Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Theuns, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Broeckhoven, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Theuns, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Broeckhoven, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, 2000, Vol. 9, No. 16 2383-2394
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Transcriptional regulation of Alzheimer’s disease genes: implications for susceptibility

Jessie Theuns and Christine Van Broeckhoven+

Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), Born-Bunge Foundation (BBS), University of Antwerp (UIA), Department of Biochemistry, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerpen, Belgium

Received 19 June 2000; Accepted 6 July 2000.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE EXPRESSION AND REGULATION...
 PROMOTER VARIATIONS AND...
 IMPLICATIONS OF VARIABLE GENE...
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
In recent years, important progress has been made in uncovering genes implicated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Three causal genes have been identified in which mutations cause familial presenile AD: the amyloid precursor protein gene and the presenilin 1 and 2 genes. Additionally, the {varepsilon}4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene was shown to be a major risk factor for AD. Despite the genetic heterogeneity, all of these genes work through a common mechanism, i.e. increasing the amount and deposition of the amyloid ß peptide (Aß) in brain triggering AD-related neuronal degeneration. Therefore, the levels of Aß and of the factors involved in its production and deposition are important in the neuropathogenesis of AD. Regulation of transcription of AD genes might therefore be an important player in the neurodegenerative process. In this review, we describe the major features of transcriptional regulation of the known AD genes and the implications of variable expression levels on susceptibility to AD.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE EXPRESSION AND REGULATION...
 PROMOTER VARIATIONS AND...
 IMPLICATIONS OF VARIABLE GENE...
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder of the brain characterized by neuronal loss, extensive deposition of amyloid ß peptide (Aß) in the brain parenchyma and in vessel walls, and the appearance of neuronal inclusions of abnormally phosphorylated tau. The regions that are most affected are the hippocampus and cerebral cortex. Clinically, AD patients show a gradually progressive decline in memory and cognitive functions that is diagnosed on neurological examination, neuropsychological testing and neuroimaging. Among the dementias, AD is the most frequent, with 70% of cases affected. The prevalence of AD increases with age, with 40% of the population older than 85 years affected (1). Apart from aging per se, two other well defined risk factors are gender and family history of AD (2). The genetic etiology of AD is complex, with both genetic and environmental factors influencing the expression of the phenotype. Nevertheless, in a small percentage (<1%) of AD cases the disease is inherited as a fully penetrant monogenic trait in an autosomal dominant manner. In all these cases, the disease onset is before the age of 65 years, i.e. presenile AD or early-onset AD (EOAD). These monogenic AD families have been instrumental in the identification of AD genes using the positional cloning approach. At least four genetic loci that confer inherited susceptibility have been identified to date. Characteristics of these genes are summarized in Table 1. The first causative gene identified for EOAD is the amyloid precursor protein gene (APP) (3) on chromosome 21q21.2 (4), encoding a single membrane-spanning protein (59). Full-length APP is metabolized rapidly by two major pathways in all cells. In many cells, the most prominent pathway is the constitutive pathway where {alpha}-secretase cleaves the Aß sequence (10), producing N-truncated Aß peptides. Neurons, however, have an intrinsic tendency to metabolize APP along the amyloidogenic pathway (1113), in which sequential cleavage by ß- and {gamma}-secretases releases full-length Aß peptides. Whereas ß-secretase cleaves highly specifically, {gamma}-secretase cleaves less specifically, leading to either a 40 amino acid peptide (Aß40) or a 42 amino acid isoform (Aß42) (14,15). All eight AD-related APP mutations detected to date are located near the secretase cleavage sites and have been demonstrated to interfere with APP processing, leading to increased secretion of Aß42. This Aß42 peptide has been shown, at least in vitro, to aggregate more rapidly into fibrils (16) and was claimed to be the earliest and most abundant Aß peptide in amyloid deposits (1719). Recent theories propose that Aß deposits or partially aggregated soluble Aß trigger a neurotoxic cascade, thereby causing neurodegeneration and AD (20,21). As a result, Aß and, in particular, Aß42 were assigned a pivotal role in AD pathogenesis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. AD genes
 
The most frequently mutated EOAD gene is presenilin 1 (PSEN1), located on chromosome 14q24.3 (2224). Based on homology studies, the third causal EOAD gene, presenilin 2 (PSEN2), was isolated and mapped to chromosome 1q42.3 (25,26). The PSEN genes encode highly homologous integral membrane proteins with eight putative transmembrane domains (2730). To date, >60 PSEN1 and 4 PSEN2 mutations have been identified in EOAD patients, scattered over the entire coding region of the genes (http://molgen-www.uia.ac.be/ADMutations/ ). Both in vitro and in vivo, PSEN mutations lead to increased 42 production, suggesting a role for PSEN in the processing of APP (3145). Together, these findings led to the hypothesis of a gain of function for mutant PSEN (20) and provided further evidence for the central role of Aß42 in AD pathogenesis. PSENs have also been shown to be death substrates undergoing caspase cleavage during apoptosis (4648). Although the role of apoptosis in neuronal cell death in AD remains to be proven, AD-linked PSEN mutations, as well as decreased expression of PSEN1 and overexpression of PSEN2 (46), result in apoptosis (49). However, the homology with SEL-12 of Caenorhabditis elegans suggested a possible role for PSEN in NOTCH signaling (50). Further evidence was provided by the study of embryonically lethal PSEN1-deficient mice, which show abnormal somite segmentation, a phenotype shared with NOTCH1-deficient mice (51,52). Moreover, mutations in other genes involved in NOTCH signaling also lead to central nervous system (CNS) disorders with onset ages in adulthood (53).

In addition to the three causative genes, the {varepsilon}4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) on chromosome 19 was identified as a genetic risk factor for both EOAD (54,55) and late-onset AD (LOAD) (5658). The risk associated with the {varepsilon}4 allele is dose dependent, which is reflected in the increased risk and decreased onset age with the number of {varepsilon}4 alleles (59). Several observations indicated that APOE {varepsilon}4 is also involved in increased Aß deposition. It was shown that APOE promotes Aß fibril formation in vitro (60). Also, APOE {varepsilon}4 has a higher binding affinity for Aß than has APOE {varepsilon}3 (56,61), possibly making Aß insoluble and therefore more prone to deposition. Although these in vitro data are controversial, AD patients homozygous for APOE {varepsilon}4 have indeed been shown to have more Aß deposits than APOE {varepsilon}3 homozygotes (62). Also, it was shown that APOE {varepsilon}4 influences the onset age of EOAD patients carrying an AD-related APP mutation but not that of PSEN1 mutation carriers (63).

Since mutations in the causal EOAD genes explain <1% and APOE {varepsilon}4 <20% of all AD cases (22,64,65), it is clear that other genetic factors are involved in AD pathogenesis. Variation in the regulatory regions of APP (66,67), PSEN1 (22,68,69) and APOE (7073) have been suggested to contribute to susceptibility to AD. In this review, we will discuss the importance of expression levels of known AD genes and the implications of variations in their regulatory regions for susceptibility to AD.


    GENE EXPRESSION AND REGULATION OF TRANSCRIPTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE EXPRESSION AND REGULATION...
 PROMOTER VARIATIONS AND...
 IMPLICATIONS OF VARIABLE GENE...
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
APP is expressed in a variety of tissues, with the highest expression in neuronal cells of the CNS (6,7477). APP expression can be induced by a variety of agents such as growth hormones and cytokines (9,11,7886) and by stress conditions (8789). Up-regulation (90,91) of APP promoter activity corroborates with mRNA expression studies (82,92), suggesting a major role for the APP promoter in specific APP expression.

The control mechanisms of APP gene expression have been subject to extensive studies. The APP promoter contains numerous putative binding sites for regulatory transcription factors (Table 2) (9397). However, deletion mapping of the APP promoter demonstrated that <100 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site (TSS) are sufficient for high levels of expression in numerous cell types (98100). This proximal promoter region is devoid of a functional TATA box, and transcription initiation is regulated by a strong initiator element (Inr) surrounding the major TSS +1 (Fig. 1A) (9,95,97,101). Mutations within and immediately upstream of Inr lead to altered use of multiple TSSs and reduce transcriptional activity. Both Inr and the upstream element (UE) are associated with DNase I-protected domains, suggesting sequence-specific binding of nuclear factors (101).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Functional promoter elements for APP, PSEN1 and APOE
 


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Functional promoter elements of AD genes. Boxes represent consensus sequences for binding of TFs. DNA-binding proteins are presented between brackets. Transcription start sites (TSSs) are represented by black arrows. (A) Functional elements in the APP proximal promoter sequence (GenBank accession no. D87675) from –390 to +10. (B) Functional elements in the PSEN1 proximal promoter sequence (GenBank accession no. AF205592) from –164 to +36. Numbering is according to the most upstream TSS of exon 1A (P1) (131). Other TSSs are found at +2 (P2) (131), +16 (Rt1) and +27 (Rt2) (129). (C) Functional elements in the 5'-flanking region of APOE. Shaded boxes represent enhancer elements.

 
APP promoter activation is covered mainly by two GC-rich elements (Table 2, Fig. 1A) (100). The –93/–82 fragment (APBß) contributes at least 70% to APP promoter activity in both neuronal and non-neuronal cells and was shown to bind the CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF), a known regulator of c-myc expression implicated in the promotion of apoptosis (Table 2, Fig. 1A) (102,103). The remaining APP promoter activity is accounted for mainly by the –65/–41 fragment (APB{alpha}) and is mediated by binding of stimulating protein 1 (SP1) and the upstream stimulatory factor (USF), member of the c-Myc-related family of DNA-binding proteins (99,104106). Recently, an interaction model for APP transcriptional activity based on DNA looping was presented. In this model, a novel SP1-like protein forms a homodimer tethering the USF and 5'-flanking SP1 sites, and the upstream AP-1 site with flanking GC-rich motif (Fig. 2, Table 2) (98,107).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Model for APP transcription activation: interaction between the near upstream and downstream (proximal) GC-rich elements. Speckled boxes, SP1-like binding protein or complex; open boxes, homologous DNA sequences shared by both domains; hatched box, SP1 site; black box, AP-1 site.

 
Transcriptional activation of APP can also be mediated by heat shock factor-1 (HSF-1) binding to the heat shock element (HSE) at position –317 (Table 2, Fig. 1A) (88). HSF-1 activation is induced by numerous stress factors, including hypoxia, decreased pH, elevated Ca2+, decreased ATP and exposure to reactive species. It was also reported recently that members of the NF-{kappa}B/Rel family can specifically recognize two identical sequences at –1837/–1822 and –2250/–2241, in the distal promoter region of APP, referred to as APP{kappa}B sites (108). These sites were shown to interact specifically with a complex containing the p50 subunit of the NF-{kappa}B family that is constitutively expressed in neurons and acts as a positive regulator of gene expression in cells of neuronal origin (109). The distal APP promoter also harbors at least one negative regulator of transcription, the upstream regulatory element (URE) between –2257 and –2234, binding an unknown transcription factor (TF), expressed in a restricted number of cell types and different regions of the human brain (110,111).

Not only are the structure and expression pattern of APP highly conserved between species (112,113), but the promoter regions of rodents and primates are also highly homologous to that of the human APP (>=80%) (93,94,114). They all have a high GC content, lack typical TATA and CAAT boxes and share nearly all of the above-described TF-binding sites (Table 2), suggesting a major role for these TFs in APP regulation in vivo (93,94,99,114).

