| Human Molecular Genetics | Pages |
Inner ear and kidney anomalies caused by IAP insertion in an intron of the Eya1 gene in a mouse model of BOR syndrome
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials And Methods
Genetic mapping
Histological and clinical analyses
ABR threshold determinations
Genomic DNA and RNA, and cDNA preparation
Southern and northern blots
Genomic clones
PCR primers
PCR reactions
DNA sequencing
Acknowledgements
References
Inner ear and kidney anomalies caused by IAP insertion in an intron of the Eya1 gene in a mouse model of BOR syndrome
DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession nos AF097544-AF097546
INTRODUCTION
Hearing loss is the most common sensory deficit in humans and affects ~1 in 2000 live births (1). Tremendous progress has been made during the last 5 years in mapping and cloning of genes responsible for both syndromic and non-syndromic hereditary hearing loss (2,3). The mouse is an excellent animal model for the study of these human conditions because the anatomy, function and hereditary abnormalities of the inner ear have been shown to be similar in both humans and mice (4,5). Genetic and molecular analyses of mouse deafness mutations have aided the discovery of genes that underly several human hearing loss syndromes. For example, the mouse shaker-1 mutation (sh1) was shown to be a mutation of Myo7a (6), and the homologous gene in humans subsequently was shown to be responsible for both dominant (DFNA11) and recessive (DFNB2) forms of non-syndromic deafness (7,8), as well as for Usher syndrome type 1B (9). Recently, the mouse shaker-2 mutation (sh2) was shown to be a mutation of Myo15 (10), and the homologous gene in humans to be responsible for DFNB3 (11).
In mice, mutations affecting the vestibular system of the inner ear often result in a characteristic circling or head-bobbing phenotype; many of these mutations also affect the cochlea and cause deafness (4). As part of our research program at the Jackson Laboratory to identify genes causing deafness, we have been selecting and studying mutant mice that exhibit behavior characteristic of vestibular dysfunction. Pathological analysis of one such circling mutant revealed gross morphological abnormalities of the inner ear and also dysmorphic or missing kidneys.
Here, we describe the inner ear and kidney pathology of these mutant mice and our genetic mapping results that place the new mutation on proximal chromosome 1, near the position of the Eya1 gene (12). The human homolog of this gene, EYA1, has been shown to underly branchio-oto-renal (BOR) syndrome, an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by hearing loss with associated branchial and renal anomalies (13). Because of the coincident map position and the mutations phenotypic similarity to human BOR syndrome, we considered Eya1 to be a likely candidate gene for the new mouse mutation and undertook a molecular analysis of this gene in mutant mice. We show that Eya1 mRNA expression is altered in mice homozygous for the new mutation as compared with their normal, co-isogenic littermates, and demonstrate that this altered expression is caused by the spontaneous insertion of an intracisternal A particle (IAP) element into intron 7 of the Eya1 gene.
RESULTS
Mice with circling and head-bobbing behavior were discovered in a C3H/HeJ colony at the Jackson Laboratory. The abnormal behavior was shown to be inherited as an autosomal recessive trait. Affected male homozygotes would sometimes breed; females did not. Auditory-evoked brainstem response (ABR) threshold measurements demonstrated that homozygous mutant mice are deaf (no evoked response to sound pressure levels >95 dB) at the earliest testable age (3-4 weeks), but heterozygotes hear normally. Mice homozygous for the mutation were also characterized by absent or dysmorphic kidneys.
The adult inner ears of the mutant mice displayed a number of morphogenetic abnormalities (Fig.
