| Human Molecular Genetics | Pages |
Allele-specific late replication and fragility of the most active common fragile site, FRA3B
Introduction
Results
FRA3B expression and DNA replication in the FHIT/FRA3B region
Profile of replication timing in the FHIT/FRA3B region
Discussion
Materials And Methods
Cell lines and reagents
Visualization of late replication in the FRA3B region
Flow cytometry and DNA isolation
PCR analysis of replicated DNA
Replication timing analysis
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
References
Allele-specific late replication and fragility of the most active common fragile site, FRA3B
INTRODUCTION
FRA3B is the most highly inducible fragile site in the human genome (1). Deletions in the FRA3B region are observed in a number of different solid tumors (2-6). Ohta et al. (7) identified the fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene from this region, and they identified alterations in this gene using nested RT-PCR analysis in a number of different tumor types (7-9). The human FHIT gene spans an estimated 1 Mb of DNA at chromosome 3p14.2 and encompasses the entire FRA3B region and a t(3;8) translocation breakpoint observed in a family with hereditary renal cell carcinoma (the hRCC breakpoint). In contrast to its large genomic size, the final processed transcript of this gene is only 1.1 kb and it encodes a 16.8 kDa protein with diadenosine triphosphate hydrolase activity (10).
The molecular basis for the fragility in the FRA3B region is not yet known. Previous studies (11,12) have suggested that the common fragile site FRA3B is distinct from the cloned rare fragile sites. First, no repeat motifs, such as trinucleotide or minisatellite repeats, characteristic of rare fragile sites have been identified. Second, genomic breakage and instability occur over a large genomic region (at least 500 kb). It has been hypothesized that gaps at fragile sites arise as a result of replication failure at chromosomal points that are unusually sensitive to interference during DNA synthesis (13). Using a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based procedure to analyze replication timing, Le Beau et al. (14) reported that FRA3B sequences are late replicating and that replication was delayed further by aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA polymerases [alpha] and [delta] (15).
Although the function of the FHIT gene has not yet been determined, the gene can be used as a biomarker to analyze DNA replication around the FHIT/FRA3B region. We treated cell lines with aphidicolin and analyzed replication timing in the FHIT region using multiplex PCR analysis with human FHIT exon-specific primers as well as markers throughout the FRA3B region including several polymorphic markers. We also adopted an immunofluorescent procedure to visualize 5-bromo-2[prime]-deoxyuridine (BrdU)-substituted DNA in metaphase chromosomes. Our data show that replication timing in the FHIT/FRA3B region is asynchronous and that there are two distinct alleles that replicate at different times in the cell cycle. Breaks/gaps within the FRA3B region preferentially occurred on the chromosome with the late replicating (LR) allele. To our knowledge, this is the first report to demonstrate allele-specific late replication in this region.
RESULTS
FRA3B expression and DNA replication in the FHIT/FRA3B region
To visualize the replication pattern across the FRA3B region, we labeled the cells with BrdU for 3 h and then collected them for chromosome preparation. Indirect immunofluorescence was used for detection of BrdU-substituted DNA in metaphases. Since BrdU was incorporated into DNA in the last 3 h before the cells entered M phase, the detected BrdU should represent the LR region on chromosomes. Preliminary data from cell line GM03715 and two normal blood samples showed that LR signals were observed mostly on one of the two chromosomes 3 and that breaks/gaps in the FRA3B region occurred preferentially on the chromosome with LR signals. These data raise an important question, which is whether FRA3B expression occurs randomly between the chromosome 3 homologs or preferentially on one homolog. To answer this question, we chose another cell line (GM11428) with abnormalities on both chromosomes 3, which were easily differentiable as one had a partial deletion, del(3), and the other had a partial duplication, dup(3). We analyzed 660 metaphases from this cell line, comprising 278 metaphases from cells with aphidicolin induction and 382 metaphases from cells without aphidicolin induction. We first analyzed late replication and compared the results obtained between aphidicolin-induced cells and cells not exposed to aphidicolin. After aphidicolin induction, a total of 75 LR signals out of 278 metaphases were identified in the FRA3B region while 48 of 382 metaphases from untreated cells showed LR signals in this fragile site. The difference between the two groups is statistically significant (P1 = 0.0001, [chi]2 test) (Table 1), demonstrating a delay of replication at FRA3B after aphidicolin induction. Figure
Figure 1. Visualization of late replication in the FRA3B region. Cultured cells were treated with aphidicolin for 24 h and labeled by BrdU for 3 h before harvest for chromosome preparation. BrdU-labeled DNA in the metaphase chromosomes was detected by an immunofluorescent procedure (see Materials and Methods). The green/light blue spots represent the late replicating region (BrdU-substituted DNA) on the chromosomes. The metaphase spreads were obtained from cell lines GM11428 (A and B) and GM03715 (C and D), respectively. (A) and (C) show late replication of one chromosome 3 homolog without fragile site breakage in either homolog. (B) and (D) show late replication of one homolog with fragile site breakage. Two of the metaphases (A and D) also showed very strong signals (late replication) on the inactive chromosomes X. del(3), chromosome 3 with partial deletion; dup(3), chromosome 3 with duplication. Table 1.