Like APP, the PSENs are ubiquitously expressed, although they display markedly tissue-specific transcriptional differences. In brain, both PSEN1 transcripts of 2.7 and 7.5 kb are present at relatively high levels, whereas only one PSEN2 transcript (2.3 kb) can be detected at relatively low levels (24,26, 115,116). Both PSENs are expressed primarily in neurons and to a lesser extent in glial cells (117127). The PSEN1 5'-untranslated region (UTR) is contained within four exons, with the first two exons (1A and 1B) being alternatively transcribed (Table 1) (128,129). Multiple TSSs have been reported to date, with the major exon 1A TSSs designated +1(P1) and (P2) (Fig. 1B) (129,130).

Deletion mapping of the PSEN1 promoter delineated the most active fragment from –118 to +178 relative to +1(P1), in both neuronal and non-neuronal cells (131). The sequence in this region contains >70% GC, lacks a TATA box but contains transcriptionally active GC boxes around positions –70, –50 and +20 (Fig. 1B), binding SP1-like TFs. The crucial PSEN1 promoter element is located between –22 and –6 and controls >90% of PSEN1 promoter activity. This region contains a binding motif for Ets proteins at –12 (Fig. 1B), and altering the core sequence results in a drastic decrease in promoter activity, by interfering with TF binding. In neuronal cells, the PSEN1 promoter binds an Ets-1/2 protein. Both Ets-1 and Ets-2 are widely expressed in different tissues but are differentially regulated (132,133). Ets-2 is present at high levels in adult brain, including post-mitotic neurons. Ets-1 is particularly abundant in the CNS during specific developmental stages (133). Another Ets family member, Elk-1, has also been shown to be expressed in brain where it is localized exclusively to neurons (134). Which members of the Ets family are able to activate PSEN1 transcription in vivo is not clear. Sequences (+107 to +178) downstream from the TSS also contain major cis-elements, controlling ~80% of total PSEN1 promoter activity. Collectively, these data indicate that sequences upstream and downstream of the TSS each control >80% of promoter activity, indicating the importance of protein–protein interactions between TFs binding to upstream and downstream cis-elements.

Preliminary data on murine PSEN1 promoter activity and in situ hybridization suggest that PSEN1 is expressed and transcribed preferentially in neurons. The structure and expression of PSEN1 are highly conserved between mice and human. Multiple mRNA transcripts, originating from TSSs of alternatively transcribed first exons, have been reported for both species. Reporter gene analysis showed that both TSSs are most probably controlled by one single promoter spanning the +1 position of exon 1A (130). In human, only one exon 1B transcript has been reported so far; therefore, it is difficult to conceive how exon 1B transcription can be driven from the same promoter as the abundant exon 1A transcripts, as described for the mouse transcripts. Hence, it is possible that transcription from the human exon 1B is controlled by its own promoter or at least by exon 1B-specific cis-elements, possibly located downstream of +178. Until now, no data on functional cis-elements controlling transcription from human PSEN1 exon 1B have been reported.

In the regulatory region, maximal similarity is found in the –39/+117 sequence of the mouse PSEN1 promoter region. The +20 GC box (SP1) and the –12 Ets motif are strictly conserved, and reporter gene analysis indicated that this region contributes to the neuron-preferred promoter activity (130). The mouse sequence upstream of position –39 differs significantly from the human sequences. Absence of long stretches of sequence homology is one of the main problems in promoter recognition and it is conceivable that more functional cis-elements, although not located at the corresponding positions, are shared between the mouse and human PSEN1 promoter. Furthermore, sequences from –22 to +178, which confer >80% of human PSEN1 promoter activity, coincide with the region of high homology with the mouse promoter. Also, the major human +1 TSS is located only eight nucleotides downstream of the mouse TSS (130,131), emphasizing the importance of this region for the function of the promoter in both species.

Despite the striking similarities between PSEN2 and PSEN1 in genomic structure, alternative transcripts and use of multiple TSSs (116,135,136), there is little homology in the 5'-flanking region, and the first two exons of PSEN2, although alternatively transcribed, are not mutually exclusive (116). There are two distinct cis-elements regulating transcription from the predicted TSS. PSEN2 basal promoter activity resides between –403 and +13, a TATA-less, GC-rich region containing numerous putative AP-2 and SP1 sites (137). In this region, a functional nerve growth factor (NGF)-responsive element that mediates PSEN2 promoter activation following NGF treatment also resides. The observed 2-fold up-regulation by NGF confirmed the predicted involvement of PSENs in neuronal differentiation (138). Whether the AP-2 or SP1 sites clustered in this region or another as yet unidentified cis-element is responsible for the NGF responsiveness is not yet clear. Further deletion analysis provided evidence for the existence of a second PSEN2 promoter located in intron 1, directing transcription from the start sites in exon 2, though no functional elements have been identified so far.

APOE is expressed in a variety of tissues and cell types and its expression is highly regulated by nutritional, hormonal, tissue- and cell-specific factors, and intracellular cholesterol levels (139,140). In contrast to the causal AD genes, the 5'-flanking sequence of APOE harbors a functional TATA box (141). Multiple general and specific cis-elements have been mapped to the APOE promoter (Table 2, Fig. 1C) (140). The proximal GC box binds SP1 and is required for maximum transcriptional activity (142). Three non-specific enhancer elements, active in both neuronal and non-neuronal cells (143), were identified. Two of these, upstream regulatory elements 1 (URE1) and 2 (URE2), reside in the proximal promoter region and one resides in the first intron, the intron regulatory element 1 (IRE1). The dominant regulatory sequence in URE1 is located from –161 to –141 and is termed the positive element for transcription (PET). This fragment binds at least two TFs, one of which is SP1. Although SP1 is the only protein required for enhancer activity of PET, a second as yet unknown protein competes with SP1, in this way possibly negatively regulating APOE expression (142). A fourth regulatory domain in the APOE promoter, URE3, binds the 300 kDa URE3-binding protein, but needs further characterization (144).

In astrocytic cells, the activity of the proximal promoter of APOE is up-regulated synergistically by cAMP and retinoic acid (RA), which is mediated by two AP-2 sites located in the proximal promoter (145). cAMP mimics the changes occurring in reactive gliosis (146,147) and RA is a potent morphogenetic agent on the developing nervous system and a known regulator of AP-2 expression (148). It is therefore reasonable to presume that the observed synergistic effect of cAMP and RA on the APOE promoter is probably due to an RA-promoted increase in AP-2, followed by a post-transcriptional activation of AP-2 mediated by cAMP (148,149). More tissue-specific cis-elements identified at present seem to reside downstream of APOE, with a potential brain-specific transcriptional activator in the APOEAPOCI intergenic region (150154).

The 5' upstream region of rodent APOE is homologous to human APOE up to 200 bp upstream of the TSS (155,156), with the TATA box, the proximal GC box and URE3 at corresponding positions (Table 2) (141,156,157).


    PROMOTER VARIATIONS AND TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVITY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE EXPRESSION AND REGULATION...
 PROMOTER VARIATIONS AND...
 IMPLICATIONS OF VARIABLE GENE...
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Screening for mutations in the –802/+268 APP promoter fragment in sporadic, and familial EOAD and LOAD cases did not reveal any AD-specific mutation (158161). However, a C->G transversion was detected at position –209 in both affected and unaffected subjects (Table 3) (161). Although this variation is not unique for AD, it may have an effect on APP transcriptional activity associated with AD. Since the number of patients and controls was small and the individual analyses covered only parts of the APP promoter, one cannot yet exclude the existence of AD-related variations in the APP promoter altering transcriptional activity. Recent sib-pair analyses suggested that genetic variability at the APP locus may contribute to risk for LOAD (66,67). It is obvious that a systematic screening of the APP regulatory sequences in extended AD populations is necessary.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Promoter variations in AD genes
 
Besides the amount of full-length APP available, the amount and activity of APP processing factors also influence the production of the amyloidogenic Aß42. Since PSENs were assigned a pivotal role in APP processing, altered PSEN expression due to variations in regulatory regions is considered a risk factor for AD. Genetic association studies in a population-based EOAD case–control sample showed association of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) –48C->T with EOAD (Table 3) (68). Systematic screening of 3 kb of the PSEN1 upstream region in the same population revealed, in addition to –48C/T (22), four novel polymorphisms (–1789G/A, –2154G/A, –2319Tn and –2823I/D), two of which (–2154G/A and –2823I/D) were also shown to be associated with increased risk for EOAD (Table 3). Linkage disequilibrium allowed for the identification of an EOAD risk haplotype (–48C/–2154G/–2823D). Additionally, two potentially AD-related mutations (–280C->G and –2818A->G) were identified (Table 3) (69). The effect of –280C->G and –48C->T on the transcriptional activity of PSEN1 was studied in a transient transfection system. Luciferase reporter gene analysis demonstrated a neuron-specific 30% decrease in promoter activity for the –280G mutant and a neuron-specific 50% decrease in promoter activity for the –48C risk allele, which in homozygous individuals can lead to a critical decrease in PSEN1 expression. Notably, the genetic association of –48C with EOAD was explained by an over-representation of the CC genotype in EOAD patients. These studies provide evidence that increased risk for EOAD associated with PSEN1 may result from genetic variations in the regulatory region leading to altered expression levels of PSEN1 in neuronal cells due to differential binding of nuclear proteins (69,162,163). These data suggest that the increased risk for EOAD associated with PSEN1 may result from decreased expression levels of the PSEN1 protein.

Although PSEN2 has also been shown to be involved in APP processing, and changes in its expression levels might be important in AD pathology, no association was found with AD and no PSEN2 promoter variations have been reported to date.

It was shown that the relative APOE {varepsilon}4 mRNA level is increased in AD compared with controls, and it was suggested that genetic variability in the neuronal expression of APOE contributes to disease risk (70). Multiple studies suggested that genetic variability in the regulatory region of APOE may modulate the risk associated with the APOE {varepsilon}4 isoform. The first variation detected in the APOE regulatory region was a C->G transversion at position +113 in the intron 1 enhancer element (IE1), although no statistically significant association independent of APOE {varepsilon}4 could be detected (Table 3) (164). In a population-based study, three SNPs (–491A->T, –427T->C and –219T->G alias Th1E47cs) and two heterozygous mutations (–557C->T and –456C->T) were identified (Table 3) (71,73). Reporter gene analysis and electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) demonstrated that the three SNPs alter transcriptional activity of the APOE promoter due to differential binding of TFs (71,72). For all three SNPs, genetic association with AD, independent of APOE {varepsilon}4, was reported (7173). Although several studies attempted to confirm this association, most reported either absence of association or association due to linkage disequilibrium with APOE {varepsilon}4 (114,165172). However, population-based differences of APOE {varepsilon}4 frequencies, giving rise to differences in relative risk for AD, have been documented previously (173,174). It is therefore conceivable that there is a wide variation in relative risk for AD associated with APOE promoter polymorphisms.

In vivo studies demonstrated that the deleterious effect on disease risk of both the –219T and –491A risk alleles correlated with an increased expression of the {varepsilon}4 allele in brain (175). Later it was shown that the –491AA risk genotype is associated with increased levels of APOE in plasma, independently of APOE {varepsilon}4 or AD status, though more pronounced in AD patients (176). These data provide evidence that, in addition to the qualitative effect of the APOE {varepsilon}2/{varepsilon}3/{varepsilon}4 isoforms on risk for AD, the quantitative variation of expression of these isoforms due to functional APOE promoter variations is a key determinant in AD development.


