| Human Molecular Genetics | Pages |
Maturation of wild-type and mutated frataxin by the mitochondrial processing peptidase
Introduction
Results
Identification of MPP[beta] as a frataxin-interacting protein
Frataxin binds MPP[beta] in vitro
In vitro and in vivo processing of frataxin
In vivo processing of frataxin mutant
Discussion
Materials And Methods
Bait constructions and mutagenesis
Yeast strain and transformation
Screening for frataxin-interacting proteins and [beta]-galactosidase assays
Protein expression in E.coli
GST pull-down assay
Construction of eukaryotic expression vectors and in vitro translation
In vitro processing and western blot analysis
Acknowledgements
References
Maturation of wild-type and mutated frataxin by the mitochondrial processing peptidase
INTRODUCTION
The gene responsible for Friedreich ataxia (FRDA), an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disease (1), codes for a novel 18 kDa protein, frataxin (2,3), located at mitochondrial membranes (3-5). Most patients are homozygous for a large trinucleotide expansion in the first intron of the gene, that causes a severe reduction of the transcript and protein steady-state levels. Four per cent of patients are compound heterozygotes for an expansion mutation and a point mutation. Two missense mutations have been reported, both being located at the C-terminal half of the protein, which might be relevant to the function of the protein (2,6).
Frataxin is conserved from yeast to man and has a distant homologue in purple bacteria that share a common phylogeny with the prokaryotic mitochondrial ancestor. The study of yeast frataxin null mutants revealed a growth deficit on a non-fermentable carbon source, mitochondrial DNA instability, decreased activity in cytochrome c oxidase and high sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide, copper and iron (5,7,8). The most pronounced effect of yeast frataxin deficiency is an accumulation of iron in the mitochondria (5,8). In addition, iron deposits (9) and deficiency of iron-sulfur enzymes (10) were found in the heart of FRDA patients, the former suggesting that frataxin plays a role in iron handling and the latter suggesting involvement of oxidative stress.
We applied a yeast two-hybrid assay (11) to unravel frataxin function in mitochondria, and we identified mitochondrial processing peptidase [beta] (MPP[beta]), a subunit of heterodimeric peptidase that is involved in proteolytic cleavage of N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequences (12,13). Frataxin with C-terminal missense mutations found in FRDA patients showed decreased interaction in the yeast two-hybrid assay. Processing of wild-type and mutated frataxin was analysed in vitro with reconstituted MPP and in vivo by COS cell overexpression. The results suggest that the maturation efficiency of the missense mutants is reduced and may contribute to the pathogenicity of these mutations.
RESULTS
Identification of MPP[beta] as a frataxin-interacting protein
We searched for protein partners of frataxin by yeast two-hybrid screening. An expression vector that encodes mouse frataxin fused to the DNA-binding domain of the transcription factor LexA was used as a bait in a two-hybrid screen of an embryonic (E9.5-E12.5) cDNA library. Frataxin is expressed during mouse embryogenesis and, therefore, its putative partners are expected to be represented in such a library. From ~1.5 × 106 transformants, 11 independent positive clones were obtained as determined by activation of his and lacZ reporter genes. Seven clones code for known non-mitochondrial proteins and three code for proteins that are unlikely to be mitochondrial based on sequence similarity. A single mitochondrial protein, MPP[beta], was identified. The specificity of interaction between MPP[beta] and frataxin was verified by retransformation into yeast cells. The MPP[beta] two-hybrid clone encodes a protein homologous to rat MPP[beta] from amino acids 40 to 489, and would therefore contain six additional N-terminal amino acids compared with the mature MPP[beta] protein (14).
In order to test whether the interaction between frataxin and MPP[beta] is part of the recognition process that removes its mitochondrial targeting peptide, we constructed a series of frataxin deletion and point mutants and tested them using the yeast two-hybrid assay. The C-terminal domain of frataxin used as a bait did not activate the his and lacZ reporter genes, while a strong activation was detected when the N-terminal domain was used (Fig. Figure 1. Activation of the lacZ reporter gene by the interaction of MPP[beta] with various frataxin baits. Schematic diagram of LexA fusion constructs (black box, LexA; white box, frataxin) used to test for the specificity of interaction between MPP[beta] and frataxin. The construction of the plasmids pBTM-frataxin, pBTM-N, pBTM-C, pBTM-G127V and pBTM-I151F is described in Materials and Methods. MPP[beta] from mammals is structurally related to, but functionally distinct from, the core I protein of the respiratory chain complex III (15). We tested, therefore, whether the interaction of frataxin is specific for MPP[beta] or also applies to the complex III core I protein. We found only a very weak interaction between frataxin and core I protein in vitro, by GST pull-down assay. In addition, no interaction was detected in vivo using the yeast two-hybrid assay and mature core I protein (amino acids 35-472) as a prey (data not shown).
