| Human Molecular Genetics | Pages |
Localization of dystrophin isoform Dp71 to the inner limiting membrane of the retina suggests a unique functional contribution of Dp71 in the retina
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials And Methods
Antibodies
Indirect immunofluorescence
Acknowledgements
References
Localization of dystrophin isoform Dp71 to the inner limiting membrane of the retina suggests a unique functional contribution of Dp71 in the retina
INTRODUCTION
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive lethal disease caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene (1-6). The gene is complex, encoding multiple tissue-specific isoforms that differ structurally in their respective N- and C-termini. Retinal electrophysiology in both humans (7-11) and mice (12; D.M. Pillers and W.R. Woodward, in preparation) with mutations in the dystrophin gene is abnormal. Analysis of dark-adapted electroretinograms (ERGs) has revealed a reduction in amplitude of the b-wave potential in the majority of DMD patients (7-11) and the dystrophic mdxCv3 mouse (12). Characterization of ERGs from allelic variants of the mdx mouse and DMD/BMD patients with mutations in different regions of the dystrophin gene demonstrated a correlation between the position of the mutation (and consequently the specific dystrophin isoforms affected) and the severity of the ERG abnormality (7,10,14; D.M. Pillers and W.R. Woodward, in preparation). Mice with mutations in the 5[prime] end of the gene (mdx, mdxCv5) have normal ERGs, mice with mutations in the middle of the gene (mdxCv2 and mdxCv4 ) have ERGs with increased implicit times for the b-wave and oscillatory potentials, and the mdxCv3 mouse, with a mutation in the 3[prime] end of the gene, has an ERG with both increased implicit times and an attenuation of the amplitude of the b-wave response (D.M. Pillers and W.R. Woodward, in preparation). Furthermore, the targeted disruption within exon 52 of the dystrophin gene in mice results in an ERG phenotype very similar to the mdxCv2 and mdxCv4 mice (13). In man, DMD patients with mutations affecting the middle or 3[prime] end of the gene have abnormal ERGs (8-11), while most patients with mutations at the 5[prime] end of the gene have normal ERGs (10).
The dystrophin gene is transcribed from at least seven different promoters located in different regions of the gene. Four of these promoters are located within introns and encode short dystrophin isoforms, named according to their molecular weight. There are three full-length dystrophins (Dp427) which contain unique N-termini fused to the actin-binding, rod, cysteine-rich and C-terminal domains (14-16). Three dystrophin isoforms (Dp260, Dp140 and Dp116) lack the actin-binding domain, but contain a portion of the rod domain, and retain the cysteine-rich and C-terminal domains (17-19). The remaining isoform (Dp71) has a unique seven residue N-terminus fused to the cysteine-rich and C-terminal domains (20-24). By western blot analysis and indirect immunofluorescence, we, and others, have detected expression of three dystrophin isoforms (Dp427, Dp260 and Dp71) in the retina (7,13,17). A recent report has also suggested that Dp140 may be expressed in the retina although the localization was not determined (25). Indirect immunofluorescence analysis has shown that Dp427 and Dp260 are expressed at the outer plexiform layer (OPL) of the retina (7,17,26,27). The localization of Dp71 was not determined in these studies; however, through analysis of the exon 52 knockout mice, Kameya et al. deduced that Dp71 was expressed at retinal blood vessels and possibly at the inner limiting membrane (ILM) (13). The precise localization of dystrophin isoforms in the retina has been complicated by the large number of isoforms generated through multiple promoter usage, and alternative splicing of exon 78 which alters the translation reading frame and changes the hydrophilic C-terminus to a hydrophobic C-terminus (20,28,29). Isoform-specific antisera have not been available for previous studies which have relied on a combination of non-isoform-specific dystrophin antibodies and mutation information to deduce the localization of the dystrophin isoforms (7,13,17,26,27). The correlation between genotype and ERG phenotype suggests that isoform specificity is functionally important in the retina. Elucidation of these functions requires precise knowledge of the expression of individual isoforms at the cellular level. To address this issue, we have prepared isoform-specific antibodies to N-terminal regions of Dp260 (RET-1) and Dp71 (NME-1), and to the alternative C-terminus that is generated when exon 78 is spliced from the transcript (ACT-1).