Metaphases analyzed
LR signals
del(3)/dup(3)Breaks
del(3)/dup(3)
Aphidicolin induction
278
75 (63/12)
33 (31/2)
Control (no induction)
382
48 (48/0)
8 (8/0)
Since the cell line utilized has two distinct homologs, del(3) and dup(3), it was very easy to differentiate them. We next analyzed LR and breaks/gaps between the two chromosome 3 homologs. Interestingly, 84% (63/75) of LR signals were detected on the chromosome 3 with the partial deletion in aphidicolin-treated cells (Table 1). A similar result was also obtained in the cells without aphidicolin treatment (Table 1). The difference between the two distinguishable chromosomes 3 in this cell line was significant (P2 = 0.035, [chi]2 test). These results indicate that replication at FRA3B is asynchronous. One chromosome 3 contains an LR allele and the other contains an earlier replicating allele. More interestingly, the chromosome with the LR allele showed more breaks/gaps at FRA3B than its homolog, especially after aphidicolin induction (Table 1), suggesting that late replication is associated with fragility of the fragile site FRA3B.
Profile of replication timing in the FHIT/FRA3B region
BrdU-labeled human DNAs from six fractions of the cell cycle were isolated by co-immunoprecipitation with BrdU-labeled hamster DNA. To test the quality of the isolated DNA, we performed control experiments by analyzing control PCR products in the cell line GM03715. First, the hamster-specific PCRs from hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (HXGPRT) and transducin (TRANA) genes showed constant bands across the six fractions of cell cycle, suggesting that BrdU-labeled human DNAs were co-precipitated successfully (data not shown). Secondly, human-specific PCR primers derived from regions with known replication profiles showed late (DXS297 and DXS7857) and early replication (HPRT) as expected, further suggesting that the DNA did indeed represent different fractions in the cell cycle (Fig.
Figure 2. Allele-specific replication in the FHIT/FRA3B region. PCR products were labeled and separated on sequencing gels. (A) A control experiment was performed to ensure the high quality of isolated DNAs. The PCR products from known replication pattern markers produced early (HPRT) and late (DXS297 and DXS7857) replication signals as expected. Note: both of the late replication markers also showed early replication bands since the DNAs were isolated from female cells with only one late replicated chromosome X (inactivated). (B) Three polymorphic markers from the FHIT/FRA3B region displayed asynchronous replication of their two distinct alleles. The arrows demonstrate the two different replicating alleles for each polymorphic marker. Figure 3. Replication timing profile of the FHIT gene. BrdU-labeled DNA from six different fractions of cell cycle were subjected to multiplex PCR by direct labeling with [[alpha]-32P]dCTP followed by separation on sequencing gels (see Materials and Methods). (A) Replication profile before aphidicolin induction. (B) Replication profile after aphidicolin induction. Asynchronous replication timing can be seen with most of the FHIT exons. To better understand the replication profile in the FHIT/FRA3B region, we scanned all of the signals and compared the relative density of each signal. We chose the two cell cycle stages that gave the greatest amplification with each respective marker to represent the replication timing of the early and late alleles for that specific marker. Figure Figure 4. Timing of the replication profile across the FHIT/FRA3B region in cell line GM03715 in the absence and presence of aphidicolin. A total of 21 markers across the FHIT/FRA3B region were analyzed. The approximate position of each marker within the FHIT/FRA3B region is shown on the left. Also included in this figure is the region where aphidicolin-inducible breakage occurs (the FRA3B region), as well as important landmarks in that region including the hRCC breakpoint, the proximal and distal clusters of aphidicolin-induced breakpoints, the position of the HPV16 viral integration site and the position of pSV2neo insertions into the FRA3B region in the presence of aphidicolin. The two strongest signals were chosen to represent the replication timing for each allele for that marker. The curved lines represent replication timing for each allele across this region. The most significant asynchronous replication between