Frataxin binds MPP[beta]in vitro
A GST pull-down assay was used to confirm mutual interaction of frataxin and MPP[beta] in vitro. MPP[beta] was cloned in the prokaryotic expression vector pGEX4T3 and expressed in Escherichia coli. Purified MPP[beta]-GST fusion protein was shown to bind ~10% of the in vitro translated frataxin while no binding was observed with a GST protein alone (Fig. Figure 2. In vitro binding of frataxin and MPP[beta]. In vitro binding to GST-MPP[beta] of in vitro translated wild-type frataxin and the I151F mutant. Bound frataxin was revealed by western blot analysis with 1G2 antibody. The amount of bound frataxin was measured by densitometry of the autoradiograph (Bio-Rad) and compared with the amount of input frataxin (20% of input, right lanes) (see text). The absence of binding to GST alone demonstrates the specificity of the interaction. In order to test whether frataxin is indeed processed by MPP, we have reconstructed MPP in vitro by co-expression of the [alpha] and [beta] subunits in E.coli. Total bacterial protein extract was assayed for processing activity using mouse wild-type and I151F and G127V mutant frataxins tagged at their C-terminus by five [35S]methionine residues. The [beta] subunit of ATPase was used as a positive control (data not shown), and non-recombinant bacterial protein extract served as a negative control for non-specific degradation. Both wild-type and mutant frataxins are cleaved by MPP. About 25% of wild-type frataxin is cleaved by MPP after 1 h incubation, while cleavage appeared slower for I151F frataxin (~15% cleavage over the same time period; Fig. Figure 3. In vitro and in vivo processing of frataxin. (A) In vitro processing of mouse frataxin-5×M and the I151F mutant by rat MPP[alpha] and MPP[beta] co-expressed in E.coli. Cleavage products were analysed directly by SDS-PAGE and fluorography of [35S]frataxin. Input, in vitro translation products prior to incubation; +, after 1 h digestion with MPP bacterial extract; -, after incubation with bacterial extract without MPP; C, no DNA was added to the in vitro translation mixture. (B) In vivo and in vitro processing of human frataxin revealed by western blot. Lane 1, in vitro translated frataxin; lane 2, COS cells extract overexpressing frataxin; lane 3, in vitro processed frataxin with MPP[alpha] and [beta] bacterial extract; lane 4, in vitro incubation with bacterial extract without MPP; lanes 5 and 8, same as lane 2; lane 6, COS cells expressing N-terminally truncated frataxin (amino acids 41-210); lane 7, endogenous frataxin from muscle tissue. Immunodetection was performed using the anti-frataxin specific monoclonal antibody 1G2. Note that the COS cells overexpressing frataxin in lanes 2, 5 and 8 were harvested at a time point when processing of frataxin was not complete. The 28 kDa band in lane 7 is a cross-reacting product (present in FRDA patients, not shown), and the 29 kDa band in lanes 2, 3, 4, 5 and 8 might be a degradation product of frataxin. (C) Western blot analysis of COS cells overexpressing human wild-type frataxin (lane 10) and the I154F mutant (lane 9) after a 48 h incubation period. The lowest band corresponds to the mature frataxin form as demonstrated by the co-migration with endogenous frataxin from human muscle tissue (B). We then compared the cleavage site of MPP with the different forms observed during frataxin in vivo maturation. The maturation process can be followed in COS cells overexpressing human frataxin. The cells use the endogenous mitochondrial import system to target overexpressed frataxin to the mitochondria, and different maturation intermediates are obtained at different time points. Therefore, samples of in vitro processed frataxin were compared with overexpressed maturation product in COS cells and with the endogenous frataxin from muscle tissues by western blot analysis, using the 1G2 anti-frataxin antibody (Fig. We found a putative MPP recognition motif at the N-terminus of frataxin, predicted from a consensus sequence derived from the comparison of mitochondrial precursor protein sequences [RXhXX(S,T,G), where h is a hydrophobic residue and cleavage occurs before the hydrophobic residue (16)]. The corresponding mouse frataxin sequence RGLHVT would predict the cleavage to occur between G40 and L41, while the human frataxin does not have a sequence that fits the consensus perfectly. In order to test the mouse-based prediction for human frataxin, which we can detect with the 1G2 antibody, we compared the electrophoretic mobility of human frataxin starting at G41 (corresponding to the mouse G40) and expressed in bacteria with the intermediate forms seen in COS cells overexpressing human frataxin. We indeed found that such an N-terminally truncated protein co-migrates with the major intermediate product of COS cells, corresponding to the in vitro MPP-processed fragment (Fig. Since we observed that the in vitro processing of frataxin seems reduced for the mutant compared with wild-type frataxin, we analysed this process in vivo using the transiently transfected COS cells. We found repeatedly that the maturation process of the human I154F mutant is significantly slowed down in comparison with that of the corresponding wild-type (Fig.