Figure 1. Effect of the Eya1 mutation on adult inner ear morphology. Cleared whole-mount preparations (a and b) compared at equal magnification, and histological sections (c and d, 80× magnification, and e and f, 200× magnification) of inner ears from C3H/Hej +/+ control (a, c and e) and C3H/HeJ-Eya1bor/Eya1bor mutant (b, d and f) mice. Asterisks indicate the distinct interscalar septi of a normal cochlea (a); arrowheads designate a normal cochlea in the +/+ control (a) and its absence in the mutant inner ear (b). The stria vascularis (small arrow) and organ of Corti (large arrow) shown in the +/+ control (e) are absent in the mutant inner ear (f). sl designates the spiral ligament (e and f). The kidney phenotype seen in post-wean mutants showed variable expressivity, ranging from bilaterally normal kidneys to unilateral absence (Fig. Figure 2. Effect of the Eya1 mutation on adult kidney morphology. Top center: autopsy of a 4-month-old male mutant showing complete absence of the left kidney. The right kidney, indicated by an arrow, shows normal morphology. The intestinal tract was excised intentionally and the left ureter is partially obscured by the pancreas. Both testes were present. Bottom panels: the right kidney from a 7.5-month-old female +/? control (a, d and g) is compared with the left (b, e and h) and right (c, f and i) kidneys of a 7.5-month-old female sibling mutant: kidney whole-mounts 10× (a, b and c); longitudinal sections, 10×, H&E stained (d, e and f); and cortex sections, bar = 100 µm, PAS (g, h and i). Although hypoplasia is obvious in both mutant kidneys, their cellular morphology is similar to that of the control kidney. However, functional stress is indicated by elevated plasma urea nitrogen (32 mg/dl for the mutant versus 18 mg/dl for control). To map the new mutation genetically, an intercross was made between F1 hybrids produced from matings between homozygous mutant mice and mice from the wild-derived inbred strain CAST/Ei. Intercross progeny with obvious vestibular dysfunction were typed for polymorphic markers dispersed throughout the genome. Linkage was found with markers on chromosome 1. The haplotypes of 58 affected intercross progeny (116 tested meioses) were examined to establish gene order and interlocus recombination distances. No recombination was observed between the new mutation and the markers D1Mit68, D1Mit4 or D1Mit52, and ~7% recombination (8/116) was observed between this cluster and D1Mit71. These results placed the mutation ~10 cM from the chromosome 1 centromere, near the recently mapped Eya1 gene (12). DNA sequence comparisons of RT-PCR products covering the protein-coding region of the Eya1 cDNA (nucleotides 153-1926; 12) failed to reveal any differences between mutant and control mice; however, a gross alteration of the Eya1 gene in affected mice compared with wild-type controls was detected by Southern blot analysis (Fig. Figure 3. Southern blot analysis of the Eya1 mutation. Genomic DNA from C3H/HeJ controls (+/+; lanes marked +), heterozygotes (+/Eya1bor; lanes marked H) and homozygous mutant mice (Eya1bor/Eya1bor; lanes marked M) were digested with EcoRI, PstI, PvuII, MspI and BglII and hybridized with three Eya1 cDNA probes: (a) exons 1-13 (nucleotides 1-1600), (b) exons 5-10 (nucleotides 592-1277) and (c) exon 8 (nucleotides 992-1097). Exon numbering corresponds to Abdelhak et al. (13) and nucleotide numbering to Xu et al. (12). The same fragment polymorphisms were detected with all three probes. The mutant fragment sizes were larger in EcoRI and PvuII digests and smaller in PstI, MspI and BglII digests. The overall size and exon-intron structure of the mouse Eya1 gene appeared similar to that described for the human EYA1 gene (14). Because of its large size (the human EYA1 gene consists of 16 coding exons and extends over 156 kb), the region of the Eya1 gene containing the mutation was narrowed by sequential hybridization of Southern blots with probes from increasingly restricted portions of the Eya1 cDNA (Fig. To compare DNA sequences in the mutated region of the Eya1 gene, genomic clones were identified by screening phage libraries