the two alleles occurred at FHIT exon 6, D3S1300, D3S4482, FHIT exon 5, U39804, U39799, spc-DNA1, FHIT exon 4, D3S1480 and FHIT exon 3 (arrows beside each marker). Chromosome replication is under stringent temporal and spatial control to ensure accurate duplication of the genome. Timing of DNA replication appears to be an important epigenetic regulator of gene expression during development. Using a FISH-based procedure, Le Beau et al. (14) reported LR in the FRA3B region and this replication was delayed further in the presence of aphidicolin. By detecting BrdU-labeled DNA, we cytologically and molecularly demonstrate not only late replication but also allele-specific replication within the FHIT/FRA3B region, especially after aphidicolin induction (Table 1 and Fig. Asynchronous DNA replication has been reported in imprinted regions such as 15q11-13, 11q23 and 11p15.5 (16-19). Imprinted regions appear to be unstable in the human genome since frequent deletions and rearrangements were observed in these regions in human cancers and also in several genetic diseases. So far, the molecular basis of the instability at imprinted regions is not yet known. Imprinted regions and the FRA3B region share several common features such as asynchronous replication and frequent deletion in cancers. Preliminary studies in our laboratory have shown that one allele of the FHIT gene in cancer cell lines is deleted preferentially (unpublished data) whereas the other allele appears to be unperturbed. This could explain why full-length RT-PCR products were still observed in cell lines with heterogeneous deletions in FHIT exons (20). Asynchronous replication may be associated with frequent splicing alterations within the FHIT gene, as seen in a variety of tumors and some normal tissues (21,22), since altered RNA splicing in other regions with asynchronous replication has been reported (23,24). More interestingly, FMR1 and FMR2, the two cloned genes at rare fragile sites, also demonstrated altered RNA splicing and late replication (25-28). Further analysis will help to address any relationship between DNA replication and RNA splicing. The data presented here show that the markers throughout this region replicate at different times in the cell cycle (Fig. In summary, we report here that there is allele-specific replication of the FHIT/FRA3B region. The expression of fragility in the FRA3B region preferentially occurred on the chromosome with the late replicating allele. The results herein provide evidence that allele-specific late replication is related to the fragility of the common fragile site FRA3B. It will be interesting to see if the genes that reside on the 87 other common fragile sites show allele-specific replication. Such an observation would suggest that this is the mechanism underlying the common fragile sites: a very late replicating allele, which cannot finish replication before cell division in the presence of aphidicolin or some other cellular stress, predisposes that homolog to breakage and rearrangement. Human lymphoblastoid cell lines GM03715, GM00546 and GM11428 were purchased from NIGMS. The former two cell lines are karyotypically normal. GM11428, came from a 6-year-old female with the following karyotype: 46, XX, del(3)(p25pter),der(3)add(3)(pter)dup(3)(q21qter). The two chromosomes 3 in this patient are easily distinguishable from each other, thus facilitating our analyses of chromosome-specific late replication. The culture conditions were based on recommendations from the supplier. In addition, two peripheral blood samples were obtained from two females with normal karyotypes. Aphidicolin and BrdU were purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO). Mouse anti-BrdU antibody and fluorescein-labeled secondary antibody (anti-IgG) were obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). Cell lines GM03715 and GM11428 and two whole blood samples were cultured in RPMI-1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and treated with aphidicolin (0.4 µM) for 24 h. The cells were then labeled with BrdU at a final concentration of 10 µM (for GM03715 and GM11428) or 50 µM (for the two whole blood samples) for 3 h and treated with colcemid at a final concentration of 0.4 µM for 1 h before harvesting. The cells were collected and subjected to chromosome preparation. Chromosomes from metaphase spreads were denatured by incubation for 2 min in a mixture