The genotype-phenotype correlation supports two possible hypotheses. The dystrophin isoforms may be functionally redundant, with the severity of the phenotype increasing as the number of isoforms affected by the mutation increases, resulting in marked loss of b-wave amplitude only when all isoforms are inactivated. The relatively mild ERG phenotype seen in mdxCv2, mdxCv4 and the exon 52 knockout mice could be explained by the continued expression of Dp71 which may compensate for Dp260 at the OPL. An alternative hypothesis is that the isoforms are functionally distinct and that the loss of Dp260 results in increased implicit times of the ERG while the loss of Dp71 results in reduction of b-wave amplitude. The first hypothesis implies that the subcellular localization of dystrophin isoforms should overlap, whereas the second hypothesis allows for the localization of specific isoforms to different structures.
In this report, we test these hypotheses by determining the precise localization of each isoform using isoform-specific antibodies to immunostain retinal sections of normal and dystrophic mice. We found that while the expression of Dp427 and Dp260 is restricted to the OPL, Dp71 expression is confined to the ILM and retinal blood vessels, and is absent from the OPL. We also examine [beta]-dystroglycan expression in the mutant mice. This protein interacts with the hinge 4 and cysteine-rich region of dystrophin (30), co-localizes with dystrophin at the OPL and is also expressed at the ILM and in the retinal blood vessels (31,32). We show that [beta]-dystroglycan localization to the OPL is dependent on the expression of Dp260, while [beta]-dystroglycan localization at the ILM and retinal blood vessels is dependent upon Dp71 expression. Our results support the hypothesis that both Dp260 and Dp71 are required for normal electrophysiology in the retina (13; D.M. Pillers and W.R. Woodward, in preparation) and that these isoforms function at different structures in the retina through a common interaction with [beta]-dystroglycan.
RESULTS
Previous studies on dystrophin in the retina have utilized two mouse models, the original mdx and the mdxCv3 mouse (11,12). We have extended this work by analysing additional mouse mutants which have been recently characterized (33). In Figure
Figure 1. A diagram of the dystrophin gene indicating the positions of the dystrophin promoters (below) and the position of the mutations in each mdx allelic variant; adapted from Im et al. (33). The mdx mouse has a nonsense mutation in exon 23 which inactivates only Dp472 (34,35). The mdxCv4 mouse has a premature stop mutation in exon 53 and expresses only Dp71 (33). The mdxCv3 has a splice acceptor mutation in intron 65 of the gene and does not express any of the known isoforms (33,36). Table 1.
mdxCv5
mdx
mdxCv2
mdxCv4
mdxCv3
Dp427
-
-
-
-
-
Dp260
+
+
-
-
-
Dp140
+
+
+
-
-
Dp116
+
+
+
+
-
Dp71
+
+
+
+
-
ERG
N
N
[up arrow]IT
[up arrow]IT
[up arrow]IT [down arrow]b-wave
We prepared serial retina sections from each of the mdx allelic variants and examined the localization of dystrophin isoforms using antibody 1583, which recognizes the hydrophilic C-terminus. Figure
Figure 2. Serial sections of frozen retina were prepared from C57BL/6J (A-C), mdx (D-F), mdxCv4 (G-I) and mdxCv3 (J-L). The left column shows the phase-contrast image of a section. Pigment epithelium is at the top of the image and the ILM is at the bottom. The middle column shows the immunofluorescent signal obtained with 1583 on each of the different strains. A strong punctate signal (arrow) was observed at the OPL in C57BL/6J and mdx retina, but not in mdxCv4 or mdxCv3 retina. A weak signal was also detected at the ILM and retinal blood vessels in C57BL/6J, mdx and mdxCv4, which was absent in mdxCv3. The right-hand column shows control sections in which the primary antibody was omitted. Identical sets of controls were performed for secondary antibodies, and each of the other primary antibodies used. In all cases, no signal above background was detected. In addition to the signal at the OPL, control and mdx mice showed a weak signal at the ILM and retinal blood vessels. This signal was found in all of the mouse strains except mdxCv3, suggesting that it is due to low levels of Dp71. To define the specific isoform expression at the ILM and retinal blood vessels in more detail, we generated several new isoform-specific antibodies. Figure Figure 3. A