Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access published online on October 21, 2003
Human Molecular Genetics, doi:10.1093/hmg/ddg347
© 2003 by Oxford University Press
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 National Cancer Centre, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169610, Republic of Singapore
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cmrtan{at}nccs.com.sg.
Recent work using expression profiling to computationally predict the estrogen receptor (ER) status of breast tumors has revealed that certain tumors are characterized by a high prediction uncertainty ("low-confidence"). We analyzed these low-confidence tumors and determined that their uncertain prediction status arises as a result of widespread perturbations in multiple genes whose expression is important for ER subtype discrimination. Patients with low-confidence ER+ tumors exhibited a significantly worse overall survival (p = 0.03) and shorter time to distant metastasis (p = 0.004) compared to their high-confidence ER+ counterparts, indicating that the high and low-confidence binary distinction is clinically meaningful. We then discovered that elevated expression of the ERBB2 receptor is significantly correlated with a breast tumor exhibiting a low-confidence prediction, and this association was subsequently validated across multiple independently derived breast cancer expression datasets employing a variety of different array technologies and patient populations. Although ERBB2 signaling has been proposed to inhibit the transcriptional activity of ER, a large proportion of the perturbed genes in the "low-confidence"/ERBB2+ samples are not known to be estrogen responsive, and a recently described bioinformatic algorithm (DEREF) was used to demonstrate the absence of potential estrogen-response elements (EREs) in their promoters. We propose that a significant portion of ERBB2's effects on ER+ breast tumors may involve ER-independent mechanisms of gene activation, which may contribute to the clinically aggressive behavior of the low-confidence breast tumor subtype.
Article
Classifying the Estrogen Receptor Status of Breast Cancers by Expression Profiles Reveals a Poor Prognosis Subpopulation Exhibiting High Expression of the ERBB2 Receptor
2 Department of Pathology, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169610, Republic of Singapore
3 Institute for Infocomm Research, 21 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119613, Republic of Singapore
4 National Cancer Centre, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169610, Republic of Singapore; Defence Medical Research Institute, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169610, Republic of Singapore
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Raulic, Y. Ramos-Valdes, and G. E DiMattia Stanniocalcin 2 expression is regulated by hormone signalling and negatively affects breast cancer cell viability in vitro J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2008; 197(3): 517 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K.T. Tan, L. K. Tan, K. Yu, P. H. Tan, M. Lee, L. H. Sii, C. Y. Wong, G. H. Ho, A. W.Y. Yeo, P. K.H. Chow, et al. Clinical Validation of a Customized Multiple Signature Microarray for Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 14(2): 461 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Lin, S. Reierstad, C.-C. Huang, and S. E. Bulun Novel Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Binding Sites and Estradiol Target Genes Identified by Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Cloning in Breast Cancer Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 67(10): 5017 - 5024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. E. Harvell, J. K. Richer, D. C. Allred, C. A. Sartorius, and K. B. Horwitz Estradiol Regulates Different Genes in Human Breast Tumor Xenografts Compared with the Identical Cells in Culture Endocrinology, February 1, 2006; 147(2): 700 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Siddique, C. Balram, L. Fiszer-Maliszewska, A. Aggarwal, A. Tan, P. Tan, K. C. Soo, and K. Sabapathy Evidence for Selective Expression of the p53 Codon 72 Polymorphs: Implications in Cancer Development Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2005; 14(9): 2245 - 2252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. X. Jin, Y.-W. Leu, S. Liyanarachchi, H. Sun, M. Fan, K. P. Nephew, T. H.-M. Huang, and R. V. Davuluri Identifying estrogen receptor {alpha} target genes using integrated computational genomics and chromatin immunoprecipitation microarray Nucleic Acids Res., December 17, 2004; 32(22): 6627 - 6635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Modlich, H.-B. Prisack, M. Munnes, W. Audretsch, and H. Bojar Immediate Gene Expression Changes After the First Course of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer Disease Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2004; 10(19): 6418 - 6431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





