| Human Molecular Genetics | Pages |
NF2 gene in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients
Introduction
Results
Sequencing the NF2 locus
Search for point mutations
Search for NF2 rearrangement
In situ hybridization analyses
Patients without identifiable NF2 alteration
Discussion
Materials And Methods
Patients and cell lines
NF2 sequence determination
Point mutation screening
Southern blot and probes
RT-PCR procedure
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
Acknowledgements
References
NF2 gene in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients
DDBJ/EMBL GenBank accession no. Y18000
INTRODUCTION
Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is an autosomal dominant disorder that predisposes to nervous system tumors. Bilateral vestibular schwannomas are pathognomonic of the disease, whereas schwannomas at other locations, meningiomas, ependymomas and early-onset lenticular opacities frequently are associated with the phenotype (1-4). The NF2 disease is rare and occurs with a birth incidence between 1 in 33 000 and 1 in 40 000 in the north-west of England population (4). The estimated penetrance of the disease is >95% (1,4). Approximately half of the NF2 patients are new cases and are presumed to be the result of de novo gene mutations (2,4). The NF2 mutation rate was estimated to be 6.5 × 10-6 (4), a frequency that is compatible with that reported for the Von Hippel-Lindau gene (4.4 × 10-6) (5), but smaller than that of the NF1 gene (3.1-10.4 × 10-5) (6).
At least two clinical subtypes of NF2 have been described: the severe (Wishart) type has an early onset, a rapid course and is characterized by a marked predisposition to meningiomas and spinal tumors in addition to vestibular schwannomas (7), whereas the mild (Gardner) type has a late onset, and a comparatively benign course with a low incidence of meningiomas and spinal tumors (8). In general, NF2 manifestations are similar among members of a family, although some families with both mild and severe forms have been described (9). All linkage analyses are compatible with the existence of a single locus for NF2, that is localized on chromosome 22 (10,11).
The NF2 gene was identified on chromosome 22q12 by positional cloning strategies (12,13). The schwannomin (also termed merlin) protein encoded by the NF2 gene shows a close relationship to the family of cytoskeleton-to-membrane proteins linkers ERM (ezrin-radixin-moesin proteins). Schwannomin interacts with actin-based cytoskeletal structures (14-16) but its function remains poorly understood. However, recurrent observations of biallelic NF2 inactivation in schwannomas, meningiomas and mesotheliomas indicates that schwannomin acts as a tumor suppressor (12,13,17).
Identification of the NF2 gene enabled a search to be made for mutations in NF2 patients. Since its discovery, the application of single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) or the direct sequencing of exons has led to the identification of >100 different germline point mutations (12,13,18-22). Mutations have been described for all NF2 exons with the exception of exons 9 and the translated part of exons 16 and 17. Major hot spots for mutations have not been observed. The majority of observed germline NF2 mutations are nonsense, frameshift or splice site mutations which result in gene products with an altered or absent C-terminal domain. Such truncated proteins are generally unstable (16). A small number of mutations preserve this domain. They include missense mutations, in-frame internal deletions or splice site mutations causing exon skipping without frameshift (12,13,18-22). The search for genotype-phenotype correlations has revealed a link between mutations generating a truncated NF2 product and disease severity (21,22).
Point mutations have been observed in 34-66% of NF2 patients analyzed (12,13,18-22). Large size deletions have been described only rarely, and a single case of chromosomal translocation interrupting the gene has also been reported (12,13,23-25). The latter rearrangements, which escape detection by the techniques usually applied for the screening of point mutations, have never been searched for systematically because of the large size of the gene (90 kb). Furthermore, the search for mutations in non-coding, but functional, regions of the gene has been hampered by the lack of knowledge of their complete sequence. In order to provide tools that would enable exhaustive alteration screening for the NF2 gene, we have deduced its entire genomic sequence. This knowledge has enabled the design of a mutation screening strategy which, when applied to a series of 19 NF2 patients, has revealed a high recurrence of large deletions in the gene and has raised the efficiency of mutation detection in NF2 patients to 84% of the cases analyzed.