composite of retinal sections from each of the different strains used in the study, comparing the signal obtained with different antibodies. The first column (A-D) is stained with 1583 (Fig. 2) and is shown for comparison. The second column (E-H) shows the immunofluorescent signal using the hydrophobic C-terminus antibody, ACT-1. A weak signal could be detected at the OPL in C57BL/6J and mdx that is missing in mdxCv4 and mdxCv3. In contrast, a strong signal was present at the ILM and blood vessels in strains C57BL/6J, mdx and mdxCv4 that was absent in mdxCv3. The third column (I-L) shows the immunofluorescent signal detected with the Dp260 N-terminus antibody RET-1. A strong signal is detected at the OPL in C57BL/6J and mdx, which is absent in mdxCv4 and mdxCv3. No signal was detected at the ILM and blood vessels with this antibody. The fourth column (M-P) shows the signal using the [beta]-dystroglycan antibody NCL-43DAG. A [beta]-dystroglycan signal can be seen at the OPL, ILM and blood vessels in C57BL/6J and mdx. The OPL signal was substantially reduced at the OPL in mdxCv4 but appeared to be normal at the ILM and blood vessels. In mdxCv3, all [beta]-dystroglycan signals were greatly reduced. By comparing the intensity of signal at the OPL with the intensity of signal at the ILM for antibodies 1583 and ACT-1, obvious differences in the relative amount of isoform with the two C-termini can be seen at the OPL, ILM and retinal blood vessels. More Act-1 signal was seen at the ILM and blood vessels than at the OPL. Conversely, there was more 1583 signal at the OPL than at the blood vessels and ILM. This suggests that Dp260 at the OPL contains predominantly the hydrophilic C-terminus, while Dp71 at the ILM and blood vessels contains predominantly the hydrophobic C-terminus. To confirm that the signal we detected at the OPL was due to Dp260, and that Dp260 expression is restricted to the OPL, we used an antibody RET-1 which recognizes the unique N-terminus of Dp260. In Figure Previous reports have shown that Dp427 co-localizes with the [beta]-dystroglycan and that the loss of dystrophin results in a concomitant loss of glycoprotein complex at the cell membrane (13,37-40). The [beta]-dystroglycan antibody, NCL-43DAG (Novacastra, UK), clearly demonstrated the expression of [beta]-dystroglycan at the OPL, ILM and blood vessels of retinal sections from both C57/BL6 and mdx mice as has been reported previously (31). While the signal at the OPL was not affected in mdx mice, the signal at the OPL was greatly reduced in sections from both mdxCv4 and mdxCv3. These results confirm the results of Kameya et al. (13), indicating that Dp260 expression at the OPL is required for proper localization of [beta]-dystroglycan. In contrast, the signal at the ILM and blood vessels appeared normal in C57Bl/6J, mdx and mdxCv4 but was greatly reduced in sections from mdxCv3. Thus, the loss of both Dp427 and Dp260 is necessary to reduce [beta]-dystroglycan localization at the OPL, while the loss of Dp71 expression at the ILM and blood vessels affects [beta]-dystroglycan localization at these structures. In control experiments, laminin staining was unaffected in each of the strains, indicating that the reduction in signal was specific for [beta]-dystroglycan and not due to a loss of structure (data not shown). We have not detected the expression of Dp140 in western blot analysis of retinal extracts with any of our antisera. Thus, we conclude that the signal in the ILM and retinal blood vessels is due to Dp71 expression. However, to confirm the localization of Dp71 to the ILM and retinal blood vessels, we used antibody NME-1, directed against the seven amino acids encoded by exon 1 of Dp71. Since this antibody is human specific and does not recognize murine Dp71 (G.Y. Dally, unpublished data), indirect immunofluorescence analysis of serial sections from a human adult retina are shown (Fig. Figure 4. Serial sections from human retina were fixed and stained with Dp71 N-terminal antibody NME-1, the hydrophobic C-terminus antibody ACT-1 or the hydrophilic C-terminus antibody 1583. (A) A phase-contrast micrograph of a serial section indicating the location of the OPL and ILM. (B) NME-1 signal is detected at the ILM and blood vessels but is absent from the OPL. (C) ACT-1 signal is detected at the OPL, ILM and blood vessels. (D) 1583 signal can be detected at the OPL, ILM and blood vessels. The most severe pathological