Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Colella, S.
Right arrow Articles by Stefanini, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Colella, S.
Right arrow Articles by Stefanini, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Molecular Genetics, 2000, Vol. 9, No. 8 1171-1175
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Identical mutations in the CSB gene associated with either Cockayne syndrome or the DeSanctis–Cacchione variant of xeroderma pigmentosum

Stefano Colella, Tiziana Nardo, Elena Botta, Alan R. Lehmann1 and Miria Stefanini+

Istituto di Genetica Biochimica ed Evoluzionistica CNR, Via Abbiategrasso, 207-27100 Pavia, Italy and 1MRC Cell Mutation Unit, Sussex University, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RR, UK

Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) and Cockayne syndrome (CS) are two hereditary disorders in which photosensitivity is associated with distinct clinical and cellular phenotypes and results from genetically different defects. We have identified the primary molecular alteration in two patients in whom clinical manifestations strongly reminiscent of a severe form of XP were unexpectedly associated with the CS cellular phenotype and with a defect in the CSB gene. Sequencing of the CSB-coding region in both cDNA and genomic DNA showed that these patients had identical alterations to those in a patient with the clinical features of the classical form of CS. These data, together with fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, demonstrated that the two siblings with XP as well as the CS patient were homozygous for the same CSB mutated allele, containing a silent C2830T change and a nonsense mutation C2282T converting Arg735 to a stop codon. The finding that the same inactivating mutation underlies different pathological phenotypes indicates that there is no simple correlation between the molecular defect and the clinical features. Therefore, alterations in the CSB gene give rise to the same repair defect at the cellular level but other genetic and/or environmental factors determine the pathological phenotype.

+ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +39 0382 546330; Fax +39 0382 422286; Email: stefanini@igbe.pv.cnr.it


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
I. Rapin, K. Weidenheim, Y. Lindenbaum, P. Rosenbaum, S. N. Merchant, S. Krishna, and D. W. Dickson
Cockayne Syndrome in Adults: Review With Clinical and Pathologic Study of a New Case
J Child Neurol, November 1, 2006; 21(11): 991 - 1006.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
F. M. Sonmez, F. Celep, and S. A. Ugur
Severe Form of Cockayne Syndrome With Varying Clinical Presentation and No Photosensitivity in a Family
J Child Neurol, April 1, 2006; 21(4): 333 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Spivak
The many faces of Cockayne syndrome
PNAS, October 26, 2004; 101(43): 15273 - 15274.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
B. C. Broughton, M. Berneburg, H. Fawcett, E. M. Taylor, C. F. Arlett, T. Nardo, M. Stefanini, E. Menefee, V. H. Price, S. Queille, et al.
Two individuals with features of both xeroderma pigmentosum and trichothiodystrophy highlight the complexity of the clinical outcomes of mutations in the XPD gene
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2001; 10(22): 2539 - 2547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.