of ethanol/0.1 M NaOH (2:5) (29). BrdU-labeled chromosomes were visualized by using an indirect immunofluorescence procedure. Briefly, the denatured slides were permeabilized with 0.1% NP-40 for 15 min followed by incubation with 10% goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) for 20 min. The slides were incubated with 5 µg/ml of anti-BrdU antibody in PBS-FCS solution (1× PBS, 5% fetal calf serum) for 1 h. After three 3 min washes with PBS, the slides were incubated with 1 µg/ml of fluorescein-labeled anti-mouse IgG for 1 h. The slides were then washed three times for 5 min each with PBS before counterstaining with 4[prime],6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (0.03 µg/ml). The slides were analyzed under a Zeiss fluorescence microscope with a CCD camera. Two different lymphoblastoid cell lines (GM03715 and GM00546) were cultured and treated with and without aphidicolin at a final concentration of 0.4 µM for 24 h. The cells were then pulse-labeled for 90 min with BrdU at a final concentration of 50 µM. Before sorting, the cells were collected and stained with propidium iodide. The aphidicolin-treated and -untreated BrdU-labeled cells were separated into six different cell cycle phases on a FACS cell sorter. They include G1, four S phases (S1, S2, S3 and S4) and G2/M (30). For each phase, 1 × 105 cells were collected. BrdU-containing DNA from the lymphoblastoid cells and an equal amount of BrdU-labeled DNA from hamster cells were mixed and isolated by co-immunoprecipitation as described previously (27,28,30). A total of 21 PCR-amplifiable sequence-tagged site (STS) markers (see Fig. For non-polymorphic STS markers, PCR reactions were performed in a volume of 12.5 µl containing 100 µM of each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 6.25 pmol of each primer pair, 0.5 U of AmpliGold Taq polymerase (Perkin Elmer-Cetus, Branchburg, NJ) and BrdU-labeled DNA corresponding to 1000 flow-sorted cells in 1× reaction buffer II supplied by the manufacturer. For polymorphic STS markers and FHIT primers, 5 µCi of [[alpha]-32P]dCTP (Amersham) was put into each PCR reaction for direct labeling. All reactions were performed on a Themocycler 480 (Perkin-Elmer Cetus) with 10 min initial denaturation at 95°C to activate the Taq polymerase. Amplification was for 25 cycles which included 94°C for 20 s, 58-60°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s. Except for FHIT primer sets, PCR reactions routinely included a pair of hamster primers as a control. PCR products from non-polymorphic STS markers were run on 1.5% agarose gels, transferred to nylon membranes and then probed with 32P-labeled PCR products. The membrane was reprobed with [alpha]-32P-labeled hamster-specific PCR products. The multiplex PCR products from the FHIT exons were run on 5% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels. PCR products from polymorphic STS markers were analyzed by 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels with 8 M urea. The films were exposed for 1-48 h before development. All of the experiments analyzing the cell cycle purified fractions were repeated at least twice. The authors thank Dr A.F. Gazdar at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center for providing multiplex PCR primer sequences of the FHIT gene and Dr J.Q. Qian at the Mayo Clinic for his technical support for chromosome analysis. This work was supported by NIH grant CA48031 (D.I.S.), DOD grant DAMD-98-1-8522 (D.I.S.) and by the Mayo Foundation. BrdU, 5-bromo-2[prime]-deoxyuridine; FHIT, fragile histidine triad; hRCC, hereditary renal cell carcinoma; LR, late replication.
DISCUSSION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines and reagents
Visualization of late replication in the FRA3B region
Flow cytometry and DNA isolation
PCR analysis of replicated DNA
Replication timing analysis
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABBREVIATIONS
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 6 Feb 1999
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1999.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A. Koren
The role of the DNA damage checkpoint in regulation of translesion DNA synthesis
Mutagenesis,
May 1, 2007;
22(3):
155 - 160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
S. V. Diaz-Perez, D. O. Ferguson, C. Wang, G. Csankovszki, C. Wang, S.-C. Tsai, D. Dutta, V. Perez, S. Kim, C. D. Eller, et al.