consequence of DMD is its effect on muscle tissue, which leads to progressive muscle wasting and eventual death. However, the necessity for dystrophin in the central nervous system (CNS) is also well documented (7-12,41). DMD is associated with a cognitive impairment characterized by a reduction of the mean Intelligence Quotient (IQ) (41). The dark-adapted ERG, which measures the electrophysiological response of the retina to light stimulus, is also abnormal (7-12). Thus, the retina provides a means to study the function of dystrophin in the CNS. Genotype-phenotype correlations by ERG in mouse, compared with the expression of multiple dystrophin isoforms in the retina, led to the suggestion that dystrophin isoforms have specific functions (17; D.M. Pillers and W.R. Woodward, in preparation). We have postulated that differences observed in the mouse ERGs were due to either redundant isoform expression or isoform-specific function in the retina. The purpose of this study was to test these hypotheses by establishing the localization of each dystrophin isoform using isoform-specific antisera. Both our data and those recently published by Kameya et al. (13) demonstrate that Dp260 and Dp71 localize to distinct structures in the retina, with non-overlapping patterns of expression and are thus not functionally redundant. Both isoforms are required for proper b-wave formation and timing (D.M. Pillers and W.R. Woodward, in preparation). In contrast, isoform Dp427 co-localizes with Dp260 in the retina. While the finding of normal ERGs from mdx mice (12; D.M. Pillers and W.R. Woodward, in preparation) could suggest that Dp427 is not required for normal electrophysiology in the retina, it is also possible that Dp260 is compensating for the loss of the Dp427 isoform. Dp260 differs from Dp427 in that it does not have the actin-binding domain at the N-terminus of the protein (17). However, recent studies have indicated the presence of an actin-binding site within exon 56 which would be present in Dp260 but not Dp71 (42). This suggests a possible interaction of Dp260 with the actin cytoskeleton analogous to that postulated for Dp427 (42). Distinguishing the role of Dp427 from Dp260 will require ERG analysis of animals with Dp260-specific mutations. We have not been able to detect Dp140 expression in the retina by immunofluorescence or western blot analysis although it has been reported by one other group (25). The reason for this discrepancy is unknown, although it could be due to the use of different antibodies. However, no differences were found in ERG recordings between mdxCv2 and mdxCv4 (D.M. Pillers and W.R. Woodward, in preparation). Since mdxCv2 expresses Dp140 while mdxCv4 does not, it seems likely that this isoform is not required for normal electrophysiology in the retina. Unfortunately, unlike the other dystrophin isoforms, Dp140 does not encode a novel N-terminus, making the generation of Dp140-specific antibodies impossible (18). Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that Dp140 may contribute to the expression in the retina, and that the phenotypic consequences of loss of this isoform may be masked by Dp71 expression. We have detected a difference in the expression of the hydrophilic and hydrophobic C-termini at the OPL and ILM, with the OPL primarily expressing dystrophin with the hydrophilic C-terminus, and the ILM and retinal blood vessels primarily expressing dystrophin with the hydrophobic C-terminus. This indicates that the majority of Dp260 at the OPL, and Dp71 at the ILM and blood vessels, have different C-termini, which may influence protein-protein interactions. While the functional consequences of the splicing of exon 78 are unknown, the change introduced into the protein is significant, resulting in an overall change in hydrophobicity that seems likely to influence protein folding (20,23). Thus, the difference in expression of the C-termini at the OPL and ILM may result in distinct protein interactions at these structures. Immunofluorescence analysis of dystrophin and [beta]-dystroglycan expression in the retina has shown that the two proteins co-localize (31,32). Furthermore, the proper localization of [beta]-dystroglycan to the membrane requires the expression of Dp260 at the OPL (13), and Dp71 at the ILM and blood vessels. Taken together, these data strongly indicate that both Dp260 and Dp71 participate in membrane complexes with [beta]-dystroglycan in the