RESULTS
Sequencing the NF2 locus
Genomic sequencing totaling 125 kb was centered around the NF2 gene. It contains the entire NF2 gene with 8.7 kb centromeric and 26.7 kb telomeric (Fig. Figure 1. Schematic representation of the NF2 region corresponding to the 120 kb of genomic sequence. Restriction sites for EcoRI (E), BamHI (B) and HindIII (H) enzymes are indicated. Gray boxes represent repetitive sequences, numbered black boxes NF2 exons, dotted white boxes CpG islands, and triangles the ribulose-5[prime]-phosphate-epimerase pseudogene region. Numbered black lines represent probes used in Southern blot analysis. FISH probes are indicated. Analysis of the 120 kb sequence with the GRAIL 1.2 program, using the definition of Gardiner-Garden and Frommer (27), indicated the presence of two CpG islands (Fig. Apart from the NF2 exons, the GRAIL 1. 2 software predicted no additional consistent protein-coding region. Search for homology with a BLAST request detected 1 kb in the first intron (coordinate 13 401-14 453) homologous to both ARSH1 (human autonomous replicating sequence H1) (28) and to the human putative ribulose-5[prime]-phosphate-epimerase (90% identity in nucleotides). Computer translation of the homologous region identified two frameshifts indicating that the NF2 intron 1 contains a ribulose-5[prime]-phosphate-epimerase pseudogene.
Search for point mutations
NF2 exons and their boundaries were scanned in 19 unrelated patients with a confirmed NF2 disease. Exons 1-15 and exon 17 were screened by DGGE, whereas exon 16 and the 5[prime]- and 3[prime]-non-coding regions were screened by direct sequencing. Mutations were identified in 10 patients and were localized in exon 2, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14 or 15 (Table 1). All mutations were private, half of them occurring in consensus splicing sequences. Four caused a frameshift and one a nonsense mutation. No mutation was found in CpG1, but four biallelic DNA variants were identified. Similarly, in the 1.1 kb 3[prime]-non-coding region adjacent to exon 17, a biallelic variant was identified. However, genotyping of 28 independent CEPH individuals revealed the polymorphic nature of these variants (Table
Figure 2. Detection of rearranged bands in NF2 patients. A Southern blot was performed of a BamHI digest and hybridized with NF2 probe 5 (A) and an EWS probe (B). Statement GL13 demonstrated a rearranged band with probe 5 (arrow). The intensity of the GL08 band in (A) is decreased in (B), indicating a possible deletion of NF2 probe 5. Table 1.
Patient
Exon
Mutation type
Codon position
Consequence
Age at onset
Transmission
Gravity
GL9a
2
Aggt->Agtt
J80/81
splice donor
35
F
M
GL3a
7
T deletion
216
frameshift
17
N
S
GL16a
7
acggt del
217-128
frameshift
19
N
S
GL22a
7
GGgt->Ggtt
J225/226
splice donor
27
N
S
GL18a
8
C del
262
frameshift
17
F
S
GL2a
11
C to T
341
nonsense
18
F
S
GL5a
12
Aggt->Agat
J447/448
splice donor
22
F
S
GL06
14
del C
482
frameshift
22
N
S
GL20
14
cagCC->cgCC
J481/482
splice acceptor
30
F
M
GL14a
15
agAG->gg
J525/526
splice acceptor
20
N
S
GL01
1-17
deletion
1-595
hemizygosity
22
F
M
GL04
1-17
deletion
1-595
hemizygosity
16
F
M
GL10
1-17
deletion
1-595
hemizygosity
26
N
M
GL21b
1-17
deletion
1-595
hemizygosity
24
F
M
GL08
1-8
deletion
1-270
hemizygosity
30
N
M
GL13
4
deletion
122-149
deletion exon 4
19
N
M
GL07
43
N
S
GL11
19
N
M
GL15
32
N
S
Table 2.
| Locus | Position in NF2 sequencea | Polymorphic sequence | % heterozygosity |
| nfprom1 | 8240 | cccG/Cggt | 58 |
| nfprom2 | 8348 | tgc6T/7Tgca | 54 |
| nfprom3 | 8787 | gggC/Accg | 43 |
| nfprom4 | 8881 | cggC/Gcag | 31 |
| nfp3[prime]nc | 99632 | tcaC/Ttgt | 39 |
Search for NF2 rearrangement
In order to enable the detection and location of the boundaries of chromosomal rearrangements implicating the NF2 gene, Southern blot analyses were performed of DNAs from nine NF2 patients with unidentified mutation and 10 controls. These blots were hybridized sequentially with 12 probes derived from the single copy regions of the NF2 gene as indicated in Figure
In situ hybridization analyses
The presence of large deletions may be monitored and explored by in situ hybridization on metaphasic chromosomes. However, this approach is difficult because of the high content of repeated sequences in the 5[prime] region of the NF2 gene. Based on the genomic sequence, three probes each composed of three amplified fragments devoid of repeated sequence were designed (Fig.
