| Human Molecular Genetics | Pages |
The [Delta]ccr5 mutation conferring protection against HIV-1 in Caucasian populations has a single and recent origin in Northeastern Europe
Introduction
Results
Geographic distribution of the [Delta]ccr5 allele
Characterization of the IRI3.1 (D3S4579) microsatellite
Haplotype determination
Approximate dating of the [Delta]ccr5 mutation
Analysis of a second microsatellite (IRI3.2, D3S4580)
Discussion
The [Delta]ccr5 allele frequency is higher in Northern Europe
[Delta]ccr5 alleles originate from a single and recent mutation event
Possible existence of a selection pressure in favor of the [Delta]ccr5 allele
Conclusions and perspectives
Materials And Methods
DNA samples
Detection of the [Delta]ccr5 allele
Microsatellite analysis
Statistics
Acknowledgements
References
The [Delta]ccr5 mutation conferring protection against HIV-1 in Caucasian populations has a single and recent origin in Northeastern Europe
The chemokine receptor CCR5 is encoded by the CMKBR5 gene located on the p21.3 region of human chromosome 3, and constitutes the major co-receptor for the macrophage-tropic strains of HIV-1. A mutant allele of the CCR5 gene, [Delta]ccr5, was shown to provide to homozygotes with a strong resistance against infection by HIV. The frequency of the [Delta]ccr5 allele was investigated in 18 European populations. A North to South gradient was found, with the highest allele frequencies in Finnish and Mordvinian populations (16%), and the lowest in Sardinia (4%). Highly polymorphic microsatellites (IRI3.1, D3S4579 and IRI3.2, D3S4580) located respectively 11 kb upstream and 68 kb downstream of the CCR5 gene deletion were used to determine the haplotype of the chromosomes carrying the [Delta]ccr5 variant. A strong linkage disequilibrium was found between [Delta]ccr5 and specific alleles of the IRI3.1 and IRI3.2 microsatellites: >95% of the [Delta]ccr5 chromosomes carried the IRI3.1-0 allele, while 88% carried the IRI3.2-0 allele. These alleles were found respectively in only 2 or 1.5% of the chromosomes carrying a wild-type CCR5 gene. From these data, it was inferred that most, if not all [Delta]ccr5 alleles originate from a single mutation event, and that this mutation event probably took place a few thousand years ago in Northeastern Europe. The high frequency of the [Delta]ccr5 allele in Caucasian populations cannot be explained easily by random genetic drift, suggesting that a selection advantage is or has been associated with homo- or heterozygous carriers of the [Delta]ccr5 allele.
INTRODUCTION
Members of the chemokine receptor gene family recently have been identified as the co-receptors which allow entry of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) into human CD4-positive cells (1-6). Chemokine receptors belong to the superfamily of serpentine G protein-coupled receptors; they are classified as CXC- (or [alpha]-) or CC- (or [beta]-) chemokine receptors, according to the primary structure of their natural agonists (7). After the landmark identification of CXCR4 as the co-receptor for infection by T-tropic HIV-1 strains (those strains capable of infecting primary T lymphocytes and T cells adapted to continuous culture) (1), CCR5 (8) was shown to act as the major co-receptor for M-tropic HIV-1 strains (2-6,9). By contrast to T-tropic strains, which generally appear at late stages of the disease, M-tropic strains infect monocytes/macrophages and have been shown to be responsible for viral transmission (10-12). The gene encoding CCR5 (CMKBR5) is located in the p21.3 region of human chromosome 3, within a cluster including most of the other CC-chemokine receptor genes (13).
Resistance to infection by HIV-1 has been described in individuals who remain seronegative despite repeated exposure to the virus (14). The mechanism of resistance in these `exposed-uninfected' individuals is certainly not unique, but one convincing genetic explanation has been provided by the identification in individuals of Caucasian origin of a null mutation of CCR5 (15-17). Homozygotes for a 32 bp deletion in the gene segment encoding the second extracellular loop of CCR5 ([Delta]ccr5) appear to resist infection. This conclusion is based on the observation (i) of a high frequency of these natural [Delta]ccr5/[Delta]ccr5 knock-outs in cohorts of exposed-uninfected individuals (16-18), (ii) the virtual absence of [Delta]ccr5 homozygotes in large cohorts of seropositive individuals (15,17,19) although rare exceptions have been published to date (20-22) and (iii) on the observation that white blood cells from [Delta]ccr5 homozygotes are highly resistant to infection, in vitro, by M-tropic HIV-1 strains (15,16,18,20,23). Heterozygotes for the [Delta]ccr5 allele exhibit slower progression into the clinical stages of AIDS (19,24-26), and appear partially protected against HIV infection (15,26). This mutant allele was not found in populations from Black Africa and the Far East (15,27), but other rare mutations affecting the CCR5 gene have been described in all populations (28).
