Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on September 20, 2005
Human Molecular Genetics 2005 14(21):3191-3201; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi350
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/21/3191    most recent
ddi350v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yampolsky, L. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kondrashov, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yampolsky, L. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kondrashov, A. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Distribution of the strength of selection against amino acid replacements in human proteins

Lev Y. Yampolsky1, Fyodor A. Kondrashov2 and Alexey S. Kondrashov3,*

1Department of Biological Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614-1710, USA, 2Section of Ecology, Behavior and Evolution, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093-0346, USA and 3National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 3014358944; Fax: +1 3014809241; Email: kondrashov{at}ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Received May 3, 2005; Revised July 27, 2005; Accepted September 12, 2005

The impact of an amino acid replacement on the organism's fitness can vary from lethal to selectively neutral and even, in rare cases, beneficial. Substantial data are available on either pathogenic or acceptable replacements. However, the whole distribution of coefficients of selection against individual replacements is not known for any organism. To ascertain this distribution for human proteins, we combined data on pathogenic missense mutations, on human non-synonymous SNPs and on human–chimpanzee divergence of orthologous proteins. Fractions of amino acid replacements which reduce fitness by >10–2, 10–2–10–4, 10–4–10–5 and <10–5 are 25, 49, 14 and 12%, respectively. On average, the strength of selection against a replacement is substantially higher when chemically dissimilar amino acids are involved, and the Grantham's index of a replacement explains 35% of variance in the average logarithm of selection coefficients associated with different replacements. Still, the impact of a replacement depends on its context within the protein more than on its own nature. Reciprocal replacements are often associated with rather different selection coefficients, in particular, replacements of non-polar amino acids with polar ones are typically much more deleterious than replacements in the opposite direction. However, differences between evolutionary fluxes of reciprocal replacements are only weakly correlated with the differences between the corresponding selection coefficients.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
D. Bachtrog
The Temporal Dynamics of Processes Underlying Y Chromosome Degeneration
Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1513 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. Charlesworth and A. Eyre-Walker
The McDonald-Kreitman Test and Slightly Deleterious Mutations
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1007 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
C. T. Saunders and P. Green
Insights from Modeling Protein Evolution with Context-Dependent Mutation and Asymmetric Amino Acid Selection
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2007; 24(12): 2632 - 2647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
J. L. Thorne, S. C. Choi, J. Yu, P. G. Higgs, and H. Kishino
Population Genetics Without Intraspecific Data
Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2007; 24(8): 1667 - 1677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. G. Nackley, S. A. Shabalina, I. E. Tchivileva, K. Satterfield, O. Korchynskyi, S. S. Makarov, W. Maixner, and L. Diatchenko
Human Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Haplotypes Modulate Protein Expression by Altering mRNA Secondary Structure
Science, December 22, 2006; 314(5807): 1930 - 1933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. Subramanian and S. Kumar
Higher Intensity of Purifying Selection on >90% of the Human Genes Revealed by the Intrinsic Replacement Mutation Rates
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2006; 23(12): 2283 - 2287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
K. M. Teshima, G. Coop, and M. Przeworski
How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps?
Genome Res., June 1, 2006; 16(6): 702 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Eyre-Walker, M. Woolfit, and T. Phelps
The Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Deleterious Amino Acid Mutations in Humans
Genetics, June 1, 2006; 173(2): 891 - 900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
I. P. Gorlov, M. Kimmel, and C. I. Amos
Strength of the purifying selection against different categories of the point mutations in the coding regions of the human genome
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2006; 15(7): 1143 - 1150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.