    IMPLICATIONS OF VARIABLE GENE EXPRESSION ON AD PATHOGENESIS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE EXPRESSION AND REGULATION...
 PROMOTER VARIATIONS AND...
 IMPLICATIONS OF VARIABLE GENE...
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The most favored hypothesis suggests a pivotal role for increased 42 secretion in AD pathology. Since the amount of APP and of factors involved in its processing are crucial for this elevation, it is conceivable that the transcriptional regulation of their genes plays an important role in AD pathology. A number of studies indicate that the amount of APP mRNA is indeed increased in AD brains (177181). Moreover, trisomy 21 in Down syndrome (DS) patients leads to a 4- to 5-fold overexpression of APP, resulting in a 50 year decrease in onset age of AD in DS patients compared with the normal population (182). These results imply that a fundamental component of the molecular etiology of AD may lie in the expression of APP, its biogenesis and turnover, since the induction of the pathway leading to Aß production will depend on the amount of APP present.

Since overlapping cis-elements are known to be important for differential gene expression (183185), the presence of overlapping SP1- and USF-binding sites in the APP promoter suggests that two different and independent regulatory pathways for APP expression might exist, one mediated by SP1 and the other by USF (104). SP1 has been shown to be ubiquitously expressed, however, with a substantial variation in different cell types and during development (186). The low levels of SP1 detected in different brain regions suggest that USF might also contribute substantially to the high expression of APP in neuronal cells, which was confirmed by EMSA with nuclear extracts from rat brain showing binding to USF but not to SP1. A number of factors have been reported that are able to influence SP1 activity in certain cell types, in this way leading to preferred usage of one pathway (187,188). Therefore, a deregulated overexpression of APP in brain might simply be caused by a local increase in SP1 activity.

Additionally, AD brains exhibit numerous features which indicate that neurons affected by AD exist under conditions of stress. Since APP expression is regulated by stress factors, one can speculate that APP may be one of the genes coordinately modulated in brain in response to situations that require a defensive reaction. Stress-induced overexpression of APP can then lead to increased Aß production. It is therefore conceivable that an imbalance between different regulatory pathways for APP expression, caused by a variation in a functional cis-element or by altered expression levels of TFs in specific brain regions, might be a risk factor for AD.

During aging, the expression of PSENs decreases (120), and an even more significant decrease in PSEN has been reported in neurons from brain areas adversely affected by AD (189,190). In contrast, astrocytes reacting to neurodegeneration express elevated levels of PSEN (189,191). Several lines of evidence indicate that PSEN1 is closely linked to the {gamma}-secretase processing of APP and that decreased expression (<50%) and mutations in PSEN1 lead to increased secretion of Aß42 (20,192). Small changes in PSEN expression levels can have major implications for APP processing and AD pathology.

Additionally, PSENs were shown to be death substrates undergoing caspase cleavage during apoptosis (4648,193). Although the role of apoptosis in neuronal cell death in AD remains to be proven, it is interesting that PSEN2 overexpression and AD-linked mutations in both PSENs can shift conventional PSEN cleavage towards caspase cleavage (46), whereas a reduction of PSEN1 results in apoptosis (49). Regardless of the hypothesis on AD pathology, it is clear that expression of both PSENs is highly regulated and that mutations or variations leading to altered expression can easily be imagined to have major effects on PSEN functioning.

APOE was suggested to be involved in the repair process following nerve injury. It was shown that APOE has an effect on neurite morphogenesis of cultured neurons, where APOE {varepsilon}3 reduces the amount of neurite branching and promotes neurite extension, whereas APOE {varepsilon}4 does not (194,195). In brain, APOE synthesis takes place in astrocytes (196,197) and is increased dramatically after nerve injury (198200). The reactive gliosis in AD brains involves a series of morphological and biochemical changes in activated astrocytes (201), including up-regulation of APOE mRNA levels which is mediated by AP-2 (202). Further determination of the molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of APOE synthesis in brain is a matter of greatest importance, considering the possible roles of this protein in processes of repair in the pathogenesis of AD (56,59). Here, special attention needs to be drawn to mechanisms of differential expression of the different APOE isoforms.

Although it is clear that expression levels of AD genes are important in AD etiology, little is known about their specific regulation. Studying the effect of variations in regulatory elements and their corresponding TFs will contribute to our understanding of the disease process.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE EXPRESSION AND REGULATION...
 PROMOTER VARIATIONS AND...
 IMPLICATIONS OF VARIABLE GENE...
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The promoters of all three causal EOAD genes, APP and PSEN1/2, show characteristics of promoters of housekeeping genes. All lack a functional TATA box and show a very high GC content presenting multiple potential SP1 sites, known to be involved in transcription initiation and regulation of TATA-less promoters (137). APP, PSEN1 and PSEN2 are ubiquitously expressed, though with a tightly controlled differential regulation depending on tissue and cell type, developmental stage and environmental factors. Interestingly, all these proteins are synthesized predominantly in neurons of the CNS. This highly controlled regulation implicates the presence of specific regulatory elements mediating transcriptional activity, though only few of these have been described to date. The regulation of APOE is extremely complex, with multiple general and specific positive and negative cis-elements. In brain, APOE is expressed in astrocytes and is probably involved in neuronal regeneration processes.

It is well documented that single nucleotide changes in a promoter region may affect transcriptional activity mediated by TFs (203,204), either by directly altering a TF-binding site or by changing the structure of DNA, thereby affecting the access of TFs. Multiple studies provided evidence that altered expression levels of APP, PSENs and the different isoforms of APOE are involved in AD pathology, suggesting a role for transcriptional regulation in the disease process. Variations in functional regulatory elements can therefore be considered risk factors for AD when altering gene expression. To date, promoter variations in PSEN1 and APOE have been shown to be associated with increased risk for AD. Functional data suggested that the increased risk for AD could be explained by the effect of the promoter variations on transcriptional levels of both genes either by decreasing the levels of total expression (PSEN1) or by differentially influencing the expression levels of different isoforms (APOE). Further analysis of the transcriptional regulation of AD genes and of variations in their regulatory regions will lead to more insight into AD etiology.

Multiple factors, both genetic and environmental, underlie the etiology of complex diseases like AD. It is therefore conceivable that an interplay of discrete transcriptional changes of different genes can influence disease processes. Analysis of regulatory regions of disease genes and the effect of variations on gene regulation is therefore very important for the elucidation of complex disease processes.


    FOOTNOTES
 
+ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +32 3 8202601; Fax: +32 3 8202541; Email: cvbroeck@uia.ua.ac.be Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 GENE EXPRESSION AND REGULATION...
 PROMOTER VARIATIONS AND...
 IMPLICATIONS OF VARIABLE GENE...
 CONCLUSIONS
 REFERENCES
 
1 Breteler, M.M., Claus, J.J., van Duijn, C.M., Launer, L.J. and Hofman, A. (1992) Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease. Epidemiol. Rev., 14, 59–82.[Free Full Text]

2 Rocca, W.A., Hofman, A., Brayne, C., Breteler, M.M.B., Clarke, M., Copeland, J.R.M., Dartiques, J.-F., Engedal, K., Hagnell, O., Heeren, T.J. et al. (1991) Frequency and distribution of Alzheimer’s disease in Europe: a collaborative study of 1980–1990 prevalence findings. Ann. Neurol., 30, 381–390.[Web of Science][Medline]

3 Goate, A., Chartier-Harlin, M.-C., Mullan, M., Brown, J., Crawford, F., Fidani, L., Giuffra, L., Haynes, A., Irving, N., James, L. et al. (1991) Segregation of a missense mutation in the amyloid precursor protein gene with familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature, 349, 704–706.[Medline]

4 Kang, J., Lemaire, H.-G., Unterbeck, A., Salbaum, J.M., Masters, C.L., Grzeschik, K.-H., Multhaup, G., Beyreuther, K. and Müller-Hill, B. (1987) The precursor of Alzheimer’s disease amyloid A4 protein resembles a cell-surface receptor. Nature, 325, 733–736.[Medline]

5 Ponte, P., Gonzalez-De Whitt, P., Shilling, J., Miller, J., Hsu, D., Greenberg, B., Davis, K., Wallace, W., Lieberburg, I., Fuller, F. and Cordell, B. (1988) A new A4 amyloid mRNA contains a domain homologous to serine proteinase inhibitors. Nature, 331, 525–527.[Medline]

6 Tanzi, R.E., McClatchey, A.I., Lamperti, E.D., Villa-Komaroff, L., Gusella, J.F. and Neve, R.L. (1988) Protease inhibitor domain encoded by an amyloid protein precursor mRNA associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nature, 331, 528–530.[Medline]

7 Konig, G., Monning, U., Czech, C., Prior, R., Banati, R., Schreiter-Gasser, U., Bauer, J., Masters, C.L. and Beyreuther, K. (1992) Identification and differential expression of a novel alternative splice isoform of the ßA4 amyloid precursor protein (APP) mRNA in leukocytes and brain microglial cells. J. Biol. Chem., 267, 10804–10809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8 Sandbrink, R., Masters, C.L. and Beyreuther, K. (1994) ßA4-amyloid protein precursor mRNA isoforms without exon 15 are ubiquitously expressed in rat tissues including brain, but not in neurons. J. Biol. Chem., 269, 1510–1517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9 Yoshikai, S., Sasaki, H., Doh-ura, K., Furuya, H. and Sakaki, Y. (1990) Genomic organization of the human amyloid ß-protein precursor gene. Gene, 87, 257–263.[Web of Science][Medline]

10 Esch, F.S., Keim, P.S., Beattie, E.C., Blacher, R.W., Culwell, A.R., Oltersdorf, T., McClure, D. and Ward, P.J. (1990) Cleavage of amyloid ß peptide during constitutive processing of its precursor. Science, 248, 1122–1124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11 Hung, A.Y., Koo, E.H., Haass, C. and Selkoe, D.J. (1992) Increased expression of ß-amyloid precursor protein during neuronal differentiation is not accompanied by secretory cleavage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 9439–9443.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12 De Strooper, B., Simons, M., Multhaup, G., Van Leuven, F., Beyreuther, K. and Dotti, C.G. (1995) Production of intracellular amyloid-containing fragments in hippocampal neurons expressing human amyloid precursor protein and protection against amyloidogenesis by subtle amino acid substitutions in the rodent sequence. EMBO J., 14, 4932–4938.[Web of Science][Medline]

13 Simons, M., De Strooper, B., Multhaup, G., Tienari, P.J., Dotti, C.G. and Beyreuther, K. (1996) Amyloidogenic processing of the human amyloid precursor protein in primary cultures of rat hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci., 16, 899–908.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14 Citron, M., Diehl, T.S., Gordon, G., Biere, A.L., Seubert, P. and Selkoe, D.J. (1996) Evidence that the 42- and 40-amino acid forms of amyloid ß protein are generated from the ß-amyloid precursor protein by different protease activities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 13170–13175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15 Klafki, H., Abramowski, D., Swoboda, R., Paganetti, P.A. and Staufenbiel, M. (1996) The carboxyl termini of ß-amyloid peptides 1–40 and 1–42 are generated by distinct {gamma}-secretase activities. J. Biol. Chem., 271, 28655–28659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16 Jarrett, J.T. and Lansbury Jr, P.T. (1993) Seeding ‘one-demensional crystallization’ of amyloid: a pathogenic mechanism in Alzheimer’s disease and scrapie? Cell, 73, 1055–1058.[Web of Science][Medline]