CCR5 is expressed on monocytes, macrophages, memory T cells and dendritic cells, and is believed to play an important role in the chemokinesis of these cell populations in vitro and in vivo, in response to RANTES, MIP-1[alpha] and MIP-1[beta] (29,30). CCR5 is also expressed in the microglial cells, in correlation with the ability of HIV-1 to infect the central nervous system (31), but no function has so far been attributed to the receptor in this location. [Delta]ccr5 homozygotes are apparently healthy, suggesting that the normal function(s) of the receptor can be taken over efficiently by other chemokine receptors and their ligands. A recent report suggests, however, that [Delta]ccr5 heterozygotes are more susceptible to opportunistic infections during the late stages of AIDS progression (32).
Table 1
| Population | CCR5 genotype (n) | [Delta]ccr5 allele | [chi]2HW | n | ||
| CCR5/CCR5 | CCR5/[Delta]ccr5 | [Delta]ccr5/[Delta]ccr5 | (frequency) | |||
| Mordvinians | 58 | 28 | 0 | 0.163 | 3.250 | 86 |
| Finns | 67 | 31 | 0 | 0.158 | 3.470 | 98 |
| Russians | 61 | 21 | 1 | 0.139 | 0.290 | 83 |
| Lithuanians | 220 | 61 | 2 | 0.115 | 1.030 | 283 |
| Swedish Saamis | 101 | 18 | 1 | 0.083 | 0.030 | 120 |
| Swedes | 152 | 46 | 6 | 0.142 | 1.160 | 204 |
| Norwegians | 79 | 21 | 0 | 0.105 | 1.380 | 100 |
| Danes | 78 | 22 | 0 | 0.110 | 1.530 | 100 |
| French (Brittany) | 79 | 20 | 1 | 0.110 | 0.050 | 100 |
| French (Montpellier) | 79 | 20 | 0 | 0.101 | 1.250 | 99 |
| Belgians | 582 | 114 | 8 | 0.092 | 0.810 | 704 |
| Spaniards (Murcia) | 81 | 19 | 0 | 0.095 | 1.100 | 100 |
| Basques | 79 | 9 | 1 | 0.062 | 1.470 | 89 |
| Portugese | 88 | 13 | 0 | 0.064 | 0.460 | 101 |
| Hungarians | 84 | 13 | 2 | 0.086 | 2.640 | 99 |
| Italians (Milano) | 82 | 15 | 1 | 0.087 | 0.110 | 98 |
| Sardinians | 92 | 8 | 0 | 0.040 | 0.170 | 100 |
| Turks | 91 | 13 | 0 | 0.063 | 0.450 | 104 |
| Total | 2153 | 492 | 23 | 0.101 | 2668 | |
The high frequency of the [Delta]ccr5 allele in some populations raises the question of whether it is the result of random genetic drift, or rather the consequence of selective pressures possibly driven by an increased resistance to an infectious agent related or not to HIV. The aim of the present study was to determine more precisely the distribution of the [Delta]ccr5 allele in populations of `Caucasian' descent and to explore the possibility that the mutation has emerged more than once. By genotyping >2500 individuals from 18 European populations, we found the highest [Delta]ccr5 allele frequency in Northeastern Europe. Analysis of tightly linked polymorphic microsatellites demonstrated strong linkage disequilibrium. Our observations are compatible with a single and relatively recent origin of the [Delta]ccr5 allele, coming most probably from the Finno-Ugrian population, and could suggest a selective pressure in favor of the mutant allele.