retina. Analysis of [beta]-dystroglycan and dystrophin localization in the retina by electron microscopy has shown that the proteins are found in the intracavital extensions of the presynaptic photoreceptor termini of the OPL, and the vitread membrane surface of the Muller cell endfeet which forms the ILM (32,43). The precise function of these complexes remains elusive. [alpha]- and [beta]-dystroglycan are expressed in a wide range of tissues and, in muscle, act as a receptor for merosin and agrin in the extracellular matrix (44,45). The [beta]-dystroglycan component binds to [alpha]-dystroglycan and spans the membrane where it interacts with dystrophin (30,44). Two models have been proposed to explain the function of dystrophin in this complex. The first is that dystrophin is required to maintain the structural integrity of the cell membrane by linking the actin cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix (44). The second model is that dystrophin functions in a clustering process that assembles receptor membrane complexes at specialized locations on the cell surface (45,46). The first model requires an actin-binding site in dystrophin. For reasons already discussed, Dp260 could function at the OPL according to either model. However, in the case of Dp71, which lacks an actin-binding domain, it seems more likely to be involved in positioning membrane receptors according to the second model. The non-overlapping expression patterns of Dp260 and Dp71 combined with the ERG data clearly indicate that both Dp260 at the OPL and Dp71 at the ILM and retinal blood vessels are required. In addition, both proteins appear to function through the [beta]-dystroglycan. At present, the other protein components of the complex are unknown. From our knowledge of dystrophin function in muscle, one can speculate that these isoforms may position membrane channels or receptors at the OPL and ILM or, alternatively, are maintaining the structure of the OPL and ILM. Given the obvious differences between the OPL and ILM, it is likely that this function will involve distinct protein interactions. The identification of the proteins that associate with Dp260 at the OPL and Dp71 at the ILM and blood vessels with undoubtedly be necessary for further understanding of dystrophin function in the CNS. Normal human adult male retinas were obtained from the Eye Bank Laboratory of the Canadian National Institute for the Blind (Toronto, Ontario). C57BL/6J and mdx mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). The mdxCv3 and mdxCv4 mice were supplied by Dr Verne Chapman (Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY). The antibody 1583 has been described previously (47). This antibody was raised against a peptide containing the last 17 amino acids of the C-terminus of dystrophin when exon 78 is included. Hydropathy profile of this C-terminus indicates that it is hydrophilic (20,28,29). Antiserum ACT-1 is specific to the alternatively spliced C-terminus that does not include exon 78, in which the 13 hydrophilic residues are replaced by 33 primarily hydrophobic ones (20,28,29). ACT-1 was generated from a peptide conjugated at its N-terminus to keyhole limpet haemocyanin (KLH): DLGRAMESLVSVMTDEEGAE-COOH (Alberta Peptide Institute, Edmonton, Canada). Antibody NME-1 was raised against a peptide (H2N-MREQLKGG) containing the first eight amino acids of Dp71 N-terminus conjugated at its C-terminus to bovine serum albumin (BSA). Antibody RET1 was raised to a peptide (H2N-MSARKLRNLSYKKK) containing the first 14 amino acids of the unique Dp260 N-terminus conjugated at its C-terminus to BSA. In each case, the peptides were mixed with Freund's complete adjuvant and injected into rabbits. The immune response was monitored by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Four booster injections were performed over a 6 week period before the final bleed. Serum raised to BSA-conjugated peptides was pre-purified through a column containing BSA cross-linked to Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia, PQ). Serum was isolated and purified on an affinity column in which the conjugated peptide was chemically cross-linked to CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia, PQ). The specificity of each of the antibodies was confirmed by western analysis of appropriate fusion proteins and the loss of signal when comparing tissue from mdx and mdxCv3 mice, lacking all of the dystrophin