In vitro and in vivo processing of frataxin
In vivo processing of frataxin mutant
DISCUSSION
Frataxin is a mitochondrial protein whose precise function is unknown. In order to unravel this function, we searched for frataxin protein partners using the yeast two-hybrid assay. We identified 11 positive clones, only one of which codes for a mitochondrial protein, MPP[beta], that was characterized further.
MPP[beta] is a subunit of the heterodimeric MPP that cleaves the targeting sequence of nuclearly encoded mitochondrial proteins. MPP acts at the N-terminal [alpha]-helix amphiphilic structure of its substrate, and we demonstrated that MPP[beta] specifically interacts with amino acids 4-87 of frataxin using the yeast two-hybrid assay. The interaction between frataxin and MPP[beta] was confirmed independently by in vitro affinity binding, and the specificity of this interaction was demonstrated by the absence of interaction with the complex III core I protein which is highly homologous to MPP[beta] (55% identity).
MPP activity reconstituted in vitro was used to test the cleavage of wild-type frataxin. Frataxin cleavage was found to result in a protein of ~20 kDa. The comparison of the in vitro MPP processed frataxin and N-terminally truncated frataxin with maturation products from frataxin overexpression in COS cells indicates that MPP cleaves frataxin to an intermediate form corresponding to amino acids 41-210. This intermediate form is then cleaved into the mature form. A two-step cleavage process is known to occur in the case of proteins that are targeted either to the mitochondrial matrix (17) or to the inner membrane and intermembrane space (17-19). The second cleavage might thus be associated with subsequent re-routing to the inner membrane or the intermembrane space, since frataxin was found by immunoelectron microscopy to reside at the mitochondrial membranes (3), while it did not co-localize with porin, an outer mitochondrial membrane protein in yeast (5).
The rare missense point mutations found in FRDA patients are all located within the C-terminal conserved domain of the protein. Vassarotti et al. reported that changes in the mature domain of the substrate may affect the precursor cleavability, probably by modifying the primary sequence in such a way that the accessibility of the targeting signal to the mitochondrial import apparatus is somehow restricted (20). We therefore constructed two mouse missense mutants corresponding to mutations reported in patients, and found that they cause reduced interaction with MPP[beta] in the yeast two-hybrid assay, suggesting that the maturation of the mutated frataxins may be defective in FRDA.
In vitro cleavage of the I151F mutant with reconstituted MPP occurred at the same position as in wild-type frataxin but with lower efficiency. The overall processing of the mutant frataxin in vivo in transfected COS cells also appeared less efficient, with a lower mature to precursor ratio for the same incubation period when compared with normal frataxin. However, the different sites of cleavage appeared unaltered between normal and mutant frataxin, indicating that no aberrant form of frataxin is produced as a consequence of the missense mutation. The lower efficiency of processing of the mutant frataxin at the intermediate MPP cleavage site might contribute to the pathogenicity of the missense mutations in addition to the likely functional alteration caused by the modification of an amino acid highly conserved during evolution.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bait constructions and mutagenesis
Mouse frataxin cDNA was PCR amplified using primers UT56, 5[prime]-TACATAGAATTCGGAGGTCGCGCAGCC; and UT60, 5[prime]-CAGTTCGGATCCTCAAGTGCCTTTTCCAG (EcoRI and BamHI sites are indicated in italics), and fused in-frame into the EcoRI-BamHI sites of the LexA DNA-binding domain of the yeast two-hybrid vector pBTM116 (a gift of Dr S. Hollenberg, Seattle, WA) generating pBTM-frataxin. The N-terminal construct (amino acids 4-87), pBTM-N, was generated by PCR using primers UT56 and WF228, 5[prime]-GCCTTGGATCCTCATAGAGAGCTTGGGTTGTC. The C-terminal construct (amino acids 86-207), pBTM-C, was generated by PCR using primers VU254, 5[prime]-AACGAATTCATGTCTCTAGACGAGACAGCG and UT60. Mouse frataxin mutants (G127V and I151F) corresponding to the missense mutations found in FRDA patients were generated by overlap extension (21), resulting in pBTM-G127V and pBTM-I151F. Negative control (pBTM-lamin) and positive control (pBTM-VP16) were as reported by Bartel et al. (22).