RESULTS
Geographic distribution of the [Delta]ccr5 allele
The CCR5 genotype was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in population samples from 18 regions covering most of Europe. The mutant [Delta]ccr5 allele was found in all investigated populations (Table 1 and Fig. 1), but a significant heterogeneity was observed among the population samples ([chi]2 = 47.8; 17 d.f.; P = 0.00013). A general North to South downhill gradient was observed, with only the Lapps (Saamis) constituting a notable exception. The highest frequencies were found in Northern and Northeastern Europe (16% in Finnish and Mordvinian populations). The Swedish Saamis had a significantly lower frequency (8.3%) than Swedes (P = 0.024). We found lower frequencies in the Mediterranean area, with the lowest observed figures in Sardinians (4%). No significant deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was observed, when considering the whole material, or the individual populations (Table 1).
Figure
Characterization of the IRI3.1 (D3S4579) microsatellite
A TG repeat microsatellite located 11 063 bp upstream from the [Delta]ccr5 deletion site was identified by sequencing the 17 kb separating the genes encoding CCR2 and CCR5 (8) and in the 140 kb genomic sequence of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC), which was released recently in the databases (33). The polymorphism of this microsatellite was analyzed in 290 individuals belonging to different populations (Tables
Haplotype determination
Out of the 16 [Delta]ccr5 homozygotes that were tested for the microsatellite, 15 displayed the same genotype, being homozygous for the IRI3.1-0 allele (Fig. 2 and Table 3). The other alleles were named relative to this allele. The single exception harbors the IRI3.1-0 allele together with an IRI3.1+4 allele. From the data collected from CCR5/CCR5 and [Delta]ccr5/[Delta]ccr5 individuals (Table 3), the linkage disequilibrium between CCR5 and IRI3.1 was extremely significant ([chi]2 = 286, 1 d.b., P <<0.00001). The IRI3.1-0 allele was seldom found in association with the wild-type CCR5 allele, being one of the rarer alleles among CCR5/CCR5 individuals (average frequency of 0.02). We then investigated a total of 98 [Delta]ccr5 heterozygotes, originating mostly from the same cohorts as the CCR5/CCR5 homozygotes. Out of these, only five did not display an IRI3.1-0 allele (Table 3). Four of these exceptions had in common an IRI3.1+1 allele, differing by a single doublet from the IRI3.1-0 allele. It should be noted that the IRI3.1+1 allele is also a rare allele on chromosomes bearing a wild-type CCR5 gene, with an average frequency of 0.006 (Table 2). The last exception was heterozygous for the IRI3.1+5 and IRI3.1+8 alleles. Among heterozygotes for [Delta]ccr5 and IRI3.1-0, the probability of having the IRI3.1-0 allele associated with CCR5 and another allele with [Delta]ccr5 is low (<0.001) and can be neglected. We can therefore consider that among the 98 [Delta]ccr5 heterozygotes, the IRI3.1-0 allele, when present, is associated with [Delta]ccr5. Taking this into account, we found that, out of 130 chromosomes carrying [Delta]ccr5, 124 are associated with IRI3.1-0 (95.4%), while six [Delta]ccr5 alleles [95% confidence interval (c.i.): 2.20-13.6 considering a Poisson distribution] belong to other haplotypes (4.4%, 1.7-10.5%).
Figure
Table 2
Table 3. These other haplotypes could originate from three main causes: (i) independent mutation events occurring on a different genetic background; (ii) crossing-over disrupting the pre-existing association between [Delta]ccr5 and IRI3.1-0; and (iii) modification of the number of microsatellite repeats by replicative slippage. Microsatellite mutation can most probably be held responsible for the four IRI3.1+1 alleles found in heterozygotes, this allele being rare among CCR5/CCR5 homozygotes. This is in agreement with the reported observation that most of the mutations affecting microsatellites involve the gain or loss of a single repeat unit (34), and that mutations are biased in favor of longer allele lengths (35). If we neglect independent mutations (they can, however, not be ruled out), we end up with four (1.09-10.24; c.i. 95%) chromosomes resulting from microsatellite mutation events and two (0.24-7.22; c.i. 95%) chromosomes resulting from recombination events out of 130 chromosomes.