from both mutant and wild-type mice with a 106 bp exon 8 probe. Restriction site mapping was then used to localize the mutation to intron 7 (Fig. Figure 4. Structure and sequence of the Eya1 gene in the region of IAP insertion. (a) Gene structure and site of IAP insertion, ~1480 bp upstream of exon 8. Exons are indicated by black rectangles. Landmark restriction sites and PCR primers (shown as arrowheads indicating direction) are shown at their approximate locations. (b) DNA sequence of IAP LTRs flanked by the 6 bp direct repeat sequence GGTAGG, underlined. The start of each LTR is indicated above the sequence. A 30 bp deletion (compared with the pale ear IAP LTR, GenBank accession no. AF003867) in the CT-rich region of the LTRs is indicated by three asterisks. A consensus 5[prime] splice site, shown in bold, is created by the junction of the 5[prime] LTR with the 6 bp direct repeat. (c) PCR genotyping of mice. Two forward primers, one specific to the IAP insertion (IAPF1) and the other specific to the 5[prime]-flanking region of intron 7 (gF5), were combined with one reverse primer specific to the 3[prime]-flanking region of intron 7 (gR5). In combination, the three primers distinguish +/+ (lane 1), +/Eya1bor (lane 2) and Eya1bor/Eya1bor(lane 3) genotypes. Primers IAPF1 and gR5 amplify mutant DNA (160 bp product) but not wild-type DNA, whereas primers gF5 and gR5 amplify wild-type (285 bp product) but not mutant DNA. The IAP insertion was in the same transcriptional orientation as the Eya1 gene. The single mutant genomic clone did not contain the 5[prime] end of the IAP element; therefore, the DNA sequence of the cloned 3[prime] long terminal repeat (LTR) together with the Eya1 intron sequence 5[prime] to the IAP insertion site were used to amplify the uncloned 5[prime] LTR junction fragment from mutant genomic DNA. Sequence analysis of this PCR product revealed that the 5[prime] and 3[prime] LTR sequences were identical and that the IAP element was flanked by a 6 bp direct repeat (GGTAGG), a characteristic of retrotransposition. The nucleotide sequences of the IAP junctions with intron 7 of the Eya1 gene have been deposited in GenBank under accession nos AF097545 (5[prime]LTR) and AF097546 (3[prime] LTR). Northern blot analysis of total RNA from adult skeletal muscle hybridized with a 1.6 kb Eya1 cDNA probe showed an ~50% reduction in the level of wild-type message in homozygous mutant mice compared with +/+ controls (Fig. Figure 5. RNA expression analyses of mutant Eya1. (a) Northern blot analysis. Total cellular RNA extracted from skeletal muscle of wild-type C3H/HeJ (lane marked +) and homozygous mutant mice (lane marked M) was hybridized with a 1.6 kb Eya1 cDNA probe (exons 1-13). Relative optical density measurements were 1300 and 730 for the normal 4 kb Eya1 transcript from wild-type and mutant mice, respectively. The densities of the additional 7 and 10 kb transcripts in mutant mice were 420 and 120, respectively. Density measurements for the two Actb transcripts indicated that equal quantities of RNA were loaded in each lane. Migration positions for 28S and 18S rRNAs are shown on the left. (b) RT-PCR analysis. cDNA prepared from skeletal muscle RNA from one control (lane marked +) and three mutant (lanes marked M) mice was used as PCR template with primers amplifying the exon 5-8 region (nucleotides 592-1097) (12) of the Eya1 cDNA. Both the new mouse mutation and human BOR syndrome are caused by alterations of homologs of the Drosophila eyes absent gene (mouse Eya1, human EYA1). These disorders are consistent with the role of this gene in early embryonic development. BOR syndrome is characterized by developmental anomalies of the branchial arches (pre-auricular pits, branchial cysts, outer and middle ear malformations), the inner ear (absent or undeveloped cochlea and semicircular canals) and the kidneys (kidney hypoplasia to bilateral agenesis) (13,15). The prominent features of the mouse Eya1 mutation, including cochlear and kidney hypoplasia, are strikingly similar to those of BOR syndrome. The reduced, but still present, expression of normal Eya1 transcripts in affected