] GCACTCCGGCCTCTTCTACA 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 25
44554
5[prime] GAGTAATGACAGCACCATATTAGCCGT 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 26
45298
5[prime] CTGGGCCGGGGAAGATGACAG 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 26
45299
5[prime] GGTTCCTCCATTTTATGGGTGCC 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 27
40025
5[prime] GCAGAGCTGGAATCAACCGCA 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 28
40073
5[prime] GCCAACAGAAAGCACAGGATCAAC 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 28
40072
5[prime] GCCAAGGGTGGTAGATTTATGCAC 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 30
40043
5[prime] GTTTCTCCAGAGAACCGACCAT 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 30
40074
5[prime] TAGCCATGGTCGGTTCTCTGGAG 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 31
40044
5[prime] GCCAGATTGGTACCAAACAGGG 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 35
45300
5[prime] CCGAAGCAATCATTCCCAACATCT 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 35
45301
5[prime] TTGCTTGGAGTGGTAACGCTCATA 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 39
45302
5[prime] GAGCTGTCCCTCTCCCCACATC 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 40
40075
5[prime] GGAAGAGATGTCATCCAACAGGAC 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 47
45304
5[prime] CTGACCTCTTGAGCGTCATGAGT 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 48
45305
5[prime] GGAGACTTAGGTTGAATTCCTTGC 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 50
40077
5[prime] GCACCTACTCCAGGACCAGTTG 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 50
40076
5[prime] TGCAGGGCCAAACACAGACATGAC 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 52
40045
5[prime] AAGGTCTTCAGAGCGTCCTTTC 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 52
40046
5[prime] GATGATATTGCGTAAAGTCGGTG 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 55
40078
5[prime] CTTGAGCGTACCCAGCTGAACGT 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 55
40079
5[prime] GTGTTTCCAGGGCCTTGAGGCT 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 59
45306
5[prime] CATACTCATCAGTGAAGTCGTTCG 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 59
40054
5[prime] CGAACGACTTCACTGATGAGTATG 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 63
40108
5[prime] TTGTCTCGTGTTGACGGGGAA 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 63
40109
5[prime] CGATGGCATGTTCACTCTGT 3[prime]
Reverse
Exon 65
47293
5[prime] CAGGATATCATGAACAAGGTCATCG 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 66
47295
5[prime] GTCCCTGTCCAACTTCACTCAG 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 67
46852
5[prime] GGAGCTGGACCGCAGGGCTT 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 67
46853
5[prime] TCTTCGAGACCGTGGCCTCGC 3[prime]
Forward
Exon 67
45308
5[prime] AGCATCTAGAGCGGCCGCTTAGAGCGATTTATCCTGATGGATC 3[prime]
Reverse
3[prime]UTR
40051
5[prime] CGTTACTCGCACATACACTTGCCT 3[prime]
Forward
3[prime]UTR
40058
5[prime] CGCATGCTTAGCATTACTGCTTAG 3[prime]
Forward
3[prime]UTR
40050
5[prime] TCAGCTCCATCCGCTGTGAAT 3[prime]
Forward
3[prime]UTR
40059
5[prime] AAGCAGCAGAAGGTTCAGTGAGAA 3[prime]
Forward
3[prime]RACE RT
Qt
5[prime] CCAGTGAGCAGAGTGACGAGGACTCGAGCTCAAGC(T)17 -3[prime]
3[prime]RACE PCR1
Qo
5[prime] CCAGTGAGCAGAGTGACG 3[prime]
Reverse
3[prime]RACE PCR2
Qi
5[prime] GAGGACTCGAGCTCAAGC 3[prime]
Reverse
RESULTS
Expression profile of the FrHD gene
The human and mouse HD genes are both widely expressed in brain and peripheral tissues. Prior to the analysis of the FrHD gene in mouse we set out to ensure that the processed mRNA in Fugu tissues was as predicted from the sequence comparison of the genomic Fugu sequence with that of the human and mouse cDNAs. By Northern analysis, the gene was found to be expressed in all tissues tested except muscle (Fig. The genomic sequence of the FrHD gene predicted that there were three possible polyadenylation signals. We performed 3[prime] RACE to identify the presence of different polyadenylated mRNA forms in Fugu RNA prepared from a number of Fugu tissues. In all cases, PCR products corresponding to the use of the polyadenylation signals predicted at positions 26080 (AGTAAA) and 27410 (ATTAAA) were present, but that corresponding to 26884 (AGTAAA) was not found (Fig.
The FrHD gene is expressed from its own promoter in mouse cells
Comparative sequence analysis of the promoter regions of the Fugu and human HD genes did not reveal any similar sequence motifs. In addition, the GC content was not raised. Therefore, before generating constructs for transgenesis it was important to determine whether the Fugu promoter was functional in mouse cells. To test this, a 30 kb EagI fragment (Fig.
Figure
Generation of mice transgenic for FrHD
The 30 kb EagI fragment containing the FrHD gene was used to generate transgenic mice by standard procedures. Two founders were recovered from 51 newborns, FrHD43 (male) and FrHD46 (female), both of which transmitted the transgene to their offspring. The genomic structure of the integration sites was determined by Southern analysis (Fig.