17 Iwatsubo, T., Odaka, A., Suzuki, N., Mizusawa, H., Nukina, N. and Ihara, Y. (1994) Visualization of Aß42(43) and Aß40 in senile plaques with end-specific Aß monoclonals: evidence that an initially deposited species is Aß42(43). Neuron, 13, 45–53.[Web of Science][Medline]

18 Mann, D.M. and Iwatsubo, T. (1996) Diffuse plaques in the cerebellum and corpus striatum in Down’s syndrome contain amyloid ß protein (Aß) only in the form of Aß 42(43). Neurodegeneration, 5, 115–120.[Web of Science][Medline]

19 Gravina, S.A., Ho, L., Eckman, C.B., Long, K.E., Otvos, L.J., Younkin, L.H., Suzuki, N. and Younkin, S.G. (1995) Amyloid ß protein (Aß) in Alzheimer’s disease brain. Biochemical and immunocytochemical analysis with antibodies specific for forms ending at Aß40 or Aß42(43). J. Biol. Chem., 270, 7013–7016.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20 Hardy, J. (1997) Amyloid, the presenilins and Alzheimer disease. Trends Neurosci., 20, 154–159.[Web of Science][Medline]

21 Selkoe, D.J., Yamazaki, T., Citron, M., Podlisny, M.B., Koo, E.H., Teplow, D.B. and Haass, C. (1996) The role of APP processing and trafficking pathways in the formation of amyloid ß-protein. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 777, 57–64.[Web of Science][Medline]

22 Cruts, M., van Duijn, C.M., Backhovens, H., Van den Broeck, M., Wehnert, A., Serneels, S., Sherrington, R., Hutton, M., Hardy, J., St George-Hyslop, P.H. et al. (1998) Estimation of the genetic contribution of presenilin-1 and -2 mutations in a population-based study of presenile Alzheimer disease. Hum. Mol. Genet., 7, 43–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23 Van Broeckhoven, C., Backhovens, H., Cruts, M., De Winter, G., Bruyland, M., Cras, P. and Martin, J.-J. (1992) Mapping of a gene predisposing to early-onset Alzheimer’s disease to chromosome 14q24.3. Nature Genet., 2, 335–339.[Web of Science][Medline]

24 Sherrington, R., Rogaev, E.I., Liang, Y., Rogaeva, E.A., Levesque, G., Ikeda, M., Chi, H., Lin, C., Li, G., Holman, K. et al. (1995) Cloning of a gene bearing mis-sense mutations in early-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature, 375, 754–760.[Medline]

25 Levy-Lahad, E., Wijsman, E.M., Nemens, E., Anderson, L., Goddard, K.A.B., Weber, J.L., Bird, T.D. and Schellenberg, G.D. (1995) A familial Alzheimer’s disease locus on chromosome 1. Science, 269, 970–973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26 Levy-Lahad, E., Wasco, W., Poorkaj, P., Romano, D.M., Oshima, J., Pettingell, W.H., Yu, C.-E., Jondro, P.D., Schmidt, S.D., Wang, K. et al. (1995) Candidate gene for the chromosome 1 familial Alzheimer’s disease locus. Science, 269, 973–977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27 Doan, A., Thinakaran, G., Borchelt, D.R., Slunt, H.H., Ratovitsky, T., Podlisny, M., Selkoe, D.J., Seeger, M., Gandy, S.E., Price, D.L. and Sisodia, S.S. (1996) Protein topology of presenilin 1. Neuron, 17, 1023–1030.[Web of Science][Medline]

28 Li, X. and Greenwald, I. (1996) Membrane topology of the C.elegans SEL-12 presenilin. Neuron, 17, 1015–1021.[Web of Science][Medline]

29 De Strooper, B., Beullens, M., Contreras, B., Levesque, L., Craessaerts, K., Cordell, B., Moechars, D., Bollen, M., Fraser, P., St George-Hyslop, P. and Van Leuven, F. (1997) Phosphorylation, subcellular localization, and membrane orientation of the Alzheimer’s disease-associated presenilins. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 3590–3598.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30 Li, X. and Greenwald, I. (1998) Additional evidence for an eight-transmembrane-domain topology for Caenorhabditis elegans and human presenilins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 7109–7114.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31 Scheuner, D., Eckman, C., Jensen, M., Song, X., Citron, M., Suzuki, N., Bird, T.D., Hardy, J., Hutton, M., Kukull, W. et al. (1996) Secreted amyloid ß-protein similar to that in the senile plaques of Alzheimer’s disease is increased in vivo by the presenilin 1 and 2 and APP mutations linked to familial Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Med., 2, 864–870.[Web of Science][Medline]

32 Borchelt, D.R., Thinakaran, G., Eckman, C., Lee, M.K., Davenport, F., Ratovitsky, T., Prada, C.-M., Kim, G., Seekins, S., Yager, D. et al. (1996) Familial Alzheimer’s disease-linked presenilin 1 variants elevate Aß1–42/1–40 ratio in vitro and in vivo. Neuron, 17, 1005–1013.[Web of Science][Medline]

33 Citron, M., Westaway, D., Xia, W., Carlson, G., Diehl, T., Levesque, G., Johnson-Wood, K., Lee, M., Seubert, P., Davis, A. et al. (1997) Mutant presenilins of Alzheimer’s disease increase production of 42-residue amyloid ß-protein in both transfected cells and transgenic mice. Nature Med., 3, 67–72.[Web of Science][Medline]

34 Xia, W., Zhang, J., Kholodenko, D., Citron, M., Podlisny, M.B., Teplow, D.B., Haass, C., Seubert, P., Koo, E.H. and Selkoe, D.J. (1997) Enhanced production and oligomerization of the 42-residue amyloid ß-protein by Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing mutant presenilins. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 7977–7982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35 Mehta, P.D., Dalton, A.J., Mehta, S.P., Kim, K.S., Sersen, E.A. and Wisniewski, H.M. (1998) Increased plasma amyloid ß protein 1–42 levels in Down syndrome. Neurosci. Lett., 241, 13–16.[Web of Science][Medline]

36 Murayama, O., Tomita, T., Nihonmatsu, N., Murayama, M., Sun, X., Honda, T., Iwatsubo, T. and Takashima, A. (1999) Enhancement of amyloid ß42 secretion by 28 different presenilin 1 mutations of familial Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett., 265, 61–63.[Web of Science][Medline]

37 Duff, K., Eckman, C., Zehr, C., Yu, X., Prada, C.-M., Perez-Tur, J., Hutton, M., Buee, L., Harigaya, Y., Yager, D. et al. (1996) Increased amyloid-ß42(43) in brains of mice expressing mutant presenilin 1. Nature, 383, 710–713.[Medline]

38 Oyama, F., Sawamura, N., Kobayashi, K., Morishima-Kawashima, M., Kuramochi, T., Ito, M., Tomita, T., Maruyama, K., Saido, T.C., Iwatsubo, T. et al. (1998) Mutant presenilin 2 transgenic mouse: effect on an age-dependent increase of amyloid ß-protein 42 in the brain. J. Neurochem., 71, 313–322.[Web of Science][Medline]

39 Lemere, C.A., Lopera, F., Kosik, K.S., Lendon, C.L., Ossa, J., Saido, T.C., Yamaguchi, H., Ruiz, A., Martinez, A., Madrigal, L. et al. (1996) The E280A presenilin 1 Alzheimer mutation produces increased Aß42 deposition and severe cerebellar pathology. Nature Med., 2, 1146–1150.[Web of Science][Medline]

40 Mann, D.M.A., Iwatsubo, T., Cairns, N.J., Lantos, P.L., Nochlin, D., Sumi, S.M., Bird, T.D., Poorkaj, P., Hardy, J., Hutton, M. et al. (1996) Amyloid ß protein Aß deposition in chromosome 14-linked Alzheimer’s disease: predominance of Aß42(43). Ann. Neurol., 40, 149–156.[Web of Science][Medline]

41 Gomez-Isla, T., Wasco, W., Pettingell, W.P., Gurubhagavatula, S., Schmidt, S.D., Jondro, P.D., McNamara, M., Rodes, L.A., DiBlasi, T., Growdon, W.B. et al. (1997) A novel presenilin-1 mutation: increased ß-amyloid and neurofibrillary changes. Ann. Neurol., 41, 809–813.[Web of Science][Medline]

42 Okochi, M., Ishii, K., Usami, M., Sahara, N., Kametani, F., Tanaka, K., Fraser, P.E., Ikeda, M., Saunders, A.M., Hendriks, L. et al. (1997) Proteolytic processing of presenilin-1 (PS-1) is not associated with Alzheimer’s disease with or without PS-1 mutations. FEBS Lett., 418, 162–166.[Web of Science][Medline]

43 De Strooper, B., Saftig, P., Craessaerts, K., Vanderstichele, H., Guhde, G., Annaert, W., Von Figura, K. and Van Leuven, F. (1998) Deficiency of presenilin-1 inhibits the normal cleavage of amyloid precursor protein. Nature, 391, 387–390.[Medline]

44 Davis, J.A., Naruse, S., Chen, H., Eckman, C., Younkin, S., Price, D.L., Borchelt, D.R., Sisodia, S.S. and Wong, P.C. (1998) An Alzheimer’s disease-linked PS1 variant rescues the developmental abnormalities of PS1-deficient embryos. Neuron, 20, 603–609.[Web of Science][Medline]

45 Qian, S., Jiang, P., Guan, X.M., Singh, G., Trumbauer, M.E., Yu, H., Chen, H.Y., Van de Ploeg, L.H. and Zheng, H. (1998) Mutant human presenilin 1 protects presenilin 1 null mouse against embryonic lethality and elevates Aß1–42/43 expression. Neuron, 20, 611–617.[Web of Science][Medline]

46 Kim, T.-W., Pettingell, W.H., Hallmark, O.G., Moir, R.D., Wasco, W. and Tanzi, R.E. (1997) Endoproteolytic cleavage and proteasomal degradation of presenilin 2 in transfected cells. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 11006–11010.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47 Grunberg, J., Walter, J., Loetscher, H., Deuschle, U., Jacobsen, H. and Haass, C. (1998) Alzheimer’s disease associated presenilin-1 holoprotein and its 18–20 kDa C-terminal fragment are death substrates for proteases of the caspase family. Biochemistry, 37, 2263–2270.[Medline]

48 Loetscher, H., Deuschle, U., Brockhaus, M., Reinhardt, D., Nelboeck, P., Mous, J., Grunberg, J., Haass, C. and Jacobsen, H. (1997) Presenilins are processed by caspase-type proteases. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 20655–20659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49 Roperch, J.P., Alvaro, V., Prieur, S., Tuynder, M., Nemani, M., Lethrosne, F., Piouffre, L., Gendron, M.C., Israeli, D., Dausset, J. et al. (1998) Inhibition of presenilin 1 expression is promoted by p53 and p21WAF-1 and results in apoptosis and tumor suppression. Nature Med., 4, 835–838.[Web of Science][Medline]

50 Levitan, D. and Greenwald, I. (1995) Facilitation of lin-12-mediated signalling by sel-12, a Caenorhabditis elegans S182 Alzheimer’s disease gene. Nature, 377, 351–354.[Medline]

51 Shen, J., Bronson, R.T., Chen, D.F., Xia, W., Selkoe, D.J. and Tonegawa, S. (1997) Skeletal and CNS defects in presenilin-1-deficient mice. Cell, 89, 629–639.[Web of Science][Medline]

52 Wong, P.C., Zheng, H., Chen, H., Becher, M.W., Sirinathsinghji, D.J., Trumbauer, M.E., Chen, H.Y., Price, D.L., Van der Ploeg, L.H. and Sisodia, S.S. (1997) Presenilin 1 is required for Notch1 and DII1 expression in the paraxial mesoderm. Nature, 387, 288–292.[Medline]