homozygotes is evidence that the mouse mutation is hypomorphic, which may explain its recessive nature compared with the dominant inheritance of human BOR syndrome. The ~50% level of Eya1 expression observed in homozygous mutant mice (Fig. The mouse genome contains ~2000 copies of retroviral-like IAPs (17). IAP retrotranspositions have been shown to underly several inherited mutations in the mouse, including agouti, A (18); pale ear, ep (19); vibrator, Pitpnvb (20); Lamb3 (21); reeler, Relnrl (22); albino, Tyrc (23); fused, AxinFu (24); and [beta]-glucuronidase, Gusmps-2J (25). IAP element insertions into non-coding introns have been shown to cause reduced expression and/or formation of chimeric transcripts in the Pitpnvb (20), AxinFu (24) and Gusmps-2J (25) mutations, similar to our findings for the Eya1bor mutation. It is thought that IAP element insertions introduce cryptic splice and polyadenylation sites that disrupt normal transcript processing or stability and consequently reduce gene expression. In the Eya1bor mutation, the junction of the 6 bp direct repeat with the 5[prime] LTR of the IAP created a consensus 5[prime] splice site (AGGTGTG; Fig. The DNA sequence of the Eya1 IAP LTR (Fig. In summary, we believe that retrotransposition of an IAP element into intron 7 of the Eya1 gene is responsible for the phenotype of the new mouse mutation for the following reasons. (i) The inner ear and kidney abnormalities of mutant mice are similar to the characteristic traits of human BOR syndrome, known to be caused by mutations of the human EYA1 gene. (ii) The new mouse mutation and the Eya1 gene co-segregated in 116 tested meioses from the linkage cross. (iii) Northern blot and RT-PCR analyses showed that Eya1 gene expression is altered in mutant mice compared with controls. (iv) Southern blot and DNA sequence analysis revealed that an IAP element was present in intron 7 of the Eya1 gene of mutant mice but not in co-isogenic controls. (v) PCR genotyping (Fig. This new mouse model will permit studies of Eya1 gene expression and etiology not possible in humans with BOR syndrome. For example, linkage backcross mice homozygous for the Eya1 mutation, with varying genetic backgrounds derived from parental C3H/HeJ and CAST/Ei genomes, displayed variable phenotypes for both inner ears and kidneys. Analysis of such genetically well-defined mice will permit identification of genes that modify the phenotypic manifestation of the Eya1 mutation and may provide insight into causes of the incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity characteristic of human BOR syndrome (15). The mouse mutation also provides a means to study mutant Eya1 gene expression during embryonic development. Other developmental control genes such as Pax2 are also known to contribute to inner ear and kidney patterning (26). Studies can now be undertaken to examine the role of Eya1 in molecular pathways leading to these common morphogenetic events. PCR primer pairs (MapPairs) for microsatellite markers distributed throughout the mouse genome were purchased from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL) and typing was performed as previously described (27), except that PCR reactions were carried out for 30 cycles and products were separated on 3% agarose gels (Metaphor; FMC BioProducts, Rockland, ME) and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Gene order, determined by minimizing the number of obligate cross-over events, and recombination frequency estimates were calculated with the aid of the Map Manager computer program (28). Adult inner ears were harvested after transcardial perfusion with 1% paraformaldehyde, 1% glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer, pH 7.2. For light microscopy, inner ears were dissected and post-fixed in buffered 4% OsO4, dehydrated in ethanol and propylene oxide, and embedded in SPURR resin (Polysciences, Warrington, PA). Semithin sections (1-2 µm) were cut with a diamond knife and stained with 0.5% toluidine blue in 0.5% sodium borate. Kidneys were fixed in Bouins, halved longitudinally and embedded in paraffin. Sections (5 