Metaphases obtained from nine patients with unidentified point mutations were hybridized successively with the three fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes and the number of copies of labeled chromosome 22 was determined. In 95% of the normal metaphases, the two copies of chromosome 22 were labeled and the background was negligible (Fig.
Figure 3. Detection of deletion by FISH. Metaphases from patient GL08 hybridized with FISH probes 1 (A) and 3 (B). The arrow indicates the deleted chromosome 22.
Patients without identifiable NF2 alteration
Screening by DGGE, Southern blot, FISH and promoter sequencing of 19 NF2 patients failed to reveal any NF2 gene alterations in three cases. In these cases, RT-PCR analyses were performed. The amplified products exhibited a normal size, and the absence of a point mutation was confirmed by direct sequencing. In order to explore the putative silencing of one allele of the NF2 gene, polymorphisms in the 3[prime] and/or 5[prime] transcribed non-coding regions were analyzed at the DNA and RNA levels. Heterozygosity for at least one locus was evidenced in genomic DNA from these three patients. In all cases, sequencing of the cDNAs demonstrated that both alleles were expressed (Fig.
Figure 4. Comparative amplification of genomic DNA and cDNA to detect silent NF2 alleles. The NF2 sequence is schematized with exons (boxes), introns (stippled lines), stop and start codon (ATG and TAG) and polymorphic bases (black arrows). The localization of primers used for PCR amplification on DNA and cDNA is indicated by gray and white arrows, respectively.
DISCUSSION
This work provides the first exhaustive search for NF2 gene alterations in patients meeting the criteria for NF2. By a conventional search for point mutations in the coding region, we identified deleterious alterations in 52% of the cases, a percentage that is comparable with those previously published for other series (12,13,18-22). Strikingly, in two-thirds of the remaining cases, a deletion which encompassed at least one entire exon was evidenced. Among these six deletions, one was intragenic involving a 1.5 kb fragment including exon 4, another removed the 5[prime] half of the NF2 gene. Exon 4 deletion in patient GL13 is in-frame, indicating the possible localization of an important functional domain between amino acids 122 and 149. Recently the region between amino acids 122 and 185 has been identified as mediating the intermolecular association of the schwannomin with the N-terminal domain of the ERM proteins (29). Thus, the exon 4 deletion could contribute to delimit more precisely this domain of interaction in the schwannomin protein. The last four deletions encompassed the entire NF2 gene, indicating that the deletion was at least 90 kb long. In one of these cases, GL10, the deletion was shown to include the EWS gene, which is 350 kb centromeric to NF2. When intragenic, the boundaries of these large deletions appear to be localized at various positions. However, many boundaries are localized outside of the NF2 gene in regions that have not yet been sequenced. Thus, the mechanism underlying the high incidence of large deletions in NF2 patients remains currently unknown, contrasting this observation to that of multiple small mutations in the NF1 gene as the most common mutation mechanism (30).
In the present series, all 10 point mutations are predicted to generate exon skipping or translation frameshifts, and eight of these patients manifest a severe phenotype. In contrast, all six patients with a genomic deletion had a mild phenotype. Five patients carrying large deletions extending out of the NF2 gene did not manifest additional symptoms. In particular, analysis of patient GL10 suggests that hemizygosity for EWS may not have additional deleterious consequences. The observation of a mild NF2 phenotype associated with large NF2 deletions is in sharp contrast to the severe clinical features of patients with large NF1 deletions (31).