Yeast strain and transformation
The yeast strain L40 [MATa his 3D200 trp1-901 leu2-3,112 ade2 LYS::(lexAop)4-HIS3 URA3::(lexAop)8-lacZ gal4 gal80] was used for all transformations and assays. Yeast transformations were performed using a modified lithium acetate transformation protocol (23) and grown at 30°C using appropriate synthetic complete or selective (SC) media.
Screening for frataxin-interacting proteins and [beta]-galactosidase assays
A mouse embryo cDNA library (in the vector pASV3) of embryonic stage 9.5-12.5 days (gift of Dr J.-M. Garnier, Strasbourg) was transformed into the yeast strain L40 already harbouring the pBTM-frataxin construct. The transformants were plated onto SC media deficient in Trp, Leu and His supplemented with 25 mM 3-amino-triazole.
The cDNAs of positive plasmids were isolated by growing the His+/[beta]-galactosidase+ colonies in SC-Leu media overnight, lysing the cells with acid-washed beads, electroporating the bacterial strain HB101 (leuB auxotrophic) with the yeast lysate and plating onto M9 (-Leu) plates.
Liquid [beta]-galactosidase assays were performed in 9-12 independent measurements. Yeast colonies were inoculated into appropriate selective media and processed as described (24).
Protein expression in E.coli
The original pASV3-MPP[beta] clone was modified by PCR at its N-terminus (primers VU155, 5[prime]-TAAGGTACCGGATCCCAGGCTGCCCCACAGG, and VU156, 5[prime]-GCTCTGGGCAAATCTCTC) and cloned into the BamHI site of the pGex4T3 vector for expression of a GST-mature MPP[beta] fusion protein (amino acids 46-489).
Overexpression of GST fusion protein was performed in the E.coli BL21 strain, and proteins were purified as described by the manufacturer (Pharmacia Biotech).
GST pull-down assay
GST pull-down assay was performed as follows. Glutathione-Sepharose beads were washed three times in GST buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.3 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 5% glycerol, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)] and incubated with 1 mg of purified GST fusion protein or GST at 4°C for 2 h. Unbound protein was washed off with GST buffer three times. Protein-protein interaction was assayed using an in vitro translated frataxin (or its mutant) in GST buffer in a final volume of 100 µl with 13.3 µl of the in vitro translation reaction (TNT7 Quick Promega) for 1 h at 4°C on a rocking table. Beads were washed with GST buffer three times, and as much supernatant as possible was removed after the last wash. Bound proteins were released in 2× Laemmli buffer by boiling and analysed by western blot.
Construction of eukaryotic expression vectors and in vitro translation
The complete coding sequence of mouse frataxin and of the I151F mutant was fused to a 5× methionine tag at the 3[prime] end and cloned in the pTL1 eukaryotic expression vector, resulting in pTLfrataxin-5×M and pTLI151F-5×M. The human I154F mutant was constructed by overlap extension mutagenesis of the human frataxin pTL1 clone (3). The N-terminally truncated human frataxin clone was constructed by PCR (primers XP22, 5[prime]-GGGCGAATTCATGCTGCGCACCGACATCGA; and XO20, 5[prime]-GGCTGGTACCTCAAGCATCTTTTCCGGAAT) and cloned into the EcoRI-KpnI sites of the pTL1 vector. Overexpression of the truncated protein was performed in COS cells as described in Campuzano et al. (3). In vitro translation was performed using TNT7 quick system as described by the manufacturer (Promega).