IRI3.1
N. Eur.
Sweden
Finland
S. Eur.
Sardinia
Turkey
allele
n
%
n
%
n
%
n
%
n
%
n
%
-2
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
0.6
0
0.0
1
1.3
0
3
1.9
0
0.0
3
3.8
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
+1
1
0.6
0
0.0
1
1.3
1
0.6
1
1.3
0
0.0
+2
10
6.3
3
3.8
7
8.8
2
1.3
0
0.0
2
2.6
+3
30
19.0
16
20.5
14
17.5
39
25.3
24
31.6
15
19.2
+4
49
31.0
27
34.6
22
27.5
14
9.1
5
6.6
9
11.5
+5
20
12.7
10
12.8
10
12.5
33
21.4
15
19.7
18
23.1
+6
34
21.5
16
20.5
18
22.5
39
25.3
20
26.3
19
24.4
+7
8
5.1
4
5.1
4
5.0
11
7.1
4
5.3
7
9.0
+8
2
1.3
1
1.3
1
1.3
7
4.5
1
1.3
6
7.7
+9
1
0.6
1
1.3
0
0.0
4
2.6
3
3.9
1
1.3
+10
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
1
0.6
1
1.3
0
0.0
+11
0
0.0
0
0.0
0
0.0
2
1.3
2
2.6
0
0.0
Total
158
100
78
100
80
100
154
100
76
100
78
100
IRI3.1
CCR5/CCR5
CCR5/[Delta]ccr5
[Delta]ccr5/[Delta]ccr5
Overall
Allele
n
%
n
%
n
%
%
-2
1
0.3
0
0.0
0
0.0
0.3
0
7
2.0
96
49.0
31
96.9
11.5
+1
2
0.6
7
3.6
0
0.0
0.5
+2
16
4.5
2
1.0
0
0.0
4.1
+3
75
21.3
21
10.7
0
0.0
19.2
+4
79
22.4
27
13.8
1
3.1
20.5
+5
58
16.5
14
7.1
0
0.0
14.8
+6
78
22.2
18
9.2
0
0.0
19.9
+7
19
5.4
4
2.0
0
0.0
4.9
+8
9
2.6
5
2.6
0
0.0
2.3
+9
5
1.4
1
0.5
0
0.0
1.3
+10
1
0.3
1
0.5
0
0.0
0.3
+11
2
0.6
0
0.0
0
0.0
0.5
Total
352
100
196
100
32
100
100
Approximate dating of the [Delta]ccr5 mutation
The rates of crossing-over between IRI3.1 and [Delta]ccr5, and of microsatellite mutation can both be used to estimate grossly how long this haplotype has been present in European population history, using the Luria and Delbruck's equations as described by Hästbacka et al. (36). Considering the distance of 11 063 bp between the CCR5 gene deletion and the IRI3.1 microsatellite, and an approximate recombination rate of 1% per megabase and generation for the human genome, the recombination frequency ([thetas]) was estimated to be 0.0111% per generation. Based on the Luria-Delbrück equations (36), we obtained a number of ~140 generations (17-516; c.i. 95%) since the initial mutation leading to [Delta]ccr5. Considering an average of 25 years per generation, this places the mutation event some 3500 (400-13 000; c.i. 95%) years ago.
The same calculation was made, using the frequency of microsatellite mutations, and the reported average mutation rate (0.056%) observed for microsatellites in CEPH families (34). If we consider that the four IRI3.1+1 alleles found in [Delta]ccr5 heterozygotes result from events of repeat amplifications (3.08; 0.84-7.9%; c.i. 95%), the number of generations since the [Delta]ccr5 mutation was estimated to be 56 (15-147; c.i. 95%), corresponding to 1400 years (375-3675; c.i. 95%).