53 Joutel, A., Corpechot, C., Ducros, A., Vahedi, K., Chabriat, H., Mouton, P., Alamowitch, S., Domenga, V., Cecillion, M., Marechal, E. et al. (1996) Notch3 mutations in CADASIL, a hereditary adult-onset condition causing stroke and dementia. Nature, 383, 707–710.[Medline]

54 van Duijn, C.M., de Knijff, P., Cruts, M., Wehnert, A., Havekes, L.M., Hofman, A. and Van Broeckhoven, C. (1994) Apolipoprotein E4 allele in a population-based study of early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Genet., 7, 74–78.[Web of Science][Medline]

55 Roses, A.D. (1994) Apolipoprotein E affects the rate of Alzheimer disease expression: ß-amyloid burden is a secondary consequence dependent on APOE genotype and duration of disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol., 53, 429–437.[Web of Science][Medline]

56 Strittmatter, W.J., Saunders, A.M., Schmechel, D., Pericak-Vance, M., Enghild, J., Salvesen, G.S. and Roses, A.D. (1993) Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to ß-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 1977–1981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57 Pericak-Vance, M.A., Bebout, J.L., Gaskell Jr, P.C., Yamaoka, L.H., Hung, W.Y., Alberts, M.J., Walker, A.P., Bartlett, R.J., Haynes, C.A., Welsh, K.A. et al. (1991) Linkage studies in familial Alzheimer disease: evidence for chromosome 19 linkage. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 48, 1034–1050.[Web of Science][Medline]

58 Slooter, A.J., Cruts, M., Kalmijn, S., Hofman, A., Breteler, M.M., Van Broeckhoven, C. and van Duijn, C.M. (1998) Risk estimates of dementia by apolipoprotein E genotypes from a population-based incidence study: the Rotterdam study. Arch. Neurol., 55, 964–968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

59 Corder, E.H., Saunders, A.M., Strittmatter, W.J., Schmechel, D.E., Gaskell, P.C., Small, G.W., Roses, A.D., Haines, J.L. and Pericak-Vance, M.A. (1993) Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science, 261, 921–923.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

60 Ma, J., Yee, A., Brewer Jr, H.B., Das, S. and Potter, H. (1994) Amyloid-associated proteins {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin and apolipoprotein E promote assembly of Alzheimer ß-protein into filaments. Nature, 372, 92–94.[Medline]

61 Zhou, Z., Smith, J.D., Greengard, P. and Gandy, S. (1996) Alzheimer amyloid-ß peptide forms denaturant-resistant complex with type {varepsilon}3 but not type {varepsilon}4 isoform of native apolipoprotein E. Mol. Med., 2, 175–180.[Web of Science][Medline]

62 Pericak-Vance, M.A. and Haines, J.L. (1995) Genetic susceptibility to Alzheimer disease. Trends Genet., 11, 504–508.[Web of Science][Medline]

63 Houlden, H., Crook, R., Duff, K., Collinge, J., Rossor, M. and Hardy, J. (1993) Confirmation that the apolipoprotein E, E4 allele is associated with late onset, familial Alzheimer’s disease. Neurodegeneration, 2, 283–286.

64 Van Broeckhoven, C. (1995) Molecular genetics of Alzheimer disease: identification of genes and gene mutations. Eur. Neurol., 35, 8–19.[Web of Science][Medline]

65 Farrer, L.A., Cupples, L.A., Haines, J.L., Hyman, B., Kukull, W.A., Mayeux, R., Myers, R.H., Pericak-Vance, M.A., Risch, N. and van Duijn, C.M. (1997) Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis. APOE and Alzheimer Disease Meta Analysis Consortium. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 278, 1349–1356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

66 Wavrant-De Vrieze, F., Crook, R., Holmans, P., Kehoe, P., Owen, M.J., Williams, J., Roehl, K., Laliiri, D.K., Shears, S., Booth, J. et al. (1999) Genetic variability at the amyloid-ß precursor protein locus may contribute to the risk of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett., 269, 67–70.[Web of Science][Medline]

67 Kehoe, P., Wavrant-De Vrieze, F., Crook, R., Wu, W.S., Holmans, P., Fenton, I., Spurlock, G., Norton, N., Williams, H., Williams, N. et al. (1999) A full genome scan for late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet., 8, 237–245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

68 van Duijn, C.M., Cruts, M., Theuns, J., Van Gassen, G., Backhovens, H., Van den Broeck, M., Wehnert, A., Serneels, S., Hofman, A. and Van Broeckhoven, C. (1999) Genetic association of the presenilin-1 regulatory region with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease in a population-based sample. Eur. J. Hum. Genet., 7, 801–806.[Web of Science][Medline]

69 Theuns, J., Del-Favero, J., Dermaut, B., van Duijn, C.M., Backhovens, H., Van den Broeck, M., Serneels, S., Corsmit, E., Van Broeckhoven, C. and Cruts, M. (2000) Genetic variability in the regulatory region of presenilin 1 associated with risk for Alzheimer’s disease and variable expression. Hum. Mol. Genet., 9, 325–331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

70 Lambert, J.C., Perez-Tur, J., Dupire, M.J., Galasko, D., Mann, D., Amouyel, P., Hardy, J., Delacourte, A. and Chartier-Harlin, M.C. (1997) Distortion of allelic expression of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet., 6, 2151–2154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

71 Artiga, M.J., Bullido, M.J., Sastre, I., Recuero, M., Garcia, M.A., Aldudo, J., Vazquez, J. and Valdivieso, F. (1998) Allelic polymorphisms in the transcriptional regulatory region of apolipoprotein E gene. FEBS Lett., 421, 105–108.[Web of Science][Medline]

72 Bullido, M.J., Artiga, M.J., Recuero, M., Sastre, I., Garcia, M.A., Aldudo, J., Lendon, C., Han, S.W., Morris, J.C., Frank, A. et al. (1998) A polymorphism in the regulatory region of APOE associated with risk for Alzheimer’s dementia. Nature Genet., 18, 69–71.[Web of Science][Medline]

73 Lambert, J.C., Pasquier, F., Cottel, D., Frigard, B., Amouyel, P. and Chartier-Harlin, M.C. (1998) A new polymorphism in the APOE promoter associated with risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet., 7, 533–540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

74 Bahmanyar, S., Higgins, G.A., Goldgaber, D., Lewis, D.A., Morrison, J.H., Wilson, M.C., Shankar, S.K. and Gajdusek, D.C. (1987) Localization of amyloid bß protein messenger RNA in brains from patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Science, 237, 77–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

75 Goedert, M. (1987) Neuronal localization of amyloid ß protein precursor mRNA in normal human brain and in Alzheimer’s disease. EMBO J., 6, 3627–3632.[Web of Science][Medline]

76 Shivers, B.D., Hilbich, C., Multhaup, G., Salbaum, M., Beyreuther, K. and Seeburg, P.H. (1988) Alzheimer’s disease amyloidogenic glycoprotein: expression pattern in rat brain suggests a role in cell contact. EMBO J., 7, 1365–1370.[Web of Science][Medline]

77 Zimmermann, K., Herget, T., Salbaum, J.M., Schubert, W., Hilbich, C., Cramer, M., Masters, C.L., Multhaup, G., Kang, J. and Lemaire, H.G. (1988) Localization of the putative precursor of Alzheimer’s disease-specific amyloid at nuclear envelopes of adult human muscle. EMBO J., 7, 367–372.[Web of Science][Medline]

78 Mobley, W.C., Neve, R.L., Prusiner, S.B. and McKinley, M.P. (1988) Nerve growth factor increases mRNA levels for the prion protein and the ß-amyloid protein precursor in developing hamster brain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 9811–9815.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

79 Goldgaber, D., Harris, H.W., Hla, T., Maciag, T., Donnelly, R.J., Jacobsen, J.S., Vitek, M.P. and Gajdusek, D.C. (1989) Interleukin 1 regulates synthesis of amyloid ß-protein precursor mRNA in human endothelial cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 86, 7606–7610.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

80 Quon, D., Catalano, R. and Cordell, B. (1990) Fibroblast growth factor induces ß-amyloid precursor mRNA in glial but not neuronal cultured cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 167, 96–102.[Web of Science][Medline]

81 Forloni, G., Demicheli, F., Giorgi, S., Bendotti, C. and Angeretti, N. (1992) Expression of amyloid precursor protein mRNAs in endothelial, neuronal and glial cells: modulation by interleukin-1. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 16, 128–134.[Medline]

82 Lahiri, D.K. and Nall, C. (1995) Promoter activity of the gene encoding the ß-amyloid precursor protein is up-regulated by growth factors, phorbol ester, retinoic acid and interleukin-1. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 32, 233–240.[Medline]

83 Konig, G., Masters, C.L. and Beyreuther, K. (1990) Retinoic acid induced differentiated neuroblastoma cells show increased expression of the ßA4 amyloid gene of Alzheimer’s disease and an altered splicing pattern. FEBS Lett., 269, 305–310.[Web of Science][Medline]

84 Gray, C.W. and Patel, A.J. (1993) Induction of ß-amyloid precursor protein isoform mRNAs by bFGF in astrocytes. Neuroreport, 4, 811–814.[Web of Science][Medline]

85 Monning, U., Konig, G., Prior, R., Mechler, H., Schreiter-Gasser, U., Masters, C.L. and Beyreuther, K. (1990) Synthesis and secretion of Alzheimer amyloid ßA4 precursor protein by stimulated human peripheral blood leucocytes. FEBS Lett., 277, 261–266.[Web of Science][Medline]

86 Adler, M.J., Coronel, C., Shelton, E., Seegmiller, J.E. and Dewji, N.N. (1991) Increased gene expression of Alzheimer disease ß-amyloid precursor protein in senescent cultured fibroblasts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 16–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

87 Dewji, N.N., Do, C. and Bayney, R.M. (1995) Transcriptional activation of Alzheimer’s ß-amyloid precursor protein gene by stress. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 33, 245–253.[Medline]

88 Dewji, N.N. and Do, C. (1996) Heat shock factor-1 mediates the transcriptional activation of Alzheimer’s ß-amyloid precursor protein gene in response to stress. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 35, 325–328.[Medline]

89 Abe, K., St George-Hyslop, P.H., Tanzi, R.E. and Kogure, K. (1991) Induction of amyloid precursor protein mRNA after heat shock in cultured human lymphoblastoid cells. Neurosci. Lett., 125, 169–171.[Web of Science][Medline]

90 Siman, R., Card, J.P., Nelson, R.B. and Davis, L.G. (1989) Expression of ß-amyloid precursor protein in reactive astrocytes following neuronal damage. Neuron, 3, 275–285.[Web of Science][Medline]

91 Sola, C., Garcia-Ladona, F.J., Mengod, G., Probst, A., Frey, P. and Palacios, J.M. (1993) Increased levels of the Kunitz protease inhibitor-containing ß APP mRNAs in rat brain following neurotoxic damage. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 17, 41–52.[Medline]

92 Wirak, D.O., Bayney, R., Kundel, C.A., Lee, A., Scangos, G.A., Trapp, B.D. and Unterbeck, A.J. (1991) Regulatory region of human amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene promotes neuron-specific gene expression in the CNS of transgenic mice. EMBO J., 10, 289–296.[Web of Science][Medline]

