Human Molecular Genetics Advance Access published online on June 30, 2005
Human Molecular Genetics, doi:10.1093/hmg/ddi226
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, New Research Building, Room 0466B, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, Boston, MA 02115
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Comparison of human and mouse genomes has revealed that many non-coding regions have levels of sequence conservation similar to protein-coding genes. These regions have attracted a lot of attention as potentially functional genomic sequences. Little is known, however, about the effect mutations in these conserved non-coding regions have on fitness and how many of them are present in the human genome as deleterious polymorphisms. To gain insight into the selective constraints imposed on conserved non-coding and protein-coding regions, we compared substitution rates in primate and rodent lineages, and analyzed density and allele frequencies of human polymorphism. Genomic regions conserved between primate and rodent groups show higher relative conservation within rodents than within primates. Thus, our analysis indicates a genome-wide relaxation of selective constraint in the primate lineage, which most likely resulted from a smaller effective population size. We found that this relaxation is much more profound in conserved non-coding regions than in protein-coding regions, and that mutations at a large proportion of sites in conserved non-coding regions are associated with very small fitness effect. Data on human polymorphism is also consistent with very weak selection in conserved non-coding regions. This staggering enrichment in sites at the borderline of neutrality can be explained by assuming an important role for synergistic epistasis in the evolution of non-coding regions. Our results suggest that most individual mutations in conserved non-coding regions are only slightly deleterious but are numerous and may have a significant cumulative impact on fitness.
Received February 9, 2005
Revised May 20, 2005
Accepted June 22, 2005
Article
Small Fitness Effect of Mutations in Highly Conserved Non-coding Regions
Shamil Sunyaev, E-mail: ssunyaev{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Ovcharenko Widespread Ultraconservation Divergence in Primates Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2008; 25(8): 1668 - 1676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Liang, Y.-S. Lin, and W.-H. Li Fast Evolution of Core Promoters in Primate Genomes Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1239 - 1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Yang, B. Frank, K. Hemminki, C. R. Bartram, B. Wappenschmidt, C. Sutter, M. Kiechle, P. Bugert, R. K. Schmutzler, N. Arnold, et al. SNPs in ultraconserved elements and familial breast cancer risk Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2008; 29(2): 351 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Nikolaev, J. I. Montoya-Burgos, K. Popadin, L. Parand, E. H. Margulies, National Institutes of Health Intramural Sequencin, and S. E. Antonarakis Life-history traits drive the evolutionary rates of mammalian coding and noncoding genomic elements PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20443 - 20448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Casillas, A. Barbadilla, and C. M. Bergman Purifying Selection Maintains Highly Conserved Noncoding Sequences in Drosophila Mol. Biol. Evol., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 2222 - 2234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Katzman, A. D. Kern, G. Bejerano, G. Fewell, L. Fulton, R. K. Wilson, S. R. Salama, and D. Haussler Human Genome Ultraconserved Elements Are Ultraselected Science, August 17, 2007; 317(5840): 915 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Resch, L. Carmel, L. Marino-Ramirez, A. Y. Ogurtsov, S. A. Shabalina, I. B. Rogozin, and E. V. Koonin Widespread Positive Selection in Synonymous Sites of Mammalian Genes Mol. Biol. Evol., August 1, 2007; 24(8): 1821 - 1831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Asthana, W. S. Noble, G. Kryukov, C. E. Grant, S. Sunyaev, and J. A. Stamatoyannopoulos Widely distributed noncoding purifying selection in the human genome PNAS, July 24, 2007; 104(30): 12410 - 12415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Bernat, G. E. Crawford, A. Y. Ogurtsov, F. S. Collins, D. Ginsburg, and A. S. Kondrashov Distant conserved sequences flanking endothelial-specific promoters contain tissue-specific DNase-hypersensitive sites and over-represented motifs Hum. Mol. Genet., July 1, 2006; 15(13): 2098 - 2105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