Table 4
| IRI3.2 | CCR5/CCR5 | CCR5/[Delta]ccr5 | [Delta]ccr5/[Delta]ccr5 | Overall | |||
| Allele | n | % | n | % | n | % | % |
| -1 | 2 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| 0 | 4 | 1.5 | 103 | 52.6 | 23 | 88.5 | 10.2 |
| +1 | 14 | 5.1 | 8 | 4.1 | 1 | 3.8 | 5.0 |
| +2 | 6 | 2.2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| +3 | 4 | 1.5 | 6 | 3.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
| +4 | 29 | 10.7 | 7 | 3.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 9.6 |
| +5 | 64 | 23.5 | 18 | 9.2 | 2 | 7.7 | 21.9 |
| +6 | 65 | 23.9 | 20 | 10.2 | 0 | 0.0 | 21.5 |
| +7 | 20 | 7.4 | 8 | 4.1 | 0 | 0.0 | 6.6 |
| +8 | 4 | 1.5 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
| +9 | 5 | 1.8 | 5 | 2.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 1.7 |
| +10 | 9 | 3.3 | 7 | 3.6 | 0 | 0.0 | 3.0 |
| +11 | 10 | 3.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3.3 |
| +12 | 20 | 7.4 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 6.6 |
| +13 | 10 | 3.7 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3.3 |
| +14 | 6 | 2.2 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| Total | 272 | 100 | 196 | 100 | 26 | 100 | 100 |
Analysis of a second microsatellite (IRI3.2, D3S4580)
In order to confirm the observations, we analyzed a second microsatellite (GA repeat adjacent to a GT repeat) included in the BAC covering the CCR5 gene (33), but located 68 kb downstream of the [Delta]ccr5 deletion. A total of 247 individuals (most of the sampling tested for IRI3.1) from different European populations were tested, including 136 CCR5/CCR5 homozygotes, 98 CCR5/[Delta]ccr5 heterozygotes and 13 [Delta]ccr5/[Delta]ccr5 homozygotes. The IRI3.2 microsatellite was also found to be highly polymorphic, with 16 different alleles and 72% heterozygozity. Among CCR5/CCR5 homozygotes, the most frequent alleles were IRI3.2+4 to +7 and IRI3.2+12 (Table 4). No significant difference was found for allele distribution among European populations (not shown). When analyzing [Delta]ccr5/[Delta]ccr5 homozygotes, a strong linkage disequilibrium was found, the [Delta]ccr5 allele being associated with the IRI3.2-0 allele in 23 chromosomes out of 26 (88%), while the IRI3.2-0 allele only represents 1.5% of the alleles associated with wild-type CCR5 (Table 4, P <<0.0001). The three exceptions were an IRI3.2+1 allele (most likely resulting from microsatellite mutation), and two alleles of greater size (IRI3.2+5), presumably resulting from cross-overs. All [Delta]ccr5 alleles were associated with either IRI3.1-0 or IRI3.2-0. As expected, heterozygotes exhibited intermediate frequencies. Ten heterozygotes out of 98 did not bear an IRI3.2-0 allele, and half of these contained an IRI3.2+1 allele. Taking into account the corrections for the expected frequency of cross-overs giving rise to an association of [Delta]ccr5 with IRI3.2+1 alleles, we estimated that out of 123 analyzed chromosomes bearing [Delta]ccr5, 5.6 (1.9-12.6, c.i. 95%) were the result of microsatellite mutation and 7.4 (2.9-15.1, c.i. 95%) were the result of cross-overs between CCR5 and IRI3.2. The number of generations since the origin of the [Delta]ccr5 mutation was estimated as 83 (28-192, c.i. 95%) on the basis of the microsatellite mutations, corresponding to 2100 years (700-4800, c.i. 95%). Using the recombination events, figures of 90 generations (35-190, c.i. 95%) and 2250 years (900-4700, c.i. 95%) were obtained.