In vitro processing and western blot analysis
In vitro processing was performed using the pGEMabinv plasmid coding for the MPP[alpha] and MPP[beta] subunits (a gift of Dr J. Adamec, Prague) as described in Striebel et al. (25). The [beta] subunit of ATPase (a gift of Dr J. Adamec, Prague) served as a positive control for the in vitro processing. Western blot analysis was performed as described in Campuzano et al. (3).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We wish to thank Drs M. Cossée and J.-L. Mandel for discussions and comments on the manuscript, Dr J. Adamec for the MPP[alpha] and [beta] expression clone, and L. Reutenauer, P. Filipe, I. Kolb-Cheynel, Y. Lutz and A. Staub for their technical assistance. This work was supported by funds from the Association Française contre les Myopathies (to M.K.), CNRS, INSERM, the Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche and the Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg. H.K. is a recipient of a fellowship from the Association Française contre les Myopathies. V.C. is a recipient of an EEC fellowship.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 12 Aug 1998
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1998.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
S. Schmucker, M. Argentini, N. Carelle-Calmels, A. Martelli, and H. Puccio
The in vivo mitochondrial two-step maturation of human frataxin
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
November 15, 2008;
17(22):
3521 - 3531.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
I. Condo, N. Ventura, F. Malisan, A. Rufini, B. Tomassini, and R. Testi
In vivo maturation of human frataxin
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
July 1, 2007;
16(13):
1534 - 1540.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
F. Acquaviva, I. De Biase, L. Nezi, G. Ruggiero, F. Tatangelo, C. Pisano, A. Monticelli, C. Garbi, A. M. Acquaviva, and S. Cocozza
Extra-mitochondrial localisation of frataxin and its association with IscU1 during enterocyte-like differentiation of the human colon adenocarcinoma cell line Caco-2
J. Cell Sci.,
September 1, 2005;
118(17):
3917 - 3924.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
P. T. Kotzbauer, A. C. Truax, J. Q. Trojanowski, and V. M.-Y. Lee
Altered Neuronal Mitochondrial Coenzyme A Synthesis in Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation Caused by Abnormal Processing, Stability, and Catalytic Activity of Mutant Pantothenate Kinase 2
J. Neurosci.,
January 19, 2005;
25(3):
689 - 698.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C. M. Everett and N. W. Wood
Trinucleotide repeats and neurodegenerative disease
Brain,
November 1, 2004;
127(11):
2385 - 2405.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
S. Adinolfi, M. Trifuoggi, A. S. Politou, S. Martin, and A. Pastore
A structural approach to understanding the iron-binding properties of phylogenetically different frataxins
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
August 1, 2002;
11(16):
1865 - 1877.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
D. M. Gordon, M. Kogan, S. A.B. Knight, A. Dancis, and D. Pain
Distinct roles for two N-terminal cleaved domains in mitochondrial import of the yeast frataxin homolog, Yfh1p
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
February 1, 2001;
10(3):
259 - 269.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
P. Cavadini, C. Gellera, P. I. Patel, and G. Isaya
Human frataxin maintains mitochondrial iron homeostasis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
October 1, 2000;
9(17):
2523 - 2530.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
H. Puccio
Recent advances in the molecular pathogenesis of Friedreich ataxia
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
April 1, 2000;
9(6):
887 - 892.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. B Delatycki, R. Williamson, and S. M Forrest
Friedreich ataxia: an overview
J. Med. Genet.,
January 1, 2000;
37(1):
1 - 8.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. Pandolfo
Molecular Pathogenesis of Friedreich Ataxia
Arch Neurol,
October 1, 1999;
56(10):
1201 - 1208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
S. S. Branda, P. Cavadini, J. Adamec, F. Kalousek, F. Taroni, and G. Isaya
Yeast and Human Frataxin Are Processed to Mature Form in Two Sequential Steps by the Mitochondrial Processing Peptidase
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 6, 1999;
274(32):
22763 - 22769.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
S. Dhe-Paganon, R. Shigeta, Y.-I. Chi, M. Ristow, and S. E. Shoelson
Crystal Structure of Human Frataxin
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 29, 2000;
275(40):
30753 - 30756.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
P. Cavadini, J. Adamec, F. Taroni, O. Gakh, and G. Isaya
Two-step Processing of Human Frataxin by Mitochondrial Processing Peptidase. PRECURSOR AND INTERMEDIATE FORMS ARE CLEAVED AT DIFFERENT RATES
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 22, 2000;
275(52):
41469 - 41475.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
FREE Full Text (PDF)
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Koutnikova, H.
![]()
Articles by Koenig, M.
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Koutnikova, H.
![]()
Articles by Koenig, M.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?