Skip Navigation


Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access originally published online on December 3, 2007
Human Molecular Genetics 2008 17(6):825-834; doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm354
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
17/6/825    most recent
ddm354v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haiman, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, B. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haiman, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, B. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comprehensive association testing of common genetic variation in DNA repair pathway genes in relationship with breast cancer risk in multiple populations

Christopher A. Haiman1,*, Chris Hsu1, Paul I.W. de Bakker2, Melissa Frasco1, Xin Sheng1, David Van Den Berg1, John T. Casagrande1, Laurence N. Kolonel3, Loic Le Marchand3, Susan E. Hankinson4, Jiali Han4, Alison M. Dunning5, Karen A. Pooley5, Matthew L. Freedman2,6, David J. Hunter7, Anna H. Wu1, Daniel O. Stram1 and Brian E. Henderson1

1 Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA 2 Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA 3 Epidemiology Program, Cancer Research Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA 4 Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA 5 Cancer Research UK, Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK 6 Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA 7 Epidemiology Department, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 3234427755; Fax: +1 3234427749; Email: haiman{at}usc.edu

Received September 21, 2007; Revised November 12, 2007; Accepted November 29, 2007

Genetic association studies of multiple populations investigate a wider range of risk alleles than studies of a single ethnic group. In this study, we developed a multiethnic tagging strategy, exploiting differences in linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure between populations, to comprehensively capture common genetic variation across 60 genes spanning multiple DNA repair pathways, in five racial/ethnic populations. Over 2600 SNPs were genotyped in each population and single- and multi-marker predictors of common alleles were selected to capture the LD patterns specific to each group. Coding variants (n = 211) were genotyped to test whether combinations of putative functional variants in DNA repair pathway genes could have cumulative effects on risk. Tests of association were conducted in a multiethnic breast cancer study (2093 cases and 2303 controls), with validation of the top allelic associations (P ≤ 0.01) performed in additional studies of 6483 cases and 7309 controls. A variant in the FANCA gene (rs1061646, 0.15–0.68 frequency across populations) was associated with risk in the initial study (P = 0.0052), and in the replication studies (P = 0.032). In a combined analysis (8556 cases and 9605 controls), this SNP yielded an 8% increase in risk per allele. Combinations of coding variants in these genes were not associated with breast cancer and together, these data suggest that common variation in these DNA repair pathway genes are not strongly associated with breast cancer risk. The methods utilized in this study, applied to multiple populations, provide a framework for testing in association studies in diverse populations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.