DISCUSSION
The [Delta]ccr5 allele frequency is higher in Northern Europe
The [Delta]ccr5 allele was found all across Europe, but a difference in allele frequencies was found among regions, with a North to South downhill gradient. This gradient is largely in agreement with the results of Martinson et al. (27) who studied the [Delta]ccr5 allele in European and non-European countries, but a larger number of regions was investigated in the present work. In discussing their results, Martinson et al. stated that the distribution of the [Delta]ccr5 allele was similar to that of some other Europe-centered genes, namely the [Delta]F508 cystic fibrosis mutation and the hemochromatosis gene. We find, however, a clear difference in the distribution of the [Delta]ccr5 allele on one hand and of the [Delta]F508 or hemochromatosis genes on the other. The latter two genes have a West European `gene center' and low frequencies in eastern Europe (37,38), whereas high frequencies of the [Delta]ccr5 allele are found in eastern Europe. The fact that the highest frequencies of [Delta]ccr5 were found in Mordvinians (16.3%) and Finns (15.8%) raises the question of whether the [Delta]ccr5 mutation originated somewhere among the Finno-Ugrian tribes of Russia. The relatively modest frequencies in two other Finno-Ugrian populations, Saamis and Hungarians, would seem to be in disagreement with such a hypothesis. However, Saamis are known to differ genetically from other Finno-Ugrian people (39), and present-day Hungarians should have received a considerable admixture from other populations, which is expected to lower their original [Delta]ccr5 frequencies. The location of the [Delta]ccr5 gene center in Northern European countries could explain the high frequency found by Martinson et al. (27) for Ashkenazi Jews, who have lived for centuries in these regions, and for whom a founder effect has been postulated for a number of genetic diseases (40). The existence of a 10 bp direct repeat, which flanks the 32 bp deletion of [Delta]ccr5 (15), could suggest that the [Delta]ccr5 mutation has possibly occurred more than once in Europe. This possibility is made extremely unlikely by the strong linkage disequilibrium which the [Delta]ccr5 allele displays with the IRI3.1-0 and IRI3.2-0 alleles of microsatellites flanking the CCR5 gene on both sides, combined with the fact that both IRI3.1-0 and IRI3.2-0 alleles are rare (0.02 and 0.015 respectively) in the absence of CCR5 deletion (Table 2). It appears, therefore, that most if not all [Delta]ccr5 chromosomes originate from a single mutation event. The fact that all [Delta]ccr5 alleles were associated either with IRI3.1-0 or IRI3.2-0 further suggests that events of crossing-over or microsatellite mutation occurred independently on an IRI3.1-0/[Delta]ccr5/IRI3.2-0 original haplotype. It cannot be excluded that other mutagenesis events contributed to a very small proportion of the [Delta]ccr5 alleles, but this would not change the conclusions of the work.
Considering the observed frequencies for recombination between the [Delta]ccr5 allele and the microsatellites, and the observed frequencies for microsatellite mutations, we estimated the number of generations required since the original CCR5 mutation in order to obtain the present day frequencies, using the formula of Luria and Delbruck, as described (36). From the recombination frequency between CCR5 and IRI3.1, the [Delta]ccr5 mutation appears to be relatively recent (some 3400 years old), while from the microsatellite mutation rate, it appears even more recent (some 1400 years ago). Similar analysis for the IRI3.2 microsatellite gave ~2000-2200 years, starting from mutation or crossing-over events. These calculations make a number of assumptions that are certainly not met (such as uniform exponential growth of the population and panmixis), and are prone to high error rates (due, among other factors, to the relatively low number of observations in the case of the IRI3.1 marker). Also, microsatellites have different evolution rates, and we have considered an average rate for our calculation. Nevertheless, it is likely that the [Delta]ccr5 mutation is relatively recent, and took place within the Neolithic period, a few thousand years ago. This is consistent with the fact that the [Delta]ccr5 mutation is not found in African populations nor in most Asian populations. European and Asian populations are considered to have separated ~35 000 years ago, while their common Middle East ancestors separated from African populations some 120 000 years ago (41). The high frequency of the [Delta]ccr5 allele in European populations, starting from a single mutation event, could in theory result from random genetic drift, in the absence of selection against or in favor of the mutation. However, given the relatively recent origin of the mutation, and the size of the population in Europe during the Neolithic period (steady increase from a few hundred thousand to 400 million), random genetic drift is unlikely to account for the rapid increase in [Delta]ccr5 allele frequency. A positive selection is therefore postulated, and selections acting primarily on heterozygotes are more likely to drive a new mutation to an average level of 10% allele frequency within a few hundred generations or less. Potential selection advantages could be associated with resistance to infectious diseases or their consequences, in accordance with the involvement of CCR5 in the recruitment of monocytes, macrophages and helper T cells. The precise nature of the putative selective factor(s), however, remains to be identified. Together, the geographical distribution of the [Delta]ccr5 allele and the large excess of the IRI3.1-0/[Delta]ccr5/IRI3.2-0 haplotype strongly suggests a single emergence of the [Delta]ccr5 mutation, taking place most probably in a Finno-Ugrian tribe of Russia. The high frequencies of the [Delta]ccr5 allele in some populations could affect the epidemiology of the disease and the mean progression rate of HIV-positive individuals in these populations. It could also favor in these populations the emergence of strains that can bypass the CCR5 defect by using other co-receptors efficiently (2,6,42). The possibility that a selection pressure has allowed the rapid expansion of the [Delta]ccr5 allele in European populations will require further work in order to confirm the hypothesis, and to investigate the nature of the potential selection factors. Anonymous DNA samples were collected from a total of 2668 unrelated individuals of 18 different European populations representing most major ethno-linguistic groups (Baltic, Finno-Ugrian, Germanic, Romanic, Slavic) and including Basques, Saamis and Sardinians. In previous population studies, these groups have been found to show distinct and peculiar gene frequencies. The DNA was prepared from blood leukocytes by standard methods (43) and analyzed in Brussels. The 32 bp deletion in the CCR5 gene was detected by electrophoresis through a 3% agarose gel of a 735 bp fragment amplified by PCR from genomic DNA (forward primer, 5[prime]CCTGGCTGTCGTCCATGCTG3[prime]; reverse primer, 5[prime]AGCCATGTGCACAACTCT3[prime]; 30 cycles; annealing 60°C for 1 min; elongation 72°C for 1 min; denaturation 93°C for 1 min). To increase separation of the wild-type and deleted alleles, the 735 bp fragment was cleaved with EcoRI into a 332 bp constant fragment and a 403 or 371 bp fragment corresponding to the wild-type or [Delta]ccr5 fragment, respectively. A TG dinucleotide microsatellite was identified 11 063 bp upstream from the CCR5 gene deletion (33). It was analyzed by PCR, using AAGAGATTGGTTCCAGGCATG as forward primer, CCGGACCTTGCATTACAGGAC as reverse primer, and the following conditions: annealing 63°C for 1 min; elongation 72°C for 1 min; denaturation 94°C for 1 min; 0.75 mM MgCl2; 125 ng each primers; 200 µM dCTP, dGTP and dTTP, 100 µM dATP and 1 µCi [[alpha]-32P]dATP. Alternatively, PCR was performed using an [alpha]-32P-labeled forward primer, in the absence of labeled nucleotides. A second microsatellite (GA repeat followed by GT repeat) was analyzed similarly (labeled forward primer, CCTTCTGGAGCAGCACTTCCA, reverse primer, GTAAATCTCCTAACAACATGC; annealing 58°C for 1 min; elongation 72°C for 1 min; denaturation 94°C for 1 min; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 125 ng each primers; 200 µM dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP). PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis through a 6% sequencing polyacrylamide gel containing 35% formamide and 5.6 M urea and radioautography. Allele frequencies were calculated, and the fit to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and the heterogeneity between population samples were evaluated by means of the [chi]2 test, using Instat software. In several instances, the data from the tables were pooled for different alleles, in order to avoid numbers <5, and/or to reduce the number of degrees of freedom. As an example, when comparing IRI3.1 alleles between populations from Northern and Southern Europe, alleles IRI3.1-2 to +1 were pooled as well as alleles IRI3.1+8 to +11. We thank M. Georges for fruitful discussion. This study was supported by the French Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le SIDA and the Belgian Programme on University Poles of Attraction initiated by the Belgian State, Prime Minister's office, Service for Sciences, Technology and Culture. Also supported by grants from the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique Médicale, the Fonds Médical Reine Elisabeth, Télévie, the European Union (Biomed) and the Association Recherche Biomédicale et Diagnostic. The scientific responsibility is assumed by the authors. F.L. is Chercheur Qualifié of the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique and M.S. is a post-doctoral fellow of the European Community.[Delta]ccr5 alleles originate from a single and recent mutation event
Possible existence of a selection pressure in favor of the [Delta]ccr5 allele
Conclusions and perspectives
MATERIALS AND METHODS
DNA samples
Detection of the [Delta]ccr5 allele
Microsatellite analysis
Statistics
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
+These authors contributed equally to this work
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 14 Feb 1998
Copyright© Oxford University Press, 1998.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J. A Belperio and A. Ardehali
Chemokines and Transplant Vasculopathy
Circ. Res.,
August 29, 2008;
103(5):
454 - 466.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C. S. Carlson, D. J. Thomas, M. A. Eberle, J. E. Swanson, R. J. Livingston, M. J. Rieder, and D. A. Nickerson
Genomic regions exhibiting positive selection identified from dense genotype data
Genome Res.,
November 1, 2005;
15(11):
1553 - 1565.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
U Hannelius, C M Lindgren, E Melen, A Malmberg, U von Dobeln, and J Kere
Phenylketonuria screening registry as a resource for population genetic studies
J. Med. Genet.,
October 1, 2005;
42(10):
e60 - e60.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C Goulding, A Murphy, G MacDonald, S Barrett, J Crowe, J Hegarty, S McKiernan, and D Kelleher
The CCR5-{Delta}32 mutation: impact on disease outcome in individuals with hepatitis C infection from a single source
Gut,
August 1, 2005;
54(8):
1157 - 1161.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
R. Colobran, P. Adreani, Y. Ashhab, A. Llano, J. A. Este, O. Dominguez, R. Pujol-Borrell, and M. Juan
Multiple Products Derived from Two CCL4 Loci: High Incidence of a New Polymorphism in HIV+ Patients
J. Immunol.,
May 1, 2005;
174(9):
5655 - 5664.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C J Duncan and S Scott
What caused the Black Death?