Since the NF2 gene is located on an autosome, large deletions escape detection by the usual screening techniques for point mutations that are based on PCR amplification of individual exons (i.e. SSCP, DGGE and heteroduplex analysis). The present sequencing of the entire NF2 gene has provided a reliable FISH method to search for genomic deletions. The identification of intronic regions devoid of repeated elements has been exploited fruitfully to develop probes that display intense specific labeling on metaphasic chromosomes. Large genomic alterations were evidenced by this FISH method in five out of 19 NF2 patients (26%), thus demonstrating its effectiveness and suggesting FISH as a powerful tool for the systematic screening of patients. Nevertheless, small intragenic deletions encompassing one or more exons, as observed for case GL13, were not detected by the FISH procedure. In such cases, if the deletion does not abrogate transcription of the mutant allele, an aberrantly sized transcript can be detectable by RT-PCR. Moreover, silent alleles or alleles that yield an unstable transcript can be detected by comparison of the homozygous/heterozygous status at the DNA and cDNA levels (Fig.
The presence of normal transcripts expressed from the two alleles, combined with the lack of alteration detected by FISH, RT-PCR and DGGE on all exons, provides a demonstration that both alleles of the NF2 gene are functional. Such a demonstration was obtained on lymphoblastoid cell lines from three patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas. Thus, these patients meet the criteria for NF2, but are likely to have two functional NF2 alleles in their lymphoblastoid cell lines. This hypothesis was supported further by the direct sequencing of all NF2 exons. Although we cannot exclude that mutation in a gene distinct from NF2 may be responsible for the phenotype of these patients, the observation that all three patients are new mutants suggests the presence of a mosaic NF2 mutation which does not involve the B lymphocyte compartment. One such case has recently been reported (32). In familial cases, only the affected individual from the oldest generation is a putative mosaic patient, and mutations should be evidenced in the younger generations. In sporadic NF2 cases, such as those reported here, demonstration of mosaicism relies on the availability of samples from different tissues or from multiple independent tumors and is, therefore, more difficult to document.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients and cell lines
Lymphoblastoid cell lines have been established of 19 independent NF2 patients from 1987 to 1993. Patients were collected by G. Fischer in neurosurgery departments of the Rhone-Alpes region in France. Clinical data were collected for all patients and met the diagnostic criteria for NF2 as defined by the 1991 NIH consensus conference statement. Patients were classified as mildly (M) or severely (S) affected according to the criteria described by Evans et al. (4) (Table 1).
NF2 sequence determination
Cosmids 72C, 101D, 142A and 57C were isolated from the LL22NCO1 library by a chromosome-walking procedure and overlap a 140 kb genomic region containing the entire NF2 gene (12). These four cosmids were sequenced entirely using a shotgun procedure as described previously (33). The whole NF2 sequence is deposited in the EMBL database (accession no. Y18000).
Point mutation screening
Mutation screening by DGGE was performed essentially as described in Mérel et al. (19). Screening for mutation in the 5[prime] UTR, 3[prime] UTR and exon 16 alternative was performed by direct sequencing of PCR products. PCR primer sequences and conditions are available on the Fondation Jean Dausset/CEPH web server (http://www.cephb/nf2deletion ).
Southern blot and probes
Southern blotting was performed according to standard procedures after digestion by EcoRI, BamHI or HindIII (34). Probes were obtained by PCR (Fig.
RT-PCR procedure
In all cases with unknown NF2 alterations, four RT-PCR amplifications were performed using the GeneAmp RNA PCR kit (Perkin-Elmer) with an oligo(dT) priming and primers described in Deguen et al. (35). Transcribed polymorphisms in the 5[prime]- and 3[prime]-non-coding regions were searched for by sequencing products amplified with primers NF5[prime]UTRF- NF5[prime]UTRR and NF3[prime]UTF-NF3[prime]UTR from the NF2 cDNA (http://www.cephb/nf2deletion ). Polymorphic loci were characterized on the set of 28 reference CEPH individuals used by Weissenbach et al. (36).
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
In situ hybridization was performed using amplified PCR products described in Figure
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Ronald Von der Neut and Marco Giovannini for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from Groupe de Recherche et d'Etude des Génomes (GREG) and Fondation Jean Dausset/CEPH.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 13 Nov 1998
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1998.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M E Baser, L Kuramoto, R Woods, H Joe, J M Friedman, A J Wallace, R T Ramsden, S Olschwang, E Bijlsma, M Kalamarides, et al.
