Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Small, K.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Small, K.
Right arrow Articles by Warren, S. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, Vol 7, 135-139, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Emerin deletions occurring on both Xq28 inversion backgrounds

K Small and ST Warren
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (EMD) is an X-linked disorder characterized by contractures, progressive weakness and cardiomyopathy. EMD is caused by mutations in the 2 kb emerin gene that is located within human Xq28. Emerin is immediately distal to the 26 kb filamin gene, and flanking the filamin-emerin region are two large inverted repeats. This entire region previously has been found to be inverted in approximately 20% of X chromosomes, presumably mediated by the inverted repeats. Only one complete emerin deletion has been reported previously. It was found to be due to a complex rearrangement involving the inverted repeats which partially duplicated filamin. We report here two additional EMD patients who have large deletions of 20 and 34 kb, respectively. Unlike the previously reported deletion, these deletions appear to be simple deletions, with each breakpoint junction showing only 2 bp of overlap, suggesting an end-joining mechanism. However, the two deletions were found on each of the two inverted backgrounds. The 20 kb deletion includes the entire emerin gene and extends well into most of the distal inverted repeat. In contrast, the 34 kb deletion occurs on the inverted X chromosome and extends centromeric, well beyond the proximal inverted repeat. In addition, at least three nearby putative genes detected by previous sequence analysis are deleted among these patients but without obvious deviation from a typical EMD phenotype. Similarly to the previously reported deletion, filamin remains intact in these two deletions. All three deletions involve distinct breakpoints within the 4.7 kb filamin-emerin intergenic region, suggesting that loss of filamin is a lethal event. Thus, the close proximity of filamin to emerin may place constraints upon potential emerin deletions and probably accounts for the rarity of complete emerin deletions in EMD patients.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
C. M.B. Carvalho, F. Zhang, P. Liu, A. Patel, T. Sahoo, C. A. Bacino, C. Shaw, S. Peacock, A. Pursley, Y. J. Tavyev, et al.
Complex rearrangements in patients with duplications of MECP2 can occur by fork stalling and template switching
Hum. Mol. Genet., June 15, 2009; 18(12): 2188 - 2203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
M. Bauters, H. Van Esch, M. J. Friez, O. Boespflug-Tanguy, M. Zenker, A. M. Vianna-Morgante, C. Rosenberg, J. Ignatius, M. Raynaud, K. Hollanders, et al.
Nonrecurrent MECP2 duplications mediated by genomic architecture-driven DNA breaks and break-induced replication repair
Genome Res., June 1, 2008; 18(6): 847 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.