Expression of the FrHD gene in mouse in vivo and in vitro
As only one transgenic founder containing intact copies of the FrHD gene was recovered, the expression analysis was performed on this transgenic line and two of the L-cell transfectants in parallel. The primers described in Table
Table
Figure
Figure
A sequence analysis of the aberrant splice products was initiated. The sequence of the RT-PCR product from exons 1-8 showed that intron 7 (81 bp) had been retained. This was identical to one of the aberrant splice forms identified in the Fugu tissues, and it maintains the reading frame of the message. The 3[prime] 84 bp of intron 4 was also found arising from the presence of a possible branch site sequence (CATTTAT) 20 nucleotides prior to an internal splice acceptor site (Y6AG). This aberrant splice product contained four in-frame stop codons and would be incompatible with the production of a full length FrHD protein. All of the transgene mouse tissues tested and the L-cell transfectants showed no evidence of a correctly spliced product that did not contain the in-frame stop codons in intron 4. Sequencing of the many other aberrant splice forms was not pursued once this result had been obtained.
Differential polyadenylation was found to originate from the polyadenylation signals predicted at positions 26080 (AGTAAA) and 27410 (ATTAAA) in the genomic sequence. Therefore the same polyadenylation signals were used in both the Fugu and mouse cells. However, in mouse there was no evidence of the brain-specific product detected in Fugu (Fig.
RT-PCR product
Fugu product (bp)
Product size
Oligo detection
Hyridisation oligo
Transgene
Cell line
Transgene
Cell line
Exon 1-8
884
970
970
+
+
43568(ex 3)
803
870
870
+
+
43568(ex 3)
Exon 8-13
869
~900
~900
+
+
40022(ex12)
840
~840
~840
+
+
40022(ex12)
~800
~800
+
+
40022(ex12)
~550
~550
-
-
40022(ex12)
Exon 12-16
554
ND
~554
ND
+
40023(ex14)
ND
~520
ND
+
40023(ex14)
ND
~450
ND
+
40023(ex14)
Exon 16-25
1237
~1380
~1380
+
+
44555(ex19)
~1300
~1300
+
+
44555(ex19)
~670
+
44555(ex19)
Exon26-31
668
668
668
+
+
45299(ex26)
~600
~600
+
+
45299(ex26)
~450
~450
+
+
45299(ex26)
668
668
+
+
40073(ex28)
~600
~600
-
-
40073(ex28)
~450
~450
-
-
40073(ex28)
Exon 30-35
640
640
640
ND
ND
Exon 35-40
827
~1300
~950
+
+
45302(ex39)
~700
~900
+
+
45302(ex39)
~650
~700
+
+
45302(ex39)
~550
~650
-
+
45302(ex39)
~550
-
45302(ex39)
Exon 39-48
1371
1371
1371
ND
ND
Exon 52-59
1008
~1300
~1350
+
+
40079(ex55)
~1150
~1300
+
+
40079(ex55)
~700
~1250
-
+
40079(ex55)
~1200
+
40079(ex55)
~1150
+
40079(ex55)
~750
+
40079(ex55)
~700
-
40079(ex55)
Exon 55-59
631
~1300
~1300
++
+
40079(ex55)
~1070
~1070
++
+
40079(ex55)
~872
~872
+
++
40079(ex55)
~840
~840
+
++
40079(ex55)
Exon 59-67
1368
~1360
~1400
+
+
47293(ex65)
1257
~1257
~1360
++
+
47293(ex65)
~1257
+
47293(ex65)
DISCUSSION
Comparative sequencing projects between the genomes of human and Fugu rubripes are providing increasing evidence that Fugu represents a good model genome for the identification of human genes and control elements (
It was difficult to predict whether the Fugu promoter would be functional in mouse cells. The Fugu and human 5[prime] UTR sequences are 46% identical at the nucleotide level, and possible conserved regulatory sequences are not apparent (
In human there are two differentially polyadenylated isoforms of the HD mRNA generating 3[prime] untranslated regions of 600 and 3921 bp which Northern analysis suggests show a tissue-specific relative abundance (
Although the FrHD gene was found to be expressed from its own promoter in mouse cells and polyadenylation was conserved, we found multiple instances of aberrant splicing throughout the mRNA. In metazoans, high fidelity in pre-mRNA splicing is important at three distinct points during the splicing pathway: first during the initial recognition of the 5[prime] and 3[prime] splice site; second for connecting the correct pairs of 5[prime] and 3[prime] splice sites across the intron; and third for selecting the precise bonds for cleavage at each 5[prime] and 3[prime] splice site. The cis-acting sequences in the pre-mRNA that participate in the initial complex formation are localized to a ~300 nucleotide region containing the branchpoint sequence (BPS), the 3[prime] splice site, the exon and the 5[prime] splice site, and it is the spacing of each of these elements within the 300 nucleotide region that determines whether complex assembly will occur. This model suggests that cryptic splice sites are not recognised because they are not situated at the appropriate distances from the multiple elements involved in efficient complex assembly (
Prior to studying the processing of the Fugu pre-mRNA transcript in mouse cells, we used RT-PCR to test whether the Fugu pre-mRNA was processed in Fugu tissues as predicted from the comparison of the human and Fugu genes. Amplification products of the predicted size were obtained across the entire gene except in three regions. The retention of intron 7 and the use of an internal splice acceptor in intron 63 maintains the reading frame of the message. All tissues contained both the intron 7 spliced and non-spliced isoforms. However, only brain contained both of the intron 63 isoforms, all other tissues tested containing only the alternatively spliced version. The identification in Fugu tissues of the incorrectly spliced isoform that has skipped exon 10 and retains intron 11 was unexpected, as this contains in-frame stop codons and is incompatible with the production of a full length protein. Not surprisingly, all tissues were also found to contain the correctly spliced version.