The location of constitutional neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) splice site mutations is associated with the severity of NF2
J. Med. Genet.,
July 1, 2005;
42(7):
540 - 546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
F. Nunes and M. MacCollin
Neurofibromatosis 2 in the Pediatric Population
J Child Neurol,
October 1, 2003;
18(10):
718 - 724.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M E Baser, L Kuramoto, H Joe, J M Friedman, A J Wallace, R T Ramsden, and D G R Evans
Genotype-phenotype correlations for cataracts in neurofibromatosis 2
J. Med. Genet.,
October 1, 2003;
40(10):
758 - 760.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C Bovie, S T Holden, A Schroer, E Smith, D Trump, and F L Raymond
Neurofibromatosis 2 in a patient with a de novo balanced reciprocal translocation 46,X,t(X;22)(p11.2;q11.2)
J. Med. Genet.,
September 1, 2003;
40(9):
682 - 684.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A Moyhuddin, M E Baser, C Watson, S Purcell, R T Ramsden, A Heiberg, A J Wallace, and D G R Evans
Somatic mosaicism in neurofibromatosis 2: prevalence and risk of disease transmission to offspring
J. Med. Genet.,
June 1, 2003;
40(6):
459 - 463.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
L Kluwe, V Mautner, B Heinrich, R Dezube, L B Jacoby, R E Friedrich, and M MacCollin
Molecular study of frequency of mosaicism in neurofibromatosis 2 patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas
J. Med. Genet.,
February 1, 2003;
40(2):
109 - 114.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. E. Baser, J. M. Friedman, A. J. Wallace, R. T. Ramsden, H. Joe, and D. G.R. Evans
Evaluation of clinical diagnostic criteria for neurofibromatosis 2
Neurology,
December 10, 2002;
59(11):
1759 - 1765.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. Ruggieri and S. M. Huson
The clinical and diagnostic implications mosaicism in the neurofibromatoses
Neurology,
June 12, 2001;
56(11):
1433 - 1443.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J. Lasota, J. F. Fetsch, A. Wozniak, B. Wasag, R. Sciot, and M. Miettinen
The Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Gene Is Mutated in Perineurial Cell Tumors : A Molecular Genetic Study of Eight Cases
Am. J. Pathol.,
April 1, 2001;
158(4):
1223 - 1229.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C. E.G. Bruder, C. Hirvela, I. Tapia-Paez, I. Fransson, R. Segraves, G. Hamilton, X. X. Zhang, D. G. Evans, A. J. Wallace, M. E. Baser, et al.
High resolution deletion analysis of constitutional DNA from neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients using microarray-CGH
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
February 1, 2001;
10(3):
271 - 282.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
D G. R Evans, M Sainio, and M. E Baser
Neurofibromatosis type 2
J. Med. Genet.,
December 1, 2000;
37(12):
897 - 904.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
D G R EVANS, V NEWTON, W NEARY, M E BASER, A WALLACE, R MACLEOD, J P R JENKINS, J GILLESPIE, and R T RAMSDEN
Use of MRI and audiological tests in presymptomatic diagnosis of type 2 neurofibromatosis (NF2)
J. Med. Genet.,
December 1, 2000;
37(12):
944 - 947.
[Full Text]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J. A. L. Armour, C. Sismani, P. C. Patsalis, and G. Cross
Measurement of locus copy number by hybridisation with amplifiable probes
Nucleic Acids Res.,
January 15, 2000;
28(2):
605 - 609.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C. LÓPEZ-CORREA, J. ZUCMAN-ROSSI, H. BREMS, G. THOMAS, and E. LEGIUS
NF2 gene deletion in a family with a mild phenotype
J. Med. Genet.,
January 1, 2000;
37(1):
75 - 77.
[Full Text]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
K. Ueki, C. Wen-Bin, Y. Narita, A. Asai, and T. Kirino
Tight Association of Loss of Merlin Expression with Loss of Heterozygosity at Chromosome 22q in Sporadic Meningiomas
Cancer Res.,
December 1, 1999;
59(23):
5995 - 5998.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
FREE Full Text (PDF)
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (45)
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Zucman-Rossi, J.
![]()
Articles by Thomas, G.
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Zucman-Rossi, J.
![]()
Articles by Thomas, G.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?