µm) were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or periodic acid-Schiff (PAS). Plasma was obtained by retro-orbital sinus bleed, and urea nitrogen values were assessed by Affiliated Laboratories (Bangor, ME). Mice were tested at the University of Cincinnati for ABR thresholds. A computer-assisted evoked potential system (Intelligent Hearing Systems, Miami, FL) was used to obtain ABR thresholds for clicks and for pure-tone pips at 8, 16 and 32 kHz, as described previously (29). Genomic DNA was prepared from mouse spleens by standard phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation methods. Total RNA was purified from mouse brain, eye and skeletal muscle tissues with TRIzol reagent, according to the manufacturers protocol (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD). DNA and RNA concentrations were estimated by spectrophotometric measurements of absorbance. cDNA was prepared from total RNA from adult mouse skeletal muscle with the SuperScript Preamplification System for First Strand cDNA Synthesis (Gibco BRL). Blotting, probe labeling and hybridization procedures used for both Southern and northern blots were as previously described (30). A 1.6 kb fragment of the mouse Eya1 cDNA, containing most of the protein-coding sequence, was used as a probe for initial Southern and northern blot analyses. Additional probes for Southern analysis were produced by PCR amplification with the primers described below. For northern analysis, 15 µg of total RNA was loaded per lane on a 0.8% agarose gel with 2.2 M formaldehyde, electrophoresed in 1× MOPS buffer at 2 V/cm for 4 h, vacuum blotted in 10× SSC onto a positively charged nylon membrane, and UV cross-linked. For quantitative estimation of transcript abundance, densitometry measurements were made on developed X-ray film using the Computing Densitometer and ImageQuant software from Molecular Dynamics (Sunnyvale, CA). The wild-type Eya1 clone was isolated by standard filter hybridization screening methods from a commercially available lambda phage library prepared with 129/SvJ mouse genomic DNA (Lambda FIX II; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The mutant Eya1 clone was isolated from a custom-made phage library (Lambda FIX II) prepared with genomic DNA from homozygous mutant mice. PCR primers used to amplify portions of the mouse Eya1 cDNA for sequence comparisons and as probes for Southern blot analysis are given in Table 1. Primers used for sequence comparisons of genomic DNA are given in Table Table 1. Table 2.
DISCUSSION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Genetic mapping
Histological and clinical analyses
ABR threshold determinations
Genomic DNA and RNA, and cDNA preparation
Southern and northern blots
Genomic clones
PCR primers
Forward primer
Reverse primer
Amplified nucleotides
EYA1F1
EYA1R4
153-833
ATGGAAATGCAGGATCTAAC
TGTGCGTACTGACCCTGGCC
EYA1F3
EYA1R6
592-1277
GGAAAGTGGATTGTCACAGT
AAAAATAGATGTGTGTCTGC
EYA1F5
EYA1R8
1036-1720
CGTCGAGGTTCAGATGGGAA
CTATTGGAAACACAATTCCT
EYA1F7
CON1R
1478-1926
GATCTACAACACCTACAAAA
CAGGTACTCTAATTCCAAGG
Primer
Sequence
ex8F
ACAGTCCTTCCACACCCATT
ex8R
GGAGGGGAGGGATTATTGTT
gR2
CCAGGGAGCCTGATATTTGA
gR4
TCTTCCTCACTGTGATCTTGTTG
gR6
CAGAAAAATTGATGAAACTGGAGA
gR7
GTCTCCACCATGGCTTCAAT
gF1
TGCTGAGTCCTGGTGATCTG
gF2
TAGTCCCCATGTGCTTCCAT
gF3
TAGGGCTCTTCCCAAAGCTG
gF5
TCTCCAGTTTCATCAATTTTTCTG
gR5
CAGATCACCAGGACTCAGCA
IAPR1
CAGACCAGAATCTTCTGCGA
IAPF1
TCGCAGAAGATTCTGGTCTG
PCR reactions
The following reaction conditions were used for PCR amplifications: 20-50 ng of template DNA, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.01% Triton X-100, 2.25 mM MgCl2, 100 nM of each primer, 100 µM of each of four deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase. Amplification consisted of one cycle of denaturation at 94°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles, each consisting of 94°C for 15 s denaturation, 60°C for 2 min of annealing and 72°C for 2 min of extension. After the 35 cycles, the final product was extended for 7 min at 72°C. PCR reaction products were separated on 2.5% Metaphor agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized with UV light.