The expression analysis of the FrHD transfectants and transgenes would suggest that Fugu genes are unlikely to be useful in the construction of transgenic mice. The reduction of intron size appears severely to stress the fidelity of the mouse splicing machinery. The Fugu splicing complexes must have evolved in parallel to compensate for a reduction in the spacing of the cis-elements important for complex assembly. The identification of at least one aberrant splice form which would terminate the FrHD protein relatively close to its N-terminus suggests that the reduction in the size of the FrHD gene may have reached an equilibrium. The selective pressures causing the Fugu genome to lose DNA are not known. However, it is possible that the inability correctly to process pre-mRNAs once intron size has decreased beyond a certain threshold size acts as a counter selection to this DNA loss.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Generation and characterisation of L-cell transfectants and transgenic mice
Mouse L-cells were co-transfected with 25 [mu]g of the 30 kb EagI fragment containing the FrHD gene and 1 [mu]g of the PGK-neo plasmid pKJ1 per 2.5 × 107 cells by calcium phosphate precipitation as previously described (
Expression analysis
RNA was prepared from cell lines and tissues as described (
DNA sequencing
PCR products were either blunt ended by T4 DNA polymerase (NEB) as recommended by the manufacturer at 12°C for 25 min, and subcloned into SmaI cut bluescript plasmid (Stratagene) after the addition of 5[prime] phosphates using T4 DNA kinase (NEB), or purified by Geneclean (Bio 101 Inc.) and sequenced directly. Sequencing was by dideoxy chain termination (
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank John Copier and Adrian Kelly for advice concerning calcium phosphate transfections and Adrienne Knight for proof reading the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the MRC, Hereditary Disease Foundation (in the form of an award donated by Harry Liebermann) and Special Trustees of St. Thomas's Hospital.
REFERENCES
This page is maintained by OUP admin. Last updated Sat Oct 18 13:41:19 BST 1997. Part of the OUP Journals World Wide Web service.
Copyright
Oxford University Press, 1997
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. F. Bumaschny, F. S. J. de Souza, R. A. Lopez Leal, A. M. Santangelo, M. Baetscher, D. H. Levi, M. J. Low, and M. Rubinstein Transcriptional Regulation of Pituitary POMC Is Conserved at the Vertebrate Extremes Despite Great Promoter Sequence Divergence Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 21(11): 2738 - 2749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Yeo, S. Hoon, B. Venkatesh, and C. B. Burge Variation in sequence and organization of splicing regulatory elements in vertebrate genes PNAS, November 2, 2004; 101(44): 15700 - 15705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Miles, L. Rankin, S. I. Smith, M. Niksic, G. Elgar, and N. D. Hastie Faithful expression of a tagged Fugu WT1 protein from a genomic transgene in zebrafish: efficient splicing of pufferfish genes in zebrafish but not mice Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2003; 31(11): 2795 - 2802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Pozzoli, G. Elgar, R. Cagliani, L. Riva, G. P. Comi, N. Bresolin, A. Bardoni, and M. Sironi Comparative Analysis of Vertebrate Dystrophin Loci Indicate Intron Gigantism as a Common Feature Genome Res., May 1, 2003; 13(5): 764 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gillemans, T. McMorrow, R. Tewari, A. W. K. Wai, C. Burgtorf, D. Drabek, N. Ventress, A. Langeveld, D. Higgs, K. Tan-Un, et al. Functional and comparative analysis of globin loci in pufferfish and humans Blood, April 1, 2003; 101(7): 2842 - 2849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Gottgens, L. M. Barton, M. A. Chapman, A. M. Sinclair, B. Knudsen, D. Grafham, J. G.R. Gilbert, J. Rogers, D. R. Bentley, and A. R. Green Transcriptional Regulation of the Stem Cell Leukemia Gene (SCL) --- Comparative Analysis of Five Vertebrate SCL Loci Genome Res., May 1, 2002; 12(5): 749 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sathasivam, B. Woodman, A. Mahal, F. Bertaux, E. E. Wanker, D. T. Shima, and G. P. Bates Centrosome disorganization in fibroblast cultures derived from R6/2 Huntington's disease (HD) transgenic mice and HD patients Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2001; 10(21): 2425 - 2435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||





