Skip Navigation



Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access published online on July 14, 2004

Human Molecular Genetics, doi:10.1093/hmg/ddh214
© 2004 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/18/2011    most recent
ddh214v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, S.
Right arrow Articles by Feany, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, S.
Right arrow Articles by Feany, M. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Article

Comparison of pathways controlling toxicity in the eye and brain in Drosophila models of human neurodegenerative diseases

Srimoyee Ghosh 1 Mel B. Feany 2*

1 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 77 Louis Pasteur Ave., Room 630, Boston, MA 02115; Department of Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263
2 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 77 Louis Pasteur Ave., Room 630, Boston, MA 02115

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mel_feany{at}hms.harvard.edu.


   Abstract

Most human neurodegenerative diseases have a number of features in common including adult onset, progressive degeneration of selected neuronal populations, and the formation of abnormal protein aggregates. Although these shared characteristics raise the possibility of conserved pathogenic mechanisms, the diverse clinical and pathologic features of each disorder indicate significant differences as well. Since a number of human neurodegenerative diseases have now been modeled in Drosophila, and genetic modifiers identified, we have been able to perform a genetic comparison of pathways controlling toxicity in these models. By directly comparing modifiers isolated in models of polyglutamine diseases and in a Drosophila model of tauopathy we find a final common pathway of cell death involving apoptosis. Among the polyglutamine diseases, protein folding and histone acetylation are key common mediators. In addition, two novel modifiers suggest shared pathways of toxicity among all the disorders. Since cell type specificity is a highly salient feature of all neurodegenerative diseases, but most work to date in Drosophila models has been performed in the retina, we determined if similar pathways of toxicity operate in neurons of the Drosophila brain. Many, but not all, retinal modifiers also modify toxicity in postmitotic neurons in the brain. Analysis of polyglutamine toxicity in the adult brain facilitated identification of nicotinamide (Vitamin B3), a vitamin with histone deacetylase inhibiting activity, as a potent suppressor of polyglutamine toxicity. These findings outline common pathways of neurotoxicity, demonstrate of disease- and cell-type specific pathways, and identify a common vitamin as a potential therapy in polyglutamine disorders.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
S. Chatterjee, T.-K. Sang, G. M. Lawless, and G. R. Jackson
Dissociation of tau toxicity and phosphorylation: role of GSK-3{beta}, MARK and Cdk5 in a Drosophila model
Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 164 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. Pallos, L. Bodai, T. Lukacsovich, J. M. Purcell, J. S. Steffan, L. M. Thompson, and J. L. Marsh
Inhibition of specific HDACs and sirtuins suppresses pathogenesis in a Drosophila model of Huntington's disease
Hum. Mol. Genet., December 1, 2008; 17(23): 3767 - 3775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. N. Green, J. S. Steffan, H. Martinez-Coria, X. Sun, S. S. Schreiber, L. M. Thompson, and F. M. LaFerla
Nicotinamide Restores Cognition in Alzheimer's Disease Transgenic Mice via a Mechanism Involving Sirtuin Inhibition and Selective Reduction of Thr231-Phosphotau
J. Neurosci., November 5, 2008; 28(45): 11500 - 11510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J.-C. Lievens, M. Iche, M. Laval, C. Faivre-Sarrailh, and S. Birman
AKT-sensitive or insensitive pathways of toxicity in glial cells and neurons in Drosophila models of Huntington's disease
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 15, 2008; 17(6): 882 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. Branco, I. Al-Ramahi, L. Ukani, A. M. Perez, P. Fernandez-Funez, D. Rincon-Limas, and J. Botas
Comparative analysis of genetic modifiers in Drosophila points to common and distinct mechanisms of pathogenesis among polyglutamine diseases
Hum. Mol. Genet., February 1, 2008; 17(3): 376 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Latouche, C. Lasbleiz, E. Martin, V. Monnier, T. Debeir, A. Mouatt-Prigent, M.-P. Muriel, L. Morel, M. Ruberg, A. Brice, et al.
A Conditional Pan-Neuronal Drosophila Model of Spinocerebellar Ataxia 7 with a Reversible Adult Phenotype Suitable for Identifying Modifier Genes
J. Neurosci., March 7, 2007; 27(10): 2483 - 2492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Zheng, S. W. Edelman, G. Tharmarajah, D. W. Walker, S. D. Pletcher, and L. Seroude
Differential patterns of apoptosis in response to aging in Drosophila
PNAS, August 23, 2005; 102(34): 12083 - 12088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Helmlinger, J. Bonnet, J.-L. Mandel, Y. Trottier, and D. Devys
Hsp70 and Hsp40 Chaperones Do Not Modulate Retinal Phenotype in SCA7 Mice
J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55969 - 55977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.