isoforms (G.Y. Dally and P.N. Ray, in preparation). Retinas were embedded in OCT (Miles) and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Sections of 7 µm were cut using a -20°C microtome (Leica), mounted on silane-coated slides, and stored at -80°C until used. Prior to immunocytochemistry, slides were fixed with 2% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 15 min, treated with 0.2% sodium borohydrate (Sigma, St Louis, MO) for 15 min and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma). Sections were washed in PBS for 10 min and blocked in 10% horse serum in PBS for 45 min. All steps were performed at room temperature. The blocked retinal sections were rinsed briefly in PBS before addition of primary antibodies, 1583 (1:1000), ACT-1 (1:500), Ret-1 (1:1000), NME-1 (1:1000) and NCLB DAG-43 (1:50) (Novacastra). Primary antibodies were diluted in 1% horse serum, 1% fetal calf serum, 0.03% BSA in PBS. Sections were incubated with primary antibody for 2 h, and washed for 10 min three times in PBS. Secondary antibodies consisted of either a biotin-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (to detect 1583, Act-1, Ret-1, NME-1) or a biotin-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (to detect NCL-BDAG-43) and were incubated with the sections for 1 h at room temperature. The slides were washed three times with PBS before being incubated with rhodamine conjugated to streptavidin (diluted 1:100) (Jackson Immunoresearch, Westgrove, PA) for 1 h. Sections were washed in PBS, mounted in Immunoflo (ICN) and examined using a Leica epifluorescent microscope with rhodamine filter. Negative controls were treated in an identical manner except for the omission of the primary or secondary antibodies. The authors would like to thank Iris Diplock in the Department of Pathology (Hospital for Sick Children) for preparing the retina sections. We are grateful to Danka Vidgen and Dr Carol Freund for their helpful discussions. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada (P.N.R.), Research to Prevent Blindness (R.G.W.), Foundation Fighting Blindness (D.M.P.) and NIH EY10084 (D.M.P.). P.L.H. was the recipient of an Ontario Graduate Scholarship.
DISCUSSION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Antibodies
Indirect immunofluorescence
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 12 Aug 1998
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1998.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
J. S. Satz, A. R. Philp, H. Nguyen, H. Kusano, J. Lee, R. Turk, M. J. Riker, J. Hernandez, R. M. Weiss, M. G. Anderson, et al.
Visual Impairment in the Absence of Dystroglycan
J. Neurosci.,
October 21, 2009;
29(42):
13136 - 13146.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C. Dalloz, R. Sarig, P. Fort, D. Yaffe, A. Bordais, T. Pannicke, J. Grosche, D. Mornet, A. Reichenbach, J. Sahel, et al.
Targeted inactivation of dystrophin gene product Dp71: phenotypic impact in mouse retina
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
July 1, 2003;
12(13):
1543 - 1554.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
N. C. Connors and P. Kofuji
Dystrophin Dp71 Is Critical for the Clustered Localization of Potassium Channels in Retinal Glial Cells
J. Neurosci.,
June 1, 2002;
22(11):
4321 - 4327.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
D. J. Blake, A. Weir, S. E. Newey, and K. E. Davies
Function and Genetics of Dystrophin and Dystrophin-Related Proteins in Muscle
Physiol Rev,
April 1, 2002;
82(2):
291 - 329.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
H. Ueda, T. Baba, K. Kashiwagi, H. Iijima, and S. Ohno
Dystrobrevin Localization in Photoreceptor Axon Terminals and at Blood-Ocular Barrier Sites
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
November 1, 2000;
41(12):
3908 - 3914.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
T Claudepierre, C Dalloz, D Mornet, K Matsumura, J Sahel, and A Rendon
Characterization of the intermolecular associations of the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex in retinal Muller glial cells
J. Cell Sci.,
January 10, 2000;
113(19):
3409 - 3417.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
FREE Full Text (PDF)
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Howard, P. L.
![]()
Articles by Ray, P. N.
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Howard, P. L.
![]()
Articles by Ray, P. N.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?