A Deletion at the Mouse Xist Gene Exposes Trans-effects That Alter the Heterochromatin of the Inactive X Chromosome and the Replication Time and DNA Stability of Both X Chromosomes
Genetics,
November 1, 2006;
174(3):
1115 - 1133.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A. Helmrich, K. Stout-Weider, K. Hermann, E. Schrock, and T. Heiden
Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes
Genome Res.,
October 1, 2006;
16(10):
1222 - 1230.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
E. El Achkar, M. Gerbault-Seureau, M. Muleris, B. Dutrillaux, and M. Debatisse
Premature condensation induces breaks at the interface of early and late replicating chromosome bands bearing common fragile sites
PNAS,
December 13, 2005;
102(50):
18069 - 18074.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. Schwartz, E. Zlotorynski, M. Goldberg, E. Ozeri, A. Rahat, C. l. Sage, B. P.C. Chen, D. J. Chen, R. Agami, and B. Kerem
Homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining repair pathways regulate fragile site stability
Genes & Dev.,
November 15, 2005;
19(22):
2715 - 2726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. F. Arlt, B. Xu, S. G. Durkin, A. M. Casper, M. B. Kastan, and T. W. Glover
BRCA1 Is Required for Common-Fragile-Site Stability via Its G2/M Checkpoint Function
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
August 1, 2004;
24(15):
6701 - 6709.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
D. J. Mulvihill and Y.-H. Wang
Two Breakpoint Clusters at Fragile Site FRA3B Form Phased Nucleosomes
Genome Res.,
July 1, 2004;
14(7):
1350 - 1357.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
E. Zlotorynski, A. Rahat, J. Skaug, N. Ben-Porat, E. Ozeri, R. Hershberg, A. Levi, S. W. Scherer, H. Margalit, and B. Kerem
Molecular Basis for Expression of Common and Rare Fragile Sites
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
October 15, 2003;
23(20):
7143 - 7151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. Kost-Alimova, H. Kiss, L. Fedorova, Y. Yang, J. P. Dumanski, G. Klein, and S. Imreh
Coincidence of synteny breakpoints with malignancy-related deletions on human chromosome 3
PNAS,
May 27, 2003;
100(11):
6622 - 6627.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. Ciullo, M.-A. Debily, L. Rozier, M. Autiero, A. Billault, V. Mayau, S. El Marhomy, J. Guardiola, A. Bernheim, P. Coullin, et al.
Initiation of the breakage-fusion-bridge mechanism through common fragile site activation in human breast cancer cells: the model of PIP gene duplication from a break at FRA7I
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
November 1, 2002;
11(23):
2887 - 2894.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
F. Toledo, A. Coquelle, E. Svetlova, and M. Debatisse
Enhanced flexibility and aphidicolin-induced DNA breaks near mammalian replication origins: implications for replicon mapping and chromosome fragility
Nucleic Acids Res.,
December 1, 2000;
28(23):
4805 - 4813.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A. Hellman, A. Rahat, S. W. Scherer, A. Darvasi, L.-C. Tsui, and B. Kerem
Replication Delay along FRA7H, a Common Fragile Site on Human Chromosome 7, Leads to Chromosomal Instability
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
June 15, 2000;
20(12):
4420 - 4427.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C. Jones, R. Mullenbach, P. Grossfeld, R. Auer, R. Favier, K. Chien, M. James, A. Tunnacliffe, and F. Cotter
Co-localisation of CCG repeats and chromosome deletion breakpoints in Jacobsen syndrome: evidence for a common mechanism of chromosome breakage
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
May 1, 2000;
9(8):
1201 - 1208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
A. J. W. Paige, K. J. Taylor, A. Stewart, J. G. Sgouros, H. Gabra, G. C. Sellar, J. F. Smyth, D. J. Porteous, and J. E. V. Watson
A 700-kb Physical Map of a Region of 16q23.2 Homozygously Deleted in Multiple Cancers and Spanning the Common Fragile Site FRA16D
Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2000;
60(6):
1690 - 1697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
K. Mimori, T. Druck, H. Inoue, H. Alder, L. Berk, M. Mori, K. Huebner, and C. M. Croce
Cancer-specific chromosome alterations in the constitutive fragile region FRA3B
PNAS,
June 22, 1999;
96(13):
7456 - 7461.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
FREE Full Text (PDF)
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Wang, L.
![]()
Articles by Smith, D. I.
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Wang, L.
![]()
Articles by Smith, D. I.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?