DNA sequencing
PCR-amplified products from cDNA and genomic DNA templates were excised from gels and purified with QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). DNA was sequenced using an Applied Biosystems 373A DNA Sequencer (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT) and an optimized DyeDeoxy Terminator Cycle Sequencing method. The same primers used for PCR amplification were also used for cycle sequencing.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Dr Richard Maas (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) for his generous gift of the Eya1 cDNA clone and for sharing primer sequence information. We thank personnel of the the Jackson Laboratory (TJL) Microchemistry Service for rapid and high quality DNA sequencing (Amy Lambert and Doug McMinimy) and library screening and clone purification (Kevin Johnson). We thank Emma Lou Cardell (University of Cincinnati) and Rod Bronson (TJL) for their histological expertise. We also thank Patsy Nishina and Babette Gwynn (TJL) for their careful review of this manuscript. This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants GM46697, RR01183, CA34196, DC00119, and contract DC62108.
REFERENCES
This article has been cited by other articles:
This page is run by Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, as part of the OUP Journals
Comments and feedback: www-admin{at}oup.co.uk
Last modification: 10 Mar 1999
Copyright©Oxford University Press, 1999.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
D. Zou, C. Erickson, E.-H. Kim, D. Jin, B. Fritzsch, and P.-X. Xu
Eya1 gene dosage critically affects the development of sensory epithelia in the mammalian inner ear
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
November 1, 2008;
17(21):
3340 - 3356.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
L. H. Gagnon, C. M. Longo-Guess, M. Berryman, J.-B. Shin, K. W. Saylor, H. Yu, P. G. Gillespie, and K. R. Johnson
The Chloride Intracellular Channel Protein CLIC5 Is Expressed at High Levels in Hair Cell Stereocilia and Is Essential for Normal Inner Ear Function
J. Neurosci.,
October 4, 2006;
26(40):
10188 - 10198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
M. Yamamoto, L. Cui, K. Johkura, K. Asanuma, Y. Okouchi, N. Ogiwara, and K. Sasaki
Branching ducts similar to mesonephric ducts or ureteric buds in teratomas originating from mouse embryonic stem cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
January 1, 2006;
290(1):
F52 - F60.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C. M. Longo-Guess, L. H. Gagnon, S. A. Cook, J. Wu, Q. Y. Zheng, and K. R. Johnson
A missense mutation in the previously undescribed gene Tmhs underlies deafness in hurry-scurry (hscy) mice
PNAS,
May 31, 2005;
102(22):
7894 - 7899.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
F. Banno, K. Kaminaka, K. Soejima, K. Kokame, and T. Miyata
Identification of Strain-specific Variants of Mouse Adamts13 Gene Encoding von Willebrand Factor-cleaving Protease
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 16, 2004;
279(29):
30896 - 30903.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C.-M. Li, M. Guo, A. Borczuk, C. A. Powell, M. Wei, H. M. Thaker, R. Friedman, U. Klein, and B. Tycko
Gene Expression in Wilms' Tumor Mimics the Earliest Committed Stage in the Metanephric Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition
Am. J. Pathol.,
June 1, 2002;
160(6):
2181 - 2190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
![]()
![]()

![]()
![]()
![]()
C. C. Morton
Genetics, genomics and gene discovery in the auditory system
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
May 15, 2002;
11(10):
1229 - 1240.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
![]()
This Article ![]()
![]()
Abstract
![]()
FREE Full Text (PDF)
![]()
Alert me when this article is cited
![]()
Alert me if a correction is posted
![]()
Services ![]()
![]()
Email this article to a friend
![]()
Similar articles in this journal
![]()
Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
![]()
Similar articles in PubMed
![]()
Alert me to new issues of the journal
![]()
Add to My Personal Archive
![]()
Download to citation manager
![]()
Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
![]()
Request Permissions ![]()
Google Scholar ![]()
![]()
Articles by Johnson, K. R.
![]()
Articles by Friedman, R. A.
![]()
Search for Related Content
![]()
PubMed ![]()
![]()
PubMed Citation
![]()
Articles by Johnson, K. R.
![]()
Articles by Friedman, R. A.
![]()
Social Bookmarking ![]()
![]()
What's this?