93 Chernak, J.M. (1993) Structural features of the 5' upstream regulatory region of the gene encoding rat amyloid precursor protein. Gene, 133, 255–260.[Web of Science][Medline]

94 Izumi, R., Yamada, T., Yoshikai, S., Sasaki, H., Hattori, M. and Sakaki, Y. (1992) Positive and negative regulatory elements for the expression of the Alzheimer’s disease amyloid precursor-encoding gene in mouse. Gene, 112, 189–195.[Web of Science][Medline]

95 La Fauci, G., Lahiri, D.K., Salton, S.R.J. and Robakis, N.K. (1989) Characterization of the 5'-end region and the first two exons of the ß-protein precursor gene. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 159, 297–304.[Web of Science][Medline]

96 Lahiri, D.K. (1995) Molecular analysis of the promoter region of the gene encoding the ß-amyloid precursor protein. Ind. J. Biochem. Biophys., 32, 329–335.[Web of Science][Medline]

97 Salbaum, J.M., Weideman, A., Lemaire, H.-G., Masters, C.L. and Beyreuther, K. (1988) The promoter of Alzheimer’s disease amyloid A4 precursor gene. EMBO J., 7, 2807–2813.[Web of Science][Medline]

98 Lahiri, D.K. and Robakis, N.K. (1991) The promoter activity of the gene encoding Alzheimer ß-amyloid precursor protein (APP) is regulated by two blocks of upstream sequences. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 9, 253–257.[Medline]

99 Quitschke, W.W. and Goldgaber, D. (1992) The amyloid ß-protein precursor promoter. A region essential for transcriptional activity contains a nuclear factor binding domain. J. Biol. Chem., 267, 17362–17368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

100 Pollwein, P., Masters, C.L. and Beyreuther, K. (1992) The expression of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) is regulated by two GC-elements in the promoter. Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 63–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

101 Quitschke, W.W., Matthews, J.P., Kraus, R.J. and Vostrov, A.A. (1996) The initiator element and proximal upstream sequences affect transcriptional activity and start site selection in the amyloid ß-protein precursor promoter. J. Biol. Chem., 271, 22231–22239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

102 Quitschke, W.W. (1994) Two nuclear factor binding domains activate expression from the human amyloid ß-protein precursor promoter. J. Biol. Chem., 269, 21229–21233.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

103 Vostrov, A.A. and Quitschke, W.W. (1997) The zinc finger protein CTCF binds to the APBß domain of the amyloid ß-protein precursor promoter. Evidence for a role in transcriptional activation. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 33353–33359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

104 Pollwein, P. (1993) Overlapping binding sites of two different transcription factors in the promoter of the human gene for the Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 190, 637–647.[Web of Science][Medline]

105 Kovacs, D.M., Wasco, W., Witherby, J., Felsenstein, K.M., Brunel, F., Roeder, R.G. and Tanzi, R.E. (1995) The upstream stimulatory factor functionally interacts with the Alzheimer amyloid ß-protein precursor gene. Hum. Mol. Genet., 4, 1527–1533.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

106 Vostrov, A.A., Quitschke, W.W., Vidal, F., Schwarzman, A.L. and Goldgaber, D. (1995) USF binds to the APB{alpha} sequence in the promoter of the amyloid ß-protein precursor gene. Nucleic Acids Res., 23, 2734–2741.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

107 Querfurth, H.W., Jiang, J., Xia, W. and Selkoe, D.J. (1999) Enhancer function and novel DNA binding protein activity in the near upstream ßAPP gene promoter. Gene, 232, 125–141.[Web of Science][Medline]

108 Grilli, M., Ribola, M., Alberici, A., Valerio, A., Memo, M. and Spano, P. (1995) Identification and characterization of a {kappa}B/Rel binding site in the regulatory region of the amyloid precursor protein gene. J. Biol. Chem., 270, 26774–26777.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

109 Grilli, M., Goffi, F., Memo, M. and Spano, P. (1996) Interleukin-1ß and glutamate activate the NF-{kappa}B/Rel binding site from the regulatory region of the amyloid precursor protein gene in primary neuronal cultures. J. Biol. Chem., 271, 15002–15007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

110 Lahiri, D.K. (1998) An region upstream of the gene promoter for the ß-amyloid precursor protein interacts with proteins from nuclear extracts of the human brain and PC12 cells. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 58, 112–122.[Medline]

111 Lahiri, D.K., Nall, C. and Ge, Y.W. (1999) Promoter activity of the ß-amyloid precursor protein gene is negatively modulated by an upstream regulatory element. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 71, 32–41.[Medline]

112 Yamada, T., Sasaki, H., Dohura, K., Goto, I. and Sakaki, Y. (1989) Structure and expression of the alternatively-spliced forms of mRNA for the mouse homolog of Alzheimer’s disease amyloid ß protein precursor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 158, 906–912.[Web of Science][Medline]

113 Yamada, T., Sasaki, H., Furuya, H., Miyata, T., Goto, I. and Sakaki, Y. (1987) Complementary DNA for the mouse homolog of the human amyloid ß protein precursor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 149, 665–671.[Web of Science][Medline]

114 Song, W. and Lahiri, D.K. (1998) Functional identification of the promoter of the gene encoding the Rhesus monkey ß-amyloid precursor protein. Gene, 217, 165–176.[Web of Science][Medline]

115 Rogaev, E.I., Sherrington, R., Rogaeva, E.A., Levesque, G., Ikeda, M., Liang, Y., Chi, H., Lin, C., Holman, K., Tsuda, T. et al. (1995) Familial Alzheimer’s disease in kindreds with missense mutations in a gene on chromosome 1 related to the Alzheimer’s disease type 3 gene. Nature, 376, 775–778.[Medline]

116 Pennypacker, K.R., Fuldner, R., Xu, R., Hernandez, H., Dawbarn, D., Mehta, N., Perez-Tur, J., Baker, M. and Hutton, M. (1998) Cloning and characterization of the presenilin-2 gene promoter. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 56, 57–65.[Medline]

117 Cribbs, D.H., Chen, L.-S., Bende, S.M. and LaFerla, F.M. (1996) Widespread neuronal expression of the presenilin-1 early-onset Alzheimer’s disease gene in the murine brain. Am. J. Pathol., 148, 1797–1806.[Abstract]

118 Kovacs, D.M., Fausett, H.J., Page, K.J., Kim, T.-W., Moir, R.D., Merriam, D.E., Hollister, R.D., Hallmark, O.G., Mancini, R., Felsenstein, K.M. et al. (1996) Alzheimer-associated presenilins 1 and 2: neuronal expression in brain and localization to intracelllular membranes in mammalian cells. Nature Med., 2, 224–229.[Web of Science][Medline]

119 Elder, G.A., Tezapsidis, N., Carter, J., Shioi, J., Bouras, C., Li, H.C., Johnston, J.M., Efthimiopoulos, S., Friedrich, V.L.J. and Robakis, N.K. (1996) Identification and neuron specific expression of the S182/presenilin I protein in human and rodent brains. J. Neurosci. Res., 45, 308–320.[Web of Science][Medline]

120 Lee, M.K., Slunt, H.H., Martin, L.J., Thinakaran, G., Kim, G., Gandy, S.E., Seeger, M., Koo, E., Price, D.L. and Sisodia, S.S. (1996) Expression of presenilin 1 and 2 (PS1 and PS2) in human and murine tissues. J. Neurosci., 16, 7513–7525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

121 Uchihara, T., el Hachimi, H.K., Duyckaerts, C., Foncin, J.F., Fraser, P.E., Levesque, L., St George-Hyslop, P.H. and Hauw, J.J. (1996) Widespread immunoreactivity of presenilin in neurons of normal and Alzheimer’s disease brains: double-labeling immunohistochemical study. Acta Neuropathol. (Berl.), 92, 325–330.[Medline]

122 Levey, A.I., Heilman, C.J., Lah, J.J., Nash, N.R., Rees, H.D., Wakai, M., Mirra, S.S., Rye, D.B., Nochlin, D., Bird, T.D. and Mufson, E.J. (1997) Presenilin-1 protein expression in familial and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. Neurol., 41, 742–753.[Web of Science][Medline]

123 Benkovic, S.A., McGowan, E.M., Rothwell, N.J., Hutton, M., Morgan, D.G. and Gordon, M.N. (1997) Regional and cellular localization of presenilin-2 RNA in rat and human brain. Exp. Neurol., 145, 555–564.[Web of Science][Medline]

124 Kim, K.S., Wegiel, J., Sapienza, V., Chen, J., Hong, H. and Wisniewski, H.M. (1997) Immunoreactivity of presenilin-1 in human, rat and mouse brain. Brain Res., 757, 159–163.[Web of Science][Medline]

125 Busciglio, J., Hartmann, H., Lorenzo, A., Wong, C., Baumann, K., Sommer, B., Staufenbiel, M. and Yankner, B.A. (1997) Neuronal localization of presenilin-1 and association with amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci., 17, 5101–5107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

126 Huynh, D.P., Vinters, H.V., Ho, D.H., Ho, V.V. and Pulst, S.M. (1997) Neuronal expression and intracellular localization of presenilins in normal and Alzheimer disease brains. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol., 56, 1009–1017.[Web of Science][Medline]

127 Hendriks, L., De Jonghe, C., Lubke, U., Woodrow, S., Vanderhoeven, I., Boons, J., Cras, P., Martin, J.J. and Van Broeckhoven, C. (1998) Immunoreactivity of presenilin-1 and tau in Alzheimer’s disease brain. Exp. Neurol., 149, 341–348.[Web of Science][Medline]

128 Clark, R.F., Hutton, M., Fuldner, R.A., Froelich, S., Karran, E., Talbot, C., Crook, R., Lendon, C., Prihar, G., He, C. et al. (1995) The structure of the presenilin 1 (S182) gene and identification of six novel mutations in early onset AD families. Nature Genet., 11, 219–222.[Web of Science][Medline]

129 Rogaev, E.I., Sherrington, R., Wu, C., Levesque, G., Liang, Y., Rogaeva, E.A., Ikeda, M., Holman, K., Lin, C., Lukiw, W.J. et al. (1997) Analysis of the 5' sequence, genomic structure, and alternative splicing of the presenilin-1 gene (PSEN1) associated with early onset Alzheimer’s disease. Genomics, 40, 415–424.[Web of Science][Medline]

130 Mitsuda, N., Roses, A.D. and Vitek, M.P. (1997) Transcriptional regulation of the mouse presenilin-1 gene. J. Biol. Chem., 272, 23489–23497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

131 Pastorcic, M. and Das, H.K. (1999) An upstream element containing an ETS binding site is crucial for transcription of the human presenilin-1 gene. J. Biol. Chem., 274, 24297–24307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

132 Bhat, N.K., Thompson, C.B., Lindsten, T., June, C.H., Fujiwara, S., Koizumi, S., Fisher, R.J. and Papas, T.S. (1990) Reciprocal expression of human ETS1 and ETS2 genes during T-cell activation: regulatory role for the protooncogene ETS1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 87, 3723–3727.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

133 Maroulakou, I.G., Papas, T.S. and Green, J.E. (1994) Differential expression of ets-1 and ets-2 proto-oncogenes during murine embryogenesis. Oncogene, 9, 1551–1565.[Web of Science][Medline]

134 Sgambato, V., Vanhoutte, P., Pages, C., Rogard, M., Hipskind, R., Besson, M.J. and Caboche, J. (1998) In vivo expression and regulation of Elk-1, a target of the extracellular-regulated kinase signaling pathway, in the adult rat brain. J. Neurosci., 18, 214–226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