Postgrad. Med. J.,
May 1, 2005;
81(955):
315 - 320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
S R Duncan, S Scott, and C J Duncan
Reappraisal of the historical selective pressures for the CCR5-{Delta}32 mutation
J. Med. Genet.,
March 1, 2005;
42(3):
205 - 208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A. M. Bowcock and W. O.C.M. Cookson
The genetics of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and atopic dermatitis
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
April 1, 2004;
13(90001):
R43 - 55.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A. P. Galvani and M. Slatkin
Evaluating plague and smallpox as historical selective pressures for the CCR5-{Delta}32 HIV-resistance allele
PNAS,
December 9, 2003;
100(25):
15276 - 15279.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
H. M. Naif, A. L. Cunningham, M. Alali, S. Li, N. Nasr, M. M. Buhler, D. Schols, E. de Clercq, and G. Stewart
A Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolate from an Infected Person Homozygous for CCR5{Delta}32 Exhibits Dual Tropism by Infecting Macrophages and MT2 Cells via CXCR4
J. Virol.,
March 7, 2002;
76(7):
3114 - 3124.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C. Blanpain, B. Lee, M. Tackoen, B. Puffer, A. Boom, F. Libert, M. Sharron, V. Wittamer, G. Vassart, R. W. Doms, et al.
Multiple nonfunctional alleles of CCR5 are frequent in various human populations
Blood,
September 1, 2000;
96(5):
1638 - 1645.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J. Schneider-Schaulies
Cellular receptors for viruses: links to tropism and pathogenesis
J. Gen. Virol.,
June 1, 2000;
81(6):
1413 - 1429.
[Full Text]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
P. M. Murphy, M. Baggiolini, I. F. Charo, C. A. Hebert, R. Horuk, K. Matsushima, L. H. Miller, J. J. Oppenheim, and C. A. Power
International Union of Pharmacology. XXII. Nomenclature for Chemokine Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev.,
March 1, 2000;
52(1):
145 - 176.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A. S. Lalani, J. Masters, W. Zeng, J. Barrett, R. Pannu, H. Everett, C. W. Arendt, and G. McFadden
Use of Chemokine Receptors by Poxviruses
Science,
December 3, 1999;
286(5446):
1968 - 1971.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
S. Borrego, M. E. Sáez, A. Ruiz, O. Gimm, M. López-Alonso, G. Antiñolo, and C. Eng
Specific polymorphisms in the RET proto-oncogene are over-represented in patients with Hirschsprung disease and may represent loci modifying phenotypic expression
J. Med. Genet.,
October 1, 1999;
36(10):
771 - 774.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A. D. Sullivan, J. Wigginton, and D. Kirschner
The coreceptor mutation CCR5Delta 32 influences the dynamics of HIV epidemics and is selected for by HIV
PNAS,
August 28, 2001;
98(18):
10214 - 10219.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
FREE Full Text (PDF)
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (130)
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Libert, F.
![]()
Articles by Vassart, G.
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Libert, F.
![]()
Articles by Vassart, G.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?