135 Levy-Lahad, E., Poorkaj, P., Wang, K., Hui Fu, Y., Oshima, J., Mulligan, J. and Schellenberg, G.D. (1996) Genomic structure and expression of STM2, the chromosome 1 familial Alzheimer’s disease gene. Genomics, 34, 198–204.[Web of Science][Medline]

136 Prihar, G., Fuldner, R.A., Perez-Tur, J., Lincoln, S., Duff, K., Crook, R., Hardy, J., Phillips, C.A., Venter, C., Talbot, C. et al. (1996) Structure and alternative splicing of the presenilin-2 gene. Neuroreport, 7, 1680–1684.[Web of Science][Medline]

137 Pugh, B.F. and Tjian, R. (1991) Transcription from a TATA-less promoter requires a multisubunit TFIID complex. Genes Dev., 5, 1935–1945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

138 Hong, C.S., Caromile, L., Nomata, Y., Mori, H., Bredesen, D.E. and Koo, E.H. (1999) Contrasting role of presenilin-1 and presenilin-2 in neuronal differentiation in vitro. J. Neurosci., 19, 637–643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

139 Surguchov, A.P. (1990) The apolipoprotein gene family: organization of upstream elements and regulation of gene expression. Biomed. Sci., 1, 344–353.[Medline]

140 Smith, J.D., Melian, A., Leff, T. and Breslow, J.L. (1988) Expression of the human apolipoprotein E gene is regulated by multiple positive and negative elements. J. Biol. Chem., 263, 8300–8308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

141 Paik, Y.K., Chang, D.J., Reardon, C.A., Davies, G.E., Mahley, R.W. and Taylor, J.M. (1985) Nucleotide sequence and structure of the human apolipoprotein E gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 82, 3445–3449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

142 Chang, D.J., Paik, Y.K., Leren, T.P., Walker, D.W., Howlett, G.J. and Taylor, J.M. (1990) Characterization of a human apolipoprotein E gene enhancer element and its associated protein factors. J. Biol. Chem., 265, 9496–9504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

143 Paik, Y.K., Chang, D.J., Reardon, C.A., Walker, M.D., Taxman, E. and Taylor, J.M. (1988) Identification and characterization of transcriptional regulatory regions associated with expression of the human apolipoprotein E gene. J. Biol. Chem., 263, 13340–13349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

144 Jo, D.W., Leren, T.P., Yang, Z.Y., Chung, Y.H., Taylor, J.M. and Paik, Y.K. (1995) Characterization of an upstream regulatory element of the human apolipoprotein E gene, and purification of its binding protein from the human placenta. J. Biochem. (Tokyo), 117, 915–922.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

145 Garcia, M.A., Vazquez, J., Gimenez, C., Valdivieso, F. and Zafra, F. (1996) Transcription factor AP-2 regulates human apolipoprotein E gene expression in astrocytoma cells. J. Neurosci., 16, 7550–7556.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

146 Fedoroff, S., McAuley, W.A., Houle, J.D. and Devon, R.M. (1984) Astrocyte cell lineage. V. Similarity of astrocytes that form in the presence of dBcAMP in cultures to reactive astrocytes in vivo. J. Neurosci. Res., 12, 14–27.[Medline]

147 Sharma, S.K. and Raj, A.B. (1987) Transient increase in intracellular concentration of adenosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate results in morphological and biochemical differentiation of C6 glioma cells in culture. J. Neurosci. Res., 17, 135–141.[Web of Science][Medline]

148 Luscher, B., Mitchell, P.J., Williams, T. and Tjian, R. (1989) Regulation of transcription factor AP-2 by the morphogen retinoic acid and by second messengers. Genes Dev., 3, 1507–1517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

149 Imagawa, M., Chiu, R. and Karin, M. (1987) Transcription factor AP-2 mediates induction by two different signal-transduction pathways: protein kinase C and cAMP. Cell, 51, 251–260.[Web of Science][Medline]

150 Simonet, W.S., Bucay, N., Lauer, S.J., Pitas, R.E., Weisgraber, K.H. and Taylor, J.M. (1990) Downstream regulatory elements stimulate expression of the human apolipoprotein E gene in the liver and suppress expression in the kidney of transgenic mice. Trans. Assoc. Am. Physicians, 103, S119–S128.

151 Simonet, W.S., Bucay, N., Lauer, S.J., Wirak, D.O., Stevens, M.E., Weisgraber, K.H., Pitas, R.E. and Taylor, J.M. (1990) In the absence of a downstream element, the apolipoprotein E gene is expressed at high levels in kidneys of transgenic mice. J. Biol. Chem., 265, 10809–10812.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

152 Simonet, W.S., Bucay, N., Pitas, R.E., Lauer, S.J. and Taylor, J.M. (1991) Multiple tissue-specific elements control the apolipoprotein E/C-I gene locus in transgenic mice. J. Biol. Chem., 266, 8651–8654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

153 Simonet, W.S., Bucay, N., Lauer, S.J. and Taylor, J.M. (1993) A far-downstream hepatocyte-specific control region directs expression of the linked human apolipoprotein E and C-I genes in transgenic mice. J. Biol. Chem., 268, 8221–8229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

154 Dang, Q., Walker, D., Taylor, S., Allan, C., Chin, P., Fan, J. and Taylor, J. (1995) Structure of the hepatic control region of the human apolipoprotein E/C- I gene locus. J. Biol. Chem., 270, 22577–22585.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

155 Horiuchi, K., Tajima, S., Menju, M. and Yamamoto, A. (1989) Structure and expression of mouse apolipoprotein E gene. J. Biochem. (Tokyo), 106, 98–103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

156 Fung, W.P., Howlett, G.J. and Schreiber, G. (1986) Structure and expression of the rat apolipoprotein E gene. J. Biol. Chem., 261, 13777–13783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

157 Fukazawa, C., Matsumoto, A. and Taylor, J.M. (1986) Complete nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding the rat apolipoprotein E. Nucleic Acids Res., 14, 9527–9528.[Free Full Text]

158 Fidani, L., Rooke, K., Chartier-Harlin, M.C., Hughes, D., Tanzi, R., Mullan, M., Roques, P., Rossor, M., Hardy, J. and Goate, A. (1992) Screening for mutations in the open reading frame and promoter of the ß-amyloid precursor protein gene in familial Alzheimer’s disease: identification of a further family with APP717 Val->Ile. Hum. Mol. Genet., 1, 165–168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

159 Rooke, K., Goate, A., Fidani, L., Mullan, M., Roques, P., Rossor, M., Hardy, J. and Chartier-Harlin, M.C. (1992) Screening of the promoter and the ß-amyloid sequence of the APP gene for polymorphisms in families with late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Neurodegeneration, 1, 237–240.

160 Rogaev, E.I., Lukiw, W.J., Vaula, G., Haines, J.L., Rogaeva, E.A., Tsuda, T., Alexandrova, N., Liang, Y., Mortilla, M., Amaducci, L. et al. (1993) Analysis of the c-fos gene on chromosome 14 and the promoter of the amyloid precursor protein gene in familial Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology, 43, 2275–2279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

161 Liddell, M.B., Bayer, A.J. and Owen, M.J. (1995) No evidence that common allelic variation in the Amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene confers susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet., 4, 853–858.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

162 Aldudo, J., Bullido, M.J. and Valdivieso, F. (1999) DGGE method for the mutational analysis of the coding and proximal promoter regions of the Alzheimer’s disease presenilin-1 gene: two novel mutations. Hum. Mutat., 14, 433–439.[Web of Science][Medline]

163 Theuns, J., Cruts, M., Remacle, J.E., Corsmit, E., Huylebroeck, D. and Van Broeckhoven C. (2000) Variable neuron-specific presenilin 1 transcription increases risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging, 29 (Suppl. 1), S113 .

164 Mui, S., Briggs, M., Chung, H., Wallace, R.B., Gomez-Isla, T., Rebeck, G.W. and Hyman, B.T. (1996) A newly identified polymorphism in the apolipoprotein E enhancer gene region is associated with Alzheimer’s disease and strongly with the {varepsilon}4 allele. Neurology, 47, 196–201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

165 Town, T., Paris, D., Fallin, D., Duara, R., Barker, W., Gold, M., Crawford, F. and Mullan, M. (1998) The –491A/T apolipoprotein E promoter polymorphism association with Alzheimer’s disease: independent risk and linkage disequilibrium with the known APOE polymorphism. Neurosci. Lett., 252, 95–98.[Web of Science][Medline]

166 Roks, G., Cruts, M., Bullido, M.J., Backhovens, H., Artiga, M.J., Hofman, A., Valdivieso, F., Van Broeckhoven, C. and van Duijn, C.M. (1998) The –491 A/T polymorphism in the regulatory region of the apolipoprotein E gene and early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett., 258, 65–68.[Web of Science][Medline]

167 Toji, H., Maruyama, H., Sasaki, K., Nakamura, S. and Kawakami, H. (1999) Apolipoprotein E promoter polymorphism and sporadic Alzheimer’s disease in a Japanese population. Neurosci. Lett., 259, 56–58.[Web of Science][Medline]

168 Helisalmi, S., Hiltunen, M., Valonen, P., Mannermaa, A., Koivisto, A.M., Lehtovirta, M., Ryynanen, M. and Soininen, H. (1999) Promoter polymorphism (–491A/T) in the APOE gene of Finnish Alzheimer’s disease patients and control individuals. J. Neurol., 246, 821–824.[Web of Science][Medline]

169 Chen, L., Baum, L., Ng, H.K., Chan, L.Y., Sastre, I., Artiga, M.J., Valdivieso, F., Bullido, M.J., Chiu, H.F. and Pang, C.P. (1999) Apolipoprotein E promoter and {alpha}2-macroglobulin polymorphisms are not genetically associated with Chinese late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett., 269, 173–177.[Web of Science][Medline]

170 Thome, J., Gewirtz, J.C., Sakai, N., Zachariou, V., Retz-Junginger, P., Retz, W., Duman, R.S. and Rosler, M. (1999) Polymorphisms of the human apolipoprotein E promoter and bleomycin hydrolase gene: risk factors for Alzheimer’s dementia? Neurosci. Lett., 274, 37–40.[Web of Science][Medline]

171 Licastro, F., Pedrini, S., Govoni, M., Pession, A., Ferri, C., Annoni, G., Casadei, V., Veglia, F., Bertolini, S. and Grimaldi, L.M. (1999) Apolipoprotein E and {alpha}-1-antichymotrypsin allele polymorphism in sporadic and familial Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett., 270, 129–132.[Web of Science][Medline]

172 Ahmed, A.R., MacGowan, S.H., Culpan, D., Jones, R.W. and Wilcock, G.K. (1999) The –491A/T polymorphism of the apolipoprotein E gene is associated with the ApoE{varepsilon}4 allele and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett., 263, 217–219.[Web of Science][Medline]

173 Lucotte, G., Loirat, F. and Hazout, S. (1997) Pattern of gradient of apolipoprotein E allele *4 frequencies in western Europe. Hum. Biol., 69, 253–262.[Web of Science][Medline]

174 Gerdes, L.U., Klausen, I.C., Sihm, I. and Faergeman, O. (1992) Apolipoprotein E polymorphism in a Danish population compared to findings in 45 other study populations around the world. Genet. Epidemiol., 9, 155–167.[Web of Science][Medline]

175 Lambert, J.C., Berr, C., Pasquier, F., Delacourte, A., Frigard, B., Cottel, D., Perez-Tur, J., Mouroux, V., Mohr, M., Cecyre, D. et al. (1998) Pronounced impact of Th1/E47cs mutation compared with –491 AT mutation on neural APOE gene expression and risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet., 7, 1511–1516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

176 Laws, S.M., Taddei, K., Martins, G., Paton, A., Fisher, C., Clarnette, R., Hallmayer, J., Brooks, W.S., Gandy, S.E. and Martins, R.N. (1999) The –491AA polymorphism in the APOE gene is associated with increased plasma apoE levels in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport, 10, 879–882.[Web of Science][Medline]

177 Cohen, M.L., Golde, T.E., Usiak, M.F., Younkin, L.H. and Younkin, S.G. (1988) In situ hybridization of nucleus basalis neurons shows increased ß-amyloid mRNA in Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 1227–1231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

178 Clark, A.W. and Parhad, I.M. (1989) Expression of neuronal mRNAs in Alzheimer type degeneration of the nervous system. Can. J. Neurol. Sci., 16, 477–482.[Web of Science][Medline]

179 Vitek, M.P. (1989) Increasing amyloid peptide precursor production and its impact on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging, 10, 471–473.[Web of Science][Medline]

180 Higgins, G.A., Lewis, D.A., Bahmanyar, S., Goldgaber, D., Gajdusek, D.C., Young, W.G., Morrison, J.H. and Wilson, M.C. (1988) Differential regulation of amyloid-ß-protein mRNA expression within hippocampal neuronal subpopulations in Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 1297–1301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

181 Lewis, D.A., Higgins, G.A., Young, W.G., Goldgaber, D., Gajdusek, D.C., Wilson, M.C. and Morrison, J.H. (1988) Distribution of precursor amyloid-ß-protein messenger RNA in human cerebral cortex: relationship to neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 1691–1695.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

182 Rumble, B., Retallack, R., Hilbich, C., Simms, G., Multhaup, G., Martins, R., Hockey, A., Montgomery, P., Beyreuther, K. and Masters, C.L. (1989) Amyloid A4 protein and its precursor in Down’s syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease. N. Engl. J. Med., 320, 1446–1452.[Abstract]

183 Schule, R., Umesono, K., Mangelsdorf, D.J., Bolado, J., Pike, J.W. and Evans, R.M. (1990) Jun-Fos and receptors for vitamins A and D recognize a common response element in the human osteocalcin gene. Cell, 61, 497–504.[Web of Science][Medline]

184 Lemaigre, F.P., Lafontaine, D.A., Courtois, S.J., Durviaux, S.M. and Rousseau, G.G. (1990) Sp1 can displace GHF-1 from its distal binding site and stimulate transcription from the growth hormone gene promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 1811–1814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

185 Hoch, M., Gerwin, N., Taubert, H. and Jackle, H. (1992) Competition for overlapping sites in the regulatory region of the Drosophila gene Kruppel. Science, 256, 94–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

186 Saffer, J.D., Jackson, S.P. and Annarella, M.B. (1991) Developmental expression of Sp1 in the mouse. Mol. Cell. Biol., 11, 2189–2199.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

187 Saffer, J.D., Jackson, S.P. and Thurston, S.J. (1990) SV40 stimulates expression of the transacting factor Sp1 at the mRNA level. Genes Dev., 4, 659–666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

188 Jackson, S.P., MacDonald, J.J., Lees-Miller, S. and Tjian, R. (1990) GC box binding induces phosphorylation of Sp1 by a DNA-dependent protein kinase. Cell, 63, 155–165.[Web of Science][Medline]

189 Takami, K., Terai, K., Matsuo, A., Walker, D.G. and McGeer, P.L. (1997) Expression of presenilin-1 and -2 mRNAs in rat and Alzheimer’s disease brains. Brain Res., 748, 122–130.[Web of Science][Medline]

190 McMillan, P.J., Leverenz, J.B., Poorkaj, P., Schellenberg, G.D. and Dorsa, D.M. (1996) Neuronal expression of STM2 mRNA in human brain is reduced in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 44, 1215–1222.[Abstract]

191 Cribbs, D.H., Chen, L.S., Cotman, C.W. and LaFerla, F.M. (1996) Injury induces presenilin-1 gene expression in mouse brain. Neuroreport, 7, 1773–1776.[Web of Science][Medline]

192 Refolo, L.M., Eckman, C., Prada, C.M., Yager, D., Sambamurti, K., Mehta, N., Hardy, J. and Younkin, S.G. (1999) Antisense-induced reduction of presenilin 1 expression selectively increases the production of amyloid ß42 in transfected cells. J. Neurochem., 73, 2383–2388.[Web of Science][Medline]

193 van de Craen, M., De Jonghe, C., van den Brande, I., Declercq, W., Van Gassen, G., van Criekinge, W., Vanderhoeven, I., Fiers, W., Van Broeckhoven, C., Hendriks, L. and Vandenabeele, P. (1999) Identification of caspases that cleave presenilin-1 and presenilin-2. Five presenilin-1 (PS1) mutations do not alter the sensitivity of PS1 to caspases. FEBS Lett., 445, 149–154.[Web of Science][Medline]

194 Nathan, B.P., Bellosta, S., Sanan, D.A., Weisgraber, K.H., Mahley, R.W. and Pitas, R.E. (1994) Differential effects of apolipoproteins E3 and E4 on neuronal growth in vitro. Science, 264, 850–852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

195 Handelmann, G.E., Boyles, J.K., Weisgraber, K.H., Mahley, R.W. and Pitas, R.E. (1992) Effects of apolipoprotein E, ß-very low density lipoproteins, and cholesterol on the extension of neurites by rabbit dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitro. J. Lipid Res., 33, 1677–1688.[Abstract]

196 Boyles, J.K., Pitas, R.E., Wilson, E., Mahley, R.W. and Taylor, J.M. (1985) Apolipoprotein E associated with astrocytic glia of the central nervous system and with nonmyelinating glia of the peripheral nervous system. J. Clin. Invest., 76, 1501–1513.

197 Pitas, R.E., Boyles, J.K., Lee, S.H., Foss, D. and Mahley, R.W. (1987) Astrocytes synthesize apolipoprotein E and metabolize apolipoprotein E-containing lipoproteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 917, 148–161.[Medline]

198 Boyles, J.K., Zoellner, C.D., Anderson, L.J., Kosik, L.M., Pitas, R.E., Weisgraber, K.H., Hui, D.Y., Mahley, R.W., Gebicke-Haerter, P.J. and Ignatius, M.J. (1989) A role for apolipoprotein E, apolipoprotein A-I, and low density lipoprotein receptors in cholesterol transport during regeneration and remyelination of the rat sciatic nerve. J. Clin. Invest., 83, 1015–1031.

199 Ignatius, M.J., Gebicke-Harter, P.J., Skene, J.H., Schilling, J.W., Weisgraber, K.H., Mahley, R.W. and Shooter, E.M. (1986) Expression of apolipoprotein E during nerve degeneration and regeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 1125–1129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

200 Snipes, G.J., McGuire, C.B., Norden, J.J. and Freeman, J.A. (1986) Nerve injury stimulates the secretion of apolipoprotein E by nonneuronal cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 83, 1130–1134.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

201 Poirier, J., Hess, M., May, P.C. and Finch, C.E. (1991) Astrocytic apolipoprotein E mRNA and GFAP mRNA in hippocampus after ento-rhinal cortex lesioning. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res., 11, 97–106.[Medline]

202 Diedrich, J.F., Minnigan, H., Carp, R.I., Whitaker, J.N., Race, R., Frey, W. and Haase, A.T. (1991) Neuropathological changes in scrapie and Alzheimer’s disease are associated with increased expression of apolipoprotein E and cathepsin D in astrocytes. J. Virol., 65, 4759–4768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

203 Sloan, J.H., Hasegawa, S.L. and Boss, J.M. (1992) Single base pair substitutions within the HLA-DRA gene promoter separate the functions of the X1 and X2 boxes. J. Immunol., 148, 2591–2599.[Abstract]

204 Angotti, E., Mele, E., Costanzo, F. and Avvedimento, E.V. (1994) A polymorphism (G->A transition) in the –78 position of the apolipoprotein A-I promoter increases transcription efficiency. J. Biol. Chem., 269, 17371–17374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

205 Adroer, R., Lopez-Acedo, C. and Oliva, R. (1997) Conserved elements in the 5' regulatory region of the amyloid precursor protein gene in primates. Neurosci. Lett., 226, 203–206.[Web of Science][Medline]

206 Paik, Y.K., Reardon, C.A., Taylor, J.M. and Choi, B.K. (1995) Characterization of an upstream regulatory sequence and its binding protein in the mouse apolipoprotein E gene. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1262, 124–132.[Medline]

207 Theuns, J., Cruts, M., Del-Favero, J., Goossens, D., Dauwerse, H., Wehnert, A., den Dunnen, J.T. and Van Broeckhoven, C. (1999) Determination of the genomic organization of human presenilin 1 by fiber-FISH analysis and restriction mapping of cloned DNA. Mamm. Genome, 10, 410–414.[Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
L. Guyant-Marechal, A. Rovelet-Lecrux, L. Goumidi, E. Cousin, D. Hannequin, G. Raux, C. Penet, S. Ricard, S. Mace, P. Amouyel, et al.
Variations in the APP gene promoter region and risk of Alzheimer disease
Neurology, February 27, 2007; 68(9): 684 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
K. Sleegers, N. Brouwers, I. Gijselinck, J. Theuns, D. Goossens, J. Wauters, J. Del-Favero, M. Cruts, C. M. v. Duijn, and C. V. Broeckhoven
APP duplication is sufficient to cause early onset Alzheimer's dementia with cerebral amyloid angiopathy
Brain, November 1, 2006; 129(11): 2977 - 2983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
N. Brouwers, K. Sleegers, S. Engelborghs, V. Bogaerts, S. Serneels, K. Kamali, E. Corsmit, E. D. Leenheir, J.-J. Martin, P. P. De Deyn, et al.
Genetic risk and transcriptional variability of amyloid precursor protein in Alzheimer's disease
Brain, November 1, 2006; 129(11): 2984 - 2991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. A. Bellingham, D. K. Lahiri, B. Maloney, S. La Fontaine, G. Multhaup, and J. Camakaris
Copper Depletion Down-regulates Expression of the Alzheimer's Disease Amyloid-{beta} Precursor Protein Gene
J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 20378 - 20386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. Theuns, J. Remacle, R. Killick, E. Corsmit, K.'l Vennekens, D. Huylebroeck, M. Cruts, and C. V. Broeckhoven
Alzheimer-associated C allele of the promoter polymorphism -22C>T causes a critical neuron-specific decrease of presenilin 1 expression
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2003; 12(8): 869 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
E. S. Athan, J. H. Lee, A. Arriaga, R. P. Mayeux, and B. Tycko
Polymorphisms in the Promoter of the Human APP Gene: Functional Evaluation and Allele Frequencies in Alzheimer Disease
Arch Neurol, November 1, 2002; 59(11): 1793 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
J.-C. Lambert, D. M A Mann, J. M Harris, M.-C. Chartier-Harlin, A. Cumming, J. Coates, H. Lemmon, D. StClair, T. Iwatsubo, and C. Lendon
The {-}48 C/T polymorphism in the presenilin 1 promoter is associated with an increased risk of developing Alzheimer's disease and an increased A{beta} load in brain
J. Med. Genet., June 1, 2001; 38(6): 353 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Theuns, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Broeckhoven, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Theuns, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Broeckhoven, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?